The Williamsburg Planning Commission voted Wednesday to delay discussions about proposed changes to the three-person rule until after a focus group commissioned by the City Council releases its recommendations, which could take several months.
The proposed changes would allow for some domiciles to house four unrelated people if certain conditions, including sufficient parking and square footage, are met. Current city laws bar more than three unrelated people from living in a single unit together.
Multiple Planning Commission members spoke against continuing the discussions in parallel with the focus group’s work, calling it wasteful.
“I want to refuse the assignment now,” commission member Jim Joseph said. “Any effort of anything going on in parallel is going to be a problem for us.”
Commission member Greg Ballentine agreed.
“I think we have the cart before the horse here,” he said.
Planning Commission Chairman Douglas Pons disagreed, arguing that parallel discussions are not futile.
“Now that there is a draft ordinance and now that Council has given it back to us for discussion, part of our responsibility is to have that discussion,” he said. “One of the problems I have with putting the timeline on it is it takes us out of the discussion and I think that there may be some opportunities and benefit for us to have the potential for some discussion somewhere down the line.”
Commission member Elaine McBeth cautioned that the focus group is not an avenue of public discussion, but agreed that the Planning Commission cannot move ahead until it receives the group’s report.
“The focus group is not, as I read it, going to be the place where there’s public forums,” she said. “We are the source for general public information, but until we get the report out of the focus group, I don’t think this can be any conclusion to what we do.”
Commission member Sean Driscoll said the problems with the proposal are not the city’s problems and so should be undertaken by the administration of the College of William and Mary.
“We’re wasting our time,” he said. “We could have one work session, we could have six work sessions. We’re not going to solve this issue. We need to go back to the College, we need to say, ‘What are your long-term plans? Do you need student housing? Where do you need it?’”
The commission ultimately voted 5-1 to delay discussing the proposal until after the focus group releases its report and recommendations. Pons was the dissenting vote.
Several city residents also spoke against the proposal during open forum.
Williamsburg resident Bill Dell told the commission that working in parallel with the focus group was a waste.
“I have to be honest with you, I find this untenable. We have not even had the first focus group yet,” he said before the commission voted to delay discussions. “We have not had any comment from the public as to whether or not we are going to even, you know, approach changing the rule, and for the Planning Commission to have to go through the work and for the Zoning Commission and whatever is required to authorize the changing of the zoning based on the premise that we’re going to have some change to the occupancy regulations, to me, is just a waste of time and ludicrous.”
Dell also argued that allowing more students to live in city neighborhoods will have a negative economic effect and would be difficult to enforce.
“I’m looking at a residential property that I have close to half a million dollars invested in and I simply do not want that particular piece of property or my neighborhood to go down in value … — which will happen because of these changes to the occupancy — if we don’t have proper enforcement regulations there,” he said.
Williamsburg resident Charles Ridinger spoke at length about a rental house on his street that he says is occupied by two of the football team’s co-captains.
“The traffic on our dead-end street is hard to believe,” he said, referring to Canterbury Lane, a seven-house cul-de-sac off Jamestown Road just past Lake Matoaka. “I think it’s not what anybody on our private street, dead-end lane had in mind when they purchased their homes. … We are not very happy with students renting in the city of Williamsburg.”
Dell cautioned against moving too quickly on the proposal.
“I just don’t think it’s right and although it may not be politically correct to say this, it doesn’t pass the smell test to me,” he said. “It seems to me like we are trying to push through something.”

5 Comments
good point Charles
good point Charles Ridinger, if you are renting a place to live, you should not be able to invite people over! genious!
If people like those quoted
If people like those quoted here who so frequently complain about students making use of public space in the city (a right anyone and everyone is entitled to) really have such a problem with it – Oh the noise! Oh, the traffic! – then perhaps they shou;d just move to one of the crummy, mass produced, flavorless gated communities outside of the real city. Somewhere fact and sanitized and, while probably cheaper, proportionally overpriced.
Such nanny state neighborhoods – excessively planned communities of matching houses with ridiculuous homeowner’s association covenants and deed restrictions enforcing boring homogeneity – and people like the quoted Bill Dell and his ilk – pathetic whiners and losers with no respect for anyone elses rights – are practically made for each other. The city of Williamsburg is allegedly a city – not a suburban housing development, despite arguements to the contrary (“downtown”/merchant’s square is, after all, little more than a nicely packaged mall. But this sort of control and central planning is something a real city would fight, not encourage). If it is indeed the city it pretends to be, it is a place fit for college students, not these middling, property value obsessed, exceedingly suburban losers.They should be forced to move somewhere as grotesquely sterile as their respective mindsets. Alternately, if they really hate other people so much, they could try moving to a cave in the Himalayas. Either way, good riddance to bad rubbish, I say!
I must agree with Publius.
I must agree with Publius. Williamsburg is somehow able to be constantly aware of the fact that students are an incredibly vital part of the community here in town. From the moment students get to Williamsburg they are told how important they are to the community, welcomed by the mayor and even Thomas Jefferson with fanfare and invited to a free T-shirt from the campus shop. This is the most welcome students will ever feel in town as they will soon find themselves treated as second class citizens not deserving, in the eyes of their fellow townspeople, of the same rights as other Williamsburg residents. This two-faced stance towards students goes a long way to discourage students from acting like the adults they are not treated as. Why bother to kind and conscientious when you know you will not be treated any better. I don’t mean for this to excuse truly inappropriate student behavior, but as an explanation in some small part of the psyche of the off-campus student. Banished by res-life and draconian alcohol policies from campus, the only student haven other than the Delis, and not welcome in the community at large, off-campus students find themselves between a big rock and a very hard place.
~E. Nigma
Typical. One delay after
Typical. One delay after another. “Oh, we would love to grant you student equal right to property, we really would, but we need to, um, commission a, uh, a focus group. Yes, that’s it, a focus group. It will take several months. But after that we will TOTES consider treating you like actual humans instead of second-class scum, promise! (Unless we need to commission another focus group or something, by which times, OOPS, so many of the seniors who have been fighting to end the 3-person rule graduate.)
Seriously, it’s so transparent, it’s jaw dropping.
There’s a serious problem
There’s a serious problem when a city, which was built because of its neighboring college, turns against said college in such a bald-faced and vicious manner.
Why is Williamsburg such a second-rate town, when it is home to such a world class college, like William and Mary?
I’ll tell you why. It’s the Bill Dells of the world. The anti-business, anti-growth, anti-student advocates who make it neigh impossible for students to have a top-notch college experience. These very confused individuals think it a good idea to prevent new businesses and industries (which could utilize the well-trained minds coming out of W&M) from coming to Williamsburg.
They don’t recognize that, for municipalities, its grow or die. Williamsburg has been far too reliant on tourism to fund itself. Tourism, which I might add, is drying up.
The townsfolk need to work with the school to create a a more beneficial relationship for every party involved. Advocate the College to revise its alcohol policy so that students can drink on campus. If they can get drunk here, they will be infinitely less likely to stumble about the neighborhoods, shouting profane things and stealing signs. Or start new businesses—
Currently, there are over 6,000 students who regularly sit on campus at night, with nothing to do besides buy snacks at Wawa or get drunk at the Delis. There is a market here that the town should tap. In fact, it is in the best interest of the city to do so. If the city decides not to, well…I will say this to all townsfolk who end up reading this: Tourists come and go, the markets fluctuate up and down, but Green and Gold is forever. William and Mary will thrive with Williamsburg, without it, or in spite of it.-Publius