Students reflect on death penalty for D.C. sniper

John Allen Muhammad, one of the D.C. snipers, was executed by lethal injection Tuesday evening. His execution sparked different emotional reactions among students across campus.

Rob Greene ’12 was in seventh grade when the 2002 D.C. sniper attacks began. Like many students at the College of William and Mary, Greene hails from Northern Virginia and vividly remembers the three weeks when Muhammad and his accomplice, Lee Boyd Malvo, killed 10 people and injured three others in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area and along Interstate-95.

According to Greene, most people thought it was another terrorist attack when the shooting started. Schools began taking precautions, and day-to-day activities changed.

“There wasn’t outside recess,” he said. “At my middle school, in order to go from indoor recess to the gym, there was this pathway. They had garbage bags hanging down so you wouldn’t see the kids in it. They had people at the gas stations, volunteers filling up gas for people, because people didn’t want to get out of their cars. It was pretty crazy, looking back at it, especially when it happened.”

Life for Justine di Giovanni ’11, also from Northern Virginia, was affected by the shootings as well.

“Everyone saying, ‘you know, he’s driving around in a white van,’” she said. “And so every time you saw a white van you’d zigzag a little bit. I didn’t think about it all the time, but it was definitely on my mind.”
Around two weeks into the shootings, Greene and his family were shopping at a store when the two snipers shot and killed a woman in a Home Depot parking lot down the street. The woman was walking to her car with her husband.

“We get back home, turn on the TV, and the next thing we know, we see where we just were. That woman just got killed right there,” Greene said. “I didn’t see it actually happen, but [the hooters] were definitely there at the same time I was. We were on the same side of the street. That’s the creepy part. It was one of those ‘holy crap, that was a bit too close,’ type of things.”

Even now, when he visits that Home Depot, Greene is reminded of the event.

“It’s still weird when you walk by it,” he said. “That’s our local Home Depot. I go there all the time. It’s just that I know exactly where that woman was shot.”

After three weeks of searching, Muhammad and Malvo were caught while asleep in their car. Muhammad was sentenced to death in 2003.

Malvo, a minor at the time of the shootings, was sentenced to life in prison without parole.

Muhammad’s execution brought mixed reactions around campus.

“Honestly, my heart really goes out to everyone who was affected,” Group Coordinator of Amnesty International Walter Hickey ’12 said. “To all the victims and all the families, I absolutely feel terrible about all of it.”

Standing out in the rain Tuesday night, Catholic Campus Ministries and Amnesty International held a candlelight vigil in protest of Muhammad’s execution.

“We’re not trying to mitigate what he did,” Hickey said,“But we’ve got to stand against the death penalty. It’s a violation of human rights, no matter how you look at it. We think that he should have been put away for life without parole.”

Di Giovanni, who also opposes the death penalty, would have preferred that Muhammad receive help through therapy. She hopes that Malvo will be given counseling in order to understand the severity of his
actions.

“I understand the need that people have for retribution,” she said. “But I think that the death penalty makes an assumption about human nature, that there’s no way to make people better, to improve them. And I don’t think that’s true. I’m relatively optimistic about people and I’d rather see him trying to be helped in some way as a person, rather than just being snuffed out.”

Others, like Greene, were glad to see Muhammad executed, describing him as a dangerous man. Greene wished Malvo had received the same sentence.

“I think that he definitely deserved to die,” Greene said. “I think that if you have that little regard for human life and if you commit acts like that, then you’re definitely a threat to the community. He’s just someone who shouldn’t be breathing the same air as everyone else.”

7 Comments

“An eye for an eye leaves

“An eye for an eye leaves a world full of blind men.” ~ Mahatma Gandhi

“According to Greene,

“According to Greene, most people thought it was another terrorist attack when the shooting started.”

You say that as if it wasn’t a terrorist attack. Maybe your newspaper has taken a cue from Obama and won’t “rush to conclusions” even now, years after the fact, despite how obvious it might be. Not to mention that even Wikipedia has the facts that you lack: “On November 17, 2003, by verdict of his jury, Muhammad was convicted in Virginia of all four counts in the indictment against him: capital murder for the shooting of Dean H. Meyers; a second charge of capital murder under Virginia’s antiterrorism statute, for homicide committed with an intent to terrorize the government or the public at large; conspiracy to commit murder; and the illegal use of a firearm… On April 22, 2005, the Virginia Supreme Court affirmed his death penalty, stating that Muhammad could be sentenced to death because the murder was part of an act of terrorism.”

And as a side note- Thanks for nothing, CCM. You come out as a fringe group defending a murderer like this. Stand up for the unborn more often and you won’t look so much like a leftwing front group.

Also, to suggest that CCM

Also, to suggest that CCM does not stand up for the unborn is fallacious. CCM proudly stands up for the unborn in many ways. In fact, CCM is putting on one of their monthly twilight retreats this Friday to discuss life issues and the Church! You are certainly welcome to attend and join the conversation. Information for the event can be found on the facebook group at http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=332754345533&ref=ts.

Let me first say that I

Let me first say that I often struggle with the death penalty. I think it is only human nature to desire justice be done to those who have done wrong, particularly in a case like this that directly or indirectly affected so many of us. For most of my life, it has seemed logical to me that if you take someone’s life intentionally, your life should be forfeit. I have also heard cogent arguments against the death penalty, both from a religious and human rights standpoint. Regardless of what I think, I have to reject the notion that CCM is a “leftwing front group” because of their involvement in the death penalty protest/candlelight vigil.

CCM’s actions reflect what the Catholic Church teaches. Since CCM is a Catholic organization, why would it do anything other than follow the Church’s stance on the death penalty? The Church certainly doesn’t condone or accept what the snipers did. The Church maintains it is the right of a society to punish them for the heinous crimes they committed. However, the Church argues that to take a human life at any stage is wrong and evil (from conception until death). By participating in a protest of the death penalty, regardless of whom it is for, CCM is doing nothing more than standing alongside Church teaching on the death penalty.

Again, this is a particularly touchy subject. However, I would be more surprised if CCM or the Catholic Church suddenly changed their stance on the death penalty just because it is close to home.

CCM is the home to many

CCM is the home to many members (especially board members) of Students for Life (SFL). SFL is continually “standing up for the unborn.”

Wholeheartedly agree with

Wholeheartedly agree with the last sentence. It’s a good thing that that worthless excuse for a human is dead.

If everyone who supported

If everyone who supported the “unborn” contributed $5.00 and an hour a month to the “born” living in poverty and/or with parents who need some tlc support, maybe there wouldn’t be any “unborn” to worry about.