3-person rule's revenge

Something is rotten in the city of Williamsburg. Last week, residents in nine houses across town opened their mailboxes to find letters from the city accusing them of being in violation of the three-person rule. Now, these students have about one month to prepare for a city inspection, since not being up to code at the time of inspection will result in fines that amount to a de facto eviction. This effort marks a serious escalation in enforcement of the housing ordinance, and it will have many repercussions for town-gown relations in the coming months and years.

Where do we go from here? While there is talk of using Student Assembly funds to take the city to court over this issue if need be, now the best bet is for those who are currently in violation of the housing ordinance to find alternative housing and avoid lawsuits. Even though the three-person rule is clearly a bad law that should be changed, it is still a law that is well within the city’s power to enforce. The unlucky people who have been caught should cut their losses.

However, with exams impending, December is a bad time for an apartment hunt. Students are able to apply for an inspection extension, and the city will consider cases on individual bases — something students should request if needed. But the real importance of the timing of these notices is not that it shows the city to be acting spitefully; rather, it is no coincidence that students received the letters soon after the College of William and Mary’s student directory was distributed.

The directory has to go, or at least be restructured, again. City Zoning Administrator Rodney Rhodes receives housing complaints all the time, but he is unable to act on them until he finds corroborating hard evidence. Parking decals or lease information will do, and a directory that lists student addresses and is widely available on campus makes his job very easy. Last year, when a similar situation happened to the residents of a house on Richmond Road, the College made a change to allow students to opt out of the directory. This has not been sufficient.

In the past, a major sticking point for vocal locals who oppose altering the three-person rule has been that the law is basically unenforceable. However, last week has shown this argument to be invalid. The Williamsburg Planning Commission should readdress this issue at its next meeting, starting from square one and with an open mind. If it fails to do so, the burden will fall, again, to the Williamsburg City Council to act on this issue.

We do not have much faith that this will happen, and so we simply need to elect new representation. Students have paid out of pocket and worried for too long to continue striving to satisfy the whims of a capricious and spiteful minority voting bloc. Residents who force this issue do have legitimate concerns, but the three-person rule has never been a good way to address them. The only path to a middle ground is to have someone with our interests present at the table. If it takes this action from the city to galvanize students into voting en masse, then so be it.

4 Comments

There should be some kind

There should be some kind of warning when students enter their address into the directory that the city can use it to check up on them.

The College’s student

The College’s student directory should not be as widely available as it is. The information should clearly be available only to members of the College community. To that end, the College ought to discontinue making printed copies of the directory that anyone walking through the Sadler Center can pick up (and shuffled off to the spies in the City). The student directory ought to transition to an online database accessible only through MyWm and Banner. That will hopefully slow the eviction process which apparently relies on the printed directory, but also keep the information readily available to those of us within the College who may need it.

Furthermore, where is the College administration and faculty in all of this town/gown discussion? Where is President Reveley standing up for his students and against a blatantly discriminatory and unfair law? We students cannot make the kind of progress we need without a stronger push from senior faculty and administration on our behalf. Faculty and staff: we need your vocal support.

And when will the City recognize students are valuable, permanent, and contributing members of the City? The city’s treatment of students may be a self-fulfilling prophecy: they treat us as transient residents who don’t care about the neighborhoods and so sometimes we act that way out of anger toward their attitude. Residents: a little respect for students would go a long way to improving student behavior and overall relations.

Didn’t listing your off

Didn’t listing your off campus address in the printed student directory used to be optional? Why isn’t it anymore?

http://flathatnews.com/content/directory-listing-optional

And how did Rodney Rhodes get a copy of the student directory? Isn’t that for College use only?

just file a FOIA and ask

just file a FOIA and ask for all materials pertaining to the evictions. That is all you have to do to get all the evidence used to evict. Anyone can get it.
SA members did it last year, and it cost about $6.