Home Blog Page 309

Univ. of Houston finds bee infestation in building

0

__Officials decide to keep bees alive in nearby field instead of killing them__

p. Most people’s reaction upon discovering a beehive is to have them exterminated, but officials at the University of Houston are trying another approach.

p. University officials recently discovered a hive containing over 100,000 honeybees in the engineering building and, instead of killing the bees, decided to hire a beekeeper to transport the hive to a nearby wooded area.

p. “The first thing we said was this is not something where we’re going to go in there and shoot a lot of chemicals and kill them,” said Alex Alexander, the institution’s custodial and grounds director.

p. The bees were first reported when workers noticed a small group of the insects around the top back corner of the three-story building six months ago. After the bees were briefly sprayed with water, they disappeared for a time.

p. However, when honey started dripping from the bricks, the true size of the hive was revealed.

p. Although no one has reported being stung, the university decided not to take any chances with a hive of this size.
“You can imagine — you’re trying to take your exam and for whatever reason the bees decide they’re going to swarm,” Alexander said. “That kind of disruption, we couldn’t allow.”

p. The university determined that killing the bees was not an option; the insects are depended upon to pollinate many of the trees and flowers throughout the 550-acre campus in downtown Houston. In addition, considering a declining bee population that has puzzled many researchers throughout the United States, the university did not want to contribute to the trend.

p. Many engineering students claimed that they had not even known that there was a bee problem in the building.

p. “I’ve never seen one bee and I walk around there all the time,” mechanical engineering major and senior Aaron Risinger said.

p. Mike Knuckley, the beekeeper hired by the university, stated that homeowners and businesses may not recognize or know the presence of a hive for months or even years at a time.

p. “You can walk right by their entry way a lot of times, and if you don’t disturb them, you’ll never know they’re there,” said Knuckley. “They’re interested in taking care of their own business.”

This Week in Flat Hat History (Nov. 16)

0

**1931**
To restore the appearance of an 17th century institution, the Rockefeller Foundation paid for the rebuilding of several sections of Old Campus. The foundation made many changes, including the installation of a white picket fence around the Wren Building.

p. **1968**
The College analyzed the benefits of having midterms during an academic semester. Even today, midterms have never been officially set up by the College, nor has there ever been any mention of midterms in the faculty handbook.

p. **1971**
Even though plans for renovating the old dormitories on campus were under review by the College President Thomas A. Graves, a lack of state funds restricted the College from making any major renovations to the dorms.

p. **1983**
The brightly colored solar-heating tubes located on the southern face of the Muscarelle Museum were installed amid strong criticism from the Board of Visitors. The solar-heating tubes, designed by contemporary artist Gene Davis and titled “Sun Sonata,” were cited by the BOV as being “the ugliest thing ever seen on campus.” However, strong support from the College community convinced the BOV that the art should remain.

Princeton Review administers survey to students

0

The Princeton Review is now accepting student testimonials from individuals at the College for their college review publications. The “Student Say” profiles that are compiled from student surveys like this at colleges and universities across the nation are featured on the organization’s website, PrincetonReview.com, and in their college rankings and information books.

p. The survey gives students the chance to voice opinions and perspectives on the social and academic aspects of life at the College, and are intended to be read by prospective students to “match themselves with the school most suited to their educational and personal needs,” according to the Princeton Review press release sent to the College Undergraduate Office of Admissions. Submissions will be accepted from students who log in with their school-issued e-mail address. The link to the survey is survey.review.com.

Campus Police Beat (Nov. 6 to Nov. 12)

0

**Tuesday, Nov. 6 –** A female student reported a stolen iPod from Phi Beta Kappa Memorial Hall. The iPod went missing sometime Sunday, Nov. 4. **(1)**

p. – A faculty member reported that his hangtag had been stolen from his parked car at 200 Ukrop Way. **(2)**

p. – A student reported that his car was vandalized on Harrison Avenue. Police estimate the damage to be around $200. **(3)**

p. **Wednesday, Nov. 7 –** Two non-students and two juveniles were arrested at the Old Sentara Hospital for attempting to steal copper and possession of burglary tools. $100 is thought to have been stolen from the complex. **(4)**

p. **Thursday, Nov. 8 –** A non-student called police to report that her ex-husband had embezzled $1,800 in College funds upon the termination of his employment. Police are now investigating the claim.

p. **Saturday, Nov. 10 –** Two students were arrested at the intersection of Richmond Road and Armistead Road for possession of alcohol. **(5)**

p. – A caller from the UC Terrace reported that loud noise had been coming from the frats. The noise was actually coming from the football game. **(6)**

p. – Two students were referred for disorderly conduct for attempting to jump on the field during the JMU football game. **(7)**

p. – A fire alarm went off in Fraternity Units F through J. Police reported an estimated damage of $100 due to a fire extinguisher that was set off in the hallway. **(8)**

p. Sunday, Nov. 11 – A caller reported loud music coming from the next room at 500 Ukrop Way. Police advised the residents next door about noise policy. **(9)**

– A non-student reported that her purse had been stolen from her car parked in the William and Mary Hall parking lot. Items worth $240 were stolen. **(10)**

p. **Monday, Nov. 12 –** A caller from Lodge 12 reported a suspicious person trying to get past the door. Police could not locate the suspect, but scanned the area for fingerprints and are investigating a partial print. **(11)**

p. – A student reported a stolen parking decal from 100 Wake Drive. The decal was worth $275. **(12)**

p. – A student reported his bicycle stolen from 101 Wake Drive. The estimated value of the bike was $10. **(12)**

By the Numbers (Nov. 16)

0

**262 Million**
The number of turkeys raised on farms in 2006, four percent more than in 2005. The turkeys are worth a total of 3.5 billion dollars and close to 10 percent of them were raised in Virginia.

p. **54 percent**
The increase in the number of long distance driving trips over the six-day period around Thanksgiving, according to the federal Department of Transportation. Around Christmas and New Year’s, the number of long-distance trips rises 23 percent above normal.

p. **15**
The number of homes that burnt down in 2002 due to improper use of turkey fryers, according Allstate insurance company.

p. **3**
The number of school days that students get off for Thanksgiving break. This has been the same since 2000.

Midterm 2007 SA Senate Report Card

0



**Methodology**
This list is not meant to be comprehensive. It ranks SA senators by two different criteria. It does not make subjective qualitative distinctions between bills.

p. Bills Passed: The “Bills Passed” ranking chart contains columns describing the number of bills each senator sponsored that passed this legislative session, the number that failed and the number that are currently in committee. The percent of these total bills passed is also reported, as well as an “internal affairs” number, based upon The Flat Hat’s view of the scope of each bill. The “passed internal affairs bills” score is the number of bills each senator sponsored and passed that are geared toward SA operations rather than bills that directly affect students. A senator’s total score is computed by subtracting “passed internal affairs bills” from “passed bills” to represent the number of bills each senator sponsored that directly affect students. The number arrived at, the total score, is used for ranking.

p. ATTENDANCE: Senators are also ranked by the percentage of meetings attended. Senators must have been in attendance for at least half of the votes during the meeting to be marked present. The rightmost column shows the number of meetings each senator attended.

p. FOR BOTH RANKINGS: Ties are allowed, and senators who tie within a ranking are listed alphabetically within social class.
NEWLY ELECTED SENATORS: Freshmen senators and newly-elected senator Alex Kyrios ’09 were not included in the rankings, as they have only been in office since October.

p. DATES INCLUDED: The rankings include meetings from the beginning of the senators’ terms last spring through the Nov. 6 meeting. A Senate Report Card will be printed this spring that includes all meetings, including freshmen senators and Kyrios.

Honoring a beloved coach

0

A memorial service for Pete Conomikes, club fencing coach, was held at 11:30 a.m. today in the University Center’s Commonwealth Auditorium.

p. Conomikes died in a car accident Saturday afternoon on the way to a fencing tournament in Pennsylvania.

p. Two of the three fencing team members that were injured in the same crash are still hospitalized in the VCU Medical Center in Richmond.

p. Conomikes was 86; he had coached with the College since 1972.

p. “He was a remarkable man – training athletes here and enlarging their lives for over three decades. We ask that you join his family, his athletes, his friends, and his colleagues to say goodbye to one of the most beloved and most inspiring members of our community,” College President Gene Nichol said in an e-mail to students Tuesday.

p. A reception in Tidewater will follow the service.

Staff Editorial: Doubts on Nichol

0

p. The decision facing the Board of Visitors over the potential renewal of College President Gene Nichol’s contract is the most important issue that the College has confronted in the last three years.

p. The ramifications of this decision will be far-reaching, leaving no student, faculty member or alumnus untouched. With the future of the College and every member of its community at stake, all concerned groups and individuals should focus on the facts and allow the BOV to make a logical, calculated decision.

p. The release of an e-mail correspondence between former College President Timothy Sullivan and Nichol has led many to conclude that Nichol intentionally misled alumni and students
when he announced last February that the Campaign for William and Mary had reached its $500 million goal.

p. While our confidence in Nichol has been considerably shaken over his misinterpretation of this e-mail and his inadequate response to disgruntled donor James McGlothlin ’62 J.D. ’64, we have not seen irrefutable evidence that Nichol lied about his knowledge of McGlothlin’s intentions. His response to these allegations, which he articulated in a meeting with The Flat Hat’s editorial board yesterday evening, was that he believed that Sullivan was referring to a future pledge from McGlothlin to the College, as opposed to the $12 million dollar estate pledge that was booked in 2005 before Nichol became president.

p. Nichol maintains that he made an honest mistake in misinterpreting Sullivan’s e-mail. While the wording was somewhat ambiguous, Nichol’s inability to respond to this e-mail and actively pursue contact with both Sullivan and McGlothlin is inexcusable. Nichol said that he would rather not comment on his relationship with the College’s former president, but his failure
to consult Sullivan on an important issue like the removal of the Wren cross and his inability to recognize the urgency of Sullivan’s e-mail raises important questions about Nichol’s leadership capabilities.

p. The e-mail may be the news of the day, but everyone in the College community should understand that this is part of a larger, complex problem that will dictate the future well-being of this university. We encourage the BOV to release any other pertinent documents or information that may enhance the public’s understanding of this difficult issue. As BOV Rector Michael Powell articulated in a recent statement to the community, “The Board [of Visitors] is fully aware of the facts surrounding this matter and it is the Board that will consider whether anything in this episode bears on the performance of College leadership.”

p. This is precisely what the College needs at this time. We are not making an argument for restricting free speech, but blind hatred and systematic attacks on Nichol by various groups are hindering
the delicate job with which the BOV has been tasked. Continuing dialogue on the issue is something that we will continue to encourage — particularly since Powell has notified the community via e-mail that the BOV would welcome submissions — but this decision should not be made in the public forum. Moreover, making accusations of dishonesty without proper evidence is irresponsible and undermines this important process.

p. Since Nichol’s honesty in this case cannot be indubitably proved or disproved at present, the deciding factor in the BOV’s decision should be his judgment as a leader, and the board should consider all of the decisions he has made over the past two and half years, good and bad. Based on the current evidence, The Flat Hat is quite disappointed with many of his choices as president, particularly his inability to see potential problems with a disgruntled donor and his apparent lethargy when it came to contacting both McGlothlin and Sullivan.

p. The situation with Sullivan is particularly discouraging. It is apparent from the e-mail that Sullivan had offered his counsel in the past, yet it seems that Nichol failed to consult with Sullivan before removing the cross.

p. The apparent lack of contact is troubling. At the time of the Wren cross decision, Nichol was still learning the terrain and adapting to life at the helm of the College, and his predecessor’s wisdom likely would have proved to be an invaluable asset. In the e-mail, Sullivan states, “I could have told you where this decision would go,” implying that Nichol may have had a better idea of the potential consequences for his actions had he contacted Sullivan before removing the cross. We are concerned that Nichol has a pattern of making poor decisions without consulting others.

p. Nichol has underperformed in several cases, but it must remain the BOV’s decision as to whether his accomplishments as president — some of which are quite notable and have improved our school — outweigh the alumni alienation and other side effects of the Wren cross debacle. It is difficult to believe that a president can lead this College under such scrutiny and ridicule, but Nichol remains convinced that he is the right man for the job. While we are unhappy with his leadership at the moment, we recognize that a solution will come with the BOV’s eventual decision. We hope that whatever decision is reached, the best interests of the College are preserved and continue to be the ultimate priority for all concerned.

SA Joins with Rock the Vote

0

p. The Student Assembly has partnered with the national non-profit organization Rock the Vote as part of its effort to register more students to vote in Williamsburg.

p. The partnership allows the SA to use the Rock the Vote logo and brand name in future registration drives.

p. SA President Zach Pilchen ’09 said that the goal of the partner¬ship is to build upon the successes of the SA’s recent voter registration drive. He added that there will soon be a big push from the SA to increase the size of the student electorate.

p. “I’m hoping to get about $25,000 [from] the SA senate to get a big name band on campus for Williamsburg’s first official Rock the Vote concert,” Pilchen said in an e-mail to The Flat Hat.

p. “[The $25,000] is something we would consider,” senate Chair¬man Matt Beato ’09 said. “But it is not something that is definite by any stretch of the imagination.”

p. Sen. Brittany Fallon ’11 of the Finance and Budget Committee said that funding a concert would depend on the venue, the band, UCAB’s involvement and “the mood FinCom’s in at the time.”
Pilchen did not offer specific plans for a potential concert. He only said that it should feature prominent performers.

p. Finance and Budget Chair Walter McClean ’09 was unable to comment.

p. According to Rock the Vote’s website, the organization was established in 1990 in “response to a wave of attacks on freedom of speech and artistic expression.”

p. Since then it has focused resources on organizing registration drives geared toward young people. Rock the Vote frequently uses concerts to heighten the profile of voter registration as an issue.

p. Rock the Vote’s Director of Education Kat Barr said that the organization operates within the “intersection of celebrities, culture, politics and technology” to raise awareness of issues commonly associated with younger voters.

p. Barr was unable to cite the cost for holding a concert Rock the Vote because events and partnerships are still being made for the 2008 election season.

College releases Nichol e-mail

0

p. It was all a big misunderstanding.

p. That’s how College President Gene Nichol is defending himself after College officials decided to release a controversial e-mail in which former College President Timothy Sullivan warned Nichol that a $12 million donation to the law school was in jeopardy two months before Nichol said he learned that the donation had been revoked.

p. College officials released the e-mail Tuesday night after they realized several unintended recipients had seen it. The College typically does not release documents referring
to specific donors, but both the donor and Sullivan consented to the release.

p. In the December 2006 e-mail, Sullivan said he had been working to secure a $12 million gift to the law school from long-time donor James McGlothlin ’62 J.D. ’64. “I felt that we were making good progress and moving toward closure,” Sullivan said. “But I talked to Jim who is very upset and angry about the Wren cross, and is not prepared to give any more money at this time.”

p. The donation was included in the total of the College’s seven-year fundraising campaign when Nichol announced in February that the campaign had reached its $500 million goal.

p. It had been in the campaign total since 2005, when McGlothlin made the donation in writing, according to Nichol and Vice President for Development Sean Pieri.

p. Pieri could not be reached for comment yesterday. Sullivan, McGlothlin and Marshall-Wythe School of Law Dean Taylor Reveley
refused to comment.

p. In an interview last night with The Flat Hat editorial board, Nichol blamed the language of Sullivan’s e-mail for his misinterpretation.

p. “I would not under any circumstance describe a gift committed, locked up, placed in the capital campaign a year and a half or two years earlier as one on which we are making progress toward closure,” Nichol said. “Closure had to have happened before it was booked in 2005. That was the way I read that — that was a reasonable reading.”

p. He said he thought Sullivan was seeking additional money from a donor the College has frequently turned to for support. He also said he tried, without success, to contact the donor about his concerns.

p. Sullivan stated Oct. 24 that he communicated all that he knew about the donation to College administrators “in the clearest possible terms.”

p. The fundraising campaign fell back below its goal when the $12 million pledge was removed from the total after the lost donation became public in late February. Nichol said a letter written by McGlothlin that was forwarded to him Feb. 23 prompted him to investigate whether McGlothlin was revoking the prior pledge.

p. He said he learned Feb. 27 that McGlothlin no longer intended to make the donation.

p. “I’ve tried to explain that I’ve had some misreadings, some miscalculations — I’m responsible for that,” he said. “But they were not deceptions. They were not conspiracies.”

p. Nichol’s critics allege that he ignored information about the revoked donation to avoid further embarrassment during last year’s Wren cross controversy. In an interview Wednesday, ShouldNicholBeRenewed.org spokesman Jim Jones ’82 said that Nichol is either dishonest or incompetent.

p. The online group’s petition calling on the Board of Visitors to fire Nichol currently has 698 signatures, while a Facebook group supporting Nichol has 775 members.

p. In the month leading up to the release of Sullivan’s e-mail, the Facebook group lost one member. Since the e-mail’s release two days ago, the group has lost 17 members.

p. Students and faculty have strongly supported Nichol in the past against vocal alumni who have been criticizing him for a number of issues since his decision last October to remove the Wren Chapel cross from permanent display. The cross has been returned to the chapel inside a glass case.

p. Nichol said yesterday that his opponents will continue hurling allegations at him until the BOV makes a decision on whether to renew his contract, which expires in June.

p. He also said he should have worked harder to contact McGlothlin.

p. “Hindsight is frequently better than foresight,” he said. “At least in my case.”