Home Blog Page 65

“Rhino” demolishes theatrical traditions

0

Don’t look now, but there’s a terrible beast rampaging through the rafters at Phi Beta Kappa Memorial Hall. It’s trampling all over the stage, too. A shame, really. It was a lovely space.

To be honest, it isn’t really a beast. Not in the usual sense. And that noise isn’t the fault of some marauding animal. That sound? That crashing and banging you might hear this weekend, emanating from the theater?
Well, that would be an entire auditorium losing hold of its conviction as the beast smashes to the ground.

It may only be coincidence that this occurs during performances of Eugene Ionesco’s “Rhinoceros,” directed by theater professor Laurie Wolf in a production from the College of William and Mary theater department. But if that’s the case, it would be truly shocking.

Ionesco’s play, detailing the slow but steady transformation of the people of a French provincial town into snorting, manic beasts, is most often read as an allegory against the insidious spread of Nazism through an unsuspecting public. But to characterize such a bold and brilliant work with precise labeling would be to pigeonhole a play that criticizes and mocks the very idea of categorization itself. “Rhinoceros” is about fascism insofar that it is about every ideological movement that takes hold of a group of people which does not their question its motives. Wolf, too, refuses to give in to such a simplistic reading of the play; there are moments clearly intended to comment on the Third Reich (in perhaps a hall-of-fame moment for this critic’s deductive abilities, the hand signals say as much), but the broad strokes painted by the actors and staging suggest that such a phenomenon could happen anywhere.

What makes “Rhinoceros,” remarkable is the absurd and naturalistic passivity of its characters. As a charging rhino blazes through a square, the bystanders quickly begin wondering whether the creature has one horn or two. Logicians begin forming theorems on the matter, amnesiac in their indifference to the extraordinary. As the “rhinoceritis” takes hold more of citizens, becoming a leather-skinned, one-ton herbivore seems increasingly more reasonable. That is, until there is only a mild-mannered clerk left standing.

That clerk, Berenger (Greg Benson ’11), is something of an eccentric — complacent until the moments when those around him change, and then passionate about the false certainties in his life that have already begun to disappear. Benson’s Berenger is restrained in his expressiveness, but is no less believable. His Everyman persona, a deeply held self-delusion, comes through in the hesitation before a reaction, a stammer, as his world falls apart. When he at last takes a stand, there are no illusions of heroism to be had, and this is no brave struggle. It is a capitulation of convenience, and Benson correctly denies the audience of any comforting catharsis.

Zoe Speas ’12, as Berenger’s friend and social better Jeanne, provides well-defined contrast between her impeccable grasp of the “correct” life and the primal disarray of her change into a raging monster. Speas’s transformation, the inevitable destruction of any established cultural order, is a collapse of epic proportions. Claire Fredriksen ’11, as Berenger’s love interest, is an appealing baby face who gains a fiery confidence once she sees just how much fun it must be to run with the pack. And Francesca Chilcote ’11, in providing yet another onstage metamorphosis, makes for an uproarious spectacle. (Let the cleverly calculated implications of only female actors being made horny not go unmentioned.)

Impressive as much of the staging might be, there are some issues on the technical side which, despite their intent, interfere with an otherwise inspired production. The preponderance of sound effects from Zach Armstrong ’11, while essential and well chosen, sometimes take precedence over Ionesco’s words. (This was a balance issue that may have been corrected by press time.) And theater professor Steve Holliday’s lighting, initially indicating the inevitable conversion of the characters, obfuscates the actors’ faces in the late sections of the play. As laudable as the notion of a shadowy “Rhinoceros” is in theory, it would be nice not to guess how Berenger responds to his dismal situation half of the time.

Yet, despite such hurdles, Wolf’s “Rhinoceros” is a daring production. Ionesco’s material is a delightfully unsettling -exploration into our nature as trusting beings, dependent on rationality, and the play pulls no punches for the unwary spectator. So, be forewarned — this is not theater for the weak willed — or for those attendees with a tendency to head butt their neighbors.

“Rhinoceros” will run through Sunday Feb. 27 at Phi Betta Kappa. Tickets cost $5 for students and $10 for general audience.

Confusion Corner: Planning ahead not always the best plan

0

College students are notoriously unreliable when it comes to committing to plans. Any activity that requires commitment at least one week in advance is generally unadvisable. The likelihood of successfully coordinating a trip or event with more than one other person is also generally a bad idea. Why is this? Why are we, as a group, so hard to pin down? Are we unreliable because of our age, or because we simply have so much going on in our lives?

Because I have encountered this phenomenon of non-committal college friends a bit too frequently recently, I want to get to the bottom of this phenomenon. First, I must admit that I have, at times, been the offending party. Over this past winter vacation, for example, a group of my friends valiantly attempted to organize a ski trip to Vermont. Spoiler alert: The trip was a resounding success. But judging from the weeks leading up to the trip to the slopes, no one actually thought anyone else was going to show up. I actually postponed committing until the day of the trip, when I flew standby to the Northeast. Now, I ask you, what normal human being can function under these kinds of planning conditions? I consider myself an organized, punctual, planning-is-fun-and-rewarding kind of person, but even so, I still couldn’t be counted on to commit to a trip until literally the last possible moment.

I am guessing that many of you have encountered this frustrating phenomenon over the past couple weeks when trying to formulate plans for spring break. These types of plans often prove to be the most difficult for people to commit to because they involve money. Shocking, I know. I’ve come to realize that any sort of event that requires people to commit to forking over dough is a lost cause. We are college students, after all.

I have recently again fallen victim to the non-committal planning bug. This past week, the set list for this summer’s Bonnaroo music festival was released. After pouring over the artists who would be performing, I decided that it is absolutely necessary that I attend. I have never gone before, and I figure there will be no better time to go than the summer following college graduation when I am footloose and fancy free. So, naturally, I began texting, mailing and calling all of my friends who might be game for some Bonnarooing in June. However, I soon began to realize that, although I might very well have nothing to do in June, I might actually have a job. Yes, that’s right. That would mean I will be working five days a week, eight hours a day, for someone who might not understand that I have made a prior commitment to go camping in the middle of Tennessee for the weekend to listen to some sweet music and engage in general merriment. The issue of how a college grad might fund such an excursion also poses problems. So, as you might have guessed, I, too, have become the friend who hesitates to make decisions, postpones any definite commitments, and waffles back and forth for weeks on end.

While I obviously cannot insist that every college student toughen up and learn how to make decisions like a mature person, the one piece of advice I can offer is to never disregard the utility of binding contracts. And just remember, the feeling you will have when you successfully get a group of friends together for a shindig will make all the difficulty worthwhile.

__Emily Walker is a confusion corner columnist. She wants to hang out with you sometime next week, maybe.__

Film digs out of poverty

0

In the middle of the night, when the police are avoiding unpaved roads, a group of miners transports petrified wood to Shanghai and Beijing. For a group of Uighur miners, this transport of petrified wood is their first stepping stone out of poverty: one piece may earn them over half a million Chinese yuan.

On Tuesday night, the Asian Studies Initiative hosted an on-campus screening of “Deserted Diggers,” a documentary by Chinese independent filmmaker Joy Le Li, as part of the Silk Road events to promote the new major, Asian and Middle Eastern Studies.

Rachel DiNitto, associate professor of Japanese and co-director of the grant-funded Asian Studies Initiative, helped to arrange the screening of the film. The Silk Road events promote Asian and Middle Eastern Studies, which combines East Asian Studies, South Asian Studies and Middle Eastern Studies. The Education Policy Committee approved the new major in fall 2010 and hope to offer the program to students by fall 2011.

“As part of the grant and our interest in kicking off the new major, we’ve set up a whole series of events for this semester,” DiNitto said.

The documentary tracks the lives of a group of Uighur miners in the world’s second largest petrified wood forest of the Junggar Basin near Xinjiang, China. The ongoing conflict between the majority group, the Han Chinese, and the Muslim minority group, the Uighurs, creates disparity in the town of Xinjiang. In order for many Uighurs to provide for their families, the men must mine petrified wood. However, in doing so, the miners risk their lives and safety.

In 2011, the Chinese government outlawed the excavation of petrified wood. Only one company, a Han Chinese company called the Yema Group, was able to obtain the rights to mine the fossilized wood. In order for Uighurs to continue to mine, they had to either mine illegally or share some of their profits with the Yema Group.

DiNitto presented the film to spread awareness of the social issues with the Uighurs. Although Li was unable to attend the screening, DiNitto and Li arranged a live Skype session following the screening for the audience to discuss the film. For the students in attendance, the film offered a rare glimpse into the lives of Uighur miners in China.

“Through watching this specific group of miners, you learn more about the Uighur issue as a whole,” Claire Dranginis ’11 said. “I had heard of the Uighurs before, but I never really knew of them in detail and was curious about the issue.”

In the Skype session, Li recounted the struggle to understand the Uighur minority. Since the Uighurs are often discriminated against in China, Li had to rebel against the Han Chinese negative perception of the minority.

“Some Han Chinese think that Uighur people are backwards and have bad tempers,” Li said. “The groups coexist, but they don’t really intermingle.”

Stephen Hurley ’12 attended the screening after studying abroad in Beijing last semester.

“What Joy said about the Chinese people’s perspective on the Uighurs was, in my experience, right on the dot,” Hurley said. “Some of the teachers in the program gave off the feeling that the Uighurs are us, but they’re not really us.”

The disconnection between the groups was most evident through the story of Jengis, a Uighur miner. Due to his extreme poverty, his wife had left him. Mining petrified wood was his only chance to overcome his situation. He described the daily trials of being a part of the minority and trying to mine petrified wood.

“It’s really hard to dig. We do it. We have no choice,” Jengis said.

Jengis and the other miners shared their personal struggles and opinions on their conditions in the documentary. The eclectic mix of personalities illuminated the life behind the conflict of the Uighurs and Han Chinese. When she arrived in China after studying at Columbia University in New York, Li happened upon the group by chance.

“The way I met this group of Uighurs was really pure luck. I was lost in the desert and I ran into them,” Li said. “They helped me get out of the desert, and I was so fascinated by them. I decided I would go back and make this film.”

The chance encounter in the desert led to the production of a documentary. Li filmed the group over a two-year period and focused on the miners’ lives with their families and their daily struggles in the mines.

The road to the final product was not smooth, as Li often faced police interrogations. Even today, the film has not been shown in China for fear of punitive measures being taken by the government. Still, Li hopes that the film will help other people understand the struggles of the Uighurs.

“I want to let people understand Uighurs better,” Li said. “They have love, they are funny, and they are just like everyone else.”

Williamsburg community discusses proposed arts complex

0

Students at the College of William and Mary were called upon to take an unapologetic stance toward the construction of a new performing and fine arts complex.

Director of the Muscarelle Museum of Art Aaron De Groft addressed a small crowd of students in the Sadler Center Tuesday as part of a town hall meeting on the new integrated arts complex to be built at the current site of the Muscarelle, Andrews Hall, Phi Beta Kappa Hall and the Phi Beta Kappa Hall parking lot.

“The arts are the core of this College, and it’s time for the arts to become a priority — and we shouldn’t apologize for it,” De Groft said. “This arts complex will cost less than the business school and the integrated science building.”

The College was the first in the nation to include fine arts in its curriculum, doing so in 1779. The modern fine arts department, established in 1936, was also the first in the nation. However, the Muscarelle has not been renovated since the museum’s completion in 1983, even though the size of its collections has nearly tripled.

De Groft said that the College’s priorities, which he said put the arts last, must change. According to De Groft, the College’s previous administration cut the Muscarelle’s budget by 90 percent in an effort to phase out the museum entirely from campus.

“I get myself into trouble sometimes because I don’t understand why the arts are not given enough publicity or resources, when our Michelangelo drawings, for example, were given national attention,” De Groft said.

Specific design plans and a timetable have not been completed. A feasibility study was conducted last year, leading to a preliminary design that nearly doubles the size of all current fine arts buildings, combining each with a new Muscarelle museum.

“Now that we have amassed [that] kind of space, we need a lot of student voices to tell us what they need done with the space,” De Groft said.

A new Muscarelle museum would serve as the new public entrance into the College, housing the departments of art and art history, theatre, speech, dance, film studies and music. In addition, a 250-seat auditorium, a first-class theatre, a concert hall, a student coffeehouse, a reception area, a black-box theatre, a recital hall, ensemble rooms and experimental studios would be integrated into the building.

“These new buildings need to be high efficiency and high energy, like the business school,” De Groft said. “In addition, the buildings should be inspiring, feasible and functional.”

For these reasons, De Groft said that glass or slate needs to be used instead of historic materials. He gave the example of Kansas City’s Bloch Building of the Nelson Atkins Museum, which is made of glass and glows in the dark, as a building acceptable for the arts.

De Groft also suggested using swing spaces and hydraulics to make large recital or concert halls multi-purpose.

De Groft described the financial planning as three-fold, consisting of buy-ins from the commonwealth of Virginia, student fees and major private fundraising. However, he said that the complex has a long financial road ahead of it before construction can begin.

“As of now, we have no financial reality,” De Groft said. “Student fees for the current classes are a necessary reality. And if we don’t use the state, Virginia Tech will for a new fine arts complex.”

Elections Commission releases Honor Council results

0

The College of William and Mary’s Honor Council is set to welcome 23 new members with the results of Thursday’s honor council election.

According to Honor Council Vice-Chair Skyler Halbritter ’11, 1,191 students participated in this year’s election, totaling 20.54 percent of the College’s student body. The results and turnout figures were verified by student-at-large Mike Young ’11.

The class of 2012’s new honor council representatives will be Zara Stasi, Kathleen Murphy, Laura Zobor, Tess Engebretson, Lina Yeh, Darren Migneault, Trent Sternbeck and Jason Gangwer. The class of 2013 elected Alice Shaughnessy, Ben Migdol, Rebecca Avison, Julian Harrison, Justin Duke, Mirin Park and Nicole Rugayo. The class of 2014 will be represented by Sarah Appleton, Zack Brown, Dylan Kolhoff, Hanna Loucas, Emily Newcomb, Richard Murphy, J.W. Seo and Christina Shintani.

Halbritter said that the new honor council members would serve the body well.

“We would like to thank all candidates who applied, and we look forward to the contributions our newly elected members will make in service to the College and the student body,” Halbritter said in a press release.

Due to a lack of a sufficient number of candidates, the class of 2013 elected only seven representatives to the council. The eighth vacancy will be filled once all new members have been sworn in to their positions on the council Feb. 27.

Complete voting totals for individual candidates are available beginning today on the honor council election website Wm.edu/HCelections.

Living Wage Coalition awards staff

0

Members of the College of William and Mary’s Living Wage Coalition, in conjunction with United Students Against Sweatshops, presented College Residence Life and Facilities Management workers with an award for their “10-year struggle for living wages,” yesterday.

USAS, an organization with 150 chapters nationwide, presents the award annually to groups who have shown courage and perseverance in their efforts to gain fair wages and respect in the workplace.

“I think that’s a really big deal because USAS is a national organization,” LWC member Katie Dalby ’11 said.

The organization first presented this solidarity award to three workers from the College at its national conference in Columbus, Ohio earlier this month on behalf of the wider William and Mary worker community.

Several LWC members attended the conference, where they met with other student groups to share ideas on how to strive toward greater workplace rights in their own communities.

“It’s really a space for students and workers from all over the country to come together to learn to unite effectively to produce changes on campus,” LWC member Maggie Russolello ’12 said.

The ceremony, held in the Sadler Center’s Chesapeake Room, featured an appreciation brunch and an opportunity for students and workers to voice their opinions.

“I think they felt really great about it. They seemed really energized and ready to go for the semester,” Russolello said.

Some students were slightly more critical, however.

“I think it was good to get workers out — I think it was one of the more positive things they’ve done in a while, considering worker turnout has been almost zero at a lot of these events,” LWC member Arthur Schechter said. “It’s not even really my own standpoint… we need more workers.”

Schechter cited the College’s strict employee regulations as one reason for the low turnout in the past.

“There are a lot of workers who get written up even for complaining. It’s understandable that the campaign has become alienating at this point for workers who don’t want to deal with it,” he said.

In addition to the award ceremony, the LWC has more events planned for the future, including a community forum featuring workers, students, professors and speakers from such groups as the NAACP, Student Environmental Action Coalition and Latin American Student Union.

“It’s going to be a really great opportunity for people all over the campus to come and speak on behalf of the Living Wage Campaign,” Dalby said.

Russolello said she is optimistic about the future of the LWC.

“We’re at a really cool point in the campaign,” she said.

“It’s really a space for students and workers from all over the country to come together to learn to unite effectively to produce changes on campus,” LWC member Maggie Russolello ’12 said.

The ceremony, held in the Sadler Center’s

Students surveyed on Honor Council

0

For the first time since 1997, the nation’s oldest collegiate honor system is under review and evaluation.

The Honor Council Review Committee, formed by College President Taylor Reveley at the beginning of the academic year, consists of current students, faculty members and administrators. It aims to finish the review of the system by the end of the academic year.

“We are making a thorough and balanced assessment of the system we now have and examining whether we as a community have preserved honesty and integrity at the right cost,” government professor Clay Clemens ’80, chair of the Honor Council Review Committee, said.

In order to get an accurate depiction of how the community views the current Honor System, a survey was sent out to all students.

“We are trying to solicit as much input as we could from as many parts of the campus community as we can,” Clemens said.

After an initial informal examination, the main recurring concern with the system was that it was too time consuming and complicated for all parties involved.

After reporting an honor offense, it can take several weeks until the case is closed. Each case requires a time commitment from at least 12 Honor Council members, material witnesses, professors and the accused.
Because of this enormous time commitment, many professors opt to handle each potential offense on their own.

“I think we’re probably only seeing 10 percent of all offenses, and 90 percent are dealt with by professors,” Chief Justice of the Honor Council John Pothen ’11 said.

Another reason professors shy away from involving the Honor Council in cases of lying, cheating or stealing in their classrooms is that the starting sanction for such an offense is suspension. Professors often feel they can handle the cases better on their own because they understand the situation better than an Honor Council panel would.

“It’s the one aspect of the College where professors have no control,” Pothen said.

While the review committee has not determined whether or not they will change the suspension sanction, Pothen did admit the issue is up for discussion.

Other parts of the system Pothen said the Council hopes to review include the way in which the accused and material witnesses are treated and the transparency of the process to the community.

“It’s not meant to be a punitive process,” Pothen said. “If someone has directly harmed the community through lying, cheating or stealing, the process is meant to repair that relationship.”

City government could address density issues

0

Density can be a dirty word in Williamsburg.

In 2007, the city’s comprehensive plan proposed to raise downtown density restrictions from 14 to 22 units per acre through a permit process to attract new businesses. Intense opposition from a vocal resident group called “Stop-22” pressured the Williamsburg City Council into dropping the proposal.

Nearly four years later, density may be back on the table — albeit on a case-by-case basis.

“From a staff perspective, we see more people living downtown as a good thing,” Williamsburg Economic Development Director Michelle DeWitt said. “Saying that, we live in a democratic society.”

Although controversial, allowing exceptions to the city’s density restrictions could provide an outlet for economic development in targeted areas.

In the case of Tribe Square, an exception was made to accommodate the 14-unit student mixed-use building. Currently, the city allows 10 residential units per parcel of land.

“New zoning eliminated the 10 unit per parcel max, but 14 units per acre remained,” Planning Director Reed Nester said.

The city also granted an exception to allow four students to share individual units within the complex, Nester added.

According to City Councilman Scott Foster ’10, Tribe Square would not have been economically viable had the exception not cleared city council.

“Providing exceptions for density in focused areas downtown could really provide an impetus for redevelopment,” he said.

Between the arts district, the Capitol Landing Road focus group and overtures to the Williamsburg Shopping Center, Mayor Clyde Haulman set economic redevelopment as a top priority for this year. Few would argue attracting new businesses to Williamsburg is not a good thing, especially considering that 12 percent of the city’s commercial space is vacant. In the proposed arts district, the vacancy rate is 18 percent.

Increasing the population of downtown could lead to greater economic vibrancy and vitality, DeWitt said.

“Ultimately, you need a critical mass to make an area viable for retail,” Haulman said. “There isn’t that critical mass anymore.”

According to Nester, some of the city’s older developments exceed the 14 unit-per-acre limit. The city grandfathered those developments when it adopted the limit in 1991.

City council and staff will begin work on a new comprehensive plan in 2012. While broad changes to the density limit may be off the table, determining how density can be manipulated to spur economic redevelopment in struggling areas of the city remains a part of the discussion.

“I would anticipate density being part of the discussion,” Nester said. “Whether the plan will have any recommendations on density, I can’t say.”

Ultimately, the question of density is part of a broader determination of how the city wishes to identify itself, Haulman said. While he does not anticipate high-density redevelopment will threaten the city’s bucolic reputation, it could provide a decidedly more urban, business-friendly environment.

“The real question is, what kind of downtown do you want? If you want the type of services where you can just walk downtown, there’s a tradeoff,” he said. “The sense I’ve gotten from people in the community is that when it’s a specific site or plan, they’re OK with it.”

SA releases proposed fiscal budget

0

The Student Assembly released its proposed budget for the 2011-2012 school year last night.

The proposed budget totals $626,899, requiring an estimated $93 per student, dispersed through the student activity fee.

This projection is based on the SA’s estimated population of 6,750 students.

“I am satisfied with the current version of the budget,” Sen. Noah Kim ’13 said in an e-mail. “The current version of the budget is fair to student organizations while keeping the Student Activities Fee low, despite some substantial new requests this year. This was very much my goal this year, and I believe the current version of the budget meets that goal.”

Outside of operation fees, the largest segments of the budget include the Student Publications Council, AMP, SA and Steer Clear, approved for $149,957, $137,000, $37,305 and $14,526, respectively.

Kim said the senate will be holding appeals hearings and discussing any amendments to the budget over the next few days. Following the hearings, the budget will go to the senate floor for up to two weeks, before being sent to SA President Chrissy Scott ’11. Final approval will be made by the College of William and Mary’s Board of Visitors.

Student Assembly entertains Honor Council discussion

0

Honor Council Chief Justice John Pothen ’11 and Justice Eric Robinson ’11 attended the Student Assembly meeting Tuesday night to ask for senators’ suggestions regarding ways to improve the College of William and Mary’s Undergraduate Honor Council.

“What would a more transparent council look like?” Pothen asked his audience. “What’s the type of information you would like to know? What are things that we can do within the system that will lead to the transparency that you, the student representatives, would desire?”

Sen. Mike Young ’11 said the variation in rules pertaining to plagiarism within some departments, such as computer science and foreign languages, leads to an inconsistent definition of a violation. Young suggested that the lack of information about what defines plagiarism in these departments might be a cause for the higher number of plagiarism cases which arise from these segments.

“If the Honor Council could work with these departments and could give a joint presentation for students taking classes within those departments, I think that would be a good preventative measure,” he said.

Young also cited concerns about a relative lack of information about the students running for positions on the Honor Council. He said the ballot list should include the on-campus activities and majors of candidates.

Sen. Mike Douglass ’11 said the Council should hold extra information sessions for those students who tend to have higher rates of plagiarism violations — athletes, transfer students and international students.

Following the discussion of the Honor Council, the Senate unanimously appointed Doug Haynes ’12, Jessee Vassold ’11, Walex Kjmurets ’13, Ben Chalfin ’13 and Elizabeth Thomason ’14 to the election commission.

“While the executive may not have had any other candidates to choose from, it was my sense that these people were really willing to put in the time for this difficult job,” Sen. Ryan Ruzic J.D. ’11 said.

Sen. Dallen McNerney ’14 then brought the Proliferation of FOIAs act to the Senate. This would create a searchable database of information obtained by FOIA requests funded by the FOIAs for All Act on the SA website.