Home Blog Page 32

Returning to their roots

Say the names Mary and J.R. White in Clinchco, Virginia, and a warm spark of recognition will spread through many of the residents of the mountainous southwestern Virginia town. Twelve students at the College of William and Mary also got to know the Whites this past spring break on a Branch Out National service trip to Clinchco as they worked with health related issues in the town.

These students’ service did not end with a trip, however. This past summer, trip leaders Taylor Nelson ’13 and Akie Fujita ’13 found out that Mary and J.R.’s house had burned down and that they had lost everything. The group is now mobilizing to help these two people, who have dedicated their lives helping their struggling community.

The name of the service trip to Clinchco, “First world country, third world clinic,” highlights the poverty as well as the health issues that many in southwestern Virginia face. In Dickinson County, where Clinchco is located, a third of the residents live in trailers or mobile homes, and due to both the poverty and a shortage of healthcare providers, healthcare is severely limited in the region. These factors, combined with a high prevalence of diseases such as diabetes, creates a region with lower-than-average life expectancies.

“One of the biggest problems facing the region is health care,” Mel Alim ’14, a participant on the trip, said. “They have a different culture there. One of the health providers there was talking about how when she was growing up, her parents would give her all these fried foods, and it became a norm. So that’s what she fed her kids, even though she knew it wasn’t good; it was just a cultural thing. A lot of [the health problems there] are preventable, but it’s at a structural level.”

During the trip the group worked with an organization called Health Wagon, which provides free health services and educates southwestern Virginians on diabetes prevention.

“The clinic is a mobile RV,” Nelson said. “Transportation is a key problem in a lot of areas, but because they go to the patients it’s more accessible health care,” said Nelson. While transportation is a problem, the larger issue is that people simply can’t afford health care, which makes the free service the Health Wagon provides invaluable.

The group stayed at a bunk house that was part of a community center owned by Mary and J.R. White. Not only did the group get to know the Whites, but they also got to see the impact that the Whites have on Clinchco through their community center.

“Going to Clinchco and seeing not only the inequality in the community but also seeing how the Whites bring this community together was very impactful,” Nelson said. “They’ve done numerous initiatives [through their community center], reaching out and helping people in many ways.”

The initiatives run through the community center are designed to address a variety of issues. The center provides a food program to address the issue of hunger, offers a drug education program to help alleviate
drug problems in the area, and organizes volunteers who do house repairs.

“They offer [the community center] to a lot of student groups as well as many other people,” Alim said.
Education, too, is a big issue in the area since according the Health Wagon’s 2009 Annual report, roughly half of the population over age 25 don’t have a high school diploma. The community center, though, helps make people more competitive in the job market.

“A lot of people didn’t have a lot of hope, as a lot of times poverty is all around you, and many struggle with figuring out how they are going to make a living or how your parents are,” Nelson said.

Through their community center, though, the Whites served as a source of hope.

This past summer Branch Out National received a letter sent by one of the White’s good friends, describing the White’s situation and asking for any help that could be provided.

“A tree fell on a power line by their house which started a fire. Their house was uninsured and they lost everything, so they’re currently living in a trailer,” Fujita said.

Once everyone returned to campus, the group was ready to hit the ground running in working to help the Whites. They decided to raise funds to help alleviate the costs the Whites are now facing. Thus far, the group has been networking with other Branch Out groups and Office of Community Engagement and Scholarship to organize their efforts. This Friday the 16th they will be holding a bake sale on the terrace and will be accepting donations. Anonymous donations can be sent to CSU, 3881.

Aside from working to help the Whites, the group hopes to continue to keep in touch with them.

“They were like family to us,” Nelson said. “We definitely want to keep in contact with them and keep in touch with how they are.”

Confusion Corner: Venturing beyond the picket fence

Bonjour from France! As I write this, I sit in my apartment in the 18th arrondissement, or district, of Paris.
“The city of lights” really is everything that everyone idealizes it to be. There are cafes on every street corner. There are more fashion boutiques than you can jingle a Euro at. There is more bread, cheese and wine than I’ve ever seen or considered consuming in my life.

The flight here was quite literally a trip. The sum technological advancements of the last hundred years conspired, or if I were egotistical enough, culminated in my transportation some 4,000 miles east, across the ocean whose very vastness and insurmountability made epic heroes of famous figure such as Columbus and the pilgrims. I did it in seven hours and enjoyed a snack in the middle of the flight.

As I try, goofy and big-haired, to somehow seem more in place here than out of it, I’m struck by a question.

What does it mean to be from somewhere? Many of us list it first when describing ourselves to a stranger.
“My name’s Jason, I’m from Virginia, I’m 21 years old.” It’s the second thing we share, right after our name. I also think we imagine that it colors who we are. It may be classic egocentrism, but as I stand on the Metro,
I’m sure everyone can tell I’m an American. Regardless of when I speak or how I dress, I must emit some American pheromone that immutably betrays me.

But what does it really mean to be from somewhere? Ethnographically, it means I was born in the United States — that I entered the world within the set of coordinates that men have agreed to refer to as America. It means that it took me 21 years to wander outside my corral. I was slower than some of the other cattle.

But does it identify me at all? Compulsion screams no. It seems no more valid to identify myself by the country in which I live than by the month I was born or the time that it is. “Hi, I’m Jason. I was born in August at 4 p.m.” Yet we insist upon its significance, and I understand its practicality. But I believe this practicality stems from folly. We see ourselves as citizens of our countries as though when we decide to venture outside, we are guests in other countries. But these are just constructs, and they are no more truth than mistake. We are citizens of the world — citoyens du monde. If we insist upon difference, let us draw the fence at Earthlings, for surely that makes us more similar than anything else. Let us visit Paris, Tokyo, Rome, all with a sense of ownership. With a pride that unites us all rather than asks us to tread lightly. Because after all, Where are you from?

__Jason Rogers is a Coin de Confusion Columnist and enjoys his French baguettes while pondering the world in a cafe. He might find his identity sooner or later…__

Piping the sounds of Ireland

On Monday nights, the College of William and Mary’s bookstore cafe becomes a pub. But don’t think Guinness or fish and chips. Instead, it’s the fiddle, the banjo and even the bagpipes that allows the popular study spot to adopt a new, unique tone.

The musicians filter in at seven p.m. and settle into their chosen spots. They are in no hurry to get started, reflecting the relaxed atmospheres these sessions have adopted since developing in Ireland.

“A session is basically a bunch of musicians getting together and playing tunes, learning tunes, and everyone is trying to get better but there’s nothing really riding on it so there’s less pressure — only what you put on yourself,” Tracy Jenkins ’12 said.

Eventually, the instruments make appearances. Each musician carefully prepares their chosen instrument, tuning and plucking strings. The sessions can incorporate any number of players, ranging from the Irish flute to the bodhran, an Irish frame drum.

As the music grows louder, some of the students trickle out, leaving room for spectators to trickle in, such as Kathy Duncan ’90, who studied in Cork during her time at the College.

“In Ireland every third person plays an instrument,” she said. “They gather together and play all the time, it’s really popular as a social activity.”

Musician Dan Jackson has been organizing musical sessions for the past five or six years, though they have been at the bookstore for the past two years, making it their longest run so far.

The players have various backgrounds, reflecting the ranging levels that Jackson’s sessions welcome. Fiddle player Bernard Joseph Farrell has been playing music for 35 years, while retired army officer and author Victor Rosello, who plays the bodhran, has only about six months of musical experience.

Jenkins has been playing traditional music since he was thirteen. His favorite part of the experience is simply the sound of the music. Among other instruments, he plays the dulcimer, Great Highland Bagpipes and Scottish Smallpipes.

“I love the sound of the pipes,” Jenkins said. “Since I play them, I get to hear them whenever I want. Just like any art, it’s a form of expression and I play the music I like to hear.”

Having started playing in sessions during high school, Jenkins started attending Jackson’s sessions at the end of his freshman year.

“In addition to the music, we all share a camaraderie that comes from shared enthusiasm for the traditions,” he said. “It’s part of our identity and I think we all play this kind of music because it speaks to that identity.”

The tradition is the most prominent features of these Monday night sessions. While listening to the Irish flutes, bodhran, fiddle, banjo and smallpipes, you can hardly stop yourself from tapping your foot, and it seems wholly appropriate to jump up and do a jig before ordering a Guinness at the cafe.

In the British Isles, of course, there are differences between the traditions of each region. As sessions grow in popularity in other parts of the world, those different traditions intermingle.

“I’m a Scottish-American and traditional Scottish music really moves me,” Jenkins said. “I think it’s like that with a lot of Irish musicians as well. We identify with each other as musicians but also as traditional musicians. I’ve been to sessions wherever I’ve traveled for the past few years and I’m really glad there’s a session right here in town.”

Jackson has set up the designated evenings at the bookstore so that they accommodate all types of players.
Slow sessions are on the first, third and fifth Mondays of every month and are geared towards beginner musicians, while the second and fourth Mondays are faster, meant for more advanced players. According to Ken Shields, who plays the Irish Flute, fast sessions can get up to 12 players and are generally very lively.

“Music is a great way for Irish people to come together,” Duncan said. “There, pubs are like their living room, so if people start playing then others can just jump right in. It’s a great way to learn new music and improve.”

Even at the bookstore, especially during slow sessions, there will be pauses in the music so Jackson can help the other musicians perfect their performances.

“Every session I’ve gone to has had a mix of more experienced players and less experienced players, though of course some sessions have higher-quality musicians than others,” Jenkins said. “Newcomers are nearly always welcomed and encouraged, so long as they exhibit some courtesy.”

Rules for sessions are pretty self-explanatory: play on the beat, in tune and not too loud. Oftentimes players will sit quietly and listen if they do not know the specific song being played, some even bringing recording devices for improving later on. Ultimately, the goal is to play well while having a great time.

“We all want to sound good, but we’re not getting paid,” Jenkins said. “We just do it because we love it. At a lot of others sessions, which are in pubs, folks will have a drink or two while they play. It’s totally relaxed: you can come late, leave early, miss a few weeks or even months and when you get back everyone’s happy to see you again.”

Freshman friends create humorous paper

It all started with some freshman hall bonding.

Last year, four friends sat around together making jokes and hypothetical plans in their freshman dorm. As it turned out, some of those plans weren’t so hypothetical after all. This year, those four friends have begun a fast-growing satirical periodical called The Botetourt Squat.

“When we first founded it, we were not really settled on what we wanted [to do] yet,” Zack Quaratella ’14, a staff writer for the Squat, said. “After we found out the rigors of a real paper, we decided to do satire.”

The friends formed their idea for a paper in April. They eventually made their first version with a “sketchy” online pdf maker that eventually “died,” according to Quaratella so the first Botetourt Squat is no longer accessible on the Internet.

Created in the bowels of Gooch, the first version was oriented mostly toward freshmen. Now the staff of the Squat is planning on making a more general paper for all students.

“If you can read and you like funny pictures, [the Squat is for you],” Jordan Obey ’14, a managing editor, said.

The Founders of The Botetourt Squat chose to write satire due to the perceived lack of relevant humorous writing in publications on campus.

“We’re not trying to step on the toes of any other school publications, but there is no consistent and good satire coming out in periodicals,” Quaratella said. “The other [humorous] publication comes out only once a semester, so there’s a time delay between events and when their articles are published.”

While the Pillory only comes out once a semester, the staff of the Squat is planning on putting out issues once a month.

“We’re just trying to inject some relevancy into the art of satire,” Quaratella said.

The founders of the Botetourt Squat admire the style of the national satirical publication The Onion. They said that the writers of the Onion come up with articles by thinking of funny headlines, then writing from those ideas. The writers of the Squat try to emulate that style of innovation.

“Our main sources are the Onion and the Bible,” Obey said.

Along with Jack Crum ’14, editor-in-chief of the Squat, Quaratella, Reynolds and Obey are focusing on getting funding from the Publications Council. They also have been recruiting new writers from the class of 2015. Over 100 freshmen signed up at their booth at the Student Activities Fair. This is just one of the ways they have been gaining recognition on campus; the Squat has also been expanding into social media.

“Some dude put us in Student Happenings,” Quaratella said. “I don’t know who it was.”

“We also have a Facebook and a new Twitter page,” Ben Reynolds ’14, another managing editor, said, “which will probably become very important.”

If the Squat does not recieve funding from the Publications Council, they plan to ask for support from Mark Constantine, Student Activities Director, who has been a fan of their idea for a publication from the beginning.

“We want to establish ourselves as a publication,” Obey said.

Their aspirations, however, are not limited.

“After that, we want to become the main news source on campus,” Reynolds said.

Rejected: College should de-emphasize interview in application process

Take a moment to ask yourself this question: Why did you get into the College of William and Mary? Was it your superb academic record? Was it your impressive writing ability? Your captivating wit? Your mission trip to Haiti? Your passion for juggling?

According to the admissions website, “There’s no single formula for getting into William & Mary.” Go to a few admissions information sessions and you will hear a lot about the importance of being a unique person, a passionate person, a driven person. The College is trying to assert that an applicant is more than a test score, and this is honorable, but the admissions staff needs to understand the implications of this idea as the College’s admission process evolves.

This year, the College announced that it would offer on-campus interviews in the fall as well as the summer. Increasing the number of applicants who interview will increase the influence of the interview on the application. This is just one example of how the system of values upon which college admissions is based upon is shifting. While academics used to be considered the main factor in college admissions, recently colleges appear to be putting more of an emphasis on factors that add dimension to an applicant beyond tests and grades.

In essence, colleges are no longer judging you entirely on your academic performance, but are also judging your character. Your worth as a human being is open to critique, and this is an incredibly lofty responsibility to take on. Colleges need to examine and to define exactly what these values are instead of throwing around ambiguous statements.

Deciding on a collective system of values used to formally judge individuals should not be taken lightly. At the very least, these values need to be defined objectively so that admissions decisions are based as little as possible upon the individual bias of interviewers and admissions staff. These values should be the values upon which the College is based. These values should be the values that make up the College’s moral framework, bind its community and uphold its honor system.

The College also needs to realize that many high school students will base their actions on and structure their time around getting into college. If colleges keep expanding the use of evaluations like interviews, applicants will focus more on trying to fit the profile of a successful applicant than on pursuing activities about which they are truly passionate — and shouldn’t true passion be one of those fundamental values that the College is centered around?

I am not advocating for factors like interviews to be eliminated from the admissions process altogether. However, when personality is fair game in admissions, the College has a responsibility to carefully examine its goals and to articulate them clearly.

Ranking does not fairly reflect College

Every year, U.S. News and World Report creates a list ranking colleges and universities considered “National Universities.” To be in this category, like the College of William and Mary, a school must offer “a full range of undergraduate majors, master’s, and doctoral degrees,” according to the magazine’s website. This year the College ranked 33rd out of 194 rankings, although there are several other schools on the list marked as “unranked.”

What does this mean about the College? It demonstrates that our commitment to academics, to small class sizes and to small professor-to-student ratios is noticed outside of our community. It is specifically listed that 46.7 percent of classes at the College have fewer than 20 students. However, the descriptions of other ranked schools focus on aspects that seem to be ignored at the College.

The universities ranked in the top five ranks have tuition rates ranging from $37,000 to $45,290, which demonstrates to me that low tuition is not a priority for this list. Granted, schools with more money can offer more support to students with financial need and can offer more programs, but I feel that several schools with smaller tuition rates still offer a wide variety of programs and financial aid to students. The top five schools also have a low rate of admission, the highest being 7 to 19 percent. This demonstrates that a higher ranking is given to schools that seem more “prestigious” based on the number of rejection letters they send.
The College’s admission’s rate, according to the ranking list, is 32 percent. The ranking also allows for schools to be tied — five schools are tied for number 5. This causes a bit of a discrepancy, as several schools can be ranked equally.

This means that the College’s ranking could have been higher, especially since there is a tie for the 31st position. Personally, I feel that ranking number 33 is extremely low, especially considering the types of programs offered at the College, as well as the clubs and opportunities offered, and that a lower rank was given because of the rate of admissions. Schools that have a higher tuition and a lower admission rate seem to be at the top of this list, mainly because these qualifications make them more prestigious, but schools who have a higher admission’s rate also are able to keep tuition lower, which is important if you are paying in-state or out-of-state tuition rates. The highest-ranking colleges are also all private schools, which can give more funding to students than a state-funded school and sometimes have more specialized programs in fields.

This rank does not accurately portray the opportunities for students here at the College. While 33 out of 194 is not a bad score, I feel that we can do much better. The information given with our ranking also ignores several key groups and focuses here at the College, particularly the high percentage of students who participate in community service and volunteer events and positions and who serve in some type of leadership role in the community.

The main aspect mentioned is the small professor-to-student ratio, which is a big deal, but it is not the only important thing.

There are many different factors that make the College attractive, and not all rankings place equal value on these factors. The most important thing to remember is that the ranking is only a number decided by a few people who do not know the College like we do.

Honor Code still clicks

How do sociology, the Honor Code, sustainability, attendance, IT and $40 come together at the College of William and Mary? The clicker.

For the bulk of students who are not in the three lecture classes now using the infamous clicker, this may be news to you: This gadget became more prevalent on the school supply list at the College this year. The gadget, simply called the clicker, is a pretty impressive device. It allows a student — from the comfort of his or her oh-so-soft and moldly seat — to actively participate in what could be a boring and uneventful lecture class. We’ve all experienced those classes with 50 million people who stop coming as the semester continues — at least until exam time when the hall practically bursts with slackers. While these classes bore us, the administration still mandates that we take those pesky General Education Requirements, and inevitably, we take Introduction to Psychology or Introduction to Microeconomics or some other course we’d like to conveniently forget we ever took after handing in the final exam.

The clicker is going to change that — at least, that’s what we hope. The clicker allows professors to ask questions in class and allows students to immediately respond. After everyone enters their answers, the information can be used to create graphs in class and other types of polling and data sharing can take place. Professor Thomas Linneman of the sociology department uses the clicker for teaching his Introduction to Sociology course. He uses the clicker for sociological experiments in the class, allowing students to see the opinions of their classmates and to draw conclusions from the data.

Professors are also using the clicker to take attendance and give quizzes. This policy relies on the Honor Code. Professors don’t know if you are the person you claim — or in this case ‘click’ — to be. It could be a new opportunity to cheat, but at the College, the professors truly trust students. They believe in the Honor Code and the integrity of the students so much that they trust them to keep their word and not to lie about attendance, cheat on exams or steal a person’s identity.

The slight drawback of the clicker is the $40 price tag that comes with it. It’s unfortunate when you think that you may only use it once. But hey, that’s just like a textbook, right?

The clicker saves time by not having to pass out quizzes or collect them. It also saves paper on which we would print those quizzes or attendance sheets. This technology also forces students to be responsible. Without the clicker, your attendance will not be recorded and you won’t receive a quiz grade, which has already forced some students to sprint from their lecture classes back to their dorms to get the clicker.

The College is over 300 years old, but that doesn’t mean our technology has to be. Furthering technology on campus is exciting, and it may begin with just a simple click.

Men’s soccer: Tribe slides below .500 mark with pair of losses

When it left Williamsburg for Norfolk and the ODU/Stihl Soccer Classic Friday, William and Mary apparently forgot to pack its offensive prowess, and came home after dropping games to Monmouth and East Tennessee State by a combined score of 3-0 and with a 2-3 record.

Against Monmouth, it was clear that the attacking wasn’t in sync. The Tribe didn’t put a shot on goal until the 66th minute when sophomore forward John Ciampa’s rip was stonewalled by Monmouth goalkeeper Alex Blackburn, who would not be tested again.

The No. 13 Hawks pounced shortly after, as George Quintano knocked an R.J. Allen feed past freshman goalkeeper Bennett Jones.

That was all it took to down the College, as Monmouth controlled the pace of the game and finished with a 12-7 advantage in shots taken.

The Tribe looked to rebound in another tough game, this time on Sunday against No. 19 East Tennessee State.

The College would get an early chance this time, as Ciampa headed a cross from junior midfielder Ben Anderson on goal but at the Buccaneers’ keeper in the 14th minute.

The Tribe created another golden opportunity to take a 1-0 lead in the 34th minute. Freshman midfielder Chris Albiston found himself one-on-one with ETSU goalie Ryan Coulter after fielding a pass from freshman forward Josh West. But Coulter won the battle, turning away Albiston’s effort and going on to serve as the Buccaneer’s brick wall, racking up six saves and shutting out the College.

The difference in the game was the way ETSU capitalized on its offensive openings. The teams were knotted at 7 shots apiece when the first half came to a close, but the scoreboard read 1-0 in favor of the Buccaneers after ETSU defender Simon Schroettle beat senior goalkeeper Colin Smolinsky on a direct free kick in the 43rd minute.

The College continued to create scoring chances in the second half, outshooting the Buccaneers 9-5. But again, ETSU chose its shots wisely, as Buccaneer Frank Doumbe beat Smolinsky — who finished the game with four saves — in the 84th minute to put the nail in the College’s coffin.

Inconsistency has plagued the team during the non-conference portion of the schedule. The Tribe opened the year ranked at No. 13 and got off to a quick start, upsetting No. 5 Southern Methodist University on the Mustangs’ home turf.

But any momentum the team picked up of that win quickly vanished, as it came home to get crushed, 3-0, by unranked St. John’s. After squeaking by Loyola at home, 1-0, the College went to Norfolk looking to get back in the win column before kicking off its conference schedule, which starts Saturday at UNC-Wilmington.

The team can, at the least, take solace in the fact that the conference schedule is not that difficult. The College is the only team in the CAA ranked in the top 25.

City council stops new rental law

Under pressure from Williamsburg residents, the Williamsburg City Council failed to pass a motion Thursday that would have allowed more people to rent rooms in owner-occupied homes.

The proposal was written to better accommodate students and other residents in single-family neighborhoods by encouraging room rentals in owner-occupied homes, such as bed and breakfasts and detached dwellings, rather than in houses rented to up to three nonrelated individuals.

In a 3-2 vote, and under recommendation from the Williamsburg Planning Commission, the council voted to make no changes to the existing regulations.

Under the current law, parking in owner-occupied homes must be off-street, with one bedroom per roomer by right. Special exceptions can be made to the Board of Zoning Appeals with a maximum of two bedrooms rented to two roomers each. Williamsburg Planning Director Reed Nestor said there have been five exception requests made to the Board of Zoning Appeals since the current regulations for renting rooms were adopted in 1991. Two were denied and three were approved.

The proposal would have allowed on-or off-street parking and room rental to two people with administrative approval, or up to four people with approval from the Board of Zoning Appeals.

Few students showed up to the monthly city council meeting, and Student Assembly Undersecretary to Williamsburg Danielle Waltrip ’14 was the only one to speak in favor of the proposal during the public forum.

“Currently, there are very few affordable housing options in the city,” Waltrip said. “By encouraging the rental of bedrooms in owner-occupied homes, we can build community, improve relations between the Williamsburg community and the College and dispel negative student stereotypes.”

In contrast, Williamsburg residents opposed to changing the current regulations filled most of the seats in the room.

During the at-times heated public forum, Williamsburg residents were particularly concerned that streets would become clogged with cars if the regulations were to allow on-street parking. But one of the most repeatedly voiced objections to the proposal was the idea that it would encourage more students to live off-campus.

“The obvious reason most of the people are here today is because as soon as residents hear the idea of loosening the guidelines for student housing in residential areas, we all get concerned,” Williamsburg resident Debbie Keane said.

Multiple residents cited late-night noise violations, a backlog of cars parked on the street and poorly kept residences when explaining their opposition to having more student neighbors.

But council member Scott Foster ’10 argued that the students who would choose to live in owner-occupied homes would be less likely to adhere to stereotypes of hard-partying college students.

“This is going to attract a different kind of student,” Foster said, drawing sounds of skepticism from the audience.”

Keane also criticized the council for focusing on student housing initiatives when there are other pressing economic issues facing residents.

“Residents are losing their homes to foreclosure, businesses are closing, tourism is at an all-time low, our city schools are on a downward slide, and we’re concentrating time and money on student housing again,” Keane said. “I would really like to see our city council focus a little more effort on our town residents and let the College handle the students.”

“Let’s let the College take care of the College,” Keane said to applause.

Student Assembly Secretary of Public Affairs Meg Schwenzfeier ’14, who also attended the hearing, said that the residents’ opposition to the proposal and the council’s ultimate decision illustrated that students should increase their presence at city forums and meetings.

“If we don’t show up to show the city that we care, it will be a lot harder to promote student-friendly initiatives,” Schwenzfeier said in an email.

Redesign proposed

While many buildings at the College of William and Mary are old, outdated and prone to flooding, the Campus Center may be next on the list to receive a facelift.

Two architectural firms met with College officials last week to start a feasibility study to map out potential options for a redesign of the Campus Center. The building was originally constructed in the 1950s.

“The building was good originally, but it doesn’t fit the needs of the current campus population as we have gotten bigger,” Assistant Vice President for Student Affairs Mark Constantine said.

Moseley Architects, a local contractor, and WTW Architects, known for their work on university student centers, were awarded the project last spring and began meeting with College officials, as well as with Dining Services, Student Activities and the Dean’s offices. The firms will compile data and create several mock-ups, potential designs and financial estimates to present to the feasibility study committee, which has two student representatives.

Constantine said that possible renovations were discussed in previous years, but that this feasibility study represents the first step toward future construction. He also said that the school sees three main options: to renovate the current space, to raze the building and start over, or to do a little of both.

“The school recently found the money to do a feasibility study, which allows an architect to come in, talk to the different groups that occupy this building and dream together,” Constantine said.

As it stands now, there is no money set aside for construction, and Constantine does not foresee the project starting for a few years.

“This is a long-term project; there is no money allocated for construction right now,” Constantine said.

Future incarnations of the building must be student-friendly and inviting, according to Constantine, so that students feel it is “their building.” The Office of Student Affairs emailed a survey to a random sample of students in order to gain feedback on the plans.

“I think it’s a good thing that they’re redesigning it because it’s been around for a long time,” Melissa Ahlem ’14 said. “Change might not always be welcome, but usually it brings new things forward. And the bathroom definitely needs a redesign.”

Sarah Lesley ’12 offered additional suggestions.

“Parts of the building need to be cleaned up, and things break a lot. I would like a building with a coffee shop and more study rooms,” Lesley, a Campus Center employee, said of the current state of the building.

Constantine envisioned the future building as part of student life, but was careful to point out that any potential plans for renovation must take into account the services and space already available at the College’s other main student life area, the Sadler Center.

“It is important that the two buildings complement each other, instead of competing,” Constantine said. “The same staff runs both buildings, so they will work together.”

Constantine believes that any future incarnation of the building would have more meeting space and dining space for large and small groups alike, in the same vein as the Sadler Center’s Commonwealth and Tidewater rooms. Constantine projects that the feasibility study will be completed in February.