Home Blog Page 138

Honor Council makes mockery of judicial process

0

If you haven’t heard about it yet, all of you should become familiar with the recent Undergraduate Honor Council controversy. Documents from three separate cases portray a very troubling image of the organization. The conclusion is mind-blowing in some ways because of how upsetting it is — students are being unfairly treated and punished by the Honor Council, our supposedly neutral judicial organization. It’s clear from reading about the issue that the Honor Council has to change, and that it has to change immediately to make sure nothing like this ever happens again. We deserve better, and our Honor Code deserves better.

In all of the stories, a central theme becomes clear: The Honor Council doesn’t trust the student body. Instead of treating students as innocent until proven guilty, we are treated as guilty until proven innocent. This is a problem. If the Honor Council cannot trust us, then we cannot trust the Honor Council. The College of William and Mary Honor Code states, “In a community devoted to learning, a foundation of honor among individuals must exist if that community is to thrive with respect and harmony among its members.” I could not agree more. We all give the Honor Pledge during orientation, in which we collectively entrust the Honor Council with the guardianship of the College community from those who lie, cheat, and steal. But what happens when those we have elected violate the very code they have sworn to protect and uphold?

In the last Honor Council election, only nine people ran for eight positions in the Class of 2011. Seven of the winners were returning members. Only 10 people ran for eight positions in the Class of 2012. Six of the winners were returning members. A system has been created that ensures election for the most visible and popular people running — the current members.

What should be a fair and impartial judicial process has been corrupted by the realities of electoral politics. As someone in an elected position at this school, I know all too well that people who run for office have inflated egos. This is a major problem when ruining a student’s life is at stake. The Chancellor of the College, former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, has made it her priority issue since leaving the bench to end the election of judges. In March she stated, “We are the only nation in the world that elects its judges. We are just way out in left field on this.” I agree with our Chancellor. While our Honor Code may be the oldest in the country, the organization meant to protect it is not quite as sacred. The council is considerably younger than the code, and it can and should change with the times.

There seems to be a consensus among many people that change must be made. One extreme solution is to abolish the Honor Council. After all, 25 percent of the student body voted to abolish it on March 31. While it’s not a majority, this figure shows that a significant portion of us are distrustful. The other extreme solution is to keep things mostly the way they are with a few cosmetic differences. Both of these options are unacceptable, and a compromise is desperately needed.

We need an honor council. This version, however, hasn’t proven to be up to the task. So we need a new honor council. There are a number of ideas floating around, and they all deserve full consideration. Two examples include (1) ending elections and (2) removing power from the current members, instead letting the judging be done by a random jury of our peers. These changes should be discussed over the next week, with the Honor Council substantively modified by the time this semester ends. Opponents of reform are trying to stall until the summer in the hope that momentum fades. That isn’t acceptable —change must happen now before another student is given an unfair trial, since final exams are traditionally the busiest time of the year for the Honor Council.

If the administration and the current council aren’t willing to give us changes, then we need to give them changes. Deliberation of this reform will need to be as transparent and public as possible. To that end, later this week a public forum will be publicized where all members of the community are invited to come and voice their opinions. This is a hugely important issue, and it will affect present and future students at the College for decades to come.

E-mail Erik Houser at ehhous@email.wm.edu.

Reform, not public revolt, is needed for Honor Council

0

The first honor code in the country was established at the College of William and Mary in 1779, at the request of Thomas Jefferson. After 230 years of uninterrupted service, questions are being raised about the Honor Code and the procedures associated with it. I strongly believe that it is necessary to review the process used to conduct Honor Code proceedings and reevaluate the Undergraduate Honor Council.

However, the public dissection of trials does more harm than good and misses an important point: The Honor Code is a fundamental part of the College, and what needs evaluation are the procedures of the Honor Council.

Recent events and elections on campus indicate that there is dissatisfaction among students with the conduct of the Honor Council, but the implications of disseminating intimate facts about specific cases are very serious.

Although accommodations for students’ privacy are made, the faculty are often not provided with the same concern. The proceedings of the Honor Council are supposed to be confidential, and the public discussion of intricate details does not advance the cause of systemic reform.

As a matter of fact, publicly discussing specific cases and questioning the practices of individuals may cause faculty and students not to want to participate in trials and investigations. Faculty could be discouraged from reporting honor violations to the Honor Council if they think their participation will be open to second guessing and speculation without full disclosure of all the facts.

In the case of young faculty, the situation is very worrisome, since they may not wish to be demonized on the many websites and blogs where students rank teachers. We know that it is very easy for a student to get other students’ sympathy, but it is difficult for a teacher to get rid of a reputation for being harsh or unreasonable. In the case of students interested in serving on the Honor Council, there is concern that many good students may not run for a position on the council if they feel their participation will be subject to second guessing in public forums, personal attacks and general misrepresentations of their opinions.

Discussing intimate facts about certain Honor Council cases without protecting faculty members and questioning Honor Council decisions does a disservice to the Honor Code. I think it would be more appropriate if all these details were presented before the Student Assembly and President Taylor Reveley. Simply lambasting the Honor Council will not provide any incentives for the Honor Council to reform from within; if anything, it will just elicit anger from its members, and nothing constructive will occur.

As stated before, the implications of Honor Council improprieties are very serious, and Reveley should order an investigation to determine the best method for reforming the honor system. Until then, it would be most beneficial if students were to sit down with the Honor Council and voice their concerns. Hopefully the council can explain the reasoning behind some of its surprising decisions.

E-mail Ben Arancibia at bcarancibia@email.wm.edu.

McDonnell the magician

0

_Click image to enlarge._

Behind Closed Doors: Triple X Batteries Not Included

0

The other day I browsed through a sex toy magazine, since my sex life is a little slow moving these days and I have been looking for ways to spice things up. While looking at the packages with random rings and the lady lumps with brightly colored nipple coverings, it occurred to me that a lot more than sex can happen behind closed doors.

Sexual fantasies are created so you can enter your own imaginative realm of secretive pleasure. There are tons of websites, and even stores, you can visit to help enhance this creativity.

One of the more creative toys is a nipple sucker that arouses nipples the same way that licking them might do. There is always the classic dildo or vibrator, but there is also a stool-like prop, on which you place the magic stick that moves the dildo into different positions.

Speaking of rings: There are ways to get around paying shipping and handling for rings that can cost up to five dollars. How? By going to the local dollar store. I know it sounds sketchy, but if you visit the toy aisle you will find rubber rings with soft spiky tentacles that a dog would usually chew on. But don’t let that be a turn off, these rings fit perfectly around all types of phalluses.

Word of advice: Don’t leave these mini love machines sitting around the dorm room, chilling on your desk or on your roommate’s dresser, because that’s just wrong, uncouth and disgusting. Plus, you do not want them to attract attention, or worse, be discovered by your roommate. Try to be discrete, and when your roommate is gone, get your freak on in peace.

Now, when you are getting the real thing, sex toys can complement your style by turning up the heat. Come on, be creative, people. Nipple clamps increase visual arousal. It is risque and time saving, since you don’t have to waste energy taking them off like you do with clothing.

Strawberry nipple nibblers are another dual-purpose addition to your sex life. While working as an arousal balm, they also taste great, which means that both partners are pleased. The only downside is that these nibblers can cost up to $10. For the budget-friendly student, head over to your local grocery store and grab some strawberry syrup, which costs around two dollars. Place a few dollops on the nipples, and I’m sure this will make an awesome substitute for students looking to save on cash.

Whether alone or with a partner, consider investing in sex toys, even if that just means a trip to the grocery store. And remember: Batteries are sold separately.

“A Mercurial Roadshow” confounds audience

0

In the days before radio, television or internet access — say during the late 19th century — the traveling exhibition was an event. People would turn out in droves to see feats of skill and strength, marvel at the freaks on display, or see what new miracle product the salesmen peddled. More often than not, the bearded lady was a phony and that snake oil never did make your hair grow back, but the spectacle and the outrageous experience was what made the shows so much fun. Operating out of a stage within a travel trailer, the Virginia Theatre Machine attempts to capture that same spirit while educating its audience on the dangers of mercury consumption in “A Mercurial Roadshow,” premiering as part of the International Mercury Expo at the College of William and Mary.

An original work by director Mark Lerman and designer Jeremy Woodward, “A Mercurial Roadshow” is nothing if not remarkably presented. With a company of three actors doing the legwork, the miniscule performance space becomes a broadcast room, replete with standards representing old-time radio visually: props to provide sound effects, big silver microphones and inopportune public service announcements. A small light marquee and a contingent of props handled by the characters with, well, mercurial swiftness, add to the style and the atmosphere. As Orson Welles’s Mercury Theatre Company presents a tale of the liquid metal slowly seeping into the earth, an apparent Martian invasion takes place in Virginia. This side story is clearly an homage to Welles’s scaring the populace into hysteria with his “War of the Worlds” broadcast in 1938, although comparing that watershed work to Lerman and Woodward’s “Roadshow” would be a mistake. Where Welles intended for his radio drama to fully engross the listeners into the story of an alien invasion, Lerman and Woodward have a dual purpose — to teach all attending about how a poisonous metal enters the ecosystem and to entertain the audience while doing so.

Unfortunately, the former motive is achieved haphazardly at best, and the latter is only occasionally a success. “A Mercurial Roadshow” is unique in that it blatantly pushes its message while muddling what exactly its message is. The audience is given an abundance of information on mercury: what it is, how people ingest it, and what happens when they do. Not only is the vast majority of this data near the beginning of the show — when those watching want to know quite so much so quickly — but the last act of the production completely contradicts assurances made in the first, so that the meaning of the whole enterprise is utterly lost by the time the curtain falls. The audience is told not to be afraid, then to be afraid of what mercury can bring. An authority figure who says that the metal isn’t so bad eats her tuna-fish sandwich with four arms — an attempt at irony — but the arms are never shown to be anything but advantageous. The very last lines of the show, in fact, imply that mercury is, above all, a good thing to have in our bodies. Such vacillating on the subject of the story, and the Expo itself, may prove an unwelcome lesson to those in attendance.

But, the production is still a sight to see. The three hardworking actors give endearing performances, playing a multitude of parts and providing warm and comic moments to the plodding and overlong script. Ed Whitacre as Orson Welles is deep-throated and full of bluster. Welles’s talent for rapturous storytelling is portrayed particularly well by Whitacre, who livens up long passages full of facts and figures with a showman’s flair. Mary Wadkins, as the long-suffering sound effects, has deft comic timing and shuffles through her demanding role with ease. And Connor Hogan ’10 as a young assistant, along with many other characters, quite cleverly plays the dunce. All three players move through the complicated show without missing a beat, impressing and entertaining where the show proper falls short.

Its achievements in technical skill and performance aside, “A Mercurial Roadshow” makes the fatal error of putting too many eggs in one basket. Without a strong thematic focus, the educational aspect of the show is underwhelming, and amounts to little more than a well-executed mess. While the Virginia Theatre Machine has shown promise in the past with its adaptation of “A Christmas Carol,” this new show fails to live up to that lofty standard. This “Roadshow” may not be the work of a snake oil peddler, and after advertising one thing and delivering another, some people might demand a refund.

Banaa project aims to open U.S. universities to Sudan

0

“Save Darfur.” It’s likely you’ve seen it on someone’s shirt while sitting in class. Much less likely seeing someone from Darfur in class. The William and Mary Banaa Project is trying to turn that unlikelihood into a reality. Four undergraduates and three law students have been working since last fall to create an endowment for a Sudanese student to attend the College. The initiative began with Ariel Shah ’10 who discovered Banaa, the Sudan Educational Empowerment Network, in The Washington Post.

Banaa is a non profit organization that works to bring Sudanese students to the United States with academic scholarships.

“[Banaa believes] that those scholars will return to Sudan and build stability and peace,” Matthew Berger J.D ’11. said.

According to banaa.org, Sudan has been at war for 40 of its 52 years as an independent state. Emily Sumner ’11 said the result of that war is an extremely devastated infrastructure, which has affected education at even the elementary level.

“[The Sudanese] are in dire need of assistance, and education is a way to help,” she said.

Banaa was started by an undergraduate at George Washington University, and its first scholarship recipient, Makwei Mabior, is in his second year at GWU. Mabior recently came to the College as an ambassador for the program and is expected to return to speak again this fall.

“He wanted to inform William and Mary and say the impact [Banaa] can make, not only in bringing peace to Sudan, but also to the individual,” Berger said.

To bring in more students, other higher education institutions, including Tufts University and the University of Florida, have also signed up for the program. Whereas some Banaa scholars will be funded completely by the institutions they attend, William and Mary’s Banaa Project will require multiple financial sources.

“[Banaa] will have its own distinctive William and Mary feel,” Sumner said. “George Washington is a private institution and has a different funding avenue.”

While GWU provides funding for the scholar’s transportation and summer internships, the bulk of the scholarship must be provided for by the specific school the student attends.

“State schools realize it’s going to be creative planning for fundraising,” Sumner said.

The William and Mary Banaa Project aims to establish an endowment of $250,000, accounting for inflation and tuition increases. The funds would cover the expenses of tuition, food, laptops and cell phones for each Sudanese student.

“It’s a sustainable endowment, a long time goal,” Berger said. “But by establishing that, then if you have a year when the fundraising isn’t as good, then the endowment is still there.”

Planning is still in an early stage, but members of Banaa have already begun working setting up meetings with faculty from different departments, the Reves Center for International Studies and President Taylor Reveley. Reactions have been positive but honest.

“The general reaction from people is, ‘It sounds really interesting, and we’d like to see it happen; but fundraising is hard,’” Shah said.

Although the group has received mixed feedback, the team is serious and professional about its goal.
“We’re building a business plan to solicit funds from interested parties to show it’s a well thought-out project,” Berger said.

The plan will be completed over the summer so that fundraising can begin in the fall. The club, which hopes to utilize a wide variety of sources for funds, the club is open to students of all disciplines and levels.

“[The William and Mary Banaa Project] is unique because it brings together undergraduate, law and business students,” Shah said. “It will bring a unique perspective on campus, for round tables or in class … it goes with the objective of the school — increasing diversity.”

Despite an ambitious goal o$250,000 and the challenges of fundraising at a public university, members of the William and Mary Banaa Project remain optimistic. Berger emphasized the need to educate Sudanese citizens rather than providing foreign aid.

“This approach allows people from Sudan to have the tools,” he said.

Scholars are required to work as public servants in Sudan upon graduating, but can work in fields ranging from government to water distribution. The Clinton Global Initiative has committed to Banaa’s national goal of bringing at least 20 Sudanese students to the United States next year. Berger said growing partnerships reflect that the Banna project is more than just a pipe dream.

William and Mary Banaa is accepting applications until April 29 for next year’s committee. Applications can be requested at Banaawm@gmail.com.

Football: Defense impressive in 2010 Spring Game

0

William and Mary kicked off a new season of football to high expectations Saturday, and despite an offseason’s worth of changes, last year’s themes remained true. A ferocious defense harried a developing offense all afternoon, as the Green squad defeated its Gold counterparts 10-7.

That continuity is a good thing for the College; a standout defense — ranked second in all of FCS last season — proved it had not lost a step over the winter, despite graduating key playmakers.

“I was really pleased with them picking up slack,” Head Coach Jimmye Laycock said. “Those guys were not complacent, they raised their level and they took charge. We didn’t really have any significant drop-off.”

The defense racked up three sacks and an interception over the 28 minutes of gametime, yielding only 52 rushing yards.

“They’re awfully good,” sophomore quarterback Brent Caprio said. “It’s tough going against those guys, but it definitely makes us better in the long run. They bring the pressure, they put us in tough situations.”

The defense stole the show from a heated quarterback battle, in which Caprio and junior transfer Mike Paulus are the front-runners to replace departed starter R.J. Archer. With the signal-callers under frequent pressure and unable to get into a rhythm due to frequent changes, the afternoon allowed little in the way of clarity.

“I thought they did some good things and there were some plays they could have made better,” Laycock said. “That’s the way the spring has gone, until we get more into preseason, it’s going to be hard to tell [who will win the starting job.]”

Paulus completed three of 10 passes for 37 yards and a touchdown, while Caprio countered with nine of 15 passing for 87 yards. Each missed several open throws, but showed ample promise.

On third and goal from the 27-yard line, Paulus stood tall in the pocket under a blitz and rocketed a bullet to senior wideout Chase Hill at the goalline for the score. Two plays earlier, he showed evidence of his distinguished pedigree — Paulus was a four-star recruit as a high school senior — launching a pass off his back foot with a defender in his face. The attempt fell incomplete, but had the crowd buzzing.

“I’m not really worried about how I’m throwing the ball,” Paulus said. “I need to work on the little things, like getting the signals and putting in the plays. I needed to clean up that part and I think I did a good job today.”

Caprio showed good accuracy and a strong pocket presence in his minutes under center.

“We got off to a slow start, but I thought I made some plays on the last drive,” he said. “I thought I had a good showing this spring, but I thought I had some things I need to work on. I’m going to go into summer and I still have all my goals [of winning the job] in place.”

Several underclassmen used the scrimmage to show their progress over the past year. Sophomore wideout C.J. Thomas hinted of a major presence this fall with an impressive showing, catching four balls for 60 yards and adding a 13-yard touchdown run on a reverse.

“C.J. had a great spring,” Caprio said. “He’s going to be one of our receivers down the road, and he made a name for himself.”

Elsewhere, new faces on the defensive line and secondary proved that the College will suffer minimally from the losses of seniors Adrian Tracy, Sean Lissemore and David Caldwell.

Junior Terrell Wells, a converted cornerback, looked confident at the safety position, while junior Jake O’Connor and redshirt freshman T.K. Hester featured well at safety and cornerback.

On the defensive line, senior Brian Jean-Pierre and junior Harold Robertson contained the Tribe rushing attack — which was missing starters junior Jonathan Grimes and senior Courtland Marriner — bottling up the space between the hash marks and attacking the backfield.

“I know we lost a lot on defensive line, but if you saw those guys up front today, we’ve got some weapons,” senior linebacker Evan Francks said.

Perhaps most significantly, the scrimmage capped a spring mostly devoid of major injuries. That’s just fine for the College, as the squad seeks to make a return trip to the FCS playoffs this fall.

“They’ve got a good tradition established right now, and they want to keep it going,” Laycock said.

Football: Spring game live blog

0

Football is back as the Tribe faces off in its 2010 spring game. The Flat Hat is live from Zable Stadium with play-by-play, analysis, news and more.

Alcohol policy could change

0

The College of William and Mary’s Student Assembly executive committee has crafted a proposal to amend the College’s alcohol policy.

Suggested changes include removal of the container ban on beer, wine and liquor bottles and boxes, and the re-designation of certain lounges from “public space” to “community space,” which would allow of-age students, following the established policies, to consume alcohol within designated spaces.

“The SA believes that the current alcohol policy addresses students rather broadly, while giving enumerated privileges to those over the age of 21 who reside in campus housing,” Issam Hamididdin ’09 said in an e-mail. “The SA seeks to align the social desires of these students with the policies of the College and provide a safe environment for students to socialize freely within the College policy.”

Outgoing SA president Sarah Rojas ’10, Alex Ely ’09, former SA president Valerie Hopkins ’09, SA Chief of Staff Charles Crimmins J.D. ’10, Hamididdin and Sen.-elect Mike Young ’11 generated the majority of the proposed alterations.

Hamididdin said that elements of the alcohol policy could be too restrictive, and possibly counterproductive, to the goals of limiting underage drinking.

“The container ban does not adequately enforce the prohibition on ‘common containers of alcohol,’” he said. “Therefore, the SA believes that by removing the container ban and enforcing the common container ban, the College is more efficiently achieving its policy aim of preventing underage drinking.”

The proposed changes would also allow students to keep larger containers on campus.

“Students will be allowed to consume larger containers of alcohol — namely forties — without repercussion from the administration, both in their rooms and in their lounges that provide doors that give the resident of the dorm or hall exclusive access to the lounge,” Hamididdin said.

Plans for the proposed amendments to the alcohol policy have been developing for several years.

“The antecedents that ultimately formed the basis of the proposal culminated in an individual document in the fall of 2009,” Hamididdin said. “It’s hard to put an exact time frame on how long the proposal has been in the works, but it is safe to say that it has been developed over two SA administrations.”

According to Hamididdin, the SA revealed details of the proposal in a press release prior to submitting the revisions to College administrators to solicit student reaction.

Hamididdin said that he is optimistic that both students and administrators will be receptive to the proposed changes.

“Thus far, the administration has been positive regarding the proposed changes, and we hope to receive a positive response from the students,” he said.

SA passes election reform

0

The 317th Senate of the College of William and Mary’s Student Assembly held its final meeting Tuesday.

The SA passed the Election Reform Act by unanimous consent.

The Act states that members of the Elections Commission must be nominated by the SA president and approved by the Senate at least 14 days before an election.

“It really is important that these people are appointed more than 14 days before elections,” Sen. Betty Jeanne Manning ’12 said. “They have to have time to publicize and learn how to use voting software.”

The bill also confirms the SA president’s right to remove a member of the Commission, provided that the dismissal takes place at least 10 days before an election.

“The president has removed members, I believe, twice before, but they didn’t have the express power to do so,” co-sponsor Sen. Ross Gillingham ’10 said. “This amendment allows the president to remove a commissioner before campaigning starts.”

The SA also passed the Publications Council Contract Approval Act in a 13-2 vote.

The SA Executive negotiates a new contract every two to three years with the Publications Council, which funds many student publications at the College.

Together, the two groups determine the total amount of funding that funded campus publications receive, which is then distributed by the Council.

“[The SA and the Publications Council] reached a middle ground that we both can be pretty happy with,” SA Vice President Ryan Ruzic J.D. ’11 said. “I’m certainly very pleased with the way it worked out.”

According to the new contract, the SA will provide a base budget of $148,472 to the Council for the 2010-2011 academic year.

The funds will increase by one percent each subsequent year in expectation of inflation.

Significant changes to this year’s contract include reducing the cap of the Publications Council consolidated reserve, from $100,000 to $75,000, and allowing contract negotiations if deemed necessary before the end of the three-year period.

In the past, there had been no incentive for campus publications to generate their own revenue.

Any additional revenue brought in from fundraising efforts would be deducted from the budget they received the following year. Publications could receive up to 50 percent of the additional revenue in addition to their base appropriation for the year.

The bill limits this additional revenue to $3,000, and it must be used to fund only new programs.

The Blue Book Extension Act was also passed by unanimous consent.

Since the purchase of exam booklets for the 2009-2010 academic year has exceeded the $4,700 originally allocated, this bill sets aside $5,000 for the purchase of the books for students for the remainder of the spring 2010 semester and for the 2010-2011 academic year.

Sen. Stef Felitto ’12 said the Finance Committee is in the process of looking for more sustainable options to replace the blue books.

“Although we’re moving toward sustainability, we wanted to add funds this year because, otherwise, students would be paying for the blue books themselves,” Felitto said.

The newly elected 318th Student Assembly Senate will hold its first meeting next week.