Home Blog Page 420

Staff Editorial: Snuff out smoking at delis

0

Members of the Virginia Senate, the upper house of the commonwealth’s General Assembly, are currently debating a bill which would ban smoking in all restaurants, unless owners displayed prominent “smoking permitted” signs at every entrance.

p. Here at the College, where the campus alcohol policy generally pushes students to drink off campus, particularly at the delis, the issue of smoking in bars and restaurants is particularly relevant.
Regardless of whether the bill ever reaches the desk of Gov. Kaine, the City of Williamsburg and local business owners should take the initiative to prohibit smoking in restaurants. While deli and restaurant owners may fear losing the business of smoking patrons, collective action by the city and these establishments will not only create a healthier and safer atmosphere, but will also minimize inconveniences for all persons involved.

p. Particularly at the delis, where patrons regularly enjoy food along with their drinks, a crowded and smoky atmosphere makes the entire experience less enjoyable. With warmer weather approaching, and generally favorable year-round temperatures, stepping outside for a cigarette is hardly an inconvenience when compared to constant exposure to second-hand smoke. These businesses would lose few patrons, considering the monopoly that the delis currently hold on local nightlife.

p. Given the recent ban on smoking in state buildings, a law which took effect Jan. 1 of this year and includes campus residence halls, the College must continue its efforts to make the campus and the surrounding area safer for students. The administration’s crackdown on student on-campus drinking has encouraged, if not forced, students to seek off-campus social opportunities and alleviated the school’s liability concerns in relation to alcohol consumption. However, the College still possesses a paramount responsibility to facilitate and ensure the well-being and happiness of students, and smoke-free delis would be in direct alignment with this responsibility.

p. Of course, there is only so much the College can do. Although there are few concerns that are more understandable or valid for local business owners than losing revenue and customers, deli managers nonetheless have several incentives to take action on this issue. Students are not only some of the most frequent visitors to the delis, but generally account for a sizable percentage of wait staff and servers as well. Smoke-free establishments would be cleaner, more comfortable and more accommodating to a variety of people, as well as producing a healthier and more energetic staff.

p. Ultimately, if the bill does not pass in the Senate, the burden of this issue will fall squarely on the shoulders of the City of Williamsburg. The concept is by no means a new one. Smoking bans have been implemented and have proven effective in a large number of American cities, including New York, Chicago, Birmingham and Washington, D.C. Smoking is banned in all restaurants in 19 states, and even in those states that have not banned smoking, there are several examples of cities or counties choosing to implement their own bans. Alarmingly enough, Virginia is one of only five states, along with Tennessee, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Iowa, where there is not a single municipality that has passed complete smoking restrictions in restaurants and bars.

p. Even for a state built on tobacco, this is simply unacceptable. Known worldwide for its historical significance, Williamsburg is now presented with another chance to make history by becoming the catalyst for a state-wide movement to improve health conditions. We hope the city will not let this opportunity go up in smoke.

Senate continues to serve

0

While it is well understood that a majority of the student body pays little attention to the Student Assembly Senate, in Friday’s issue, The Flat Hat’s Staff Editorial made a very important point: the senate does matter to students. But if this is the case, then why would an editorial title such as “Student Senate grows increasingly irrelevant” be necessary for The Flat Hat to print at the same time? The answer to this question is two-fold.

p. First (as stated), the senate is very passionate about the processes of government. As a result, the public (via campus press reporting) is presented with events that would seem childish for a student assembly to execute, and in most cases I would certainly agree. However, such events (although important to note) are quite uncommon given the length of time and effort that the body operates in totality beyond the meetings in which these events may occur.

p. The second answer to this question can be found within the way the campus press, including The Flat Hat, has been reporting on the senate. By solely focusing on the proceedings of senate meetings, the campus press and subsequently the public have been unable to witness the great progress that senators have made around campus. The Flat Hat understands this and it must be commended on its new approach of looking at how proposed and passed bills will impact students rather than just reporting on the weekly procedural meetings to gauge the SA Senate’s progress.

p. When such an approach is taken, I believe the public will truly see how much progress has actually been made by senators. When health violations were reported at the University Center, Sen. Fitzgerald, a senior, brought hand sanitizers to all of our college’s cafeterias. As our energy consumption and cost on campus continues to escalate, Sen. Pilchen, a sophomore, continues to be a major advocate for change in saving both our environment and money.

p. When it comes to finding increasingly better ways for the SA (and not just the senate) to work together as a body for the students, Senate Chair Luppino-Esposito, a junior, and Senate Secretary Matt Beato, a sophomore, have been and continue to be instrumental. When problems arose from students not being able to receive weekend help at the Health Center, Sen. Walter McClean, a sophomore, and Sen. Sarah Rojas, a freshman, worked diligently to see that students have such access.

p. As for myself and Sen. Scott Morris, a freshman, we have also dedicated countless hours to serving the student body. We have eliminated the $5 fee students paid in the past as a result of a stolen ID, amassed a cause and referendum where on March 29 students will be able to vote if they want cheaper laundry costs, empowered our college’s Hall Councils by working to eliminate the ability for Residence Life to charge students punitive fees and continued to work with Facilities Management to pave the numerous mud pathways on new campus that have proven dangerous to some students. Also, let us not forget that the effort to bring back Medical Amnesty during alcohol-related emergencies also emerged in the senate.

p. All of these accomplishments have happened just this year alone. When it comes down to it, the student body would suffer a great loss if the SA Senate ceased to function. It has been said by many that the senate is the greatest forum of ideas on campus, and although we have our juvenile moments every so often, the students should not forget that the senate has and will continue to serve them well.

p. __Andrew Blasi, a Student Assembly senator, is a freshman at the College.__

W&M: Soulful or soulless?

0

The Virginia Gazette, a local newspaper, features a segment called “The Last Word,” in which whiny members of the community can anonymously vent their concerns. For obvious reasons, the College has been a popular subject lately. “William & Mary now stands for ‘What a Mess,’” someone wrote last week in response to the Sex Workers’ Art Show and the continued Wren Cross controversy.

p. Another angered citizen was inspired to declare, “I would not pay that school one cent for what it is obviously trying to teach. W&M used to be a source of pride for the community. While we are saying goodbye to morals, we may as well say goodbye to our beautiful Williamsburg.” My apologies: the above statement contains enough hyperbole to suffocate a small child or anyone with a tendency to be a “free thinker.” I ought to have given fair warning.

p. Last Saturday, Feb. 17, the University Center hosted an event that went relatively unnoticed by people at this institution, despite being decently publicized and well-attended by other nearby universities. Sam Sadler even mentioned it in one of his e-mails.

p. It was called the Tidewater Gospel Music Festival, and it was enough to dispel the sickening and rampant myth that the College is a valueless place for atheist sex-fiends looking to subvert the good will of upstanding Christian traditionalists whenever possible. Granted, I fall into that last group, but that’s beside the point.
I’ve had the good fortune to attend this concert two out of the past three years, and it only gets better with time.

Unfortunately, I’ve noticed that very few of our own students — less than 50, not including those who are members of Ebony Expressions — took advantage of the opportunity. Neither, of course, did Gene Nichol. In a desperate bid to woo back his Christian audience, Nichol paused during his busy day to express his disdain for the sex workers, but wouldn’t it have been a better career move to enjoy some gospel music? Instead of alienating his student body — you know, since many of us kind of enjoy sex — our president could have praised the talents of a group that certainly deserves as many compliments as we can muster.

p. The Gospel Music Festival ranks in the top three musical events I’ve heard on this campus. To give you an idea of what this means to me, those other two are The Roots and Wilco, internationally known acts who have visited William and Mary Hall — that is, Kaplan Arena — in the past two years (I’m not expecting My Chemical Romance to join their ranks anytime soon). Enormous gospel choirs from Virginia Commonwealth University, Hampton University and Virginia State University were all in attendance, each equipped with its own three-piece funk band. These were the kind of exemplary student musicians whose attention to dynamics and feel made even the whitest audience member feel like standing and clapping. Their incredible chops put the College’s indie rockers to shame.

p. VCU’s group, The Black Awakening, dressed in classy pink and brown outfits and ornamented their performance with the most soulful interpretative dance I’ve ever seen. How they managed to maintain four-part harmony and stay in sync with the band while pantomiming an earthquake is beyond me, but they did it so elegantly.

p. Of course, for readers of the Virginia Gazette, the icing on the cake is that this was a religious event: these performances were made to praise God. The Rev. Dr. William B. McClain offered sermons and anecdotes between the choirs. His book, “Songs of Zion,” was for sale in the lobby.

p. Perhaps the surly and misinformed “Last Word” writers may want to do some more research before they begin bashing our college. For every remotely controversial event, there are at least ten that even the most right-wing patrons would have trouble deeming “immoral.”

p. The assumption by some members of the Williamsburg community seems to be that it is the duty of a liberal arts institution to teach its students a specific moral code, and to restrict any number of worldviews in favor of one objectively correct lifestyle. Should this assumption take hold in our curriculum or in our extracurricular events, it will mean the death of a truly well-rounded education.

p. Gazette readers — assuming they dirty their hands with this filthy, youth-run Flat Hat — may find it interesting that our English department has books like “Lady Chatterley’s Lover” and “Ulysses” on its syllabi. These books are brimming with sexual intercourse and other deplorable smut and, what’s more, they’re acclaimed as world-class literature. Students can read them in the Wren Chapel whenever they’d like. Isn’t that appalling? Phone your congressman immediately.

p. With any luck, next year’s gospel festival will get far more attendance from students at this school and people who live around Williamsburg. It is an event that is at once entertaining, informative and welcoming; moreover, it appeases those who mistakenly believe that our school is headed for the gutter whenever it attempts to show its students what goes on out there in the “real world.” For the last song of the night, all of the choirs took to the stage and performed together with the joyful noise that characterizes soul music. As they worshipped, I looked around the U.C. Tidewater and noticed that there wasn’t a Christian symbol in sight. I never heard a complaint — but perhaps the Gazette will print one next week.

p. __Dan Piepenbring, a junior at the College, is a Staff Columnist. His columns appear every Friday.__

Downtown needs a New Town

0

A couple weeks ago, some friends and I went to New Town to see “Hannibal Rising” and, although I wholeheartedly suggest you don’t see that movie, I do recommend you check out New Town. While it does feel vaguely Hollywood-esque with the faux windows that line the streets, the place has a lot to offer on any night of the week.

p. But, New Town is a bus ride away for most of us, and what’s more, when Williamsburg had the opportunity to add vitality to its own downtown scene, it was bullied into a compromise by what amounted to an angry mob of voters. Now that it appears students are getting the right to vote, we’ll have the chance (the duty?) to elect officials who’d favor livening things up a little closer to home.

p. But let’s step back for a moment to see what makes New Town great. It’s built on the “new urbanist” concept that says people are happier living in neighborhoods which combine housing, shopping and business. This allows them to get to a variety of places on foot — no need to hop in the car. Evidently, planners were getting tired of the cookie-cutter subdivisions and strip malls that defined urban sprawl.

p. On a more practical level, New Town gave us options as soon as we arrived: the movie theater, the pool hall and many affordable restaurants, all within walking distance from one another. The big problem, though, is that New Town’s a bus ride away — it’s in James City County rather than in Williamsburg. Instead of integrating new buildings downtown, New Town was forced to spring forth fully formed, like some architectural Athena. In fact, ten minutes from my house back home, a similar development sprouted out of what had once been a soybean field. Its name? New Town. Funny, that.

p. It’s important to remember that, despite New Town’s appeal, it fails to add appreciably to student life because it’s far away. Developers should not be blamed because they’d just as happily build downtown, but their opportunities are being curtailed by Williamsburg regulations. I’d be selling city officials short, however, if I didn’t mention their approval of a New Town-ish plan near Yankee Candle, but again, it’s too far away.

p. It may surprise you to learn that the city’s recently approved plan includes measures to add vibrancy to the downtown scene by converting some vacant lots off Armistead Street and by the Law School to newer, denser housing developments. Right now, when all the tourists leave Merchant’s Square after dark to do whatever it is tourists do at night, it’s obvious most of the area shuts down, unlike New Town.

p. Even Mayor Zeidler agreed that the lower residential population downtown might have led touristy businesses to replace the more practical ones. More to the point, did you know there used to be a drug store in Merchant’s Square that sold things a student would actually want to buy? If Williamsburg had pursued this development plan to its fullest extent, there might be a different set of businesses downtown, like those that draw a lot of us to New Town on the weekends.

p. December’s city council meeting, however, made it seem that we’ll never know. A coalition of incensed citizens strong-armed the council into a compromise by booing opposing speakers, telling them to shut up and shouting at council members. In the end, the compromise plan was even more conservative than the one recommended by the planning department — the same planning department that finds four students living in the same house unacceptable.

p. In my Feb. 9 column, “Appreciate the College,” I referred to “the entertainment vacuum that is Williamsburg.” Well, maybe as registered voters, we can start to have a voice at those same city council meetings, a voice perhaps, that will someday make Williamsburg a much more exciting place to live.

p. __Andrew Peters, a sophomore at the College, is a Staff Columnist. His columns appear every Friday.__

Tribe now 8-9 in CAA: Men’s offense sputters against Drexel in first half with 17-40 deficit

0

For the second straight game, the Tribe’s offense sputtered in the first half, leaving the College with an insurmountable deficit and a 57-64 defeat at the hands of Drexel University (21-7, 12-5) Wednesday in Philadelphia. The loss drops the Tribe to 15-13 overall and 8-9 in the CAA. Senior Adam Payton finished with a game-high 20 points, but Drexel’s trio of double-digit scorers — Dominick Mejia (16 points), Scott Rodgers (14 points) and Frank Elegar (13 points) — led the Dragons to victory.

p. The Tribe struggled offensively without freshman David Schneider, who did not play due to a hip-pointer sustained last Wednesday against Drexel. It was déjà vu for the College in the first half, as they scored just 17 points with a 32 percent average, including a dreadful 1-14 from three-point range. The Tribe’s first half was eerily reminiscent of the College’s most recent outing at Fairfield, where they tallied only 13 first-half points.

p. Early in the first half, the Tribe stayed within reach of the Dragons. However, after junior Nathan Mann connected on a three-pointer with 8:27 remaining, Drexel outscored the College 24-6 en route to a commanding 40-17 halftime lead. Mejia, who was the Tribe’s major defensive focus, caught fire in the first half as he tallied 14 points, including four three-pointers. Mejia’s marksmanship reflected Drexel’s 60 percent shooting overall and 50 percent accuracy from the three-point range.

p. The second half proved very different for both teams, as the Tribe’s offense came alive and Drexel’s nearly disappeared. Drexel’s lead reached 25 when Chaz Crawford — who finished with seven points and 14 rebounds — hit two free throws. The College, however, did not quit as they chipped away at the 25-point deficit. A 15-4 run, which included three three-pointers, had the Tribe within 14 points with 6:09 left. Drexel answered with five quick points and left the College down 19 with 5:01 remaining. Though the Tribe responded with 14-2 run to end the game, Drexel still held on for the victory.

p. Payton’s 14 second-half points fueled the comeback effort, as did the College’s 51.7 percent shooting effort and five three-pointers. Drexel, however, controlled the backboards with a 37-27 rebounding advantage which led to 13 second-chance points.

p. The Tribe returns home to face the Old Dominion University Monarchs tomorrow at 2 p.m. Earlier this season, ODU defeated the College 59-44. The Tribe jumped out to a 17-point first half lead, but the Monarchs stormed back in the second half to win. ODU is riding a 10-game winning streak, which includes victories over the CAA’s top teams — Virginia Commonwealth University, Hofstra University and Drexel. The Monarchs have also won six straight games over the Tribe.

p. This contest marks the College’s final regular season game and its Senior Day celebration, as the Tribe will recognize Payton and fellow senior guard Adam Trumbower.

Gymnasts score high: Men defeat James Madison, Women have season-high score at Hearts Invite

0

As the gymnastics season gets into full swing, both the men’s and women’s programs are hitting their stride. Competing at home against James Madison University this past weekend, the Tribe men posted their best team score of the season with a 196.15-158.35 victory over the Dukes. The women matched their season-high total with a score of 186.225, but it was not enough to keep up with some of the best teams in the nation as the Tribe finished fifth at the Hearts Invite in Raleigh, N.C.

p. Besting their previous season-high score by almost six points, the men pulled their record above .500 for the first time this year, improving to 6-5 overall. They also took home the top three spots in all six events of the evening. Sophomore Sloan Crawford won the floor event with a score of 8.70, while fellow sophomore James Prim earned the top score in pommel horse, tying his career-high with an impressive 8.5.

p. Prim followed up the pommel horse performance with his second career best of the night, a mark of 9.15 on the rings. Freshman Josh Fried earned a career best of his own with a score of 8.2 on the vault, tying for first place in the event with Crawford. Strong efforts on the parallel bars from senior David Ridings, junior Andrew Hunt and freshman Derek Gygax propelled the College to a season-best 32.65 score in the event.

p. Senior Christina Padilla led the women to a strong showing at the Hearts Invite with a score of 9.675 on the vault and 9.550 on the bars. Junior Tricia Long performed well in all four of her events, as she paced the Tribe with scores of 9.575 on the beam and a season-best 9.625 mark on the floor event. Long’s total score of 37.775 led the Tribe in the all-around.

p. Freshman Ali Medeiros continued her strong rookie season as she posted the team’s second-best scores in both the vault and bars. Sophomore Becca Bacharach turned in a career-best score of 9.525 on the floor, and was second on the team with a 9.3 on the beam. Battling back from a preseason injury, senior Jess Randall posted a strong score of 9.275 on the beam.

p. The women’s fifth-place finish can be attributed to the strength of the Hearts Invite field. Eight-time NCAA champion University of Nebraska, currently ranked sixth in the nation, turned in a team score of 196.7 to win the Invite. 24th-ranked University of West Virginia came in second with a score of 194.7, while North Carolina State University finished third and George Washington University placed fourth, finishing with totals of194.6 and 191.175, respectively.

p. Next weekend the Tribe women travel to Columbia, Missouri for the Cat Classic. The College will be up against another strong field including Illinois State University, Ball State University, and host University of Missouri. The men return to action in two weeks as they host Penn State and the U.S. Naval Academy, both nationally-ranked teams, March 3. The meet will begin at 2 p.m. in Kaplan Arena.

Dodgeball game puts reputation on line

0

Every so often it becomes necessary for a man to take stock of his life. In order to avoid the trap of placidity, one must constantly be thinking, “What can I do to be a man of the highest order; a man of civility, honor and personal strength; a boon to his family, whose name will echo throughout the halls of history for the rest of eternity; a man whom men wish to be, women swoon over and that remembers to shower at least once every three days?”

p. Last weekend I reached just such a moral turning point. The decision: either to continue writing my column from the safe confines of my abode, or to put my money where my mouth is and take a step in the direction of athletic contest. I, being a journalist of the highest order, haven’t had the need to venture into “the field” for quite some time. In fact, my columnist friends and I often gather together in our smoking jackets, drinking bourbon and making snide remarks about the “staff writers” who actually have to deal with “the public.”

p. So it was with great trepidation, fearful of losing the perfect couch butt groove I had developed through grueling sessions of sitting and a fatal fear of change, that I decided to leave my apartment and face the unknown cruelties of competition. After all, Teddy Roosevelt once proclaimed, “It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. Unless, you know, the strong man really sucks it up. Like big time.”

p. Not quite as heartened as I might have been had I remembered more than the first half of the Roosevelt quote, I set out for the fabled competition — the intramural dodgeball tournament. Ever since I came to the fortress of knowledge that we call home, I had learned to revere the annual dodgeball tourney. As a freshman I would sit quietly, listening to the upperclassmen relate in hushed tones the public triumphs and humiliations of those few brave souls who dared place their reputations on the line. Hence, with a vain thirst for glory, despite the social pratfalls involved should we lose, The Flat Hat put together the single greatest dodgeball team ever … to be put together by The Flat Hat.

p. Josh Pinkerton, better known as The Flat Hat’s editor-in-chief, served as the ringleader of our motley group. He quickly proved himself to be as adept at hurling a ball screaming across the court as he is comfortable with page design — a veteran of many fearsome dodgeball engagements, Josh leaves dozens of mourning spouses and crying children in his wake every time he picks up a ball. Rounding out our crew, we had Jeff Dooley, Austin Wright, Brian Mahoney, Omar Hamdy (whose association with The Flat Hat is unsubstantiated at best), and myself.

p. Of course, the importance of winning in a contest such as this one is minimal. I hold Ol’ Teddy’s actual sentiment, that continuing effort in the face of adversity marks a victor no matter the actual outcome, extremely close to my heart. Sports aren’t about winning or losing – really the concept of athletics is all about the transcendent feelings of fellowship and well-being that one can’t help but feel when competing, which leads me to my final point …

p. We lost. In the very first round of the tournament. Even our intrepid fireball hucking leader couldn’t save us from that hardy, daunting freshman hall. And that’s all I want to say about that — I’ve got to go shower.

p. __Brad Clark is a Flat Hat columnist and a sore loser.__

Tribe tennis extends winning streak to five matches

0

The men’s tennis team continued its winning streak Tuesday when the Tribe earned its fifth straight victory after defeating another nationally-ranked team. Ranked 65th in the country, Brown University has yet to record a victory against the College with the final score of the match at 4-3.

p. Junior Alex Cojanu and freshman Keziel Juneau defeated the 15th-ranked doubles team in the country with a decisive 8-4 score. Cojanu and Juneau have now won three straight doubles play sets, having already contributed to the Tribe’s weekend victories over Longwood University and Norfolk State University.

p. Both Longwood and Norfolk State were shut out by the Tribe, sweeping every one of both the doubles and singles play sets. Unfortunately, Brown took the early lead Tuesday, earning the team doubles point after the remaining two College doubles teams had been dispatched without a win.

p. Senior Colin O’Brien tied up the score, easily defeating his opponent 6-3, 6-3 for his fifth straight singles win and 13th singles win for the season thus far. Sophomore Marwan Ramadan kept the Tribe’s momentum going with a 7-6(5), 7-5 victory in his singles sets. He was followed soon after by another College singles victory by Juneau, who won both of his sets via tiebreakers, 7-6(5), 7-6(0). This was Juneau’s 13th singles victory of the season, tying him with O’Brien and fellow freshman Richard Wardell for the current team lead in this statistic.

p. With only one more win in the singles play needed to clinch Tribe victory, sophomore Alex Zuck made sure to keep it away from Brown, fighting through three sets to take the overall victory for himself and his team with a 3-6, 6-2, 6-2 final score. This improved Zuck’s singles play winning streak to a career-record sixth straight win. Wardell struggled through three sets himself but was unable to come out with a win. Cojanu, ranked 49th in the nation, suffered an upset at the hands of his Brown opponent, ranked 82nd nationally, after putting up a fight through three full sets of singles play.

p. The College will host two home games Sunday at the McCormack-Nagelsen Tennis Center for some high-energy matches. The Tribe will go up against Boise State University, ranked 16th nationally., at 10:30 a.m. George Mason University, a CAA rival, will face the College at 4 p.m.

Oscar watch: who will win vs. who should win

0

Everyone knows the Academy is fickle — shunning indie movies and small comedies in favor of blow-you-away blockbusters and those films about which the studios muster the most Oscar buzz. That’s why I like the way Roger Ebert does his Oscar predictions; he makes two lists: predicted winners and preferred winners. We skeptics may bet one way, but that doesn’t mean we want those results, and so let’s get right down to my list — predicted and preferred.

p. Best Picture: I’m really happy “Little Miss Sunshine” nabbed a nomination, but chances are the Academy will send this sweet, awkward comedy home without Oscar gold. It has two big things working against it: It’s a comedy (they nab nominations but rarely win) and it’s been a long time since it was released in theaters (even though it found a strong second life on DVD). “The Queen” made a good showing among critics and Helen Mirren is a shoe-in for an acting award, but I have a feeling that this film’s slow box office take will work against it. “The Departed,” Martin Scorsese’s latest masterpiece, sports amazing performances from all involved, but Scorsese picked a bad year, pitting his film against forerunners “Letters from Iwo Jima” and “Babel.”

p. While “Letters from Iwo Jima” is, in my opinion, the more amazing movie, “Babel” has a similar appeal as last year’s winner “Crash.” “Babel” features a number of different intersecting story lines, each one carried by wonderful performances from the likes of Golden Globe nominee Brad Pitt and Oscar nominees Adriana Barraza and Rinko Kikuchi. Audiences see the film’s events as wholly plausible, adding tremendously to the film’s mass appeal. Granted, “Letters from Iwo Jima” is actually based on true events, but depressing war films tend to have a hard time winning Best Picture (see “Saving Private Ryan”), not to mention that it isn’t in English and no foreign language film has ever won the award.

**Predicted winner: “Babel”**
**Preferred winner: “Letters from Iwo Jima”**

p. Best Actor: This category is a mess this year. The best performance of the year came from Leonardo DiCaprio in “The Departed,” but he got his nomination votes split by doing an excellent job in “Blood Diamond” as well. Problem is, his role in “Blood Diamond” — the one for which he’s nominated — isn’t as spellbinding as his role as an undercover cop, as in Scorsese’s film. It therefore won’t win it for him regardless of whether he did a great job — which he did.

p. Will Smith played the most inspirational man in the world in “The Pursuit of Happyness,” but this movie was so over-advertised that people like myself got sick of him and it, which will hurt his chances. Ryan Gosling is a darkhorse candidate for his role as a drug addicted high school teacher in “Half Nelson.” He is amazing in the film, but it’s rare to pull a major acting award for a movie no one saw and that wasn’t nominated in a single other category.

p. Peter O’Toole is wonderful in “Venus” as an aging actor wooing his best friend’s great-niece, but, while pleasant, he falls short of the kind of breathtaking role that wins Oscars. All bets are on Forest Whitaker taking home the Academy trophy to go along with his Golden Globe for his captivating role as an evil yet charismatic dictator in “The Last King of Scotland.”

**Predicted winner: Forest Whitaker, “The Last King of Scotland”**
**Preferred winner: Leonardo DiCaprio, “Blood Diamond”**

p. Best Actress: This category is the least contested, as Helen Mirren is, by far, the favorite to take home the Oscar for her role as the ill-directed queen of England following the death of Princess Diana in “The Queen.” She deserves it. That’s not to say the category doesn’t have interesting candidates. Meryl Streep won’t win the award for “The Devil Wears Prada” (again, a comedy), though she yet again dazzles in her role as a self-centered fashion executive. This marks Streep’s 14th Academy Award nomination, and, as always, she completely deserves it.

p. Judi Dench plays a very creepy aging teacher working at a British prep school who builds her life around manipulating younger women into being her friends and soulmates. Dench’s serene portrayal of the obsessive character is chilling. It’s good to see Penelope Cruz receive a nomination for her role in the Spanish film “Volver” — even though I think the best foreign language performance of the year came from young Ivana Baquero in “Pan’s Labyrinth” — but winning an award without speaking English is practically impossible. Lastly, Kate Winslet grabs her fifth nomination and, probably, fifth loss with her role as a cheating wife in “Little Children.” She’s good, but of all her Oscar-nominated roles, this is the weakest.

**Predicted winner: Helen Mirren, “The Queen”**
**Preferred winner: Helen Mirren, “The Queen”**

p. Best Director: This one’s hard. First, let me eliminate the easy ones. There’s no reason beyond sentimentality for Paul Greengrass to be nominated for directing “United 93,” a film that only received one other minor nomination. The Academy seems to love “The Queen,” nominating it six times, but, based on his competition, director Stephen Frears shouldn’t be surprised that this isn’t the film’s strongest category. Clint Eastwood has been nominated for the third time in five years for directing “Letters from Iwo Jima,” the better of the director’s two amazing war films released this year. Martin Scorsese has been nominated for the eighth time for directing “The Departed,” a film pitting an undercover Boston cop against an Irish mafia mole. Eastwood won the award in 2004 for “Million Dollar Baby” and in 1992 for “Unforgiven.”

p. Scorsese, as we all know, has never won. Is this his year? In my opinion, no — but, I don’t think Eastwood will get it either. The Academy rarely splits the Best Director and Best Picture awards between two films. Although they did it last year, giving Ang Lee the award for “Brokeback Mountain,” while “Crash” won Best Picture, who wasn’t shocked by the split? My money is on Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu winning the award for “Babel,” giving the film the clean sweep many believe it deserves. A lot of hope Scorsese will finally win the directing award he has so long deserved and missed — at the very least so that everyone will stop bitching about it — but yet again, this just isn’t his year.

**Predicted winner: Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu, “Babel”**
**Preferred winner: Martin Scorsese, “The Departed”**

And of course, what would an Oscars list be without notable snubs? If I had it my way, “Pan’s Labyrinth” and “Children of Men” would be the top contenders for Best Picture, but “Children of Men” was released too sparsely and too late in the year to muster much buzz and “Pan’s Labyrinth” is in Spanish (only eight foreign language films have ever been nominated for the award, including this year’s “Letters from Iwo Jima”). Still, “Children of Men,” a horribly bleak view of the future, was the best film of the year and should have received nominations for Best Picture, Best Director for Alfonso Cuaron, Best Actor for Clive Owen and Best Supporting Actor for Michael Caine (the best per-formance of the year by anyone).

p. Likewise, “Pan’s Labyrinth,” a gruesome adult fairy tale set in World War II Spain, should have been nominated for Best Picture, Best Director for Guillermo del Toro and Best Actress for twelve-year-old Ivana Baquero. As I said before, Leonardo DiCaprio should have been nominated for his role in “The Departed” instead of “Blood Diamond,” but I didn’t mention that his costar Matt Damon could have easily been nominated for either “The Departed” or for his amazingly controlled performance as a CIA agent in “The Good Shepherd.” Mark Wahlberg may have received the nomination for Best Supporting Actor for “The Departed,” but Jack Nicholson is the one who really deserved it, playing a mob boss who is starting to lose it.

p. As for the other major categories:
**Best Supporting Actor: Eddie Murphy, “Dreamgirls”**
**Best Supporting Actress: Jennifer Hudson, “Dreamgirls”**
**Best Foreign Film: “Pan’s Labyrinth”**
**Best Documentary: “An Inconvenient Truth”**
**Best Animated Film: “Cars”**

p. And there you have it. The predictions are in. Tune in Sunday and see how I did. You’re free to bet with me, but don’t blame me when the Academy empties our wallets with another shocking finish.

HBO’s ‘Rome’ conquers with depth

0

Ah, Rome. Its influence upon Western civilization — nay, the entire world — is incalculable. Its customs and social institutions have played a pivotal role in shaping many modern societies. Certainly, the sheer number of proverbs referring to the city is just one indication of the far-reaching effects its time in history has had on humanity. And now, part of that history has been made into yet another riveting TV miniseries.

p. “Rome” is not just a serialized “Gladiator,” or even a dully narrated, drawn-out historical documentary. This series combines the best elements of both, as it manages to fuse an intensely dramatic and visually stunning story with a keen respect for the historical realities of the time.

p. Jointly produced by HBO and the BBC, this eponymously-titled period drama covers the turbulent transition from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire, just before the end of the first century BCE. Several perspectives are shown through interwoven plotlines of characters that hail from diverse sectors of society — noblemen, senators, soldiers, seedy criminals and more — many of whom eventually interact with and affect one another in some capacity despite their disparate social positions.

p. A good number of these stories will intrigue viewers (though some more than others), and the emotional landscapes traversed are as varied as the personalities covered. Any onlooker will become inescapably engrossed with the machinations of Atia of the Julii, played by Polly Walker (“Patriot Games”), the crafty niece of Julius Caesar who deftly manipulates friend and foe alike, even her children, to secure her own position in the upper echelons of power.

p. At the same time, Atia and her family’s fates become indelibly affected by the actions of two soldiers who would otherwise have no interaction with the Roman elite. This narrative technique makes for a complex and densely layered depiction of the intense political and social turmoil of the time.

p. Though the show covers many perspectives, the storyline focuses on the two aforementioned soldiers — the Lucius Vorenus and Titus Pullo, played by Kevin McKidd (“Kingdom of Heaven”) and Ray Stevenson (“King Arthur”), respectively — who, through either dumb luck or some otherwise unknown conspiring of the Fates, continually cross paths with more historically significant figures. Through these coincidental encounters, the two often manage to impact crucial political and military situations that are often beyond their comprehension.

p. At the show’s start, Vorenus is a tightly scrupled, respectable soldier, and his initially unwelcome companion Pullo pulls off the brutish, badass persona with an intense believability. Yet, as a testament to the show’s writing, these two, along with many other characters, change in many respects in response to the world-altering events of the time. Their realistic portrayal of two simple soldiers embroiled in an increasingly volatile political struggle serves as a steady grounding for the story.

p. The fickle fortunes of these characters — though at times requiring a momentary suspension of disbelief — and the impact it has on their development and relationships imbues the series with a touching human element. This, in effect, nicely balances the broad scope of the series. Not only are Vorenus and Pullo portrayed in a plausible light, but viewers are also given personal insights into every other character’s emotional involvement in the inevitable human drama of love, friendship and betrayal.

p. The first season covers the Gallic Wars of Gaius Julius Caesar, his political struggles with the Senate for power, and his eventual (this can’t be a spoiler, it’s history, right?) ascendancy to dictatorship over the weakening Roman Republic.

p. The second and final season, which premiered in January after a year’s hiatus, covers the aftermath of his assassination and the eventual rise of Rome’s first Emperor, the young son of Atia, Octavian, who is played by Max Pirkis (“Master and Commander”) in the first season and Simon Woods (“Pride and Prejudice”) in the second. As history buffs know, Octavian’s bitter power struggle with Marc Antony, depicted as a brutal but cunning commander by James Purefoy (“Vanity Fair”), will have powerful consequences for the fate of Rome.

p. In the most recent episode, Brutus, played by Tobias Menzies (“Casino Royale”), who is bent on restoring Rome to a republic, and his legions are destroyed in a crushing defeat at the Battle of Philippi. Before the battle, Antony and Octavian secretly make a temporary alliance to defeat this third force vying for Rome. Only in the next episode, which will skip a week in the schedule and premier Sunday, March 4 at 9 p.m., will we see if this alliance holds. Of course, you could always spoil the surprise by cracking open a book on ancient history.

p. Even those intimately familiar with Roman history will find themselves drawn to the series, identifying with the struggles, triumphs and sometimes confounding losses of the characters. There will certainly be at least one figure that viewers will find themselves rooting for — or against.