A precedent for equality

Written by


April 27, 2015

11:13 PM

While same-sex marriage rights have advanced in recent years, LGBTQ persons still face many forms of discrimination. According to a 2011 study from the Williams Institute, an LGBT think tank, 9.2 percent of openly gay, lesbian or bisexual people have lost a job due to their sexual orientation. Currently, the Student Assembly is considering a resolution that would voice its support to expand Williamsburg’s workforce non-discrimination policy to include sexual orientation and gender identification. Given that Virginia has no such law, Williamsburg could set a powerful precedent, emboldening other localities to pass non-discrimination ordinances and pressure the Virginia General Assembly to follow its example.

As students of the College of William and Mary, we should strive to make the world a safer, more accessible place for the most vulnerable among us. LGBTQ persons were subjected to more than a century of legalized discrimination through laws banning homosexual or aberrant sexual behavior. While those laws have been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, the lack of federal or state laws protecting LGBTQ persons from workplace discrimination have left them vulnerable. Nineteen states have laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. That leaves 31 states, including Virginia, where public and private employers, landlords and tenants can legally discriminate against gays and transgendered persons.

As students of the College of William and Mary, we should strive to make the world a safer, more accessible place for the most vulnerable among us.

As recently as last December, the Virginia House of Delegates proposed a law that would allow anyone with a state license, including business owners, lawyers, teachers or even doctors to refuse to serve LGBTQ persons. While its sponsor Delegate Robert G. Marshall (R-Prince William) denied that it was discriminatory, the proposal says that anyone with a state license could refuse to participate in any action that “would violate the religious or moral convictions of such person with respect to same-sex ‘marriage’ or homosexual behavior.” If the proposal does not discriminate, it absolutely provides cover to those who would. While the bill was thankfully killed, its existence indicates the struggle for LGBTQ rights is far from over.

It almost seems outdated in 2015 to have to argue against LGBTQ discrimination. For many of us, these arguments are so self-evident that hearing them has become annoying: Everyone deserves fair and equal treatment from employers, whatever their sexual orientation or gender identity.

The SA should unanimously and unambiguously support this resolution and lobby it aggressively to city council. Furthermore, the Student Assembly should introduce future resolutions, encouraging city council to pass non-discrimination ordinances in housing and public accommodations and make Williamsburg a more open and inclusive city.

Share This Article

Related News

Our duty to care: Tackling law school’s mental health
How flaws in registration can determine more than classes
Finding healthy hobbies in scenic College locations

About Author

  • Flat Hat Editorial Board

The Flat Hat Editorial Board is elected by The Flat Hat's section editors and executive staff. The staff editorial represents the opinion of The Flat Hat.

(1) Reader Comment

  1. Peter Quinn-Jacobs
    April 29, 2015 at 11:05 PM

    I am glad that the Flat Hat is taking an unequivocal stance on the issue. This was an effort initiated by the student group William and Larry, and I would have liked to see mention of that in the editorial.

Leave A Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *