Home Blog Page 175

Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow

0

Students climb the snow-covered tree outside of Barrett Hall while others play pick-up football. After the record-breaking snowfall, students spent time frolicking in the snow. “I traveled to Old Campus from Botetourt,” Nicholas Howard ’13 said. “We did the mighty duck formation across the Sunken Garden. I jumped in a pile of snow and just acted like a kid. I also wrestled in the snow with some friends. I think it was a pretty fun snow day.” While some students enjoyed the snow outdoors, others took the opportunity to relax inside. “For my snow day, I stayed inside in the warmth, caught up on some work, and spent the rest of the day spending quality time with my friends on my hall,” Danielle Liang ’13 said. Whether students spent time with friends outdoors or indoors, all agreed that the snow added a magical touch to campus. “Everything felt a little more like a Hogwarts adventure,” Peter Cabrera ’10 said.

Many students chose to spend their snow day sledding down hills around campus. While some used real sleds, others made makeshift sleds out of old pizza boxes and other items. “My friends and I improvised some sleds and went sledding on the road next to Yates,” Sarah Marcellin ’13 said. “I’m from Arizona so it was really exciting because it was my first snow day.” Others saw strange occurrences in the snow. “While trekking across colonial Williamsburg in an attempt to find food, I came across a cross-country skier and challenged him to a race,” Will Pence ’13 said. Some students chose to entertain themselves in creative ways. “I made snow balls on the fire escape and ambushed my friend while he was trying to study,” Michael Axline ’13 said.

Even though most local schools were closed on Feb. 1, the College remained open. In order to prepare for students traveling to and from classes, campus workers shoveled and poured salt on sidewalks. Snow plows cleared the roads on campus. While this snowfall was above average, wintery weather has not left the area yet. Freezing rain and snow are in the forecast later this week. This unusual weather makes many out of state students feel a little more at home with snow on campus. “I am from New England where winters are too long, so I get the best of both worlds here in Virginia,” Meghan Veno ’13 said. “God gave us snow to make winter a great thing instead of the bummer of a season it usually is after break,” Adam Clark ’10 said.

Foster looks beyond College for votes

0

Scott Foster ’10 wants to be your city councilman.

By “your,” he means everybody. Students, professors, retirees, long-term residents, city officials. Pretty much anyone who will listen.

“Williamsburg is a unique place,” Foster said. “And I’m getting acclimated to that political atmosphere.”

It’s an atmosphere that is dominated, at least on campus, by town-gown relations. One of Foster’s top priorities, if he were to be elected to the council, would be improving the at-times tenuous relationship between the city and the College of William and Mary.

“Having the College directly involved in helping solve city issues is a first step,” he said. “My presence on the council would give the city a high level of connectivity.”

The need to find and build a cooperative relationship between city residents and the College has become the mantra for city officials, politicians, college officials and student leaders in recent years. In a statement explaining her decision not to seek reelection, Mayor Jeanne Zeidler M.A. ’76 said that improving town-gown relations was one of the proudest accomplishments and greatest struggles of her time on the council.

“We’ve got to work on that neighborhood connection,” Foster said. “Reminding students that they are living in a neighborhood, with neighbors, and [that] it would be in their best interest to get to know [the neighbors] … Giving some direction there would be a great move for the College.”

According to Foster, one way the College can take the first step is by dedicating some of its student orientation resources into preparing students for living off campus. As students become more accustomed to living in single-family communities, some of the tension that has accompanied city debates over zoning and housing may subside.

Recently, the council approved an amended version of a controversial zoning ordinance that would allow no more than four unrelated individuals to share a housing unit if their home is approved by the zoning administrator, and issued a special use permit. The amended ordinance was the product of years of negotiations between city officials, the College and student leaders.

“I was really impressed how the city council [looked at] that three-to-four person issue through the special use permit system,” Foster said. “If that’s successful … if it’s working well, we’ll move forward. If not, we’ll have to come up with something different.”

As the campaign progresses, Foster said he expects to continue developing his contacts within the city to learn more about the issues that will be arising in the campaign.

“City employees have been a huge resource as far as information goes,” he said. “That we’ve reached out to those people early … that sets us apart from past student candidates.”

The last student to run for city council was former Student Assembly Sen. Matt Beato ’09. Although Foster said he has never met Beato, his campaign includes several students who participated in Beato’s failed run for a council seat in 2008.

Foster is quick to point out that the SA cannot take an official stance on his campaign, and that although he considers some members of the SA to be resources, his campaign staff is made up of city residents, non students and students from several different organizations.

“This campaign is made up from a diverse group of people. A lot of SA folks, as well as a lot of people from the student body and the community,” he said. “If you have a diverse and broad group of supporters, which is indicated by a broad group of [donors], your group grows.”

Foster’s campaign has already raised over $6,000 from over 40 donors. Former SA Secretary of Finance Andrew Blasi ’10 is running the campaign’s fundraising efforts.

Other staffers include Managing Director of Students for a Better Williamsburg Josh Karp ’11, SA Undersecretary of Public Affairs to Williamsburg Emily Gottschalk-Marconi ’11, SA Sen. Ross Gillingham ’10 and Student Conduct Council member Ayana Russell ’10. Foster says the campaign is being supported by government professor Clay Clemens ’80 and SA President Sara Rojas ’10, although strictly from an advisory capacity. Foster is serving as his own campaign manager.

“We’ve raised a lot of money in a short amount of time, and I think it’s from broad excitement,” Foster said.
The campaign will be holding a fundraiser with College alumni in Washington, D.C. in the near future, as well as hosting a barbecue scheduled for the weekend of Feb. 13.

According to Scott Foster for Williamsburg Communications Director Erik Houser ’10, the campaign will also be releasing merchandise in the coming weeks to increase Foster’s visibility on campus and around the city.

Win or lose, Foster said he will be staying in Williamsburg for at least the foreseeable future. He plans on applying to the Marshall-Wythe School of Law for the 2011-12 academic year.

Faculty Assembly may cut merit-free raises

0

A long-standing faculty retirement option, which grants large, merit-free raises to retiring College of William and Mary professors, is being reconsidered by the Faculty Assembly.

Currently, a retiring professor is given the option of an 8 percent merit-free raise in his or her penultimate
year of employment, followed by a 7 percent increase during his or her final year. Originally designed as an incentive for early retirement, the policy developed into an open option available to all professors, including those retiring later in their careers. However, some say that the option’s accessibility has made it ineffective.

The assembly also said the policy is no longer necessary since professors are able to reach individual raise
agreements with the deans of their departments.

Salary increases are financed by a set pool of funds determined by the Board of Visitors. College Provost
Michael Halleran said faculty members are concerned that before traditional merit-based salary increases can be given to non-retiring professors, money must be allocated for this policy. As a result, less money would be available for rewarding younger faculty.

Halleran added that the College’s recent financial concerns have “intensified interest” in this issue.

“This is not a direct consequence of budget cuts,” he said. “But if you have a lot of money, you don’t worry about the absolute best way to use it. When there’s less, you ask if this is the best way to use the resources we have.”

In December, the Faculty Assembly proposed a gradual phasing-out of the policy to allow time for individual financial adjustment. The proposal stipulates that a professor intending to retire by Jul. 1, 2020 must decide whether he or she would receive the salary increase by Dec. 31, 2015. This time frame provides for those who are counting on the increase for their immediate futures, while giving younger faculty members sufficient time to make the necessary changes to their retirement plans.

The plan states that retiring professors may still opt to receive their final raise merit-free after the current policy is phased out, but that any additional salary increase reached through individual negotiation must be
funded from outside the set salary pool.

The proposition has prompted many professors to express their own views. English and philosophy professor Terry Meyers is the head of the working group charged with gathering faculty opinions and reporting them to the assembly.

“I’ve received about 20 replies from faculty who wanted to express an opinion,” he said. “Virtually all of them are in favor of phasing [the policy] out.”

The main debate seems to concern the phase-out’s time-frame.

“Some of the younger faculty think that it should happen fairly quickly,” Meyers said. “Most of the older faculty … have planned their finances for retirement with the assumption that the bump-up would occur, so they see a rapid removal as being an abrupt change that they don’t have time to plan around.”

The group will submit a report by April, after considering faculty comments. Halleran said he believes this matter will not be resolved until the end of this academic school year at the earliest.

College begins composting efforts

0

Last week Dining Services at the College of William and Mary initiated a new program to compost food waste from the dining halls in an effort to increase sustainability efforts on campus.

The program is a result of the combined efforts of the College’s Committee on Sustainability and Aramark, the College’s dining vendor. The program will reduce waste by nearly one-third, alleviate the College’s contribution to landfills and decrease waste costs.

“Composting had always been seriously considered, but only now did the right infrastructure and regional connections appear to make the program a reality,” College Sustainability Fellow Phil Zapfel ’09 said.
For years the Student Environmental Action Coalition has advocated, with limited success, for the collection of biodegradable waste to send to a composting facility.

It was not until Aramark hired three sustainability student interns last fall that the program became a reality. Ian Fuller ’11, Christy Ottinger ’10 and Sarah Will ’11 worked with Commons Director Larry Smith and Zapfel to prioritize creating a campus-wide composting program, develop standardized procedures, and secure funding.

“Dining Services has made a real commitment this year by hiring us interns,” Ottinger said. “It’s our paid job to make sure this type of thing is happening, and we’re really devoting a lot of time and effort to making it happen.”

The students submitted a project proposal for funding from the student green fee in the fall of 2008 which helped COS purchase necessary food waste.

Under the new program, employees at the Commons, Sadler Center RFoC, the Marketplace and Miller Hall dining facilities will place organic waste created from food preparation into specially marked bins that are lined with biodegradable bags instead of regular trash bins. The Commons and Sadler Center will also collect post-consumer waste to compost.

Virginia’s Natural Organic Process Enterprises will haul the food waste to a composting facility in Waverly, Va. twice weekly from campus. The waste is sold to companies and farmers around the area as bags of compost for fertilizer.

“If we are able to divert all organic matter and recyclable matter, we will probably end up with 20 percent of what we were formerly sending to landfills,” Ottinger said. “This organic matter can be recycled back into the earth by being composted, keeping it out of landfills.”

Other environmental benefits include eliminating greenhouse gases, particularly methane. According to Zapfel, the program helps to complete a resource use cycle, as the compost will be used to make organic fertilizer.

This is not the first campus initiative to improve the College’s sustainability. Previous efforts included making several on-campus facilities trayless, including the Sadler Center and the Commons, and providing biodegradable take-out containers.

Political groups reflect on past year

0

Jon Stewart ’84, one of the College of William and Mary’s favorite political commentators, has grown increasingly frustrated with the current political situation. A column in The Washington Post noted the recent slew of zings on The Daily Show, Stewart’s television program, directed at President Barack Obama. On his Jan. 27 show, Stewart sounded off on the democratic leader for “flipping on the right-turn blinker” in an attempt to find the political center.

“What Obama leftist agenda are you running from? Guantanamo? Still open. Gays in the military closet? Still closed. Afghanistan troop surge,” Stewart said. “The only vaguely progressive action taken by this administration is an increase in government spending to stimulate us out of recession. That seems to be the sum total of our leftist swing.”

Back in November 2008, the youth vote certainly played a large part in propelling Obama toward the White House. According to a Flat Hat online survey conducted for the election, 68 percent of students supported Obama and 27 percent supported Sen. John McCain. Only 1.86 percent of the students surveyed were not registered to vote.

Since then, student political opinion at the College has seemed to change only slightly, and, according to some, political interest and involvement on both sides of the aisle has only increased.

Recently, the College’s Young Democrats Club followed their first meeting of the semester with a viewing of Obama’s first State of the Union address. President Ross Gillingham ’10 described the event as highly successful, with about 35 to 40 people in attendance and an enthusiastic and excited mood from the majority.

“Well, certainly there were some people concerned with what he would say after the Massachusetts election, but he really connected with the audience,” Gillingham said. “He spoke about college grants and about job creation, which is important to those of us graduating. A lot of people were joking at points when [Speaker of the House Nancy] Pelosi blanked a lot or [Vice President Joe] Biden seemed to clap at the wrong point. But people were generally rapt with attention when Obama spoke. The one concern was the length, particularly after a long day of classes and meetings, but people for the most part wanted to see the whole thing, to see [Gov. Bob McDonnell’s] response.”

A few students have become a little more tempered in their enthusiasm. Beau Wright ’11, a member of the Young Democrats, admits feeling some disappointment regarding the president’s performance since his election.

“It’s been hard seeing him in office, watching my expectations die a little,” Wright said. “But he governs the way I like, which is cautious. Still, I feel he hasn’t been forceful, he hasn’t pushed hard enough. I feel he’s wimped out a little.”

Some students did not expect immediate change in the White House, regardless of which candidate was elected.

“I didn’t think things would change entirely in Washington,” Gillingham said. “I just felt that [Obama] had the best chance to bring people together and pass meaningful legislation, and I still do.”

Obama’s tenure in office, coupled with the democratic majority in C0ongress, has helped to inspire activism in conservative students as well. College Republican’s Chairman Thomas Chappell ’11 says that the organization has been growing, and roughly 60 people attended the first meeting of this semester.

“We’re at an all-time high as far as enthusiasm and numbers,” Chappell said. “Especially after the McDonnell election [win] last semester, and the tea party rally that happened last spring.”

Chappell feels that over the past two years, students have become more comfortable openly identifying as politically conservative.

“We were very splintered,” he said. “But since then, more and more people are willing to speak.”

Despite growing numbers on the republican side, Wright said he and his fellow democrats are still firm believers in the Obama administration.

“I think most people still in the club rally behind our president,” Gillingham said. “Otherwise they would probably stop coming.”

Yet even with midterm elections coming up this year, some students have noticed that the political fervor of 2008 is not returning.

“Last November, it was cool to vote for Obama; it was the hip thing to do, so people got involved for the social aspect,” Wright said. “Midterm [elections] are definitely not as sexy.”

Omar Farid ’10, vice president of the Young Democrats, noted that for young voters, some of the appeal of politics has died out. Young Democrats’ numbers have dropped from 115 members last fall, but the club remains optimistic. He listed several of events that the organization has planned, from bringing guest speakers to attending conventions.

“I think a lot of us are frustrated because we expected too much,” Farid said. “The system is set up for people to collaborate slowly. But I think people will be as enthusiastic as ever come election time in 2012. I really had no morale left after the Massachusetts election, but a lot of members of the Young Democrats were riled up and applauding at our viewing of the State of the Union address.”

Not all the politically minded citizens share this optimism. In the same Jan. 27 episode, Daily Show correspondent Aasif Mandvi presented a new mascot for the Democratic Party to replace the Donkey: “Presenting the [Democratic National Committee] possum: it says, ‘you can’t hurt us anymore, because we’re already dead.’”

Old raise policy retired

0

Necessity is the mother of invention, the old adage advises. This week, professors young and old announced that the limited budget situation has led them to an agreement to change an old policy that affected the way raises were doled out. In the coming years, the fruits of their efforts — a revised and improved raise policy — will leave us in a better position to retain young professors.

Many years ago, the school implemented a narrow policy to encourage older professors to retire early by raising their salaries about 10 percent for each of their final two years of teaching, regardless of merit. Even with the raise, this was a good deal for the College of William and Mary, as retiring professors tended to be paid much more than their younger counterparts. In time, however, the narrow policy came to apply to all professors, regardless of whether or not they were actually retiring early.

The Faculty Assembly has recently come out against this policy, and it is now likely that it will be removed. Too much has changed since the initial implementation of these raises, and they now no longer serve their intended purposes. Furthermore, because all of this money comes from the same pool and budgets have tightened, these raises now stand in the way of rewarding the performance of younger professors. The raises will be phased out over the next decade so that no one who has been relying on them for retirement will be left in the cold.

While an adverse budgetary environment does bring pain, it also presents plenty of opportunity. Any institution as large and as old as the College will have its fair share of inefficiencies. Tinkering with the details of salaries and retirement bonuses may be sensitive, but doing so can lead the school in a positive direction. We should all keep our eyes out for such opportunities.

The trouble with roommates

0

The College of William and Mary prides itself on having a meticulous room selection process. We are told that a lot of time is spent tediously sorting, matching and anticipating amicable room assignments. From an outsider’s point of view, one might think Residence Life puts forth every effort to place incoming students with people who stand on somewhat common ground. From an insider’s view, it’s obvious that the opposite occurs. While there’s nothing wrong with expanding personal views, keeping an open mind, or slightly blending the political divide, having to live with someone who believes and stands for everything the other despises is a nightmarish and totally undesirable situation.

The College’s not-so-extensive room selection process serves to emphasize its desire for diversity. This inexplicable need for interaction causes a passive, independent thinker with ultra-liberal tendencies from the Washington, D.C. area to be placed in a 10-by-12 room with a cadet from the farms of Maryland with Sarah Palin ideals.

Honoring a student’s roommate preference is vital to creating a productive living situation. Unfortunately, the College’s basic and inadequate pairing system consists of four irrelevant questions, which leaves ResLife with virtually meaningless information and gives no insight on the true personalities and habits of the incoming students.

The continuation of the current room assignment process will ultimately lead to dissatisfied, emotionally distraught students forced to seek immediate recourse in the form of a room switch, a task that ResLife seems to be unable to handle. Similarly, academically challenged students — with more pressing priorities than to unwillingly accost reluctant peers — have few places to turn for solace. Unless a student can find someone else in their dorm to switch rooms with, their fate is in the hands of ResLife. Even if a room change is initiated, students are thrown back into the same muddled process that left him or her with an incompatible roommate in the first place.

Moreover, scheduling conflicts may be more troublesome than personality issues. The College’s quest for campus-wide unity catalyzes roommate wars. Monroe Scholars are immune to the contagiousness of diversity and are comfortably confined to one living space, just athletes are often preferentially roomed together. Meanwhile, the College insists on assimilating the most intrusive of roommates — those in ROTC — among other students, even though a cadet’s schedule can seem disruptive to those in the civilian population. Even if the College ignores personality and values in assigning roommates, at the very least they should consider that students on similar schedules will make more amicable roommates. A studious and well-disciplined student has the right not to be awakened at 5 a.m.

Commonalities should be honored rather than neglected, and special students should be partnered with those of a similar disposition. This is not to say that students who are different should be segregated, but merely that the College should assume that not all students will get along. A more intensive questionnaire inquiring about the kind of person one wishes to live with would produce happier students and ultimately reduce the amount of time spent on reorganizing dorm assignments.

E-mail Victoria Narine at vrnarine@wm.edu.

Obama’s call to correct climate ignores copious consumption

0

President Barack Obama uttered the magic words for casual environmentalists in last week’s State of the Union address: comprehensive climate change bill.

Nevermind that the fomenting Kerry-Boxer-Graham bill is sure to placate the coal and oil industry. Nevermind that the active ingredient will be an infinitely complex cap-and-trade carbon permit system. Nevermind that the hesitant political attitude of the Democratic Party will likely derail the compromise anyway. The real travesty is that Obama has continued the recent pattern of climate change-centered environmentalism at the expense of the broader environmental movement.

After over 25 years of ostracism and marginalization, environmentalists must have thought global warming to be the perfect political issue. It had the ability to give everyday citizens an apocalyptic vision of the consequences of their actions, and it seemingly provided a universal threat, regardless of social status or location.

As our knowledge has increased, however, we’ve come to realize that global warming would have vastly different effects on different societies over a considerable period of time. Not only would tropical third world countries be the first to experience droughts, desertification and extreme cyclonic events, but richer countries like the Netherlands are far better equipped to deal with the dangers of a rise in sea level, for example, than are countries like Bangladesh. This gives wealthier countries incentive to continue the economic and diplomatic status quo for just that little while longer, as evidenced by the Sino-American tensions over the non-binding Copenhagen Treaty.

Interestingly, there are hosts of other equally daunting environmental problems that are not nearly as divisive as global warming. In the last century, we’ve lost over 20 percent of our forested land. Potentially up to 50 percent of all current flora and fauna are threatened with extinction due to habitat destruction, overuse by humans and invasive species.

Our country’s daily total of 63,000 filled garbage trucks is more than our landfills can process, and our ecological footprint is already exceeding the global carrying capacity due to poor soil use. If this isn’t enough to animate a movement, I don’t know what is. While the global warming debate is exaggerated through controversies like the East Anglia University debacle, where private e-mails regarding inflation of global temperatures were revealed, there is even less debate on these other ailments.

These problems are all distinct from global warming, but their solutions can be linked to the adaptations to global warming. Mitigating tropical deforestation — through forest purchase credits or improvements in agriculture — not only preserves biodiversity but also lessens the release of carbon into the atmosphere.
Decreased garbage would both purify our groundwater reservoirs and reduce the greenhouse gases released via incineration. The phasing-out of our petroleum-based herbicide and pesticide industries would also improve the health of our soils and our own neural systems.In truth, these scenarios all relate to more sensible consumption patterns, especially for developed nations.

This type of environmentalism is often considered radical or idealistic. In comparison to the global warming agenda though, this environmentalism has gotten things done. Whether it is the Clean Air Act, the Basel Convention on waste disposal, the Endangered Species Act, or the much-praised Montreal Protocol on CFC elimination, environmentalism has been every bit as successful in prior pursuits as it has when limited to global warming.

Decades into the impressive global organization on climate change, all we have to show for it is the American-ignored Kyoto Protocol — many of its signatories have failed to meet their abatement assignments — and a non-binding Copenhagen treaty.

Despite the recent fad of global warming skepticism, climate change is a real threat to the way we conduct our lives. This, and other great environmental challenges, are best met by comprehensive environmentalism — an environmentalism that embraces more holistic lifestyle changes like decreased consumption and a heightened appreciation for biodiversity. These features of a well-rounded environmentalism would also reduce our contribution to global warming. What we can’t afford is an environmentalism discredited by climate change dithering.

Addressing our over-consumptive ways can remedy environmental issues more salient to the American public while still responding to the threats posed by global warming. We can kill two birds with one stone, or more appropriately, save two birds with one bird feeder.

E-mail Devin Braun at dcbraun@wm.edu.

Police Beat: January 25 to January 31

0

*Monday, Jan. 25* — An individual was arrested for alleged public drunkenness on the 1000 block of Richmond Rd.

*Tuesday, Jan. 26* — An individual was arrested for allegedly driving with a suspended license on the 100 block of Wichita Ln.
— An individual reported a burglary on the 1600 block of Richmond Rd.

*Thursday, Jan. 28* — An individual reported an alleged breaking and entering on the 2400 block of Westgate Circle.
— An individual was arrested for allegedly driving with a suspended license on the 1400 block of Richmond Rd.

*Friday, Jan. 29* — Two individuals were arrested for an alleged domestic disturbance on the 200 block of New Hope Rd.

*Sunday, Jan. 31* — An individual was arrested for allegedly driving with a suspended license on the 1400 block of Richmond Rd.
— An individual was arrested for alleged possession of marijuana on the 1400 block of Richmond Rd.

News in Brief: February 2

0

*General Assembly may privatize ABC stores*

The Virginia General Assembly is considering a bill that would privatize the state’s government-owned liquor stores.

SB 443, sponsored by Sen. Mark Obenshain (R-26), would close the Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control’s retail operations. The stores would be auctioned off to private businesses wishing to sell alcohol. State alcohol taxes would still apply.

The bill would also allow grocery stores and other businesses to apply for liquor licenses. The state currently operates 334 ABC stores, providing a revenue of $322 million in 2009 and over $1.5 billion over the last five years.

*New Town burger joint closes doors*

New Town restaurant Cheeburger Cheeburger closed Jan. 25 as its parent company prepared to file for bankruptcy.

The contents of the restaurant, including furnishings and decorations, were auctioned off, and leftover food was donated to charity.

Owner Steve Touchstone said that the restaurant’s closing was due to the overabundance of restaurants and dining venues in Williamsburg-area developments like New Town and High Street.

Cheeburger Cheeburger is one of five businesses in New Town, including Old Navy and zpizza, to have closed in the last six months.

*State senate strengthens seat belt law*

The Virginia State Senate approved a bill sponsored by Sen. Harry Blevins (R-14) Wednesday, making failure to wear a seatbelt a primary offense in Virginia. It is currently a secondary offense in the state.Violators will be subject to a $25 fine, which will go to the state Literary Fund. The bill passed 24-16 and now goes to the state House of Delegates for consideration.

*Senate passes bill relaxing absentee vote limits*

With a vote of 29-10, the Virginia State Senate passed a bill that would allow registered voters to cast absentee ballots in-person without having to provide an excuse or explanation.

However, the bill would still require voters to provide a reason for requesting an absentee ballot through the mail.

Current state law requires voters to choose one of 10 reasons for requesting a mailed absentee ballot. The bill now goes to the state House of Delegates for consideration.

If it were to pass, the bill would make Virginia the 33rd state to allow absentee voting without excuse.