Home Blog Page 236

Confusion Corner: Learning mechanics of the real world

0

It’s a Sunday afternoon when my three roommates and I decide, like thousands before us, that the most productive use of our time as college students is to go out and watch a mindless superhero movie. We are heading to see “X-Men Origins: Wolverine,” a movie I have already streamed online, yet still have the somewhat masochistic desire to subject myself to again.

We are in the William and Mary Hall lot, just about to get into the car, when two guys walking across the parking lot yell over, “Hey man, can you help us jump our car?” Turns out, they had been heading out to dinner with their girlfriends, only to find that their battery was dead. “Probably left on the lights,” they explained.

Despite some audible groans from the backseat — “Let’s just leave them,” someone suggests — I get in the car and pull it next to theirs. Worst case, we’d miss ‘Wolverine’ and our lives would probably be the better for it. But I was also oddly excited; I had never jumped a car, but surely that wouldn’t be a problem because it’s one of those things that people just do. You help a guy change a flat, and you help your neighbor change his oil. They are all car-related, and you do them now that you’re an adult. And that’s what adults do.

“You ever do this before?” he asks as I pull my car up.

“Nope,” I reply, not even feigning experience. He seems untroubled.

“Me neither.”

So what, we tell ourselves. So we don’t know exactly how cars work. How hard could it be to jump a car — we’re college students. So we blundered forward with blind conviction, temperaments both similar, I assume, to that of an overconfident bullfighter about to be skewered. It’s not until we are about to attach the cables when his friend speaks up. “Watch out. If you hook it up wrong, it could explode,” he tells us, earnestly. “It happened to my uncle once.” We freeze in our tracks and turn to face something so obviously outside our realm of experience. We just stare, barely fighting off the desire to slowly back away.

It’s exactly times like these that make you question why you thought you had the right to call yourself an adult. Because surely basic auto maintenance ought to be among the skills an actual adult possesses. Despite owning a selection of ties, of varying colors and widths; despite filing your taxes separately for the approximately $200 you earned as a camp counselor this summer; despite flossing on a near semi-regular basis, your previous claims to adulthood still seem entirely shallow — like using a Burger King crown as a claim to royalty.

But that college students could be caught so unaware seems to astound us the most. College is sold to you as the place where you prepare you for life, for the real world as high-school counselors always sternly stated. But the idea starts to form — despite having taken geology, philosophy, creative writing (surely a practical course-load if there ever were one) — that you couldn’t even survive the real world, much less anything with tangible responsibilities. You can recite the major themes in Alfred Tennyson’s “In Memoriam,” but can’t find a circuit breaker to save your life. You can derive an integral but you can’t drive a car with a manual transmission. And despite the debt that’s accruing every day — every hour, every second — in order to finance it, you’re suddenly faced with the possibility that your life has at some point taken a drastically wrong turn — as if you’ve steered your pastel-colored tricycle, streamers and all, straight onto the interstate.

“Um, you know what?” the first guy’s girlfriend interjects, breaking a pause so pregnant it may have had triplets. “I think I’m just going to call my dad and ask.” There’s an audible sigh of relief. Both girlfriends begin to dial.

We all try to multitask, simultaneously attaching the cables and tending to our bruised egos. So what if we have to call our parents every once in a while, we tell ourselves. It’s not like that means we’re not independent. We just need some help every now and again, that’s all. Come to think of it, that may be the most adult decision we can make. Or at least that’s what I’m telling myself.

__Kevin Mooney is a Confusion Corner columnist. He still hasn’t jumped a car, so if you see his car on the side of the road, pull over.__

Duality in Detroit

0

One sculpture displays the rough physicality of Detroit architecture. The next, the delicate balance and relationship between a person and their shadow. Together, these works showcase the work of new visiting art faculty members Naomi Falk and Jayson Lowery in “Michigan Left”, an exhibit at Andrews Gallery. Falk and Lowery created the exhibit together in order to begin their teaching careers at the College of William and Mary with a display of their personal work.

The exhibit features both past and present works from the artists and is open to the public until Sept. 25. An opening reception will be held in the gallery on Sept. 3 to discusst he unique styles of Falk and Lowery. Their methods may be individual, but their work is unified through the title of the exhibit.

“Jayson’s work is different than mine, but we collaborated on how it was going to be installed,” Falk said. “The exhibit flows better if you have it planned together.”

Both sculptors use a variety of different media to create their pieces.

“Both Jayson and I are new faculty here, so it’s an exciting opportunity to come work here and to introduce ourselves with a show,” Falk said.

For Falk, the pieces on display demonstrate the relationships between people and the differences between physical and psychological states. She uses mostly everyday objects, including ceramics, paper and twine in her art.

“Some of the work on display is about social dynamics and social relationships,” Falk said. “How much do we encompass? It tends to psychologically extend beyond our physical presence, which is the general concept of my work.”

Lowery’s pieces are samples of his work from the past five to six years. His sculptures are a combination of steel, cast iron, bronze and stone. He also does outdoor exhibits, so many of the materials he uses are sturdier and less fluid those Falk might use.

“Several of the pieces in this show feature carved marble left in the closed form that I got it from,” Lowery said. “Some are carved into round forms you see in casting; some are architectural blocks.”

Many of Lowery’s sculptures are designed to represent large architectural structures in smaller form, such as skyscrapers in downtown Detroit.

“The block pieces are intentionally meant to represent architecture in Michigan and cities, or a built environment,” Lowery said.

Falk also examines architectural work through her art, but, according to her statement on her website, naomijfalk.com, she investigates how everyday objects and the spaces one inhabits become our life architecture. Her use of more delicate objects juxtaposes with Lowery’s solid and structural materials, creating a more fluid exhibit.

The title of the exhibit, “Michigan Left,” is significant to the artists because both recently moved from Michigan to teach here at the College.

“The title is a play on words because we are both from the Detroit area,” Falk said. “It is a term that we use to tell people to make a U-turn in Michigan.”

The focus of Falk’s pieces is on social dynamics and relationships. Many of the pieces demonstrate metaphors for different relationships. The first piece in the exhibit is entitled “Converse,” which carries a double meaning.

“‘Converse’ can be speaking to each other or ‘converse’ like people opposing each other,” Falk said. “My work has a layering of meaning all the way from the titles of things to the materials I use.”

Two of Falk’s exhibits are connected in a broader sense. One, entitled “Shadows” displays four large photos with a story connecting to her exhibit entitled “Holding My Breath,” a display of 1,000 paper lunch bags, each containing one breath.

“The story is pretty dark, but I think people could relate to it on a number of levels, from being abused to wanting to speak and not being able to,” Falk said. “I talk about holding my breath in the story, and that’s what I’m doing in the [lunch bag] piece — so I can literally hold my breath in my hand.”

In addition to opening this exhibit, both Lowery and Falk have begun teaching 3-D foundations at the College. Falk also serves as the gallery coordinator and 3-D technician.

“The full-time art faculty invite people to exhibit here, I just coordinate most everything outside of that,” Falk said of his new position.

As both begin instructing their respective classes, the new exhibit will allow them to demonstrate their work to the community as well as to their new students.

“It is an opportunity to show a grouping collection of two integrated bodies of work,” Lowery said.

King of Pop lives on through campus tribute

0

On April 19, 2009, Kevin Dua ’09 led an effort to break the Guinness world record for the greatest number of people performing pop singer Michael Jackson’s “Thriller” dance.

But then, on June 25 — just over two months after the record was broken on the College of William and Mary campus — the King of Pop died.

“It was a very surreal moment,” Dua told The Flat Hat on June 26. “It’s still hard for me to know or understand how I’m supposed to feel.”

Two hundred and forty-two students, faculty and area residents participated in the record-breaking dance. The group smashed the previous record of 147 people dancing to Jackson’s 1984 hit.

Dua claims he has been imitating Jackson his entire life, and although Dua never attended a concert or met the singer, he said Jackson was important to him.

“It’s strange that this person, who was so distant, was essentially a big part of my life,” Dua said.

Unfortunately for Dua and the other dance participants, it’s possible the record could be broken soon. Almost immediately after Jackson’s death, various groups announced plans to break the newly made record — and it appears that a group in Mexico may just do so tomorrow, the date of Jackson’s funeral and what would have been the King of Pop’s 51st birthday.

The Associated Press has reported that over 10,000 people have signed up to break the “Thriller” dance record in Mexico City tomorrow.

Nevertheless, Dua said, the College’s record-breaking dance will remain special.

“Every time this record is broken, a lot of people will look upon it as a tribute, paying homage to Michael Jackson,” he said. “Someone pointed out to me that we can take credit for the fact that we broke the record; we were the last group to hold the title while he was alive.”

History professor Kimberly Phillips, an expert in black cultural and social history, said like Dua, she too had a longtime connection to the pop singer.

“I grew up with him, and then my children grew up with him,” she said. “When the news came out yesterday, both of my children stopped. They had no idea who Farrah Fawcett was … they both stopped to hear about Michael Jackson.”

Fawcett, an ’70s actress best known for her roles as one of the original Charlie’s Angels, died the same day at the age of 62.

Although known for his wildly popular music in the 1970s and 1980s, Jackson was known more recently for various controversies, including allegations of drug use and child abuse.

“What happened to him in the early part of this century, it was so tragic, it was so different from how he had represented himself and how we had perceived him for nearly three decades,” Phillips said. “That, I think, was so counter to how he had been. That’s why people paid attention. I think people were saddened by it, perplexed by it.”

Despite the negative press, Jackson remained popular with his fans. Phillips attributed his versatility to a “chameleon-like” ability to adapt and present himself in a new light.

“He was like a phoenix; he would rise up out of the ashes, and he literally would look different,” she said. “And we were fascinated by that.”

Phillips noted that, while it is too early to know how history will judge the King of Pop, his contributions to music marked a greater change in race relations in America.

“He had been such a catalyst in American music,” she said. “I think what people should remember him for is this remarkable shift in American popular culture. People should remember that he became popular at a moment when American racial politics were shifting, and shifting in ways we weren’t quite sure how it would happen.

“He was more than this crossover figure,” Phillips continued. “He was somebody that people of all races could embrace. He was a child, and he represented the best of what America could be and how we could sound. He gave us permission to think beyond our own prejudices and concerns and just glory in his ability.”

Police Beat: August 18 – August 25

0

Sunday, Aug. 23 — An individual reported a stolen bike on the 200 block of Jamestown Rd. The estimated value is $200.

Monday, Aug. 24 — The College of William and Mary Bookstore reported the receipt of a $100 counterfeit bill.

— An individual reported a stolen bike on the 200 block of Ukrop Way. The estimated value is $350.

Beyond the Burg: Yale Press cautious about controversial cartoon

0

The Yale University Press has opted not to republish cartoons of Muhammad in an upcoming book, according to the Yale Daily News.

The book, entitled “The Cartoons that Shook the World,” by Brandeis University professor Jytte Klausen, is an account of the reaction to a Danish newspaper’s decision to publish 12 caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad in 2005. The book is still slated to be published, but it will not include the controversial images.
The most violence occurred in 2005, but there have been incidents related to the republication of the images as recently as June of last year. Altogether, 200 people have been killed in violence related to disputes over the cartoons.

“The homework for us here this summer was to ask people in positions who could give expert counsel whether there is still an appreciable chance of violence from publishing the cartoons,” Yale University Vice President and Secretary Linda Lorimer said.

The director of the Yale Press alerted Lorimer of the book’s upcoming publication in June. The university then consulted experts, including counterterrorism officials in the United States and the United Kingdom to American and Muslim diplomats.

These experts told Yale officials that they had serious concerns regarding the violence that may occur if these images were republished, according to Yale President Richard Levin.

The book’s author does not share the same sentiment. She feels that her book should not be cause for alarm.

“I have a reputation as a fair and sympathetic observer,” Klausen said. “There’s absolutely nothing anti-Muslim about my book.”

She said her intention was to show the entire page from the newspaper, which most people have not seen. She added that the experts were not shown the cartoons in the context of her book.

Klausen has chosen to stay with Yale Press, even though she wishes it had made a different decision. She said she understands Yale’s position and adds that she has experienced an enthusiastic reception from the editors.

“The Cartoons that Shook the World” will be published in November 2009.

Students showcase a strong effort on SHOW Day

0

Two-hundred and twenty College of William and Mary students participated in the Office of Community Engagement and Scholarship’s annual Students Helping Out Williamsburg Day last Tuesday. This year’s SHOW Day saw a 10-percent increase in participants from last year.

SHOW Day is an opportunity for new students at the College to volunteer for community agencies and nonprofit organizations.

“I’m really excited to be here and be a part of SHOW Day,” said Aaron Barksdale ’13, who helped with a bingo game at the Blayton Building. “When I heard about the program, I was very enthusiastic about participating.”

Students painted houses and did yard work for Housing Partnerships, Inc., cleaned barns and pastures for DreamCatchers, Inc., set up classrooms at the National Head Start Association, visited residents of the Blayton Building, posted sustainability tips around campus for the Committee on Sustainability and gleaned food from local farms to be used by Campus Kitchen.

News in Brief: August 28

0

*Professors discuss the Latin American experience*

Associate professors Silvia Tandeciarz and Jennifer Bickham Mendez discussed the growth of the Hispanic population in America on the Virginia public radio show “With Good Reason” last weekend. Tandeciarz, a professor of modern languages, and Mendez, a professor of sociology, addressed the challenges that Hispanics face integrating into American culture, as well as Hispanic influence in American society.

The segment, entitled “Latino in America,” will be re-broadcast Thursday. Broadcast times for the segment can be found online at the “With Good Reason” website.

*William and Mary researchers track bird*

Hope, a whimbrel currently being tracked by the Center for Conservation Biology, run by the College of William and Mary and Virginia Commonwealth University, was recently sighted around the U.S. Virgin Islands. Hope flew a remarkable 3,500 miles across the Hudson Bay and Canada before reaching St. Croix in the Caribbean Aug. 14.

The researchers working with the center are tracking several whimbrels, which are known to have particularly unpredictable patterns of migration. Satellite tracking of whimbrels has shed light on the population dynamics and natural history of the species.

The Center for Conservation Biology is jointly run by the College of William and Mary and Virginia Commonwealth University.

The sound and the fury

0

The Williamsburg Planning Commission is set to review the city council’s proposed changes to the three-person rule in a series of meetings next month, during which public comment will be invited. Since students almost never attend such meetings, we know what public comment will really mean in this case: It is a safe bet that the commission will hear nearly unanimous calls to change this already bad proposal into something even worse — for students at least. While it remains to be seen how the commission will respond to these calls, it is now clear that if students hope to achieve any real progress in this area, they need to dramatically increase their involvement in this process and their presence in local politics in general.

Only at first does the city’s current proposal look like progress. Yes, it would create the possibility that four unrelated people could live legally together in a house in Williamsburg. But the cost for this change will likely be too high: To obtain this permit, landlords will be forced to go through an overly difficult and costly application process, and to live in a four-person house, residents would have to give their names to the city and submit to possibly invasive inspections at only a day’s notice.

More importantly, because of restrictions in what type of house is eligible for the new kind of permit, only a small number of large houses would be affected by the change. If this proposal were to become law, the vast majority of student renters and their neighbors would experience no change, essentially putting us back at square one after a year of wrangling.

No one should be happy with this outcome. Cash-strapped student renters will continue to evade an unenforceable law by not signing a lease, forgoing both the protections and responsibilities of such a document. Their neighbors will continue to have little recourse when they suspect students are living illegally, and renting will remain just as popular in residential areas. Then this issue will resurface in a year or two, restarting this process all over again.

Of course, the Planning Commission will likely change the proposal, as they should. Maybe they will address the actual problem with the three-person rule by creating occupancy limits based on how many people per house can be safely and comfortably accommodated within it. And they may even write in long-term plans to create separate zoned high- and low-density areas that will allow for the mutual existence of single-family neighborhoods and student-friendly housing. In the meantime, students should be allowed to live where they can live comfortably. Expecting them to maintain high standards as neighbors should suffice, and if it does not, the city has strong noise and nuisance ordinances that can be put into play.

But we are not holding our breath. Something even less responsive to student and resident needs than what we already have on hand will likely emerge from this.

So what can be done? Students need to become much more active in this process both now and in the future. A strong student showing at these Planning Commission meetings will only be a start. Turning out to vote in the city council elections this spring is absolutely essential. Only when we form a unified and active voting bloc can we expect any responsiveness from elected representatives responsible to their constituents.

Embrace Creigh, with arms wide open

0

Back in 2005, Democratic Sen. Creigh Deeds faced off against Republican Del. Bob McDonnell for Virginia’s Attorney General’s office. He lost by 323 out of nearly two million votes cast. This year, Deeds and McDonnell are back, competing for the governor’s chair about to be vacated by Democratic Gov. Tim Kaine.

The latest polls may show McDonnell ahead, but there’s no doubt in my mind: this year, it’s all about Deeds.
Deeds is from Bath County, a rural area in western Virginia traversed by the Appalachian Mountains, home to the Homestead Resort and some of the most breathtaking natural beauty in Virginia. After working his way through Concord College and Wake Forest School of Law, Deeds returned home to serve as Commonwealth’s Attorney in Bath. He was elected to the House of Delegates in 1991, the Virginia State Senate in 2001 and has served with distinction in both bodies. This year’s election, however, will be the most consequential — not just for the Deeds, but for Virginia and the nation.

For eight years, Virginia has had excellent leadership under Democratic governors Mark Warner and Kaine. Both believed, and rightly so, that you can be a democrat and pro-business. Since then, Virginia has won plaudits, being named “the best managed state” by Governing Magazine and “the best state to do business” by Forbes. We have one of the best public school systems in the country and the highest possible bond rating, an evaluation of a state’s financial and administrative stature. Virginia’s Democratic governors have shown themselves to be tough, effective leaders committed to moving Virginia forward.

Deeds has been there for it all. But looking beyond the success of the past eight years, Deeds has innovative and interesting ideas for the next four. He has proposed tax credits for businesses that create jobs, wants to invest more in alternative energy, favors expanding health care to all Virginians, and is committed to making sure tax dollars stretch as far as possible. So what have we got here?

A rural democrat committed to the policies and ideas of Warner and Kaine that have proven to be successful. Why on earth would we elect anybody else?

Well, some think Bob McDonnell is the way to go. After serving in the House of Delegates, McDonnell served three years as Virginia’s Attorney General, resigning this past February to run for governor full time. McDonnell is a conservative republican from Virginia Beach. He endorses more offshore oil drilling and big coal, supports vouchers for private schools, has repeatedly voted to constrain a woman’s right to choose and — when it comes to jobs — opposed accepting $125 million in federal funds to help unemployed Virginians. This is all on the record; there’s no equivocating. He’s proposed laudable schemes for creating jobs over the next four years, but his record doesn’t suggest that he’ll actually carry through with them.
This election also has national implications. Political pundits and commentators are following this race closely. Whichever way it goes, this election will be viewed as a referendum on President Barack Obama. Virginia went for Obama in the 2008 election — if the state elects a Republican, public opinion could swing against Obama and hamper his reform efforts.

Both candidates are good men with Virginia’s best interest at heart, but only Deeds has the vision and proven leadership to get the job done right.

E-mail Beau Wright at fbwright@wm.edu.

Students should think long term before arguing with residents

0

Students should not expect an outcome in their favor regarding the ongoing debate in Williamsburg over student life off campus, namely the three person rule and the new policy on noise levels. The reality of the situation is that the laws and restrictions imposed on residents are written and enforced by elected officials of the City of Williamsburg.

It is logical to assume that these elected officials are most likely to shape these laws with the interests of their constituents in mind. Even though both residents and students at the College of William and Mary comprise the local constituency, Williamsburg residents have much more influence on town politics.
This is not an issue of numbers. Persons age 18 to 24 account for 46 percent of the population of Williamsburg, and most of these are students at the College. If numbers were the only deciding factor in political pull, we would be the most important voting bloc, capable of shaping city policy much more to our liking.

We also cannot blame discriminatory policies that discourage student voting. Although these have previously existed, researchers Andrew Pate and Jesse Richman, authors of “College Students and Voting,” find that “updated data for 2006 shows that there are currently no states with effective legal barriers to college town registration and voting. All state registration barriers for college-town voting were removed in the period between 2000 and 2006. During the period from 2000 to 2006, twenty one states revised their statutes or interpretations to remove barriers to college-town voting.”

If students have the numerical strength to greatly affect city policies and there are no legal barriers in our way, why hasn’t it happened?

For one, our age group has never been one known for high voter turnout. The 2004 election had the highest voter turnout percentage since 1972, when the voting age was first lowered to 18. And even though turnout went up again last year it was still short of the 60 percent and over turnout rates achieved prior to lowering the voting age in the 1960s. And even though voter participation seems to be on the rise, the 18 to 24 demographic still lags behind.

In local politics, our demographic is even less involved. A study by the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement found that “only 8% of the [local] party chairs identified young people as the most important demographic for the long-term success of their party, compared to 21% who named senior citizens.”

With this information in mind, many people would blame the apathy of our age group and urge multiple get-out-the-vote campaigns. This, however, is not my view on the situation. I believe the major reason we do not participate in politics at the local level is the fact that real local political participation requires a long term, vested interest and understanding of your community. As much as you may hear people say that college is your new home this is simply not the case.

For many students college, is a temporary, transitory period. Most of us will move on in a few years, a fact that prevents us from having the same connection to Williamsburg as residents who have lived here longer than we’ve been alive. This makes us a less invested and less committed constituency, greatly diminishing our political efficacy.

It is the nature of the democratic system to favor those with stronger opinions and interests. The residents of Williamsburg will continue to be the driving force in the crafting and implementation of city policies simply because they care more.

We will only have to abide by Williamsburg law for a few years, while they may well be affected by them for the rest of lives. This, of course, is not to say that students cannot forge a compromise on some issues but we must not delude ourselves into thinking we are on equal footing Williamsburg residents.

E-mail Ed Innace at einnace@wm.edu.