Home Blog Page 254

Free speech at College under fire? Not Really.

0

The Jan. 27 issue of The Flat Hat reported that as of Dec. 1, 2008, the College of William and Mary has been officially designated a “red light school” by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. William Creeley, director of legal and public advocacy for the organization, defines a red light school as a university with at least one policy that explicitly restricts freedom of speech. The College’s offense? Requiring that posters and signs meet “acceptable community standards.” Creeley condemns this clause as promoting self-censorship. According to FIRE, students subsequently choose not to speak, thus creating a “chilling effect” that restricts First Amendment rights.

Call me hopelessly elitist, but I feel certain that students of the College can adequately define acceptable community standards. By no means do I support censorship, but I do value an open and inclusive academic environment. Do students at the College have the right to be bigoted, racist, homophobic or just plain obnoxious? Of course, but I don’t want to read about it on the way to class. In addition, the Student Handbook clearly outlines the right to distribute materials outside of College facilities, if being polite proves too difficult.

Besides simply coming across as petty, FIRE’s rating loses credibility when compared to the plight of universities overall. Two-thirds of the schools’ reviews were designated red-light schools, and 98 percent were deemed red- or yellow-light institutions. In response to this information, College President Taylor Reveley finally revealed a long-dormant sense of humor, deeming the College “in good company” with its co-offenders — at the top of the list are Princeton University, Cornell University, Brown University, Harvard University and the University of Virginia.

In fact, FIRE seems more like a vehicle for unnecessarily dragging out social biases and prejudices than a constructive organization. Several of its past cases are questionable at best. For example, in 2000 FIRE rose to the defense of Tufts University’s Christian Fellowship, which refused to promote a homosexual individual to a leadership role, as the organization believed her sexual orientation violated the teachings of the Bible. To be honest, that just pissed me off. In my opinion, while the organization would be within its rights to espouse Bible teachings against homosexuality, open discrimination, in violation of university policy, would be rightly subject to judicial action.

In another, more recent instance, FIRE defended the Yale University chapter of Zeta Psi fraternity after it published a photo with brothers holding a sign that read “We love Yale sluts” in front of the university’s Women’s Center; the Women’s Center threatened to press charges against the group. FIRE responded with an ignorant editorial, complaining that “elementary schools might legitimately punish their young charges when they ‘use bad words’ on school grounds, but liberal universities should not.” Apparently sexual harassment and downright stupidity should feel right at home in one of the world’s most prestigious schools.

Of course, students at the College can identify incidents of the past few years in which the First Amendment probably was violated or at least severely warped. However, we’ve learned that bitching about the Sex Workers’ Art Show or Gene Nichol did not change any decision and that the College, as a public school desperately in need of funding, cannot operate as an isolated entity.

I think Reveley would be right to disregard FIRE’s designation and to continue evaluating the College’s free speech policies without the unwelcome input of a self-righteous organization. Yes, there may be room for improvement, but I don’t think it lies in one sentence (I checked) about posters. Drop that one in the recycling and move on.

Alexa McClanahan is a sophomore at the College.

Confusion Corner: Liberal arts majors need not apply for jobs

0

If you are a pre-med student who has already been accepted to medical school, then stop reading this article. This article is not for you. Similarly, big-shot-accountant-in-the-making, secure in your offer for next year, which included a signing bonus — much to the surprise of yours truly, who thought that only people with names like Derek Jeter got “signing bonuses” — I’m going to have to ask you, kindly yet firmly, to put the paper down and back away. The same goes for computer science majors, business students and all of you who decided to forgo two to four years of interesting classes in order to get a job devoid of the workplace dangers of misspelled nameplates, awkwardly fitting khaki uniforms and oil burns from the fryer.

If, on the other hand, you are a jobless English student, let me say, “Welcome.” To the wingtipped government student, unfairly unemployed women’s studies major and disinterested philosopher, I applaud your audacity. And, of course, let me not forget those who went the route of interdisciplinary studies: Who knew that the market would dry up for students majoring in Byzantine Pornography?

I welcome you, not to celebrate the originality and free spirit that drove us to our unique and interesting fields of study, but so that, when you stop reading this article and return to slamming your head in the door, you’ll know you’re not alone.

The reason for our collective frustration (not to mention head trauma)? Well, it seems the U.S. economy has put up a sign in its front window that reads “Liberal Arts Majors Need Not Apply.”

For many, this is no surprise. For many, studying English, history or music would make as much sense as studying to be a cooper or blacksmith in the current economy (much, much less sense in Williamsburg, actually — the only city in the country where coopers still outnumber lawyers). Those are the people with no sympathy for the plight of the liberal arts major, which is exactly why I told them three paragraphs ago to stop reading this article. I meant it.

For the rest of us — and hopefully all of us who are still reading — this fact has caught us with our figurative dungarees at our ankles. I like to think that this has something to do with a certain belief in the American Dream. Somewhere inside of us there’s a voice promising that, so long as we employ a tireless work ethic, we’ll rise to the pinnacle of our field. But as we enter the homestretch, laboring on our theses, due in three months — tentatively titled: “McPygmy: Globalization and the Sexual Practices of the Katawabi Albinos” — we see Johnny Baseball Cap instead of an image of success, one who touts an attendance record akin to a batting average and who has been known to wear the same vomit-soiled shirt for several unwashed weeks at a time. We notice him because, due to a surprisingly keen decision regarding his major made just a few years earlier, he has laid claim to the aforementioned signing bonus. One shudders at the thought of his future casual Fridays. (Is that a fair, or even slightly true, representation? No, of course not. I love baseball hats.)

The above observations, in my case, raise a series of questions — betraying, of course, a fundamental curiosity that fueled this descent into liberal arts marginality: Is health care really important? What countries have a more complete social welfare system than the United States and would freely accept a student who spent the better part of the last year writing an 80-page paper exploring the implications of differing fried chicken chains in the American South? Can one collect unemployment without having ever been fully employed?

Of course, when I stop to think about what my liberal arts major has meant to me, I’m reminded of the naive young person I was when I arrived at the College of William and Mary. I think of the enormous strides that have been made in the name of the old cliche: My mind has been strengthened as I went about “learning to think.” Most of all, I think of my courses and friends. I know, job or no job, that I am a deeper, better and more finely attuned person due to the trials I have undergone throughout my undergraduate years.
Who am I kidding? I guess I could teach … Fuck it. I’m moving to Sweden.

__Brad Clark is a Confusion Corner columnist. He wants to warn the ER of incoming students with head trauma.__

Scrub into comedy with Bill Lawerence

0

When asked to name an alumnus who is both famous and hilarious, almost any student at the College of William and Mary would jump to say Jon Stewart ’84. This, however, is not the only applicable answer. Who else could be as funny and as well-known an alumnus as “The Daily Show” frontman, himself? Well, come Thursday, Bill Lawrence ’90, the creator, producer, director and writer of the hit TV series “Scrubs,” will be here to answer that question.

Alma Mater Productions and The Virginia Informer are co-sponsoring “An Evening with Bill Lawrence” this Thursday.

Lawrence, best known for his work with “Scrubs” since its premiere in 2001, also produced the popular television show “Spin City” from 1996 to 2002.

The event sprung from an interview written by Steven Nelson ’10 with Bill Lawrence that appeared in the Informer last year.

“Once we determined he had an expressed interest in coming to William and Mary, we approached AMP for their assistance in putting the event together, and they were glad to do so,” Andrew Blasi ’09, editor in chief of the Informer, said.

AMP and the Informer have worked with both the Earl Gregg Swem Development Staff and various alumni to bring Lawrence to campus since the spring of 2008.

The event will begin with a lecture from Lawrence about both his time at the College and his career experiences and will be followed by a question-and-answer session. Lawrence will provide commentary on scenes from the most recent season of “Scrubs.”

A film competition is being held in conjunction with Lawrence’s visit. AMP received more than 20 film submissions for the contest. Students have entered short films which AMP judged based on elements such as production values, narrative, cinematography and creativity, according to Giuliana Morales ’10. She is one of many AMP members involved in planning Lawrence’s visit and is one of the heads of the film competition. Morales explained that the panel of judges for the competition consisted of both Swem Media Center and AMP representatives. Lawrence will announce the winner at the end of Thursday’s event and then show the winning film. The prize for winners of the film competition includes $100 and a signed copy of the recent “Scrubs” season.

Two of the main “Scrubs” characters, J.D. and Turk, are alumni of the College in the show. “I am a big fan of his work, and I like the fact that he made his characters in ‘Scrubs’ alumni of William and Mary,” Lauren Vick ’12, a self-described “Scrubs” enthusiast who plans to attend the event, said.
Members of both AMP and the Informer are expecting the event to generate a lot of student interest and took the extra steps to prepare for a crowd.

“AMP is expecting to pack the Sadler Center Commonwealth Auditorium,” said Morales. “We have prepared for a large turn out by reserving an overflow room.”

“An Evening with Bill Lawrence” will be held at 7 p.m. in the Commonwealth of the Sadler Center on Thursday. The event is free.

Behind Closed Doors: Speak your mind about sexual fantasies

0

Welcome back to campus, nymphs and satyrs. I hope this winter Tuesday finds you well, and sexually satisfied. I have to admit, I missed writing the column over winter break. Sexual experiences don’t stop just because you lose your loyal readers. With that in mind, I’d like to share a story from New Year’s Eve that I think has implications for many of us in our sexual lives.

This Dec. 31, I found myself at a bar with a group of my girlfriends. Somewhere in the course of the night, a close friend — let’s call her Alisa — approached my boyfriend about having a threesome. Taken aback, flattered and, most likely, aroused, he hardly knew what to say. Alisa went on to recount her experience with a past boyfriend engaging in a threesome. My boyfriend redirected her to me for the final decision.

I, too, very flattered at the proposition, was pretty sure she was joking. I laughed and brushed it off. It was only later when I compared notes with my boyfriend that I realized she had been serious. I figured it had been a long night of drinking and decided not to bring it up to her again, except that the very next night she made another joke about having sex with me and my man.

It was pretty clear it wasn’t a joke.

The experience left me in awe at Alisa’s willingness to put herself out there. How often is it that someone has the balls to breach such a topic? I’d chock it up to liquid courage the first time, but the second time was pure, sober gumption.

We all come to a point in our sexploits when we’re ready to try something new, but we’re unsure of how to bring it up. Alisa’s approach may not be the best in all situations, but you have to admire her for making her desires clear.

Maybe you’re ready to slide into home base, take a ride on the Hershey highway or try autoerotic asphyxiation. No matter what it is, you’re going to have to make your partner(s) aware of your intentions.

The simplest, but most assaulting, way of doing this is to just do it without saying anything. This solution is specious. It may be easy, but it’s not likely to elicit a positive response. I’d be surprised if, upon your penetration into her anus and not her vagina, your partner screams with glee.

Another way is to just flat out bring it up like Alisa. For the sexually adventurous, this technique may go over well. Once you make your desires clear, other people will feel more comfortable expressing theirs. The least awkward way to do this is to make it a joke. “How funny would it be if I put it in your butt?” That way, your partner can shrug it off without losing face. Obviously, you have to eventually make clear that you’re not kidding.

For my money, I think a combination of the verbal and physical approaches is the best way to bring things up. During a routine sexual encounter, caress your lover’s butt, without penetrating. Take stock of how they respond. Try this a few times then broach the topic verbally. Always leave room for him or her to say no. And if this is within the confines of a relationship, never pressure your partner by accusing him or her of not caring about you if the case is that he or she is unwilling to engage in the act.

If you want to try something during a one-night stand, things are a little more complicated. The technique most likely to succeed is speaking in code. If your mate understands what you’re talking about, they’re probably up for it. Take as an example a story from a friend of mine: While hooking up with a guy, she asked him if he liked to go skiing. He awkwardly replied that he did and continued to hook up with her. If he had understood that “go skiing” is slang for “do coke,” he would not have thought the question was awkward. People who belong to societal subgroups — such as cocaine users — know the code words for their preferences.

As for trying something new on your own, it’s just a matter of convincing yourself that it’s okay. Experimentation is always fine as long as it’s safe. If you want to put a finger in your derriere while you rub your Eiffel Tower, just take a deep breath and give it a try. No one has to know if it turns out that you don’t like it.

Everyone finds themselves at sexual precipices once in a while. The best thing to do is pick a technique for talking to your partner or convincing yourself and jump right in. You never know what something’s like until you try it. And you just might find a better, faster, stronger way to get your rocks off.

__Maya Horowitz is the Flat Hat sex columnist. She speaks some codes fluently.__

Bulldog learns new gin tricks

0

New York, NY — Quick, think of a brand of top-shelf vodka. Even for a college student, an excess of names pop to mind: Absolut, Grey Goose, Stolichnaya, Belvedere.

Now think of a top-shelf gin — not so simple.

This gap in the market was just the opportunity for Anshuman Vohra ’00 to ditch his finance job and launch his own company. Bulldog Gin, which hit shelves two years ago this month, provided something obviously lacking in the gin market: a modern premium gin.

Gin has a reputation for being old-fashioned, if not downright stuffy. It tends to evoke images of old men sipping gin and tonics in smoky backrooms more often than urban 20-somethings indulging in cocktails in trendy nightclubs. And yet the latter group was just the market Vohra’s company sought. Currently the gin is sold in the United States (the New York area, Florida and Georgia) and Western Europe.

“We began knowing a few key points,” Vohra said. “We wanted it to be very high-end, imported from England.” Sitting in Bulldog’s one-room SoHo office, Vohra described the company using words like genuine, authentic, stylish and, perhaps most important, mixable.

Gin, which Vohra explained is more or less flavored vodka that has developed its own identity, is flavored with juniper. The often intense pine taste may be what often turns people off, especially among a crowd looking for more complex, flavorful drinks.

Gin seemed a difficult push primarily because of people’s hesitation to it. “It used to be a vodka world in the ’80s and ’90s,” Vohra said. Since the arrival of Bulldog Gin in stores, he’s noticed much less resistance to the spirit. “There’s been a renaissance in gin.”

Instead of relying heavily on juniper, Bulldog boasts an assortment of more exotic flavors including poppy, dragon eye and citrus. “It’s a nice melange of botanicals that adds to the taste,” Vohra said.

This unconventional combination has made Bulldog a hit among those who create drinks for a living.

“My favorite part is going to accounts: mixologists and bartenders,” Vohra said. “New York bartenders do some of the most exotic things.”

After graduating from the College of William and Mary nine years ago, Vohra took a job as an analyst at JPMorgan Chase. “It was all I thought about in college because I knew I wanted to go into finance,” he said. Though he spent his college days “resolutely focused on finance,” both as president of the BBA associaton and as a member of Finance Academy, Vohra said he always intended to move to something more entrepreneurial later in life.

Having worked on deals advising mergers and acquisitions of smaller companies during his Wall Street days, Vohra realized that was the way to find both more money and increase satisfaction in his life. He credits his banking background with setting him up for success. From creating a business plan and attracting investors, to managing production and dealing with sales representatives, he had the skills to turn the high-end gin concept into a reality.

Bulldog Gin is the product of a friend’s idea that Vohra jumped on after a series of finance jobs. “Neither of us knew how to get it done,” he said. “I had no experience beyond recreational consumption.” He networked to find people with more expertise, and began contacting potential investors.

Vohra emphasized the importance of cultivating on-campus relationships both with students and faculty. “Some of my first investors were friends from college,” he said.

The name Bulldog was one of many thrown out during an early brainstorming session. Growing more animated as he spoke, Vohra extolled the perfection of the name. “It seemed to embody the brand,” he said. “Our name is one of our best assets.”

The distinctly British image provided a strong theme for what has developed as quite a cohesive brand. The bottle, a dusky gray and rather stout, boasts a spiked collar around its imposing neck.

“The magic’s in the bottle,” Vohra said. “It’s all about the bulldog.”

Great value comes at a price

0

The College of William and Mary offers an elite education, to elite students, at prices much lower than much of the competitions’. Only a month ago, that combination earned it a “Best Value” recognition in the Princeton Review, a university ratings publication. But as the economy floundered, the College’s budget headed south as well. First the state, facing a budget crisis of its own, yanked funding, then the downturn pummeled the endowment, and now Del. David B. Albo (R-Fairfax) hopes to further compound the problem by increasing the proportion of in-state students attending the College.

The endowment foundation wields considerable discretion in how the funds are allocated, and projections indicate the endowment fared better than the market. Still, the endowment lost millions of dollars — dollars on which our school can no longer draw to support its operations. We lament that loss but also recognize that it stems from macroeconomic factors beyond the College’s control.

At the same time, the College community cannot stand aside while Albo attempts to foist an almost comically awful plan on Virginia’s system of higher education. Evidently driven by a desire to see “normal people” in Virginia schools, Albo has introduced legislation that would require 80 percent of university students to reside in the commonwealth. Just last week, we called for a revision of the in-state/out-of-state student ratio, with an eye toward accepting more of the brightest students, and their tuition dollars, from across the country. But the current bill works in the opposite direction.

Albo’s plan to “improve accessibility” would not only hurt the Virginia universities’ finances but would also guarantee the degradation of their academic standing. The College currently allots about 65 percent of slots in entering classes for Virginia students, meaning more out-of-staters than in-staters compete for any given spot.

Accepting more Virginians from an identical applicant pool will therefore require the College to admit less-qualified students. And, ignoring financial concerns (great as they are), there’s the rub. Selectivity necessarily restricts accessibility. Virginia cannot have both in its elite institutions.

More in-staters will only water down College

0

The College of William and Mary is a small, undergraduate-centered university with first-rate faculty and scholastic resources, as well as a highly qualified and diverse student body. These attributes are the perennial strengths of the College and sources of great pride to the members of our community. This is precisely why we must oppose a new bill introduced in the Virginia General Assembly.

This piece of legislation, sponsored by Delegate David B. Albo (R-Fairfax), would mandate an annual 1.3 percent increase of Virginians at Virginia public universities until 80 percent of students are in-state. As an out-of state student myself, perhaps I am biased; and, I do realize that Virginia has a duty to see to the needs of its residents before those of out-of-state students. However, if we take the effects of this bill to their logical conclusion, it becomes clear that such legislation will harm the College to such an extent that it will not be able to offer the same caliber education it has traditionally afforded its students, Virginians or otherwise.

Two factors especially influence the quality of education at the College. The first is the financial resources used to hire qualified faculty, maintain our campus, sponsor research, and provide us with a library, labs, classrooms and other necessary facilities and services.

The second advantage the College possesses is its students. As a result of its selectivity, the College’s students are a smart, passionate lot with a wide range of interests and backgrounds. Interacting with this group on a day-to-day basis supplements in-class education, for you are constantly learning every time you converse with a fellow student.

Albo’s bill will have a detrimental effect on both of these aspects of the College if passed. The deficit of out-of-state students will mean that the College will collect less money from tuition because, as you all know, we outsiders must pay extra for the privilege of attending Virginia schools. Currently, as it seems the College’s budget is being cut weekly, any further loss of funds must be avoided.

If this bill passes, we may see a sharp decline in the quality of faculty and resources the College is able to afford. The excellence of the student body would likewise suffer. The requirement to accept more Virginians reduces the pool of potential applicants, and consequently the College will have to become less selective.

It seems clear to me that the cost of this bill to the College is completely unacceptable. To accommodate more Virginians, the College will effectively become a mediocre school, which will force the brightest Virginians, those the College was supposed to serve, to go elsewhere for an education. If the intent of this bill is to better serve Virginia’s college students, this seems to do the opposite. Albo himself has admitted to the detrimental financial effect his bill will have. However, his solutions are far from satisfactory. He speculates that Virginia schools could increase tuition across the board, which would cause lower-income Virginians who could have merited acceptance to the College under the current system to be replaced by wealthier students who perhaps could not. His second solution is to expand the size of Virginia schools. The undesirability of such action should be self-evident to all students here.

No doubt Mr. Albo’s intentions are worthy. He simply wishes to gain his constituency more access to some of the best schools in the country. Nonetheless, he should think his plan through, for it would compromise the very schools Virginians prize so highly.

Ed Innace is a sophomore at the College.

During troubled times College must turn to Colonel Ebirt

0

Entering this spring semester — my last at the College of William and Mary — the school faces a number of challenges, but here is a quick solution to one of them: Bring back Colonel Ebirt.

When the jolly green blob, who served as the College’s unofficial mascot at sporting events, was retired by the Athletic Department in 2005, rumors circulated that a new mascot — one that represented the colonial history of the College and the surrounding area — would replace Ebirt.

Not surprisingly, this never happened. The story since then has not been pretty. The NCAA ruled that the College must remove the feathers from its WM logo, deeming them offensive to American Indian groups. Then-College President Gene Nichol chose not to fight the ruling, a decision that many considered a mistake.

When a committee was formed to design a new logo, members were told that they were free to explore the possibility of creating a mascot for the College. They chose not to, and, to make matters worse, the new logo was a failure.

At the beginning of the past fall semester, President Taylor Reveley said that while a new mascot could be a unifying presence for the campus community, it could also turn into a huge mess if the response to the new mascot was unfavorable.

With debilitating state budget cuts and other difficulties — not to mention a tumultuous two-year period in which the College caught national publicity for all the wrong reasons — it’s easy to see why Reveley and others want to avoid any more messes.

This is where Colonel Ebirt (Tribe spelled backwards) comes in. The biggest advantage of the Colonel as a mascot is that it would allow the College to continue to use the Tribe moniker. The College would still be the Tribe, allowing it to continue its current merchandise sales and avoid the necessity of repainting the roads, fields and other athletic facilities.

Ebirt would simply be the physical manifestation that we currently lack, a mascot that could patrol the sidelines at football and basketball games, engage students and families, and enhance school spirit at a College desperately in need of a kick to the rear end.

Now, I should point out that as a lifelong Red Sox fan, I’m incredibly biased toward amorphous green blobs as mascots, but there are more rational reasons for bringing back Ebirt.

First, any physical mascot that would appropriately represent the Tribe name would, in all likelihood, pertain to American Indians, and this is obviously a big no-no for the College. While many of us respect the unifying idea of the tribe as a representation of the College community, it’s hard to see how you would get a mascot out of it.

Without Ebirt, the choice seems to be between not having a mascot and completely overhauling the face of College athletics by transitioning to the Phoenix or the Wren, among other suggestions. Bringing back Ebirt would avoid having to make this difficult choice.

Secondly, Ebirt was incredibly popular in the past. His reign was just before my time, but most people I talked with who attended the College then seemed to love Ebirt.

He wasn’t offensive or controversial. He didn’t really make any sense, but nobody cared. He was a character — one that students came to associate with their school and their sports teams.
Some have argued in the past that a mascot is not necessary— that we have the Tribe, and that’s enough.
Certainly a mascot alone will not improve the College’s athletic programs.

True, a mascot won’t win you games when the head football coach leaves the starting quarterback in after throwing four, five, and then six interceptions in the most pivotal game of the year. However, an appropriate, popular mascot can bring energy and enthusiasm to fans, which contributes to the energy and passion of players.

Ebirt was such a mascot. There’s no reason he should remain retired.

Alexander Ely is a senior at the College.

Hollywood Gossip (Jan. 23)

0

**Ever after?**
Looks like Charlie’s Angels are on the outs. Former BFFs Cameron Diaz and Drew Barrymore were obviously cold to each other at the Golden Globes. According to Ok!, Drew hasn’t been able to walk a mile in Cam’s shoes since some very bad things happened to the blonde diva last year. While the “Shrek” star dealt with the death of her father, lucky Drew’s frequently been kissed by a series of younger men from Jason Segel to Ed Westwick.

**A mighty heart**
Despite having already selected a new BFF, Paris Hilton has offered her services once again. This time, Life & Style reports the lucky contender is no other than Angelina Jolie, a soul clearly starved for companionship. “She’s strong and gorgeous and uses her fame for good,” Paris said, noting their similarities. “I’d have a lot in common with her.” Even with Mr. & Mrs. Smith reportedly bickering more frequently, we’re not sure Paris’s friendship is something Angie ever wanted.

**Dr. Clooney to the ER**
George Clooney is set to return to his roots in the long-awaited final season of “ER.” People magazine reports rumors that the Fug Girls’ Intern George, who owes his career to a five-year stint on the show, will return as his character Dr. Doug Ross for an undetermined number of episodes. Clooney last appeared in a 2000 cameo. Trying to keep the appearance a secret, NBC and Warner Bros. representatives refused to comment, as did Clooney’s publicist.

**NYC chamber of secrets**
Marc Jacobs and his boyfriend Lorenzo Martone have bought an apartment in the same building as ‘Harry Potter’ star Daniel Radcliffe. Already a fixture in New York’s social scene, the designer and his rumored fiancée plan to settle into their SoHo apartment. The legendary playboy, toned down of late, has made a splash as the essence of Marc Jacobs infects the popular celeb abode.

That Guy: John Weeks

0

__John Weeks wears a twist of yellow material on his wrist. When I ask about it, he recalls his recent trip to the Dominican Republic and explains how the yellow band represents his time spent with the College of William and Mary’s Student Organization for Medical Outreach and Sustainability that is based on the Caribbean island. As he puts it, the band is “a constant reminder of all of the people in my heart: the Dominicans, my teammates and what I want for myself.” John also encourages service and research as a member of Beta Theta Pi and Health Outreach Peer Educators. Academically, his neuroscience and Hispanic Studies background, coupled with his admiration for celebrated public health humanitarian Paul Farmer may set him up for a career in public health in a place where people cannot always help themselves. Before I knew it, I learned about farmers in Loudon County, aggressive pet roosters and what it is like to be interviewed by Jim Lehrer.__

**I hear you had a colorful upbringing. Can you tell me about it?**

I’m from Western Loudon County. I actually lived in a town called Paeonian Springs, which consists of about 80 people and a post office. Honestly, it’s not like much of anything, just a stop off the side of the highway with a lot of cows. Loudon County is actually one of the fastest-growing in the country in the nation, so every time I go home it’s different. Stuff that used to be big fields is now malls.

**Did you have any pets growing up in the country?**

We had a rooster for a while named Roger. He was one of those experiments in an elementary school class where you have chicks and then hatch them. We got to take him home, and then he grew up to be a full-sized rooster. He was very bonded with our family and very aggressive. The postman even had a baseball bat he would use to fend him off. That was probably our oddest pet, except we had a baby squirrel that we raised named Acorn that fell out of a tree when it was still pink and furless. And then he got old and ate all our books. We had all these books that he gnawed on the spines of.

**Any memories that stand out from the small town?**

Well, I worked on a farm for four years. My little sister’s best friend’s parents owned a farm, and they were looking for a strapping young lad to work on it, so I stepped up to the job of strapping young lad. It was the most random thing, but a really cool farm, actually. We grew hydroponic vegetables. A lot of my job was working on the farm and then going to sell in the markets in [Washington, D.C.]. I got to meet a lot of happening chefs who would use our stuff. Our product was featured on “Emeril Live.” I even got interviewed by Jim Lehrer on PBS for it. He was doing a special on farmers’ markets, and he came by and talked to me, just briefly. I don’t know if I actually made it on the show, but it was kind of fun. At the time I was working like two or three different jobs. I worked at an awesome Mom and Pop video store and also at the Target customer service desk, which made me want to kill myself. I think the farming job was my favorite. I liked being able to do my own thing, and I got to make my own specials or tell people “this head and this head make a nice salad together.”

**I bet you can make a mean salad now.**

Yeah, actually. I know more than anyone needs to about gourmet cooking, and I got really into it. I used to read these hoity-toity cooking magazines so I could talk to people about what they were buying since a lot of people in D.C. were really, really into it. If you can talk intelligently about it, you can sell more.

**Still cook?**

Yeah, I really like to cook. Since I’ve been here I haven’t had a lot of time to cook, but I’ve gotten really into baking stuff. The last couple of semesters have been all about making bread. I guess it’s not something people would know about me or guess about me. I really like whole wheat, honey breads or breads with berries and nuts in them. Hearty breads.

__John Weeks has an impressive range of talents. From the kitchen to the farmyard to the Caribbean, he can feed and lend his smarts and hard work to those around him. As for the moment, you can find him studying for the LSAT in the Grind or baking a loaf of bread in the Unit M kitchen for some very appreciative Betas.__