Home Blog Page 270

CW Foundation president steps down from board

0

Colin G. Campbell, CEO and president of the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, is leaving his position as chairman of the Board of Trustees for the CWF. Richard G. Tilghman has been chosen as his successor. Campbell is also looking for his replacement as CEO of the foundation.

p. Tilghman will be taking the position as chairman of the board immediately. Previously, he had a leadership role as the vice chairman of the board, a position he acquired in 2000. He has been a board member since 1994.

p. The change in leadership is occurring at an opportune time for Campbell. The celebrations for the 400-year anniversary of Jamestown, including highlights such as a visit from Queen Elizabeth II of England, have ended, allowing for Campbell to exit during a relatively quiet interlude.

p. “It’s time to have a succession plan in place,” Campbell said in an interview with the Daily Press.

p. Campbell became the chairman of CWF in 1998, two years before he took on the additional roles of president and CEO. Under his leadership, Colonial Williamsburg added and expanded many of its programs for visitors. The Revolutionary City program, an interactive experience that takes place in the streets and buildings of the historic area, was added to entice people looking for a more personal connection with history.

p. In 2006, a new conference center was built to allow for larger conventions to occur in Williamsburg. In addition to the conference center, a new spa was built as part of the Colonial Williamsburg resort to offer services to customers who are interested in more than the history of the area.

p. Campbell explained some of the future goals of CWF to the Daily Press, saying that most of its focus will be on getting visitors to stay longer in Colonial Williamsburg and to spend more money.
“We need to increase revenue from visitation — broadly defined,”
Campbell said. “All of the aspects of visitation are important to increasing revenue.”

p. Colonial Williamsburg is in the process of recovering from a sharp drop in visitors earlier in the decade. According to figures in the Daily Press, paid visitation dropped from 983,000 visitors in 1998 to 708,000 visitors in 2004. However, due to some of the changes implemented, visitation is climbing again and was up to 780,000 visitors in 2007. Last year was also financially strong for Colonial Williamsburg, allowing CWF to pay back some of its debts from the new buildings.

p. CWF has formed a committee to help Campbell find a replacement as CEO. The search committee will be comprised of six board members. A consulting firm will also be helping them make their decision on the new CEO.

p. There is no date set for Campbell to step down as CEO. He plans to stay until an appropriate replacement is selected.

p. “I made it very clear that I’m here until there’s been a candidate chosen and a reasonable amount of transition,” Campbell said.

Universities report record year of fundraising

0

In a preliminary report released recently by the Council for Aid to Education, it was reported that colleges nationwide raised a total of about $30 billion in private donations, a 6 percent increase from last year. The report also showed that the monetary gap between some institutions has been growing at a constant rate, making some institutions wealthier when compared to others.

p. The council, a non-profit organization aimed at producing policy research for higher education purposes, also reported that nearly $7.7 billion, or one-fourth of the total funds, were donated to 20 institutions, less than one percent of the nation’s colleges and universities. Five universities were recorded as raising more than $400 million, and Stanford University raised the most with $832 million.

p. The College’s fundraising figures are not yet available.
The report comes at a time when institutions have been accused of being fund-raising machines that do not care about college policy, as well recent movements by Congress that encourage universities to spend more of their endowments.

p. However, universities have responded to the position of Congress and criticism from the academic community by stating that their endowments are always put to good use.

p. “Harvard and many other universities make enormous contributions to our nation in research, scholarship, medicine and the arts due in large part to the resources we raise and invest,” Harvard University spokesman John Longbrake said.

p. Universities have also been using their resources for various aid purposes. Starting with Harvard late last year, wealthy schools have been announcing ambitious financial aid programs. Stanford University recently used a large portion of its funds in a monumental financial aid program that would provide free tuition for families that earn less than $100,000 per year and free tuition, room and board to those students whose families’ household incomes are less than $60,000 per year.

p. “Our donors hopefully are feeling very good about how we are making the absolute best use of their philanthropic dollars,” Stanford’s Vice President for Development Martin Shell said. “It is something we take very seriosly. There are an unlimited number of very worthwhile causes and needs out there.”

President of FIRE to speak on First Amendment rights

0

The Student Assembly Department of Student Rights, along with the College Republicans and Democrats, will be hosting Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), to come speak at the College Feb. 27.

p. FIRE, a non-profit organization focused on protecting individual rights at colleges and universities around the country, has defended thousands of students and faculty in cases involving personal rights.
The talk will take place Wednesday in Washington 201 at 6:30 p.m. and will be free and open to the public.

State Senate approves $78 billion budget

0

The Virginia Senate approved a two-year, $78 billion budget 21-19 yesterday. The House of Delegates passed the bill 93-5.

p. “I almost feel like I’ve been sucker-punched,” said Sen. R. Edward Houck (D-Spotsylvania) to the Daily Press. He felt that the Democratic majority had taken advantage of Republicans. “The lines have been drawn in the sand, the words have been exchanged and the votes have gone up on the board, not in unity but division.”

p. The budget has been contentious between political parties for several reasons, including Medicaid, reserve funds and public school funding.

p. The budget stopped further cuts in to higher education funding and kept $18.2 million for undergraduate student financial aid.

Engaged and underage

0

p. They met as blind senior prom dates, at a colonial dancing competition and in eighth grade gym class. They’ve sacrificed time and money to make long distance treks between schools or as far as an Army base in Bamburg, Germany. They’ve even sacrificed family and religion. Yet they aren’t the pregnant bridezillas and discouraged high school dropouts that MTV’s “Engaged and Underage” advertise.

p. The only common factor for engaged and married students at the College seems to be that each of their relationships has been tested by long distance, and each are looking to the future with a level-headed preparedness. While others haven’t yet chosen their majors, these ring-clad students know where they want to start their families.

p. Yet young engagement seems to be a taboo fed by shotgun weddings and the immediate connotation of the words “divorce rate.”

p. “I think it is more of a problem with society,” Faith Bland ’08 said. “I have a problem with Oprah because she insists that women should get everything that they want. I think you should have to work for the good things in your life, especially relationships.”

p. Faith met her husband, Paul Bland ’08 at a community college in Fredericksburg through their common hobby of colonial dancing. Paul transferred to the College first and, as Faith said, “If you’re going to follow your boyfriend to a school, you can’t do better than William and Mary.”

p. The two were engaged in July 2006 after dating for almost two years. They were married one year later in Wren Chapel. “I’ve got to admit, I kind of bugged him about [getting married],” Faith said. “I felt it was the natural progression for the relationship. We were not sure if financially we were ready — but that alone is not a good enough reason [to wait].”

p. Their parents’ responses to the decision were bipolar. Faith’s parents were supportive. She believes her rational approach to the relationship helped her parents see that she was approaching the situation with maturity. “I tried to keep a very realistic view about it and recognize the problems,” Faith said.

p. Paul’s family received the news with criticism that young marriages often fail. Though Paul’s mother married at age 18, she was still hesitant. “I think I’m on a different level with them,” Paul said. “I’m not their little boy anymore.”

p. While most friends were very supportive of the engagement, some people received the couple’s decision to marry in college with surprise and wariness. “Sometimes I sense it is a little weird for them,” Faith said. “I am tied down; that’s the path I’ve chosen. We were just the first. We were the trendsetters.” The trend seems to have caught on — two of Faith’s four bridesmaids have set the dates for their own weddings.

p. Both were each other’s first serious relationship, but they do not believe that they were too young. Among other reasons, the time was right with regards to their conservative religious views, the couple said. “I personally feel it was the right decision. On many levels it is actually much more convenient and less expensive. We save on rent, food, car insurance and even share some books,” Faith said.

p. Despite the Wren Chapel’s year-long waiting list, the couple obtained a Wren wedding at an opportune time, almost exactly one year after their engagement. For $500 the couple received a strict two-hour time slot in the Chapel. Friends provided choral and string musical accompaniment free of charge, and other friends helped reduce catering costs.

p. Marriage was right for the Blands financially as well as because of their religious, but both have proven to be an obstacle to Chase Albert ’10 and Rachel Brown ’10. While marriage is in some ways an acceptance of preparedness to make sacrifices, the couple discarded family and religious beliefs for their relationship.

p. The two met first semester of their freshman year of college and were engaged just a few months later in the spring. When summer sent Brown home to California and Albert to Northern Virginia, the couple faced telling their parents about their engagement.

p. Brown did not tell her family for several months. Her parents did not agree with the relationship, which, along with her overall college experience, had prompted her to question many things, including her Christian upbringing.

p. “When I started acting like I was questioning, many of my Christian friends started treating me with this arms-length cautiousness — like they could catch what I had by hanging out with me too much,” Brown said. “One of the factors that played into the poor treatment I got from my Christian friends was how serious Chase and my relationship was, which they considered un-Christian. I would say that going through the very traumatic experience of deconversion together definitely built a stronger bond.”

p. In reaction to her parents’ strong disapproval, Brown moved across the country to Northern Virginia, where she now works as she takes a year off from school to save money. She now considers herself to be agnostic. Albert began questioning his religious views before he came to college. “I don’t have a religion,” Albert said. “I sometimes say ‘anti-theist,’ but I don’t have any real meaning for that. I don’t classify myself as an atheist, because that’s just the sort of lumping I was trying to get rid of when I deconverted.”

p. Though Brown’s family was concerned about her engagement because she is young, her religious decision to disaffiliate was devastating for her parents. “My family considers me a prodigal, and they pray every day that I’ll go back to Christianity,” Brown said. Albert’s family also reacted with initial surprise, but they have welcomed Brown into their family.

p. For Albert, age was never a concern. “I have never felt too young,” he said. “I kind of thought it a silly consideration to make — statistically, a marriage this early is doomed. I don’t know. I knew I wanted to spend the rest of my life with Rachel. And I hate that cliche.”

p. Brown plans to return to the College this fall. She is applying for in-state and independent status with the university. The couple would like to get married in April of their graduation year. “We can’t really get married before then because of financial aid reasons,” Brown said. “If not for that, we’d definitely already be married.”

p. For Brown and Albert’s cross-country relationship, distance was the least of their problems. Their brief courtship pales in comparison to the relationship of Kristina Forero-Hordusky ’11 and Matthew Smith, a freshman at Virginia Commonwealth University.

p. “The whole time I was dating [Matthew], I didn’t think, ‘He’s the one, he’s the one,’” Forero-Hordusky, who met her boyfriend in eighth grade gym class, said. The two have been together since freshman year of high school.

p. “The looming idea of college made us realize how close the future is,” she said. Her fiance proposed the summer before their freshman year of college. “It really wasn’t even a thought that we would go to the same school,” Forero-Hordusky said. “It’s hard, but, I mean, we understand that we have time. If we can last four years, what’s another four?”

p. The couple plans to wait at least a year after college to marry. Forero-Hordusky’s mother married young and divorced. “It definitely made me realize that I don’t want to go out and rush things,” Forero-Hordusky said. “College really does change people.” Forero-Hordusky said most people are pleasantly surprised to hear she is engaged, which she attributes to the fact that the couple plans to put off marriage until after school. “That’s the weird thing — no one has told me, ‘You’re crazy,’” she said.
Forero-Hordusky will face three more years of separation from her fiance by a 40-minute car ride.

p. For Jared Calfee ’10 and Alicia Glorfield ’10, commuting didn’t work. As freshmen, Calfee attended Coastal Carolina University in Myrtle Beach, S.C. and Glorfield attended Emory University in Atlanta. They were separated by a six-hour commute that defined their freshman year relationship.

p. Both transferred to the College in the fall of 2007. Calfee and Glorfield met while in high school and got engaged just a few months later with plans to wait until after college to marry for financial reasons. “Our parents have said ‘Once you are married, you’re on your own,’” Glorfield said.

p. Calfee and Glorfield attended different high schools in Richmond and were set up as blind dates from senior prom by mutual friends. Though they got engaged just a few months after prom night, Glorfield said, “We both know what it’s like to date others, which has been a good frame of reference for our relationship.”

p. The speedy engagement was received with shock by their parents, particularly their mothers. “The first thing they said was ‘You’re going to wait until after school, right?’” Glorfield said.
Despite their parents’ reactions, the couple knew what they wanted. “It was something we both felt we were ready for,” Calfee said. “The weirdest part was just telling others — we already knew it was what we wanted. Only you can know if it’s right for you.”

p. Their one year apart during freshman year of college strengthened their relationship. “You have to let the other person know you are completely there,” Glorfield said, which she says the couple achieved through good communication. Long distance also required time and energy to visit and maintain the relationship over the phone. “You should never feel that you are sacrificing anything,” said Calfee.

p. Ashley Bateman ’08 and her husband understand the benefits good communication, and know a thing or two about sacrifice. Communication via telephone is Ashley’s main experience of married life. Her husband Jonas Bateman, a 2006 graduate of James Madison University, is currently serving in the Army in Afghanistan. He gets up at 5 a.m. to call his wife every morning before work.

p. Ashley met Jonas at a New Year’s Eve party that neither planned to attend. Despite their chance meeting, they pushed the limits of superstition and got engaged on Friday the 13th on the Crim Dell bridge in April 2007.

p. The couple dated long distance between JMU and the College; the distance increased when Jonas was stationed in Germany. They had been talking about marriage for a while before he proposed. “I always said I would never get married in college,” Ashley said. “We always knew he’d be deployed and go to Germany. We kind of got serious fast. It’s very serious now being in the Army — they are working 16- to 18-hour days and need to know they have complete support.”

p. The couple was married this past January, when Jonas was able to return briefly from his current deployment in Afghanistan where he works in transportation as a first lieutenant. “Afghanistan is much less developed,” Ashley said. “If he were in Iraq, he would be able to contact me more.” Though there may be more technological obstacles in Afghanistan, she is happy the area is a little safer than Iraq.

p. “I haven’t really gotten to experience married life yet,” Ashley said. “I went eight months before and now I have to wait another six months without seeing him — only hearing his voice over the phone,” she said. After Ashley graduates, she will move to Germany where Jonas will continue to serve after returning from Afghanistan. “The next few years we will have to sacrifice where we want to live to help make sure that he doesn’t get deployed again. Luckily, by the time he’s done, I’ll only be 26,” she said. The years she has ahead as an Army wife will influence their decision on when to have children since it will determine where they will live.

p. While some couples are ready to make such a sacrifice, it isn’t the right move for everyone. “Make sure it’s something that you really want if you are going to sacrifice for it,” Ashley said. “I know it is important to have your own life, but I don’t regret anything that I might have missed out on. College doesn’t seem that flexible, but it is. You have space and you have time.”

Letter to the Editor (Feb. 22)

0

**Cronyism stifling rights**

p. To the Editor:

p. During my time at the College, I was part of a small but vocal activist community that strived to raise awareness of pressing global and local issues. I worked with others to fight against injustices and the suffocating traditionalism that was stifling cultural diversity and equality on campus. When elected Student Assembly president in 2002, I attempted to address many issues that were dividing this community, but found these efforts consistently blocked by an autocratic administration hiding behind a code of silence.

p. During my tenure, no issue was more decisive and controversial than the Board of Visitors’ surreptitious appointment of Henry Kissinger as chancellor. This appointment became a catalyst for students, faculty and alumni to rally against the lack of transparency within the BOV. Kissinger’s commission was just another example of the cronyism that infests some members of the BOV (under the contentious leadership of Rector Michael Powell ’85) and the General Assembly. For these reasons, I welcomed the appointment of Gene Nichol as president, seeing it as a sign of progress in combating the College’s disturbing trend to conservative homogeneous elitism.

p. Five years after my graduation, the unexplained dismissal of Nichol has once again united students, faculty and alumni against the BOV’s equivocal behavior.

p. Before pursuing graduate studies in journalism, I spent nearly four years in the Army with the First Brigade Combat Team, 101st Airborne Division, with a year-long deployment to Iraq. I saw firsthand the death and destruction caused by individuals and organizations corrupted by money and power.

p. It was a slap in the face to return from combat, where I fought to establish democracy in a country that had been oppressed by a tyrannical regime, and see members of the College community fighting for those same rights. It is ironic that the College, which helped give birth to the Constitution, is now attempting to deny those liberties to its own population.

p. I charge members of the BOV, the General Assembly and Gov. Tim Kaine to provide answers and redress for the unjust dismissal of Nichol and the continued furtive actions of the BOV. A public university is just that: public. It belongs to the people. Students, alumni and residents of Virginia deserve to know why their tuition money, donations and tax dollars appear to be aiding in the oppression of constitutional rights.

p. — Linsay Rousseau Burnett ’03

Honor Council elections flawed

0

p. I cast a blank ballot in the Honor Council election earlier this week because I did not support the elections held Tuesday.

p. There are multiple reasons behind this.

p. First and foremost, the Honor Council has failed to uphold its own bylaws. According to the latest version of the bylaws available on the Honor Council website, it is supposed to begin promoting the election approximately one month prior to the election. The first relevant e-mail that I could find in my inbox (understanding that aside from pure spam I delete almost nothing) is from Feb. 4 (15 days ago).

p. Additionally, the bylaws presented on the Honor Council website (at least at the time I wrote this column) state that “The Nomination Form is due two (2) weeks after the last information meeting.” The final meeting was Feb. 6. Therefore, in order to meet this requirement, the Honor Council would have had to make the forms due the day following the date of elections.
In addition to the form due date not meeting the requirements set out in its bylaws on its website, the Honor Council rejected forms that were turned in within half an hour of the deadline that it provided, in the interest of fairness.

p. By the rules that the Honor Council has provided for the public, it has failed to meet its own requirements for the election. Currently, there is a bill before the Student Assembly senate to vote no confidence in the Honor Council elections. Yet, on the Honor Council election ballot, there is no way to voice disgust with the procedures used and, because of the ban on campaigning, there is no way to work to change the system.

p. The Honor Council has set itself above public accountability. With all of the shouting about accountability in the last week regarding the Board of Visitors’ decision not to retain Gene Nichol as president, it sets a sorry precedent when one of the most important organizations at this great school — one with the power of expulsion over students — places itself above public accountability.

p. It does this both by denying students the ability to fight for changes that they see necessary to the system and by violating its own rules without apparent consequence.

p. I did not cast a blank ballot against the individuals running, for many of them are fine individuals. I cast a blank set of ballots against a system that places itself above accountability and reduces a solemn election from an informed decision to a glorified contest of name recognition.

p. The elections have been so sufficiently mishandled that they are currently facing a vote of no confidence in the senate, something virtually unprecedented in the College’s history and a sign of how poorly they have been handled. I sincerely lack confidence in this year’s Honor Council elections feeling that the system is deeply flawed.

p. __Cliff Dunn is a junior at the College.__

A house divided cannot stand

0

p. As students and as leaders of our respective campus organizations, we are disappointed by the manner in which the Board of Visitors chose not to renew Gene Nichol as president of the College.

p. I am joined by Council of Fraternity Affairs chairman Joseph Andrews, Inter-Sorority Council president Laura Sauvain, Class of 2008 president Nick Faulkner, Student Assembly Senate Public Affairs Committee chair Sarah Rojas, VA21 representative of the SA Jesse Woods and Miss Teen Virginia USA 2006 Samantha Casey.

p. For many students who interacted with Nichol on a daily basis, he stood as a voice representative of our campus, our needs and our progress. He is a man loved by many and criticized by few.

p. On the day of his resignation, thousands packed the Wren Courtyard in honor of his service. Today, more than 2,000 members belong to a pro-Nichol Facebook group. These examples of resounding student opinion highlight the BOV’s utter disconnect with the community it represents.

p. Nichol was always the students’ champion. From his first day on campus, he captivated our community with his charisma, inspiration and unparallelled ability to instill hope and motivation in our student body. A prominent figure on campus, Nichol could often be found pacing the sidelines at athletic contests, hosting lunches and dinners with students and faculty, teaching seminars on constitutional law, delivering acceptance letters to Gateway Program students and leading the pep band in the Alma Mater. His presidency was one of openness and, for that, he was admired.
From this context of openness, we feel slighted by the BOV. It is our opinion that the BOV did not hear the students’ testimonies and neglected to include both our Student Assembly president (an ex-officio member to the BOV) and the student voice in its decision-making. If it had, regardless of the final decision, the College community would not have experienced the fractures of the past two weeks.

p. We urge future decisions to be transparent and all-inclusive — qualities extolled by Nichol. We call upon students to demand their inclusion in the decision-making process. We look to our own leadership to remember and reinforce why the College is a wonderful place. Our house has been divided and we must work to bring it back together.

p. As current students, tomorrow’s alumni and future donors to the College, we ask for this inclusiveness from our BOV. We look forward to the BOV’s visit to campus as one of the first of many, ensuring an open and constant dialogue between every member of the College community. Together, we can continue to work toward a successful future for our beloved institution. Nichol was more than a figurehead, he was the drumbeat of this Tribe. We were proud to follow his leadership and are committed to carrying out his legacy, together.

p. Though the loss of Nichol as our president is painful, we welcome Interim President Taylor Reveley with open arms and with great anticipation. His courage in taking on this job at this time is a testament to both his character and that of this institution. In this time of uncertainty, we will look to him and ourselves for stability and stand by him to preserve the College as “great and public.”

p. Go Tribe! And continue to hark upon the gale!

p. __Brett Phillips, co-founder of the Student Chamber of Commerce, is a senior at the College.__

Staff Editorial: Embrace transparency

0

p. By all rights, the Board of Visitors shouldn’t be on campus today. If former College President Gene Nichol’s ouster had been conducted properly, no reason for further inquiry would exist.

p. The board could have preempted student and faculty questions with a transparent process and a thoughtful explanation. But that didn’t happen. While we remain confident that the BOV made the correct decision about Nichol’s contract, we worry their process only aggravated what has become a troubling new tradition at the College: high-minded policy-making conducted from behind closed doors.

p. At the College, well intentioned decisions have too often sparked outrage because of a lack of transparency. Of course, Nichol’s decision to move the Wren cross without prior consultation marks the most notorious instance of relatively benign policy changes gone awry. While we did not criticize the cross policy shift itself, we found the apparent secrecy with which it was made disconcerting. The debate that followed would likely have proven more useful before, not after, the fact.

p. Similarly, the BOV’s actions concerning Nichol’s contract have left much to be desired. Even if the affair ran by the book, the lack of a clear statement detailing the board’s procedures and reasoning after nearly two weeks raises eyebrows­ — and protests. BOV members’ arrival on campus today, however, indicates a commitment to clearing the air. We must remember that these men and women are accomplished and educated. Much is to be expected of them.

p. We hope today’s discussion will ease the process of sifting the personal from the objective. Too many recent developments have surfaced from individual e-mails and correspondences rather than official statements. Robert Blair’s ’68 resignation from the BOV — although it prompted members to concede their decision may not have been unanimous — raised more questions than it answered. Now is the time for explanation from the BOV that will satisfy anxious members of the community.

p. Absent a comprehensive report, divining an official position has become a game of journalistic Whack-a-Mole — finding an opinion from one source has ensured another’s popping up elsewhere. Whereas BOV Rector Michael Powell ’85 said recently the search for a new president had already started, just yesterday, fellow board member Barbara Ukrop ’61 thought otherwise. “That will not even begin — we’re talking not until next September,” she said.

p. Confusing? We thought so, too. Waffling like this does nothing to instill further confidence, especially on an issue as significant as the selection of our next president. But here again, the BOV has the opportunity to do right by offering an official position on the matter. The past year and a half have proven the value of releasing information for public scrutiny. Better to provide too much than too little.

p. Certainly a friendly presentation of the facts is preferable to their forcible extraction. The ACLU has offered to challenge the legality of BOV’s decision to appoint Taylor Reveley as president designate. Following Nichol’s resignation, Reveley was installed as president with a bit or parliamentary finagling. The ACLU contends the move violated Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act. Reveley is immensely qualified for the interim, but installing him as president without an official vote opens the BOV to criticism. As is the case with our other items of concern, greater transparency from the outset could have prevented such a situation.

p. In large part, the ongoing controversy surrounding Nichol’s departure should have been avoided. A correct decision has become mired in a procedural morass, but today’s sessions provide an opportunity for the College community to find its way. Above all, the event will require openness on both sides so that the community can be satisfied and we can move on as a school.

For Tribe, it comes down to the foul line

0

p. Entering Wednesday night’s game against Drexel, the Tribe ranked last in the CAA in free-throws attempted. It’s a stat that has plagued the team since their season opener against Georgetown in November. While they’ve had success shooting three-pointers in Head Coach Tony Shaver’s perimeter-oriented offense, the Tribe’s inability to reach the foul line more than their opponents has hurt, especially in their most recent three-game road losing streak, during which they only attempted a combined 26 free throws.

All that changed Wednesday night in the friendly confines of Kaplan Arena, as they gutted out a 57-50 comeback victory and knocked down 20 foul shots, seven more than Drexel.

In the first half against the Dragons, the Tribe shot an abysmal 12.5 percent from beyond the three-point arc and struggled to execute their offense. They were lucky to be down by only three points heading into the locker room at halftime. In the second half, they turned up the pressure by pounding the ball inside and drawing fouls. Also, senior guard Nathan Mann moved well without the basketball and created open jump shots for himself. He canned two three-pointers down the stretch, igniting his team when they were struggling to score.

Leading the way for the Tribe during their second-half comeback was sophomore point guard David Schneider, who continually beat the Drexel defense on dribble drives to the basket and drew fouls instead of relying on his inconsistent jump shot. On defense, he forced several Drexel turnovers, which led to easy points for the Tribe.

Schneider, who leads the CAA in free-throw percentage, is at his best offensively when he penetrates and gets to the foul line. Many have said the Tribe lives and dies by its three-point shot, but that’s not the case. In the 12 games during which they’ve made more free-throws than their opponent, the Tribe is 11-1.

Another key in the Tribe’s victory was preventing Drexel forward Frank Elegar, a member of the CAA’s preseason first team, from getting offensive touches. In the Tribe’s 73-72 overtime win at Drexel in January, Elegar scored a game-high 24 points and grabbed 15 rebounds. But Wednesday, junior forward Peter Stein limited Elegar to nine points and five boards. The Tribe’s best defensive effort of the game came midway through the first half when Schneider was mismatched against Elegar. The much-taller Elegar tried a post-up move in the lane, but Schneider held his ground and forced him to pass the ball out to the perimeter.

For the majority of the game, Elegar was a non-factor on the low block as the Tribe big men double-teamed him and pressured him into forcing bad shots or passing it out to the perimeter. On the offensive side of the ball, the Tribe big men won the rebounding battle against Elegar and helped create many second-chance scoring opportunities. They finished with 13 second-chance points, compared to only four for Drexel.

E-mail Carl Siegmund at crsieg@wm.edu.