Home Blog Page 51

Baseball: Tribe gets revenge with Slattery’s shot in tenth

After a nail-biting 2-1 loss at home to Richmond a little over three weeks ago, William and Mary turned the tables on the Spiders by picking up its third win in a row with a 9-8 victory in extras Wednesday.

The back-and-forth, ten inning game was won on a solo home from senior designated hitter Jonathan Slattery in the top of the tenth inning, giving the Tribe (17-15, 9-7 CAA) its eleventh win in its last thirteen games and split the season series with the cross-fall line rival.

“It was definitely a back and forth, up and down, roller coaster kind of game,” head coach Frank Leoni said. “We found a way to pull it out.”

The Tribe got on the board in the second when sophomore right fielder Derek Lowe singled to score junior first baseman Tadd Bower.

Then in the bottom of the third, Richmond took advantage of a lack of control by sophomore pitcher Brett Goodloe, who hit the first two batters of the inning. After a single scored a run, Goodloe walked one more to load the bases for senior right fielder Mike Mergenthaler, whose grand slam seemed to put the game out of reach by giving the Spiders a 5-1 lead.

But the Tribe came right back in the top of the fourth to tie the game at 5-5 when Richmond’s pitching temporarily lost the strike zone.

Consecutive walks taken by Bower, sophomore left fielder Ryan Williams and sophomore second baseman Kevin Nutter loaded the bases with nobody out. A sacrifice fly by Lowe scored Bower, after which sophomore center fielder Ryan Brown walked to load the bases again.

Freshman third baseman Ryan Lindemuth then walked in another run before the runners advanced on a wild pitch, scoring Nutter. Senior shortstop Derrick Osteen then walked to load the bases for a third time, and a sacrifice fly by Slattery scored Brown. A single by freshman catcher Devin White loaded the bases once more, but the Tribe was unable to do any more damage, ending the top half of the inning having scored four runs on just one hit.

But Richmond would take the lead back in the bottom of the frame on a two-run single by shortstop Mike Small.

The momentum swung back to the College in the seventh when Bower led off the inning with a double. A double by junior pinch hitter Stephen Arcure then scored Bower, and an RBI double by Lowe knotted the game at 7-7. The Tribe would then take the lead after Lowe stole third and scored on a sacrifice bunt by Brown.

“We’ve just been putting that little sense of fear in the infielders’ minds,” Leoni said of the bunt. “We’re not just going to go up there and play station to station baseball.”

But after a Richmond sacrifice fly in the bottom of the seventh the two teams were even again.

The College had the chance to seal up the game in the eighth with runners on first and second and one out, but couldn’t make anything of it. A scoreless ninth sent the game to extra innings, and Slattery ­— who had popped out with the bases loaded in the third — capitalized with the game-winning home run in the top of the tenth.

“The game has a funny way of turning around, and you always seem to get that one last chance,” Leoni said. “He made the most of it.”

In the bottom of the tenth, sophomore reliever Brett Koehler came on to replace sophomore pitcher Matt Wainman, who hadn’t allowed an earned run in 4 1/3 innings of work, making him the winning pitcher and moving his record to 2-2.

Koehler promptly struck out two in the tenth, closing out the road win for the College.
“Those two guys have been outstanding for us,” Leoni said of Wainman and Koehler.
Next the Tribe will take on Longwood in a home-and-away series this weekend.

Conference call held to discuss Pell Grants

U.S. Senator Mark Warner (VA-D) spoke to student representatives from the College of William and Mary and other Virginia universities about federal policy on higher education Wednesday via conference call from Washington, D.C.

Pell Grant legislation currently under debate in the U.S. Congress was one of the primary topics of discussion.

“While we’ve got tight fiscal times, unless we continue to invest in higher education we’re not going to give you the same benefits and opportunities I had when I got out of college,” Warner said. “Virginia has one of the best public education systems, and we don’t want to lose that edge.”

Hosted by Virginia21, a non-partisan political education lobbying group created in 2002 by students at the College, the discussion focused on student loans, the national debt, and youth participation in governmental processes. Virginia21 Executive Director Tom Kramer ’06 moderated the question-and-answer session and gave introductory remarks about the strained economic situation of higher education in Virginia, which has increased the demand for federal student loan and grant programs.

“Over the past ten years, the cost of tuition in Virginia has basically doubled,” Kramer said.

Warner’s opening statement focused on financial issues affecting universities and students, specifically the spending cuts on higher education supported by some members of Congress.

“There’s a particular effort in the House of Representatives to cut back on Pell Grants and many of the research opportunities our colleges indirectly benefit from,” he said. “It’s a pretty frustrating place up here, a lot more partisan than it needs to be. We’re working to get stuff done.”

Pell Grants are need-based entitlements awarded to undergraduate students on the basis of their families’ Expected Family Contributions, which are determined by the Free Application for Federal Student Aid form and the number of credits they are taking. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 536 undergraduate students at the College, or 9 percent of the student body, received Pell Grants during the 2008-2009 school year.

A bill passed Feb. 19 by the U.S. House of Representatives, H.R.1, would cut approximately $5.7 billion from Pell Grant funding if signed into law, effectively reducing the maximum discretionary award per student by $845, or 17.4 percent.

This provision is part of the government spending plan currently under negotiation in the U.S. Congress. If a resolution on the legislation is not reached by midnight tonight, the federal government will shut down beginning Saturday.

The first question posed to Warner regarded new federal investment plans for higher education.

“The federal programs usually come in the form of research grants,” Warner said. “There has been a dramatic increase in the National Institute of Health funding; [we’ve] almost doubled the NIH budget. We’ve made a major investment in higher education through the Pell Grant program. It’s dramatically grown.”

These increases in aid funding, however, are in jeopardy due to Congress’s recent activity.

“That’s one of the areas that some of the new members of Congress have been trying to attack,” Warner said.

During the course of the call, Student Assembly President Chrissy Scott ’11 reminded Warner of his 2010 campaign promise to increase educational opportunities for lower and middle income families, and asked what steps he had taken to fulfill the pledge. Warner cited his support for Pell Grants, as evidenced by his voting record, and his work to prevent spending cuts of education aid programs.

“I voted for the increase funding for Pell Grants,” Warner said. “We are trying to work right now on a bigger bipartisan deficit reduction program.”

According to Warner, some representatives have been trying to ameliorate the $14 trillion national debt by targeting domestic discretionary spending, specifically education aid. He said he believes other programs should be examined so as to relieve education programs of the proposed spending cuts.

“If you’re trying to get all that from this one little sliver of the budget, student assistance gets shouldered with an unfair burden,” he said. “The best way I can help protect higher education assistance is to work on a long term deficit reduction plan.”

When asked about student loan forgiveness initiatives, Warner was ambivalent, citing the rise in tuition prices and the federal debt as reasons why such programs are unlikely.

“I don’t have a great answer here,” he said. “The reason is, most of our colleges and universities have a never-ending appetite for more resources. With a $14 trillion debt, the idea that we’re just going to give loan forgiveness for everybody is probably impossible.”

Warner’s proposed solutions to the problem of increased student debt included debt reduction for Americorps volunteers and increased credit for AP courses, which would allow students to graduate in — and pay for — fewer than eight semesters.

Warner concluded the call by encouraging students to express their support for federal education programs.

“I think your generation is very into social change. We need to have your voices heard,” he said. “Stay in the game. Try to convince your friends to be involved. I hope they all vote this year, regardless of who they vote for. Help vote in state senate and state house races— that really has the maximum effect.”

Scott said she appreciated the opportunity to hear from Warner and approved of his stance on federal student aid.

“He said he’s in support of programs, and that was great to hear,” Scott said. “He does support Pell Grants, which means he is in support of students in higher education.”

Polishing the “Rough Draft”: Senior writes, directs film for thesis

The sun beats down on the prairie landscape as men dressed in World War II uniforms dart from one ditch to another to escape enemy gunfire. Tanks roll past, sending dust into the air, and loaded machine guns appear behind barbed wire fences as the army advances its attack. The scene, in grayscale, appears to be straight out of newsreel footage from the 1940s, but it is actually a World War II reenactment in Austin, Texas. In addition to the Texans flocking to see this reenactment by 30 young men, for budding filmmaker and College of William and Mary student Caitlin Clements ’11, it is the ideal setting for a scene in her honors thesis film “Rough Draft,” premiering this Friday at the Kimball Theater.

“The whole film community here has been so great and so supportive, so it has all worked out really well,” Clements, a Murray Scholar from Oklahoma City, said, beaming. “At first I felt kind of funny saying, ‘Yeah, I’m a film studies major studying at William and Mary at this liberal arts college in Colonial Williamsburg, but I potentially want to go into film production someday, and I could have gone to Los Angeles, but I wanted to come here instead.’ It’s nice that this is really a culminating moment where a lot of it really makes sense and it has come together.”

Filmed primarily over three weeks in August 2010, “Rough Draft” follows classic film fan Charlotte as she and a used-bookstore employee uncover the story of Tom Montgomery, a fictional screenwriter who died in battle during World War II. Combining flashback montages with present-day scenes, the film not only depicts Charlotte’s discovery of a long-lost classic era filmmaker, but also her own growth as a screenwriter.

While the script itself was a project for her independent study in fall 2009, Clements found inspiration from her study of history and the tale of Ernest Hemingway’s lost manuscripts.

“It came from a lot of what we studied of Hollywood’s involvement in World War II and how different people from Hollywood [in] that era got drawn into the conflict,” she said. “[The film] even started with a story that I heard of Hemingway and [how] some of his stories were lost on this train. At first I started maybe wanting to do a ‘What If? What Had Happened?’ to these lost stories of Hemingway.”

The plot change turned out for the better. In the many months that she has spent working on the project, she has met people whom she now calls good friends, including Thuraya Masri of Richmond, who plays the leading role of Charlotte. She also enlisted the help of fellow College students, including Zan Gilles ’09, who worked as the film’s director of photography. The total effort of five full-time College crew members and five primary cast members led to a fun and rewarding experience.

The best part of being the director, producer and screenwriter, however, was her opportunity to cast the film’s characters. Since the majority of characters could not be performed by College students, she posted notices on Craigslist and casting websites, hoping to draw different people from the Tidewater community.

“That whole process was so much fun,” Clements said. “Primarily for seeing kind of the characters coming to life and having that moment when someone would come in and you say, ‘Yes! You’re X character! You’re perfect!’”

Casting Charlotte’s character was the most memorable of these serendipitous moments, since the chosen actress, Masri, only submitted her audition tape on the last day before callbacks.

“Going into [the process] I really thought that Charlotte could quite possibly have been a William and Mary performer just because that was the one role where [the college student] age was really appropriate,” she said. “And then this actress, Thuraya, came in from Richmond and it was just one of those amazing moments. It was sort of like a lightbulb went off. You always hear those funny stories of like ‘Oh, the one
who came in last was the one who just nailed it.’ And it was so cliche-sounding, but it really worked out that
way.”

Clements furthermore enjoyed the “crazy moments” spent on site in Richmond, where she and her crew often filmed scenes at Black Swan Books until 2 a.m.. They still reminisce about the day they frantically protected their equipment from a spontaneous “monsoon” rainstorm, and when they changed the letters on a Norfolk marquee sign with an ominous thunderstorm looming in the distance.

But how did this Frank Capra fan, Classic Film Club founder and future graduate film school student get her start? Put simply, she has always loved American and foreign cinema, and throughout her childhood produced short-length films that were screened in her family’s backyard or at high school film competitions.

“Present-day films have such a way of really sending a powerful message on a really mass scale, and you’re in a very privileged position when you are a filmmaker and you are beginning to make these films,” she said.
“I think in terms of our further appreciation of classic film, I think there is so much to be seen there too, just about history, about time periods … It’s amazing to see how, when done well and done right, films can really catch people’s interest and instruct in a lot of different things.”

Clements hopes that “Rough Draft,” although a small production, achieves this goal.

“I do hope that [the film] will give pause to think,” she said. “While it’s not really teaching a history lesson per se, because it is very much a fiction film, it definitely harkens back to a time period. There’s this overall message of being mindful of history in a lot of different forms. … [The film’s] sharing of stories could key people in to something in their own lives.”

Confusion Corner: Planning the final countdown

As my time at the College of William and Mary winds down, I find myself thinking increasingly in terms of “lasts.” Some of these lasts are sad and nostalgic: last Blowout, last King and Queens, last Wren 10, last cider walk. Others, however, are a bit more exciting: last exam, last paper, last class, last rainy Williamsburg day, last trip on the bricks. In the process, I have realized that there are a lot of things on this campus that I still need to do before graduation weekend.

Now, I want to be clear that the mindset of “lasts” is never a healthy one. I have been plagued with the curse of never living in the moment for my entire life. I am a great fan of countdowns and to-do lists, and I am always thinking a step ahead. When I was younger, I made enormous countdown calendars for our annual family vacation. They usually involved an intricate grid system that contained squares for the 70 or so days left until our date of departure. Every morning, I would vigorously cross off the day that had passed and gleefully exclaim, “43 days until we leave for Hawaii!” or whatever locale I was anticipating.

In the same vein, I think it is safe to say that I am addicted to Weather.com. The ultimate predictor of the days to come, it has to be in the top five of my most frequented websites. With a 10-day planner, I can form my to-do lists at least a week in advance. While this habit drives some people crazy — specifically my roommate — I am almost always properly dressed for the weather, which in Williamsburg is quite a feat in and of itself, and prepared for a monsoon, should one come our way. I sometimes think I know more about weather in the United States than about current events. Strangely, however, I have never considered meteorology as a career option. I like to think of being a weather nerd as more of a hobby.

Similarly, I have always loved advent calendars around Christmas time, especially the ones with pieces of chocolate inside. I think that these advent calendars are a very useful, if somewhat peculiar, metaphor for our last several weeks at school. Transport yourself back to your youth. During the month of December, every day leading up to Christmas is exhilarating and filled with holiday spirit. New presents appear under the tree, a different classic Christmas film is on ABC Family every night, Christmas cookies abound, eggnog replaces skim milk, and Christmas carols are ubiquitous. As you approach Christmas Day, however, the knowledge that soon all of the merriment will be over and replaced by the gloom of a dreary January creeps up on you. Christmas Day is exciting and wonderful, and then all of the decorations come down and you have a whole year until the next Christmas.

I think it is safe to say that the next six weeks will be filled with a very similar outlook. Every week will be filled with Senior Mug Nights, regular mug nights, festivities, formals, days at the beach, concerts, afternoons on the Sunken Garden, trivia nights and maybe a little work in Earl Gregg Swem Library thrown in for good measure. But as graduation day approaches, I hope that, for once, we can all live in the moment, enjoy our friends, springtime and this amazing College, and not think about the approach of post-graduation day gloom. After all, there are many fun countdowns to be had post-college too, right?

__Emily Walker is a Confusion Corner columnist and will begin to live in the moment as soon as the moment fits her plans. Contact Emily Walker at ekwalker@email.wm.edu.__

Telling Secrets: PostSecret project founder Frank Warren comes to campus

Some things should be kept secret. But PostSecret founder Frank Warren believes that, most of the time, it’s better to share. Warren shared his story about PostSecret with a full audience Thursday in the Commonwealth Auditorium, at an AMP-sponsored event.

Warren has made it a personal mission to help people share their secrets — be they sexual, hopeful, funny, painful — with his online art project PostSecret (postsecret.blogspot.com). On the PostSecret Website, Warren posts postcards that have been anonymously mailed to his home in Germantown, Md.

Warren told the audience that he receives about 200 postcards each day. Over the course of the week, he must whittle over a thousand postcards down to the 20 secrets that are shared on his website every Sunday.

“I think I might fall into the same patterns and have certain blind spots, but I rely on gut feeling to choose the postcards … whatever speaks to me,” Warren said.

Not all secrets have come on postcards — if it can fit in Warren’s mailbox, it’s probably been there. Wedding bands, a knife without a blood-crusted blade, seashells, sonograms, death certificates and an Idaho potato have all appeared in Warren’s mailbox.

A thoughtful barista sent Warren a bag of coffee beans with the note “Where I work, they don’t keep inventory. Enjoy this dark roast.” While giving his presentation on another campus, an audience member stood up and asked Warren if he had tried the coffee. It turns out that the audience member had sent the beans in question.

This type of connection is not uncommon at PostSecret events.

Before he was getting free bags of coffee and stacks of postcards, Warren owned his own small business. While on vacation in Paris, Warren bought three “The Little Prince” postcards. In a dream, he found the postcards inscribed with messages for him. One read “unrecognized evidence, from forgotten journeys, unknowingly rediscovered” and another message was about a “reluctant oracle” postcard project.

To kick start PostSecret, Warren solicited strangers on the streets of Washington, D.C. for their secrets. He gave them postcards with instructions to send him a postcard with a message revealing anything true.

“The most common reaction of stranger was ‘I don’t have any secrets.’ I made sure they took a card … they have best ones,” Warren said.

What began with three postcards has gone much farther. PostSecret has put about a quarter of million
dollars into U.S. Postal Service registers. Warren works 50 to 60 hours per week on Post Secret.

His passion for a seamless presentation and his dedication to providing a safe environment for secret-senders has ensured the success of PostSecret.

Warren is no stranger to the suffering that many of the postcards convey. Of the many postcards he showed the audience, Warren identified one as his epiphany postcard: a picture of a door with multiple punched-through holes and the message “the holes are from when my mom tried knocking down my door so she could continue beating me.”

Warren said the most heart-breaking postcards are sent from children and young adults who experience unnecessary suffering.

As Warren shared his feeling of inadequacy after he could not stop a friend from committing suicide, he encouraged the audience to be direct with friends who may be contemplating suicide. Warren showed a postcard that was a screenshot of a text conversation of one friend simply saying, “I’m worried about you. Are you ok?” The sender said this simple demonstration had saved his life.

PostSecret has certainly created an open dialogue for many issues, and even personal joys and triumphs. Online There are even PostSecret fan communities with active message boards. Warren wants PostSecret to be a living project, so his five books are a better place to store the old postcards, but there are websites dedicated to archiving PostSecret.

Some fans have even gone so far as to directly replicate Warren’s idea. Dozens of imitation sites, feature postcards with anonymous secrets in many languages.

Warren asserts that the internet has been crucial to PostSecret’s success. Consequently, he believes that anyone can and should replicate what he has done — and not just with postcards and secrets.

“There’s nothing genius about Post Secret,” he said. “You could’ve done it.”

At the end of Warren’s presentation, he welcomed students to come up to microphones and share their secrets — without anonymity.

Challenging people to share their secrets is one of Warren’s focuses as he tours college campuses.

“[At PostSecret events] I’m talking less and less,” Warren said. “People are sharing their voice.”

Not many people took the bait — to be exact, only two people came forward. One senior shared her “secret”: She is scared to leave Williamsburg and unsure of her life after graduation.

Chris Marazzo ’13 walked to the front of the auditorium and told fellow students that his ex-girlfriend from high school showed him PostSecret, and claimed that he learned a lot from it.

“The only reason I came out [to the PostSecret event] was because my ex and I used to read PostSecret together. It’s cheesy,” Marazzo said afterwards. “Frank’s the man.”

A posting on the PostSecret event’s Facebook wall mused about the students’s inability to share secrets:
“Regarding the lack of secrets shared at the event tonight: William & Mary: a school without secrets or a secretive school? I’d say the latter.”

Despite students at the College having a secretive nature or fear of sharing, many students waited for over an hour to enter the event.

“I love reading [the Post Secret] blog, and I think it’s a really interesting idea,” Kylie Hiemstra ’13 said. “I thought he was a great speaker and really inspirational. Embarrassingly, I got there an hour and half early.”
After the event, students waited to meet and get books signed by “the most trusted stranger in America.”

“It was a good turnout, overall; people were excited, and the event got even more people into PostSecret,” AMP member Nicole Rugayo ’13 said.

Although Warren’s mother has called PostSecret “diabolical,” he has impacted many lives with his ability to share secrets while making people chuckle, cry and think.

Warren may be called a “world class expert on secrets” and he takes this relationship seriously. He doesn’t foresee a conclusion to the PostSecret project, but wants to continue helping people share.

By sharing, people can strengthen and deepen relationships. Because of PostSecret, Warren has been able to reconnect with his father. He wants other people to share and reap similar benefits.

Warren has even put one of his own secrets in each of his PostSecret’s book. But he doesn’t share everything.

When asked where he keeps all the postcards, Warren replied, “That’s my secret.”

2012 Virginia Senate race kicks off

Although the 2012 Virginia senate election is over a year away, political activists on the College of William and Mary campus are already hopping on board the campaign trail in support of their favorite candidates for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Virginia Senator Jim Webb. Politicians on both sides of the aisle have declared their intent to run for office.

“I am really looking forward to the upcoming election in 2012,” Austen Brower ’14 said. “It should be an interesting race between two very strong candidates.”

The current front runners are George Allen and Tim Kaine. Both have held prominent positions in Virginia politics since the 1990s, and both have served as Governor of the commonwealth. Allen will be vying for the Republican nomination, and Kaine will most likely receive the Democratic nomination.

“You know me as someone willing to fight for the people of Virginia,” George Allen said in his first campaign commercial released in January. “[Our goal is] to bring Virginia’s voices and values back to Washington.”

Allen served in the U.S. House of Representatives before his term as governor. He previously served as a senator for the commonwealth of Virginia before he was defeated in the 2006 general election by Jim Webb. He also served as Virginia’s governor from 1994 to 1998. Some students on campus have already showed support for Allen.

“As chairman of the College Republicans, I would offer my support to whoever wins the Republican primary next summer, which looks to be George Allen,” Tyler Johnson ’13 said. “Allen has a great record of serving the commonwealth of Virginia as both a governor and a senator. I believe 2012 is the year that we can, as a club, assist Allen in once again becoming a senator.”

The 2012 election was projected to be a rematch between Allen and Webb until the current senator declared he would not seek re-election. Now Kaine has declared his intent to run as the Democratic nominee.

“I know that Washington can learn a lot of things about Virginia,” Kaine stated on his website. “We have to be unified and competitive in this tough and competitive world to expand jobs.”

Kaine served as lieutenant governor, mayor of Richmond and a Richmond city councilman before becoming governor. During his term as governor, Kaine was appointed the Chair of the Democratic National Committee. Last semester, Kaine spoke about his political past to the students of the College in the Sir Christopher Wren Building.

“The William and Mary Young Democrats are excited that Tim Kaine has decided to run,” Katie Deabler ’12, president of the Young Democrats, said in an e-mail. “While we would have loved to help re-elect Senator Webb, Governor Kaine has a history of serving the Commonwealth well as mayor of Richmond and as governor. I’m sure the W&M Young Democrats will be actively campaigning in Williamsburg and all over Virginia.”

As of right now, Kaine will not be facing any challengers in the Democratic primary. Despite leading in the polls, Allen will face Jamie Radtke, a Richmond Tea Party activist, and David McCormick, an attorney from Hampton Roads, in the Republican primary. Candidate Jamie Radtke recently spoke to the William and Mary College Republicans about her campaign.

“We need to shake up the leadership in both parties in Washington,” Radtke stated to the club. “We need to bring in a fresh new perspective to DC politics.”

Over the next few months, the Senate race may change if additional candidates decide to run. Regardless of who enters the race, politically active students will be right behind their favorite candidates on the campaign trail.

Backing new checks

Next year, the College of William and Mary will begin to conduct background checks on faculty applicants. This means that unless the charges can be adequately explained, candidates with any type of criminal history will be removed from the applicant pool. We believe this is an important new part of the application process, and a provision which should have already been in place for some time.

These background checks will be conducted by a background officer — the position will likely be filled by someone already in the administration — who will run the applicants’ names through a database. As another feature of this new application process, new hires will enter their fingerprints into a database. The program has been verified by law enforcement. Any findings will not be released beyond the College’s administration, and results will be destroyed after the hiring decision has been made. We applaud the College for taking the necessary precautions to keep our campus safe, and we are also pleased to see it will be done in a way so as to not offend the candidates or harm the integrity of the application process.

Prospective students already go through a similar process when applying to the College, and it is only fair that prospective faculty members do the same. We want to ensure the College only accepts the best individuals, and this can only be achieved by excluding those persons who have been charged with and found guilty of some criminal offense.

The College is one of the first universities in Virginia to implement a process like this. Some speculate the College has taken this initiative in response to the circumstances surrounding the dismissal of former assistant economics professor Justin May, arrested last year on child pornography charges. While the situation with May and similar incidents on other college campuses likely factored into the College’s decision, what matters most the safety of our campus. Screening potential faculty members is one more way to ensure safety here at the College.

Registration error: complete override of process is necessary

Ah, registration. There’s nothing else that can change your opinion of the College of William and Mary so drastically in 30 seconds. It’s the only time I’ve really ever cared that my laptop seems to be one hundredth of a second slower than everyone else’s computer. If you’re like me, you hopped on Facebook about five seconds after you were done registering to find your news feed populated by people who think, at least for the time being, the College sucks. After exhausting my list and registering for a whole six credits, I can’t exactly blame them.

The changes made to registration this semester — the results of an open forum, a student survey and what was likely dozens of angry e-mails — meant students only had 24 hours to register instead of the entire week, and the major restriction, previously effective only on senior and junior days, was enforced through the sophomore day as well. In the Class of 2014, it seemed as if nobody was aware of the changes, which lead to an impressive amount of loud swearing at around 3:31 p.m. last Thursday.

I credit the Office of the University Registrar with doing the best it could to make the process as simple and efficient as possible at a school with fairly small class sizes and 5,700 students. It’s really tough to run registration without giving anyone the shaft, but I’m still having a hard time choosing between the lesser of about 40 evils.

Yes, keeping major restrictions all week will benefit rising sophomores who have declared their major, but it hurts two groups of people: those who are capable of selecting a major but want to take more classes in a department before they commit, and those who don’t have enough credits to declare a major. The major restrictions put an undue burden on the former group and are flat-out unfair to the latter.

If the College wants to maintain its commitment to letting students try out a variety of departments before selecting a major — a goal consistent with its liberal arts mission — then it needs to put up or shut up. This comes into direct conflict with the effort to give students the chance to take lots of major classes done during sophomore year — especially those who are minoring or double majoring — but that’s the nature of the beast. As it stands now, registration was a disaster for non-majors looking to take government, history or International Relations classes. Unconfirmed rumors originating from whomever majors in philosophy suggest that those classes filled also up fast.

The 24-hour registration block was touted as a way to give departments more accurate numbers in order to adjust their class offerings, but the direct effects of that may be invisible to students. What is apparent is that anyone worth his or her salt has a senior friend either kind enough or bribable enough to hold a spot for them. If you’re not with the program, the scheduling changes weren’t likely to help you out a lot: the spot transfers were merely delayed rather than eradicated. Unless the College is planning to tolerate serious sign-up restrictions or delays, black market registration will be impossible to stamp out.

The College needs to strip the registration process of everything besides its pragmatism. This means basing registration blocks on credits earned rather than social class — not one at a time, but in sensible groups. This sacrifices an upperclassman privilege in order to recognize that those who have filed an intent to graduate need to take upper-level classes to do so, even if they aren’t a senior. Departments should be able to place major, minor or GER restrictions if they need to, but they should first make sure everyone can get the credits they need and worry about everything else later.

The College should also make sure that any future changes are well-publicized so students don’t get any nasty surprises after it’s too late to change their plans, and should focus more on open opportunities and less on special privileges for specific groups. No one expects to be walking on sunshine through registration, but we can keep the process as painless as possible.

Letter to the Editor: Streamlined coalition

To preface this story, I want to note that the professor described had sent out a very diplomatic e-mail to all of his students, noting that there would be no punishments for walking out, but that he would continue class regardless of how many students were left. A few minutes after the start of class on Monday, two Living Wage Coalition members burst into Andrews 101, interrupting the professor mid-lecture. They shouted to the class, reminding them of the walk out occurring in a few minutes, citing solidarity with such varied groups as the Living Wage Coalition, Martin Luther King, Jr. and the AFL-CIO. After they left to their own cheering, the entire class let out nervous giggles. The professor continued with his lecture as if nothing had happened. By 12:20 p.m. not a single student out of the two hundred person lecture had left their seat.

I don’t think this lack of participation in what was supposed to be a campus-wide walk out can in any way be attributed to a lack of sympathy from students towards the workers who clean their dorms. Instead, it seems to be an example of the hostility and confusion towards the Living Wage Coalition on our campus.
As I mentioned above, the walk out seemed to be in support of at least three different organizations, each with radically different agendas and goals. Even within the LWC there doesn’t seem to be a definite goal. After all, what is a living wage? Do they mean the cost of living in Williamsburg (where it is definitely more expensive), or in the surrounding counties and cities where most of the staff seems to live?

Secondly, the LWC does itself no good by taking such a radical and hostile position. Despite our frustrations with the College, most students seem to like College President Reveley. By personally attacking him, they further alienate themselves from the rest of the student body. When Living Wage members burst into classrooms and interrupt lectures they undermine their methods of passive, non-violent protest. Instead of painting any faculty or administrators who do not work with them as hostile, they should respect neutral opinions. A less militant, more streamlined coalition is something, in my opinion, most students would support.

Wage campaign with updated tactics

During the past decade a lot of ink has been spent in an attempt to understand the organization and psychology of student protests. The standard reading has been that, following the tide of college activism which swept across the globe in the 1960s and 1970s, the “me generation” of the 1980s and 1990s was more interested in securing jobs than in righting wrongs. This, of course, is a grievous over simplification — complaining is one of students’s most cherished traditions, next to drinking — but generally protests have declined in number and participants. Beginning in the new millennium, however, rumblings began of a new wave of college activists that would bring back the glory days.

Monday’s activities, although small even by the College of William and Mary’s standards, testified to this. In fact, the recent campus activity of the Living Wage Coalition is directly in line with national trends of campus activism.

From the start, labor rights have been central to the last decade or so of student protests. One researcher argues that the story begins with the AFL-CIO’s mid-90s reorganization which focused a large portion of its budget on organizing efforts. This new organization paid special attention to students, and the mega-union put thousands through its Union Summer program with the explicit goal of using ex-interns to influence students to take action on labor initiatives.

The strategy bore fruit in the late ’90s with the rise of student anti-sweatshop campaigns, where the first major initiative was initiated by a former Union summer intern. When backed by organized labor and especially by UNITE, a union which represents apparel workers and had an interest in combating low price imports, students successfully convinced many universities to be more conscientious when purchasing school apparel.

As in most protests, the anti-sweatshop campaign was not a one-issue movement and consequently drew like-minded students together along many lines. The living wage campaign can be seen as one of its descendants. The movement came of age in 2001. That year, the Harvard Progressive Student Labor Movement initiated a highly visible, and eventually successful, campaign to protest the wages of university employees. Several other universities soon followed suit, and the College is only a relative latecomer to the game.

These current labor-centric campus movements are distinct from the protests of the ’60s in several ways. For one, they are relatively small. The groups do not represent a large population on campuses, but rather a very vocal minority. Although many students may agree with their aims in theory, most are usually indifferent at best. However, technology, especially the internet and social media, allows activists to gain resourses and advice from similar groups. It also encourages the formation of similar movements on other campuses.

The final trend in this sort of student activism is the necessity of spectacle. Because the groups are small and most students and administrators are indifferent to them, the easiest way to draw attention to their cause is through disruptions. Many of the anti-sweatshop protests only achieved their goal after members occupied administrative buildings. The Harvard PSLM took similar recourse and after sustained protests at Harvard Yard, which reportedly caused students living nearby to file 100 noise complaints, 26 activists staged a weeklong occupation of a building. Other groups soon followed this tactic. In fact, most significant concessions to living wage movements seem to follow disruptive, sustained protests. It is also interesting to note that the utility of such a tactic is not in converting other students or faculty to the cause, since in many cases students become increasingly annoyed with the protesters. Rather, it seems it is the annoyances and media attention engendered by these sorts of protests which prompt official concessions.

These trends also seem to hold for the College’s incarnation of the living wage movement, though I don’t see students occupying buildings here.