Home Blog Page 148

Candidates face off in SA debate

0

The three candidates for president of the College of William and Mary’s Student Assembly debated topics ranging from sustainability to sexuality in the Sadler Center’s Commonwealth Auditorium, Sunday.

The debate, moderated by government professor Clay Clemens, consisted of prepared questions submitted by each campaign, followed by questions taken from audience members.

Presidential candidate Sen. Ben Brown ’11 and vice presidential candidate Sen. Betty Jeanne Manning ’12 began the debate by highlighting their sustainability efforts, including a campus-wide recycling program and the possibility of a communal bicycle program.

“Our ticket is the only ticket that has been able to work with other organizations for sustainability,” Brown said.

In response, presidential candidate Jessee Vasold ’11 and vice presidential candidate Caitlin Goldblatt ’11 said their sustainability platform had been crafted with the input of members of the Student Environmental Action Coalition. Vasold said the campaign’s goals included phasing out blue books for exams and ending daily purchase of copies of the New York Times and Virginia Gazette.

Presidential candidate Chrissy Scott ’11 and vice presidential candidate Kaveh Sadeghian ’12 said they would continue the College’s current sustainability efforts.

“When it comes down to sustainability, I think we’re seeing a lot of initiatives already taking place on campus,” Scott said. “I think [the Committee on Sustainability] has been very successful in its funding of initiatives on campus.”

The candidates then discussed the ideal role of the SA.

Vasold said the SA should take an active role in College issues.

“We think that the [SA] is, by definition, an activist organization,” Vasold said. “Not a left-wing organization, but one that takes student input into consideration.”

Scott said that to be truly effective, the SA must increase transparency.

“We want students to be aware of what the SA is doing,” she said. “We want to be as accessible as possible.”

While the candidates agreed students at the College should have more input in SA decisions, they disagreed on the value of prior SA experience.

Brown and Manning said their time in the senate has given them the chance to affect student health and safety issues, including “know your rights” cards and potential alterations to the College’s medical amnesty policy. Collectively, the two have five years of experience in the SA.

Vasold also touted previous SA experience.

“As the only presidential candidate with extensive experience with the executive branch of the SA, I’ve worked with two SA presidents as undersecretary of LGBT affairs,” Vasold said.

Scott and Sadeghian said activity within the College also provides insight. Their SA experience is Scott’s tenure as treasurer for the Class of 2011.

“My involvement with the SA has been minimal, but my involvement on campus has been strong,” Sadeghian said.

Addressing criticisms about the distribution of SA funds, the candidates also described plans for financial reform within the senate.

“What the SA really needs is an attitude shift,” Vasold said. “I know what it’s like to be denied funding. We need to get past the petty nit-picking of funding events that we like.”

Scott said the SA should be more active in the promotion of new events and groups.

“New events just get zero [funding] right away,” Scott said. “If a group wants to hold a new event, we want to know the details and what they want to do, so they don’t automatically get zero.”

The candidates also addressed how their own sexuality would affect their campaigns.

“Sexuality is something that I think affects all of us at a personal level,” Brown said. “As far as my sexuality affecting my candidacy, I would never let my personal sexual preferences affect a policy decision.”

Vasold said that his involvement in the LGBT community influences the campaign.

“As a queer [identified] student, my sexuality has allowed me to work with different groups and organizations on campus,” Vasold said.

Scott said she did not have the same insights into sexuality as other candidates, but that the SA has made efforts to improve connections to diversity at the College.

“As a straight woman, I understand that I’m in a privileged position and that I don’t understand all the issues,” she said. “But that’s what great about exec — that we have an undersecretary of LGBT affairs.”

The debate ended with closing statements from each campaign.

Vasold encouraged students to vote, regardless of who they ultimately choose.

“Your voice is echoed through these decisions and elections,” Vasold said. “Caitlin and I have experience in the SA. We can get the job done.”

Scott reiterated her desire to make the SA a more inclusive body.

“We want the SA to be representative of the school,” Scott said. “I want the SA to embody the students at William and Mary.”

Brown and Manning said their history in the SA made them the better choice for president and vice president.

“Experience and hard work are two different things,” Manning said. “Ben and I are the only ticket to have worked on all the issues that were brought up.”

SA elections are scheduled to take place March 31.

Mims appointed to Virginia Supreme Court

0

Former Virginia Attorney General Bill Mims ’79 was appointed to the Virginia Supreme Court March 10.

Mims replaced current Gov. Bob McDonnell as attorney general after McDonnell resigned last February to run for governor. He served through January, at which point he was replaced by Ken Cuccinelli.

“Bill is an extraordinary public servant and a longtime personal friend,” McDonnell said in a press release. “He has long been one of my closest co-workers in nearly 20 years in public office … We need individuals of Bill’s character and intelligence in public service, and while he may have thought his time serving Virginia was over, [the] appointment is welcome news to all of us who know just how uniquely qualified and decent a person he is.”

Mims earned a B.A. in history from the College of William and Mary, also studying public administration and serving as student body president.

“Bill Mims has served the commonwealth brilliantly and selflessly throughout his career,” College President Taylor Reveley said. “He will be a superb addition to the Virginia Supreme Court. William and Mary is enormously proud of our alumnus, Justice Mims.”

Before his appointment as attorney general, Mims worked as McDonnell’s chief deputy from 2006 to 2009. Previously, Mims served in the Virginia General Assembly from 1992 to1997 and in the Virginia State Senate from 1998 to 2005.

“The overwhelming support for Bill’s appointment to the highest court in Virginia is a reflection of the high regard in which he is held by leaders from both parties,” McDonnell said. “Bill will make a tremendous Supreme Court Justice, and I congratulate him on yet another accomplishment in a life dedicated to serving the citizens of Virginia.”

Mims’ Supreme Court position goes into effect April 1.

Honor Council forms task force

0

The College of William and Mary Undergraduate Honor Council announced the creation of a task force March 23 aimed at reevaluating the election of Honor Council members.

“At this point, the entire process is going to be reevaluated,” Undergraduate Honor Council Chair Justice John Pothen ’11 said. “Questions are going to be asked about every step of the process.”

The Honor Council Election Reform Task Force is made up of eight members — Skyler Halbritter ’11, Andy Rudd ’11, Stefanie Felitto ’12, Asha Williams ’12, economics professor Jennifer Mellor, English professor Brett Wilson, Dean Dave Gilbert and Internal Audit Director Michael Stump. The committee contains two members each from the Honor Council, the general student body, faculty and campus administration.

Honor Council members are currently elected in the spring through an online student ballot. Each student is able to vote for up to eight members of the rising sophomore, junior and senior classes. Students are prohibited from campaigning for the Honor Council. The task force will consider alternatives to the ban.

“I think it is fair to say that no one believes the process works exactly the way we might want it to,” Pothen said. “We hope to elect individuals based on their character and whether they are suitable to do the job. While the people I’ve worked with on council during my terms have been excellent, I think there are serious, legitimate doubts about whether the current process is the best way to do that.”

The task force will also evaluate changing the ballot. Currently, students base their vote on each candidate’s 200-word response to a question.

Rudd said that the task force would discuss issues concerning the possibility for campaign and ballot changes, though that is not its sole responsibility.

“Those ideas have been mentioned, but certainly are not the explicit purpose of the task force,” Rudd said. “We hope to analyze things that have worked in the council’s elections process, and more importantly, identify areas for improvement.”

While this year’s voter turnout decreased from last year, Rudd said the issue is not a cause for concern.

“The task force was not formed in response to low voter turnout,” Rudd said. “Last year’s
turnout was abnormally high, which is largely attributed to the referendum that ran concurrent to our election last year. When looking at last year as an outlier, turnout has actually continued on an upward trend.”

The Honor Council hopes to receive input from the student body on the comments section of its website, and will also distribute a limited, random survey to the student body. The task force will provide a final report of recommendations to the Honor Council at an undeclared date.

When an aid becomes addiction

0

A freshman club athlete, George sighs when he thinks about his three-year experience with prescription stimulants. While many healthy students actively seek prescription stimulants to get an edge or experience a high, George, who has ADD, sees Adderall as a necessary evil and a means to a successful academic career.

“Generally, people I know with a prescription don’t like it,” he said.

And yet, Adderall and other related stimulants are shared illegally on campus, providing students with medications an opportunity to make profit. George recalls during his senior year in high school, when the market for focus aids was particularly active. Although he never sold a pill, George admits to sharing with a friend who sold to a group of students taking the exam.

Perhaps the attractiveness of prescription stimulants is rooted in actual success stories like George’s, who began taking Adderall right around the SATs and claims that his scores improved in comparison to his practice results.

Standardized testing provides academic pressure that pushes some of the most motivated students to prescription drug abuse. Another student, Vinny, admits to becoming illegally involved with prescription stimulants, specifically Ritalin, Adderall and Vivance, during AP testing in his junior year.

“Any standardized test I took to get into this school,” Vinny says, brows furrowed for a moment as he appreciates the implications of his drug abuse. “I was fucked up,” he said.

George admits to abusing Adderall on occasion, in order to stay up all night for papers or late-night games, although he expresses frustration with students like Vinny, who abuse in order to get “fucked up.” He believes it has the opposite effect, and accuses students who claim otherwise to be trying to look cool.

“I’ve never been high from it. I hate it. I enjoy not taking it. I take it only when I have to. I don’t like the way it makes me feel, like a zombie,” George said.

After five years at the College of William and Mary, Dr. Virginia D. Wells, director of the Student Health Center, refrains from commenting on the severity of a stimulant abuse problem on campus, which she reserves as a matter of opinion. However, she acknowledges that the policy in place at the College of referring ADD and ADHD patients elsewhere is due to a commonly perceived potential for abuse of stimulant drugs at universities.

“At many colleges, there are policies in place that students come armed with their information and be prescribed medication by either their psychiatrist or practicing physician, and that that relationship continues, so that we don’t get into the position of being drug dealers,” Wells said.

Wells acknowledged a particular risk associated with the unregulated use of Adderall. The drug will work to treat other underlying disorders such as depression, and without a complete evaluation, a student may be inappropriately treating more serious problems while masking their symptoms.

Unfortunately for Vinny, his abuse of prescription drugs led to a far more serious problem with stimulants that drastically affected his life. He succumbed to a classic behavior pattern associated with addiction: seeking a more extreme high.

“I trace the huge drug problems I had later in life — my coke addiction — back to those days,” Vinny said.

Cocaine, like Adderall, causes increased energy, decreased appetite and an increased heart rate. The difference is that cocaine is highly illegal, and Adderall is becoming increasingly available.

“It was really cheap. I’d get five pills for five dollars,” Vinny said.

George, who has some experience sniffing lines, describes fellow students who snort Adderall in order to create an experience similar to the cocaine rush.

“It kicks in right away,” he said. “It doesn’t curb your appetite, although you don’t get the same concentration, and it doesn’t last as long.”

For George, dependency has never been a personal concern, but his outright distaste for the medication led him to question the necessity of the drug. He said he didn’t understand why students with ADD and ADHD get not only medical help, but also extra time on tests, teacher’s notes and other accommodations. The answer lies in the chemistry of his brain.

“Picture my sensory input as a hose with a kink in it,” George said. “I process things slower, and in that lapse it becomes easier for my mind to become focused on something else.”

Vinny came away from his experience with stimulants claiming to be a different, less positive person, while George, who has been exposed to a spectrum of stimulants such as Ritalin, Concerta, Welbutrin, Provigil and Dexedrine, insists that the drugs make him less goofy and more argumentative and uptight. Despite the negative side effects, George said he does not plan on getting off drugs any time soon.

“I’ll have a prescription as long as I need it to work,” he said.

While misuse of the prescriptions can lead to dependency, Wells said that the medication has benefits.

“When used appropriately, these drugs can be life saving, and they should be available to young people; but they need to be prescribed judiciously. I have had maybe one student come in and seek help for drug dependency and have referred that student to the appropriate place,” Wells said.

That Girl: Katy Andell

0

_I met Katy Andell on the back porch of the Grind so she could get her quick fix of caffeine and sunshine. Self-assured and down to earth, she told me about her love of the Sharpe Community Scholars Program and of tutoring English as a second language. Before our interview, Katy had just recently discovered that she’s been awarded a Fulbright English Teaching Assistantship in Germany for next year. If her continued dedication to her own studies is any indication — she brought homework for before and after the interview — she will certainly do well teaching abroad and researching education and immigration policy._

*What are you looking forward to this week?*

I really take it day by day. Since I’m a senior, I really try to find as much time to spend with my friends as possible. There’s a new movie coming out at the Kimball [Theatre], so we’ll probably go see that sometime soon. I’m finishing my thesis this week, and that’s something I’ve been working on most of the year. I will also probably go to the Scott Foster night at the [Greene] Leafe [Café].

*Tell me about your thesis.*

I’m a government and European studies double major, so I’m writing a thesis on the integration of immigrants through the German education system. And that’s really interesting. I focus on language, structure, why immigrants don’t get integrated into German society, and why the education system is partially to blame for that. I actually went to Germany two years ago — visited schools and talked to students, teachers and administrators. This was part of a Monroe [Scholars] project I conducted after my sophomore year. I just backpacked around. It was a big turning point in my life because I did it completely on my own. It helped me realize how self-sufficient I am — or can be.

*Can you tell me about your involvement on campus?*

I’m a head resident in the Randolph [Complex], and that’s probably my biggest time commitment. I was [a Resident Assistant] for two years in Yates [Hall], and then I became a head resident. Basically, I work with the RAs as a kind of mentor, and I also do hall council, which is probably one of my biggest time commitments right now because we’re planning an Iron Chef competition. We’re really excited because we’re getting dining services involved. They are actually going to loan us part of the [Commons Dining Hall] and provide us with food and everything. I really look forward to planning that with my hall council.

*What will you do during your Fulbright Assistantship abroad next year?*

I’ll be teaching English somewhere in Germany as well as American cultural studies. We’ll kind of be acting as ambassadors to reach out to the communities and tell them about the United States, who we are, and our values. The goal is to facilitate intercultural dialogue. The scholarship is something I’ve been thinking about for awhile with my research in education, and I never studied abroad because I just assumed I didn’t have enough money to do it. I know that’s not the case now, and I feel like it’s something I missed out on. The application process was very stressful, and it started all the way back in late August. I just now found out that I got the scholarship.

*What do you hope to do after your Fulbright scholarship?*

I’d really like to go to grad school for education or immigration policy. I used to want to work for the State Department, but I’ve decided not to do that because I want to be able to do something where I actually interact with people all the time. I worked for the State Department last summer, and, even though I was in public affairs, it was just too much in the office. I’d like to be a professor or teacher, someone who can affect policy.

*Do you imagine you’ll stay in Germany after the completion of your scholarship?*

I don’t know. There’s actually an option to take university courses while completing the Fulbright, but that will depend on where I’m ultimately placed. Going to grad school in Germany, or anywhere in continental Europe, would be much cheaper than doing it in the [United] States, so that’s an option. But I really love the United States, and I’m not as familiar with the programs in Europe.

*What campus events are you most excited about participating in during your last semester here?*

I’m excited for my last King and Queens [Ball], and everything leading up to graduation, like the Last Chance Dance … all of the things that seniors do, More seriously, I tutor English as a second language, and I’ve really gotten close to the two students I tutor. I want to make sure I make an impact on them and make the transition smooth to find someone else to tutor them after I’m gone.

*What’s the best book you’ve ever read for a class?*

One book I really liked is “The Wall Jumper” by Peter Schneider. I read it for a history of Germany class that I loved — the professor was awesome. It’s a novel that focuses on East Berlin and the [Berlin] Wall. I read it before I ever went to Germany.

*Who do you think has made the biggest impact on you here at the College?*

I was a Sharpe scholar freshman year, and the experience was wonderful. Really what made college for me was living in that community and meeting like-minded people who are concerned about social issues. They are all of my best friends now; we live together and work together with Sharpe.

*What is your favorite spot on campus?*

I’d say the barbecue pit in Randolph, just because I really love that community and the people in it. It’s a perfect spot for socializing and seeing who’s walking by.

_If you stop by the Commons about two weeks from now, you may see Katy displaying her ultimate cooking skills in the Iron Chef competition. But don’t be too intimidated; she’s only just won a Fulbright and finished a thesis, too._

Professor finishes tenure, not career

0

In this stressful week that is registration, many students will log into Banner only to find one familiar name absent — Professor David Holmes.

After spending hours trying to work their schedules around that one Holmes’s class, many students will be disappointed; David Holmes is retiring after his 45 years at the College.

Holmes started teaching at the College in the English department in the fall of 1965. However, his stay in that department was short-lived; in 1968, he became one of the founding members of the department of religion, now called the department of religious studies.

“In college, I took a vocations test, and according to this test I was supposed to become a minister or a pastor,” Holmes said. “I guess a religious studies professor is just the combination of that.”

After teaching at the College for 45 years, Holmes witnessed some of the College’s greatest controversies. For example, during the Wren Cross controversy and former President Gene Nichol’s resignation, Holmes was the faculty member who participated in the debate about Nichol. He said he believes Nichol could have avoided controversy.

“If only he had appointed a committee of students, faculty and alumni to study the question,” he said. “They would surely have reached a decision to make the cross optional for use, because a committee appointed during the controversy reached that conclusion–and quickly.”

Even without the committee, Holmes defended Nichol’s choice.

“Crosses weren’t used by Protestant churches until the late 19th century, as they were seen as a form of idolatry,” he said. “Anglican and Episcopal churches in Virginia churches had no crosses until the 20th century. And the Wren Chapel is intended to replicate an Anglican collegiate chapel. It didn’t have even a part-time cross until 1940.”

Nevertheless, Holmes believes that the Board of Visitors acted fairly and normally in its treatment of Nichol.
“I did not know if they were correct or not in their concerns about the president; I trusted that them to make the best decision they could based on the information they possessed,” Holmes said. “I tended to have confidence in both Nichol and the Board.”

Throughout his time at the College, Holmes’s classes have always been viewed as some of the most important, fundamental classes at the College. They combine his passionate, humorous lectures with interesting reading assignments such as fictional or autobiographical works.

“[The books that I assign] usually deal with religious history and also with life,” Holmes said. “whereas some textbooks don’t. Every book I assign should relate to the life we have lived or could live. The class lectures focus on church history, but the assigned reading is broader.”

Beyond assigning relevant class readings he goes out of his way to make sure the classroom experience is interesting and worthwhile for all of the students participating.

“He is one of the most engaging professors I have had at college,” Liz Kelly ’12, a current student in one of Holmes’ classes, said. “His anecdotes are relevant to class material and [are] always engaging. He really makes an effort to get to know his students.”

The effort Holmes puts into teaching is apparent, and because of this he is anxious about possible changes in the near future. One of his current concerns about classes is increasing class size to soften the budget cuts.

“I’m purposefully teaching an overload [schedule] because of cuts with classes — if I taught an extra class I could reduce the class size,” Holmes said. “Small classes always have the best discussions.”

Now that he is retiring, Holmes will work on finishing his fifth book, which examines post-World War II presidents and their religious beliefs. He delivered his most recent lecture, “Behind the Altars of Camelot,” March 25 and examined John and Jackie Kennedy’s religious beliefs. He attributes his interest in Kennedy to the social scene during the time of Kennedy’s election.

“I was a young man — his was the first election I participated in,” he said. “Kennedy sparked something to encourage the Quiet Generation to get America moving again. And the religious faith was controversial.”
Holmes also commented on how the United States has changed religiously since 1965.

“In the 1950s and early 60s the trend was towards greater church involvement,” he said. “Everybody except New York intellectuals seemed to belong to a church or synagogue. At one point a survey indicated that a huge percentage of Americans believed in God. And there was also a great fear of Roman Catholic authoritarianism. But who worries about Roman Catholicism eliminating religious pluralism now? All main-line churches are struggling.”

John Stanford ’10, who helped Holmes fact-check and type his book on religion and the presidents, describes Holmes’s influence on students.

“With his departure, the College loses one of its truly great professors,” Stanford said. “One can only be remiss that future graduates will not have had him as such a tremendous influence.”

Behind Closed Doors: Save water, shower together

0

It’s not even April yet, and I’m already sick of the rain. It’s kind of depressing and generally not very sexy. It makes you want to stay in bed, but not in the lusty, ravenous sense. I try to keep telling myself, “April showers bring May flowers.” So while we’re stuck in this downpour, I say we live it up. April showers, baby.

Shower sex is one of my favorite pastimes. A steamy, torrid scene played out in the bathroom is always welcome in my book. And cleaning up while getting dirty has a lot of advantages.

Genitals are lovely things, but they live between our legs — a place that is often both sweaty and stinky. Many people cite this fact as a reason not to give oral sex. And that’s understandable. Who wants to put their mouth on a smelly sex organ? Showering during sex, then, solves this problem. Make those goodies fresh and clean.

This reasoning also follows for period sex. Period blood can be particularly messy and odiferous. Luckily, we invented a wonderful thing called soap. Soap it up, rinse it off, stick it in.

Perhaps the most obvious positive is you get to hit two birds with one stone. Don’t have enough time for a romp and a shower? Combine them for double the pleasure and double the fun in half the time.

If you have more time, but still want to get wet while getting wet, try a bath if you have access to one. Baths can be very romantic, especially when candles, soft lighting and lovin’ music are involved. They are also a relaxing way to spend time bonding with your partner.

However, shower sex isn’t a perfect option. One of the major complications that can arise is size difference between partners. In a bed, generally, the playing field is leveled. There are a lot of different position options for any combination of body sizes. In the shower, however, both of you must be standing. This lends itself particularly to sex from behind. But if your fun parts don’t line up, it’s difficult to achieve insertion. If you’re lucky, your partner is strong and can lift you up to get your bajingo at equal height with his rod. If you’re unlucky, you’re just going to have to learn to stand on your tiptoes or bend your knees for a while.

Another complication that many of you may face is communal bathrooms. They’re often dirty from overuse, and it’s impossible to find alone time in them. This means that shower sex can only be a sometimes-treat. My recommendation? If you really must get down and dirty while getting clean, wait until the middle of a school night. And for propriety’s sake, keep it down.

The most serious complication to shower sex is the use of a condom. Water, although it seems it would be, is not a good lubricant. Therefore, condoms, which are already prone to dry up, may do so in the shower. The increased friction is likely to cause them to break. This means that other forms of contraception should be used in conjunction with a condom while engaging in shower sex.

Obstacles aside, shower sex is perfect for the month of April. As you sit forlornly staring out the window, watching the rain fall, turning campus into a gigantic puddle, consider the fun you could be having with water.

_Maya Horowitz is the Flat Hat sex columnist. Maya prefers her hygiene with a little bit of pleasure in the mornings. _

News in Brief: Miller Hall experiences leak

0

Alan B. Miller Hall experienced serious leakage problems when a pipe fitting on the hot water heating system failed and sprayed water on the ceiling of one of the classrooms. According to College spokesperson Brian Whitson, the room suffered damage to a portion of the ceiling, minor damage to a hallway ceiling and potential damage to a number of the computers.

Police Beat: March 23 to March 27

0

Tuesday, Mar. 23 — An individual was extradited to New Mexico for alleged possession of marijuana at College Landing Park.

Wednesday, Mar. 24 — An individual reported burglary at the 600 Block of York Street. Damages included broken glass.

Saturday, Mar. 27 — A driver was arrested and faced suspension of their driver’s license at the 100 Block of Bypass Road.

News in Brief: Eastern trailhead of Capital Trail opens

0

Virginia First Lady Maureen McDonnell opened the eastern trailhead of the Virginia Capital Nature Trail in a dedication ceremony March 26.

The Virginia Capital Trail is expected to be completed in 2014 and will connect Virginia’s past and present capitals, Williamsburg and Richmond, along Route 5.

“The Virginia Capital Trail embraces the Commonwealth’s scenic beauty and rich history,” McDonnell said in a press release. “Like the informational stations in Virginia State Parks, the interactive kiosk at the eastern trailhead will enhance the experience for all who use it.”

The trailhead includes an electronic, interactive kiosk that provides information on public accommodations, historical sites and wildlife along the trail.

According to Beth Weisbrod, the executive director of the Virginia Capital Trail Foundation, a $110,000 grant from The Dominion Foundation allowed for the installation of two additional kiosks.