Home Blog Page 163

Beyond the Burg: UBC constructs greenest building in North America

0

The University of British Columbia-Vancouver is in the process of designing the greenest building in North America for its Centre for Interactive Research on Sustainability.

Construction began last September, and the building is currently set to open in summer 2011 on the aptly named Sustainability Street of UBC’s Vancouver campus.

“Sustainability is about what kind of world we want to live in,” John Robinson, project leader and professor at UBC’s Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability said.

The $37 million building will house sustainability research, development and practice.

It is designed to be greenhouse gas-positive and a net-energy producer, which will reduce the energy UBC uses and the carbon it emits. All water used throughout the building will be collected from rainwater, and there will be wastewater treatment on site.

The university has also designed the building to be easily deconstructed, to make the building more adaptable to future green technologies. As current green systems grow outdated, they can be replaced by more efficient ones at minimal cost.

Building processes such as building occupancy, inhabitant behavior, water harvesting and treatment, heating, cooling, lighting and equipment use will be monitored at all times.

This information will be made accessible to the facility’s desktop computers where they can vote on what features are helpful.

In a October 2009 report, Robinson recommended that the Centre also be the future home of the University Sustainability Initiative to create a single powerhouse for all of UBC’s sustainable activities. Most North American universities separate the academic and operational sides of the sustainability efforts.

“It’s proven hard to [integrate these programs],” Robinson said. “They’re very different worlds.”

The Centre is looking forward in involving the public community. “Community engagement isn’t just desirable in principle,” Robinson said. “It’s actually necessary to achieve a sustainable future.”

CIRS is currently partnered with Simon Fraser University, the Emily Carr Institute of Art and Design and the British Columbia Institute of Technology.

Confusion Corner: Conquering Colds

0

Being sick in college sucks. Alright, being sick anytime sucks, but you remember the time in like elementary school when you used to hope beyond hope for a sick day? This was the time when you did not just want to pretend to be sick — parents tend to see right through that when they whip out the thermometer anyway — but you wanted to have just enough of a temperature for them to relent with a heavy, almost ironic sigh, “I guess you can stay home today.”

Then, your mom takes the day off from work. “The kid’s sick,” she tells them, provoking a symphony of “aw” on the other end of the line. You’re too naive to realize that it’s a sick day for her, too. With her presence, you have Gatorade on demand — your choice of flavors. (No, of course not the yellow one. Who drinks the yellow one?) You watch the “Land Before Time” series, entries one through five. You watch daytime soaps, but, confused by the steady, lugubrious and flow of melodrama, soon switch over to NickToons. It’s a strangely spent day, without the quick recovery and afternoon of playful frolicking you’d expected — but there’s still a degree of enjoyment to the whole thing.

Now, years later — without the sympathy your “rumbly stomach” used to elicit — you’re left completely to your own devices. Make yourself chicken noodle soup? Preposterous. You don’t even own chicken noodle soup, or crackers, Gatorade or ginger ale — all the wonderful, magical nutrients that used to pack your family’s pantry. It seems more like a treasure trove, in retrospect, than you’d ever imagined. Instead, you look in your own refrigerator, and all you find is a half-eaten package of Kraft singles and leftover chili. You have the sneaking suspicion that, if you weren’t sick already, these would more than easily do the trick.
Not to mention, everybody who hears you’re sick has some opinion on the matter, as if your illness turns them into WebMD incarnate. “Get some rest.” “Get some exercise.” “Stay hydrated,” they’ll tell you, to the point where the mere sight of Gatorade makes you more nauseous than you were before.

There’s the obvious compulsion to get work done as well. Unlike in fourth grade, you’re not missing hand-turkeys and multiplication drills. Instead, it’s presentations, quizzes and notes for that class in which you just got a ‘C’ on the midterm. There’s always the assumption that, sure, you’re not feeling great, Bub, but there’s shit needs doing. But your mind’s more scrambled than the immune system-boosting shake you, unsuccessfully, tried to make a few hours earlier.

Instead of focusing, your mind feverishly races from one topic to another: What’s on TV? Why is it called “All My Children?” Are the characters all cousins? Where do ducks come from? Ke$ha songs are like crack cocaine. (I can’t remember why.) Where do ducks go in the winter? Someone’s asked me that before. I should eat Ramen. I should shower. I should shower in Ramen.

And you know you should eventually head to the Student Health Center. Your immune system has obviously failed, once again, at its primary purpose. Reinforcements are needed. But the idea goes against every self-reliant bone in your body. You’re an adult now. Plus, you’re pretty lazy. You’re here. It’s there. The distance seems insurmountable.

But you get there, burst through the frosted glass doors with a sniffle, and low and behold: it’s everything you dreamed of. The place is filled with tissues — not scattered with used ones like your dorm room, but boxes upon boxes of fluffy, moisturizing tissues. They hear your symptoms and the nurse toward the back sincerely says, “Aw.”

After a quick diagnosis — just a virus, they say — you’re led to a room in the back with an adjustable bed and red woolen blankets that recall those at your grandmother’s house the memory is completed by a sort of inviting musty smell.

“Here’s some pills, honey. They might make you a little drowsy, so why don’t you just rest here a bit. I’ll go get you a ginger ale to take them.” You snuggle in to the blanket and you notice “The Land Before Time” resting in a bin near the roll-away TV. You think about popping it in, but you’re overtaken by sleep before you even get the chance.

__Kevin Mooney is a Flat Hat Confusion Corner columnist. He’s turned his alcohol funds into medication funds for the weekend.__

SHHO livens local hip hop culture

0

When looking down the list of stops on Tanya Morgan and Kooley High’s most recent tour, it seems like a normal list, hitting all of the major cities: Chicago, New York City and … Williamsburg. As a part of this year’s annual Student Hip-Hop Organization concert, Tanya Morgan and Kooley High will be headlining, accompanied by many local performers and additional acts.

This year’s show will be held tomorrow in the Sadler Center. SHHO is a club that focuses on exposing the College of William and Mary community to hip-hop. Every year, the club hosts a free concert with different local and national performers to highlight up-and-coming hip-hop music.

“Our goal with SHHO is to have students who never listen to hip-hop enjoy and listen to it,” SHHO president Blair Smith ’11 said. “They are able to meet the artists and buy their merchandise, and it is also a way for the artist to get his or her name out there.”

In order to provide these shows for free with a long list of performers including local artists Intalek, Nikelus F, Smiles Crew and JB, SHHO fundraises throughout the year and teams up with other organizations.

“This year we are co-sponsoring with IPEX, the Center for Student Diversity and [AMP] Late Nite funding,” Smith said.

In addition to performances, SHHO will be collecting donations for the J.Dilla Foundation. The J.Dilla foundation is a non-profit organization that helps fund inner city music programs and provides music scholarships.

“I thought it would be cool to add a service aspect to our shows,” Smith said.

While Kooley High has performed at the College before, it is Tanya Morgan’s first time visiting the Williamsburg area.

“I have never been there before,” Von Pea of Tanya Morgan said. “I think it’s going to be cool. It’s all ages and it’s free, so everybody can just come and check it out.”

The SHHO concert proves to be a very different performance from the other stops on Tanya Morgan and Kooley High’s High Fidelity tour.

“I’m looking forward to the experience of the show, not even so much any artist in particular,” Von Pea said. “Doing shows that are all ages are more fun for me. They appreciate it more.”

One of the local performers featured in this year’s concert is Jerome Waller ’12. Waller, who goes by the stage name JB, has recently become much more serious about his music.

“In middle school and high school it was just a hobby,” Waller said. “Last year I released my first mixed tape, and from there it has really just taken off. I have done a few radio shows and a few things locally since then.”

This will be Waller’s first time performing at the College. While he feels comfortable performing in front of countless strangers, performing for his peers is another story.

“I’m excited and also nervous,” Waller said. “Being in front of people that you know makes it a little different, especially at a school like ours where you don’t really see anyone outside of the classroom atmosphere.”

Waller became involved with SHHO after attending last year’s concert.

“I found out about it after last year’s annual show,” Waller said. “When I found out about it I got really interested. I went to a couple of things last semester and really joined this semester.”

For Smith, watching the club grow over the past three years has been a rewarding experience. This year’s show promises to be bigger than the past year’s shows.

“JB is a classmate of mine. I haven’t been able to see him perform so I am excited about that,” Smith said. “I am also excited about the B-Boy cipher, and especially about having other schools come out.”

For local performer Intalek it will be his fourth time performing at the College. Although not a member of SHHO, Intalek has been very involved with the organization.

“I was actually found by [Smith] through my music online,” Intalek said. “Word of mouth got around to [Smith] and SHHO, and she booked me for their show last year. From then on I have been in close contact with her about any upcoming performances.”

As the show date draws nearer, Smith and members of SHHO prepare for the biggest annual concert they have hosted at the College.

“I feel like it’s going to be a great event,” Smith said. “I envision it to be bigger than it has been since the three years on campus. It’s been getting a lot of attention.”

Episodic accounts span topics from spirited to staid

0

The lights have gone down, and the crowd has finally gotten quiet. A back door opens, and at least two dozen women file in and take seats in the front of a lecture hall. What is most striking about the group is how different its members are. Almost all wear some combination of red and black. Some have a bit of white. Several ethnicities are represented. Clearly, this will not be an ordinary night at the theater, and any notions to the contrary are dispelled when the language takes a distinct turn toward the anatomical. But when the show in question is Eve Ensler’s “The Vagina Monologues,” who would expect anything different?

As the title suggests — with all the subtlety of a charging rhino — this is a show about being a woman, and all that entails. In a series of direct conversations with the audience, one and sometimes up to four, actress talks about topics which range from first sexual experiences to, in one memorable piece, just how angry a sex organ can get. These stories were culled from interviews done by Ensler of over 200 women about their bodies and sexuality. What came out of those interviews is often surprising, funny, and at times even, tragic. Monologues about Bosnian women forced to endure sexual assault and genital mutilation practices in Africa and Asia serve as sobering reminders that all is not right with the treatment of women around the world.

Although this style of theater leaves little room for ambiguity of message, it is altogether effective and entertaining with the right people performing. Some are the right people. Some aren’t. Thankfully, the fine readings far outnumber the uninspired ones. Performing with her own character is Karina Tejada ’11, speaking as a young girl happily seduced by an older woman. Tejada handles one of the toughest monologues from the play with poise, with a realistic yet distinctive portrayal.

Examining the merits of a certain four-letter-word, beginning with ‘C,’ Katie Darby ’11 brings the most comic energy to the play, and is a welcome reprieve from the somber details of atrocities committed against women. Also worth looking out for is Virginia Butler ’11, who plays a female-only prostitute and describes the fine art of moaning during sex.

“The Vagina Monologues” is tempered from greatness by a few performers holding it back. But for those pieces performed effectively, a performance of the show can be an unforgettable night. This particular production is no exception.

Loss and identity issues surface in modern Greek tragedy Eurydice

0

Something strange and exciting has happened to the auditorium in Phi Beta Kappa Memorial Hall. Over the past few weeks at the College of William and Mary, the stage as most students know it has completely disappeared. In its place there is a crystalline playground, colorful and bleak, inviting and ominous. This playground is where some powerful forces have come to frolic. Those fortunate enough to be in the auditorium can watch these forces dance to the words of Sarah Ruhl, whose play “Eurydice” opened last night on the barely recognizable Mainstage at the College.

Ruhl’s “Eurydice” is a classic Greek myth turned on its ear several times. The old story is a familiar one: The lovers Orpheus and Eurydice live in bliss until the bride, Eurydice, passes away without warning. For Orpheus, life is unbearable without his true love, and he ventures to the Underworld to bring his wife back. His pleas are successful insofar as he is allowed to lead her back as long as he doesn’t look behind him at his bride.

The story is Greek, so no points for guessing what happens next. He looks, she disappears forever, and Orpheus doesn’t hold onto the mortal coil for very long after. But Ruhl isn’t satisfied with such a pedestrian tale. She shifts perspectives at breakneck speed, embellishes details not mentioned in the source material, adds characters, and makes changes to already established roles. Here, the Underworld is populated by drones who know nothing of their past lives. They go about their day not noticing much, but they are not zombies. The changes strengthen the already poignant fable, which touches on the nature of identity and coping with loss in deeply moving ways.

With such weighty and complex material, having a cast who can tackle the themes of the play while keeping the cleverness and emotional tone of the dialogue intact is of the utmost importance. No worries here: the major players in “Eurydice” are in great form. Abby Cawiezell ’11 plays the title character with an effervescence and grace that impresses. Orpheus, Stephen Dunford ’10, provides a glimpse into a man’s tortured life that has lost its meaning. His desperate attempts to reach his lost love offer stirring contrasts to the family reunion that takes place in the Underworld.

Ruhl added the character of Eurydice’s father (Sean Close ’10) for her version of the story. Close infuses the already sympathetic character with an ever-cracking mask of stoicism that finally breaks apart by story’s end. His metamorphosis is difficult to watch, as his fervent efforts to re-educate his daughter about who she is and her past life are so compelling, one nearly forgets how we know the story must end. And in a dual role, both parts darkly comic, Chad Murla ’10 is daringly sleazy. His turn as a nasty interesting man is simultaneously disgusting and enticing, as he traps Eurydice in his apartment just before her death. Murla as a childlike Lord of the Underworld keeps a hint of menace beneath his lighthearted teasing, and the malice in his eyes make good on their promise when rage bubbles to the surface.

In her script, Ruhl also calls for three Stones, to play the happily dead of the Underworld and to comment on the action around them. Director Elizabeth Wiley and Movement Director Joan Gavaler, in one of many moments of brilliance, elected instead to cast a group of nine stones, to function as a chorus for the main actors. These stones are unlike any monotonous Greek chorus Sophocles could have devised. They move in synchronization, but at times break apart and go their own directions. They speak together, but often have individual lines. Each one of them has applied a character to what is, essentially, a walking corpse. Yet there is a cohesiveness that speaks volumes even when the chorus has no lines at all.

Collectively and individually they steal the show. Were this a open-ended engagement, it would be worthwhile to watch each Stone for a performance to fully appreciate the nuances of their roles.

The work done by the production team in conjuring a vibrant and sinister Underworld is far too effective here to be ignored. Matt Allar’s set sparkles and shines, with a raining elevator providing passage to Hades, and a small pool that functions as the river Lethe, whose waters would make the dead forget their lives once more. The lighting design by Steve Holliday dazzles, creating spectacular scenes. The work of the technical crew creates a beautiful landscape for this story, and a terrific palette upon which the cast can practice their craft.

The cast and crew of “Eurydice” have worked hard to offer up an oft-told story with an artistic flourish by Ruhl that doesn’t disappoint. Although the water in this play appears as a symbol of lost identity and ephemeral memory, the nearly flawless success achieved in adapting the tale to this stage makes one wonder what might be in the water that they’re drinking. Whatever it is, let’s hope there’s some left for the future.

Population frustrations

0

With millions in federal stimulus dollars drying up next year, a massive budgetary crisis is upon us. This week, the Faculty Assembly suggested the College of William and Mary should increase the size of its incoming classes by 50 students in order to increase revenue and temper the imminent program cuts. While increasing enrollment at a university that prides itself on its small-school character is a very worrisome step, at this point we cannot avoid taking it.

The reasons for increasing enrollment are simple. The College can redirect every dollar it collects in tuition toward otherwise vulnerable programs, like smaller departments and diversity initiatives. Fifty more tuition-paying students may not seem like much, but collectively they add up to almost a million dollars in additional revenue, at minimal extra cost to the College. That goes a long way toward patching up a $6 million hole.

But there’s no such thing as a free lunch. If this were to happen, students would wind up bearing the brunt of this change in the form of increased class sizes and difficulty enrolling into sought-after General Education Requirement classes and labs. And their diplomas would be worth less; by definition, the College will be becoming less selective if it enacts this change.

Even with the drawbacks, the College will be in a better place if it increases enrollment. The proposed increase, which is less than 1 percent of the entering class, appears carefully sized in order to soften its impact. And temporarily raising the size limitation on GER classes for a year or three will not cause permanent damage to the College in the same way that eliminating faculty or programs will.

There are even some residual benefits of having a slightly larger school. If this passes, the Career Center will be able to draw bigger and better employers to the College’s slightly larger market.

The simple truth is that the money will have to come from somewhere.

Whether that means having fewer faculty members, fewer programs or services, or more students and a marginally deteriorated educational product, none of the options look good.

To make things tangible, consider this quote from Faculty Assembly President and physics professor Gene Tracy: “We’re going to fall off a cliff in a year, unless we figure out ways to increase revenue. We may even have to suspend the freshman seminar program until we’re back on solid footing.”

The freshman seminar program is one of many hallmarks of the College experience that stand vulnerable to cuts. We should fight to protect programs like these — even if that means waking up a little bit earlier to fight for classes on Banner.

SAFRA claimed to be saving grace, falls short of salvation

0

“Working Americans pay while bankers get rich. Sallie Mae executives have paid themselves hundreds of millions of dollars in the last decade, while teachers, nurses, and scientists — the backbone of the new economy — face crushing debt because of runaway college tuition costs.”

This was the language U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan used recently to urge the passage of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, currently deadlocked in the U.S. Senate, that would end guaranteed student loans in favor of direct government-issued loans. The supporters of the bill paint it as a fight between students and soulless financial institutions, and view its implementation as a major educational reform greatly benefiting students and taxpayers. In reality, the bill is little more than a sensible cost-saving maneuver with modest benefits.

What SAFRA accomplishes is simple. Currently there are two ways to finance student loans. A student may borrow directly from the federal government, or through an intermediary, usually a bank or financial institution. These choices are not made by the student, but rather by the college or university, which chooses to accept either direct loans or guaranteed loans from an intermediary. This makes little difference to students, since both lenders offer identical loans. Student loans are offered at low interest rates with flexible repayment schedules. This is possible because the government guarantees them, effectively assuming all the risk of default. Government subsidies to banks really benefit students to whom banks would not otherwise lend. These subsidies are not a pipeline of free money created by Wall Street lobbyists.

SAFRA will do away with the option of guaranteed loans and effectively set up the government as the sole financer of student borrowing. This move will streamline the process and, according to the Congressional Budget Office, save up to $87 billion over 10 years. However, the government — which would now be the sole lender — would incur significantly higher administrative costs, and actual saving could be much lower; $47 billion was the CBO’s lowball estimate. However, private lenders are generally better at keeping track of borrowers and securing repayment. If private lenders are removed from the market, the repayment rate on loans will likely fall further, reducing predicted savings.

Also, not all, or perhaps not even most, of these savings would be at the expense of the banks. Instead, much of the savings would come from a reduction in services to student borrowers. Financial institutions compete for student borrowers, and because their product is identical, they must do so by offering high- quality customer service, or by giving incentives to schools and students. As SAFRA would eliminate competition in the student loans market, there would be no need for such devices. There would be savings, but much of it would come at the expense of colleges and students themselves in the form of poor customer service and no incentives.

The overall effect on students is ambiguous. Congress proposes to use some of the savings for a modest increase in Pell Grant caps and investment in community colleges. These are worthy causes, but when you consider that the savings on the bill over a decade might be around as much as the 2011 budget proposes to spend on highway maintenance in one year, some skepticism is in order. Furthermore, the bill will have virtually no effect on actual loan rates or on college tuition, and thus no effect on overall student debt.
In Lucy James’s Feb. 9 column in The Flat Hat, “Lobbying firestorm should not be the last word on student loan reform,” she wrote, “the inescapable reality is that something must be done,” demonstrating how overblown this debate has become. In the Tea Party age, it is once again fashionable to rail against big business, but that doesn’t change the fact that this legislation isn’t nearly as earth shaking as it is being made out to be.

Such hyperbole emanating from SAFRA supporters is unwarranted. Overall, the current system is not that favorable to bankers and will do little, if anything to benefit students. However, as a minor cost- saving proposal, the bill might be worthwhile.

E-mail Ed Innace at einnace@wm.edu.

More choice needed in meal plans

0

The dining facilities at the College of William and Mary always serve excellent food, and the workers are continually helpful and courteous. However, meal plan organization should be changed for the upcoming semester. Certain provisions will better serve, and — within reason — place students in a more favorable position in their relationship with dining facilities and the College as a whole.

First, Flex Points should be made optional. There seems to be little use for these extra dollars, and I often have a hard time using them up. Often, I find myself spending this money frivolously. I buy items I may not even necessarily want, just to ensure I don’t waste the money at the end of the year. Considering this money can only be spent on campus, Flex appears to have been designed solely for additional revenue — and then guised as a convenience to a student’s on-campus dining options. This does not serve the student in a positive way; Express and cash provide students with an ample supplement for buying food in locations other than the dining halls.

Second, the Gold Plans, which use a system of “meals per week,” should be changed. Surely freshmen, if no one else, would appreciate having more choice in their meal plan selections. These plans disadvantage students more generally, however. As with Flex, the College begins the semester with enough money to fund student meals for the entire semester. Why, then, is there a policy to break consumption of meals into week blocks that are not transferable between weeks?

How does this serve the student? For example, if an event is occurring, or if a student is traveling and must skip a meal one day, why should this meal be taken from him, considering it has already been paid for? This extreme inconvenience pressures students to build their schedules around consuming their meals with the fear that any missed meals will disappear and not be available after the week is up.

This system is not in the College’s best interest, assuming that student needs are the interest of the College. Even though the College offers Block Plans, freshmen are forced into buying meal plans they often do not desire. As college students, we are more than capable of rationing out our own meals.
The College should do away with weekly plans, and instead offer a greater degree of variety of block plans, including those without Flex. This allows the student who, for legitimate reasons, may skip a meal on campus during one week — or may be a little hungrier during another — to have an opportunity to consume all of the meals he or she has paid for well in advance.

I hope future meal plans can be better tailored to address the needs of students, with an understanding of their financial stake in the plan that they purchase.

E-mail Grant Skakun at gmskakun@wm.edu.

Men’s basketball: Missed opportunity

0

It certainly wasn’t the way they wanted to go out.

A night that began with a spirited crowd of 3,000-plus roaring in appreciation of one of the most successful classes in William and Mary history ended with those same fans filtering out in stunned silence. David Schneider, Danny Sumner, Sean McCurdy and Steven Hess had an historic opportunity to end their home careers by all-but clinching the school’s first CAA tournament bye on senior night. Instead, the Tribe dropped a stunner, falling 83-77 Wednesday to an unheralded Towson squad.

“They just played better than we did,” Schneider said. “When we needed a big stop or a big shot, it didn’t fall for us.”

The loss was as uncharacteristic as it was surprising. After winning four-straight CAA games through crisp defensive intensity, the Tribe simply could not stop their visitors, allowing the Tigers to shoot 50 percent from the floor and knock down 9 of 20 three-point attempts. Suffering an early deficit, the College rallied to pull even several times throughout the game only to see Towson take back the momentum with key buckets.

“Each time they seemed to respond, sometimes with miraculous shots and sometimes with well-executed plays,” Head Coach Tony Shaver said. “We couldn’t stop them defensively, they just scored at will.”

The final stat line was equally puzzling. The Tribe hit 14 three-pointers, shot 39 percent from the floor and outrebounded Towson 44 to 39. Yet the Tiger guards repeatedly slashed to the bucket for layups or pulled up to drain jumpers from beyond the arc to stymie the College at every turn. Point guard Troy Franklin, all 5’11” of him, was a primary culprit, hitting 7 of 10 shots to finish with 27 points and seven assists.

As a result, in a schedule that included NCAA tournament-locks Maryland, Wake Forest and Richmond, Towson became the first squad to reach 80 points against the Tribe in any game short of three overtimes.

“Franklin controlled the ball game as much as any point guard I’ve seen in a long time,” Shaver said. “We played uncharacteristically tonight. We didn’t show the patience and poise we’ve shown all year long. It was a tough night for us.”

After a first half spent chasing a slim Tiger lead, the Tribe entered the intermission leading 35-34 on Schneider’s three with 23 seconds remaining. The College’s all-time leader in three-point attempts, the senior seemed determined to get his money’s worth in his final home game, hitting 17 treys over the course of a season-high 25 shots.

But as they did all night, Towson quickly regained the lead early in the second half, and eventually built an 11-point advantage at 57-46 with 10:20 to play.

The College roared back, unleashing a barrage of three-pointers to even the score at 59-apiece, before the Tigers regained control with a 15-5 run.

A pair of quick Schneider threes would bring the Tribe to within three points at 76-73 with 1:08 remaining. But Towson’s quick guards generated a pair of steals to ice the game and deny the College any attempt to pull even.

The loss dropped the Tribe into a tie for fourth place in the conference with Virginia Commonwealth. While a victory over the Tigers would have nearly clinched that position, the squad will enter the final weekend of CAA play needing a win over UNC-Wilmington to secure the bye.

“We need to play well,” Shaver said. “Two games in a row we really haven’t, and we’ve got to get back on track in that respect going into the tournament.”

For a box score, click here.

How the College can expand on a budget

0

_Click image to enlarge._