Home Blog Page 219

Commission decides against 4-person proposal

0

The Williamsburg Planning Commission reached a consensus Wednesday not to recommend a proposal to the City Council allowing four unrelated persons to live in a rental property.

After listening to comments from students at the College of William and Mary and members of the community, planning commission members agreed that an increase in persons per rental unit would not solve off-campus housing problems. Instead, they believe alternative options should be further explored.

“This really is an issue of where do we create more student housing,” planning commission member Doug Pons said. “The four-person rule is really just a band-aid. It’s not going to create the housing needed for students.”

Students emphasized the importance of increasing persons in rental units to raise off-campus housing
affordability and alleviate some of the enforcement issues surrounding the three-person rule.

“Were it feasible, we would live off campus, but the affordability doesn’t match up,” Student Assembly
Undersecretary of Public Affairs David Witkowsky ’11 said. “If we are living in a space that can fit a family of six and it’s just me and two friends, it can be much more affordable if it is me and three friends. I think there is a disparity there that needs to be accounted for.”

SA representative Emily Gottschalk-Marconi ’12 emphasized the necessity of maintaining a dialogue between the city and the College.

“While we support many aspects of the proposal, we encourage many changes to find an acceptable solution to this problem,” she said. “We are excited to continue dialogue on areas such as enforcement, and we invite any member of the commission to come to our meetings and continue the dialogue.”

Although all seven members of the commission agreed to put discussion of the four-person rule aside, another work session meeting is scheduled for Oct. 7. The Planning Commission is required to report to the
City Council by Nov. 27, but can file for an extension if needed.

“We need to provide something to [the] City Council that is somewhat unified,” commission member Elaine
McBeth said. “It seems that there are some general discussion points, which we need to get out between ourselves.”

While the commission has been searchsearching for a solution, the College is making an effort to create more housing, including a new residential complex near Wawa on Richmond Rd. that will offer 50 more rooms and a new dormitory that will create 200 rooms on campus.

However, when there is a total of 3,281 undergraduate and graduate students living off campus each year, 250 rooms do not appear to solve the problem.

“If the College could get something started in the next six to 12 months, it would greatly help in the next two to three years,” commission member Sean Driscoll said.

During the work session, students and community members voiced their opinions in an open forum. Students supported the increase to four people, while many members of the community spoke against it, claiming that an increase would cause neighborhoods to become rental investment developments.

“We do not want to lose our single-family homes to absentee landlords,” Williamsburg resident Bill Dell said.
Witkowsky plans to continue discussion of increasing the number of persons per rental unit, even if the Planning Commission does not think it is a viable solution.

“We encourage any and all students to attend the upcoming work session on Oct. 7,” Witkowsky said. “If the Planning Commission won’t hear us, then we’ll have to go back to City Council’s public hearings and work our way back up from ground zero.”

Josh Karp ’11, head of Students for a Better Williamsburg, believes that even though the four-person rule discussion has ended, progress from the Planning Commission is encouraging.

“It is a little bit disheartening that the door is closing on four,” Karp said. “I am very excited to see what the new progress is going to be.”

Other concerns expressed from the community include the destruction of family-friendly neighborhoods through the presence of renters and the negative behaviors associated with College students.

“There are three undergraduate students who live down the street from me who often throw parties,” Williamsburg resident Flora Adams said. “What partiers do indoors, I don’t know. However, I do know what some of the partiers are doing outside of the house on their way home. They are leaving lots of trash along the way, and they are fornicating, sometimes loudly. Is there a way to keep student rentals from becoming party houses? I don’t know. But I do know that increasing their numbers won’t help.”

One clause included in the proposal, the “in good faith and good cause” clause, troubled Students for a Better Williamsburg member Kirstie Brenson ’12. If passed, the clause would allow tenants to be evicted if a complaint was made against them in good faith and with good cause.

“This effectively kicks the fourth unrelated person out of the house and onto the street,” Brenson said. “If this person is a student, it is far too late to get on-campus housing at this point. There is no definition offered for ‘in good faith and good cause.’”

Students and community members will have the opportunity to speak again at the Oct. 7 work session meeting. Until then, the discussion of an increase to four persons per rental unit has been set aside. Instead, the commission is looking for a solution to the housing issue that benefits both the community and the students.

“We should send the message to City Council that we don’t want to change occupancy from three to four, but that we should look at alternative options,” commission member Jim Joseph said.

Councilman addresses town-gown relations

0

Williamsburg City Council member Bobby Braxton visited the College of William and Mary Wednesday night to answer student questions about town-gown relations, ranging from parking problems to the three-person rule controversy. Approximately 20 students attended the fourth part of the “Better Know Your Council Member” series organized by Students for a Better Williamsburg.

“The first thing that people asked is if I had heard about the student problem,” Braxton said. “I said, ‘what student problem? I don’t know if it’s that much of a problem.’”

Shortly after he was elected, Braxton toured the College campus for the first time and was drawn to the College community.

“The City Council is about helping the people in the city, and who’s in the city? You all,” he said.

The main focus of the evening’s discussion was on the proposed change to the three-person rule, which would have allowed four people to live in a minimum 2,000 square-foot residence with annual inspections.

“I would go for the four-person rule if it had adequate housing and inspections,” Braxton said.

The Williamsburg Planning Commission unanimously decided against recommending the proposal two days later.

He also spoke of discussions between the College and Williamsburg to allot 200 to 250 slots for student residents on Richmond Road.

“We do not have land, and everything we do must go through residents,” he said.

An Evening with Bobby Braxton from Flat Hat on Vimeo.

Braxton was positive about the parking issue on and around campus, which is also a city planning concern for Williamsburg. He said city parking fines are lower than campus ones and that 60 student spaces are now available in the Prince George Parking Garage.

Students must register through the city for a garage parking pass, which costs $250 per semester and is more expensive than on-campus resident parking.

With the state gubernatorial election coming up, student voter registration was another important issue addressed at the event.

Braxton, who experienced harassment when trying to vote and participated in sit-ins during the Civil Rights Movement, emphasized voter registration.

“If you know a kid over 18, tell them to go over there and register to vote, and you can quote me on that,” he said.

Born in Williamsburg, Braxton attended Bruton Heights School and has an electronics degree from the Hampton Institute, now known as Hampton University. He was elected to the Williamsburg City Council in 2006.

While he is not sure if he will run for re-election in May, Braxton is open to talk to any student about current city problems at his morning office hours in Aromas Cafe or at his personal residence near campus.

“[My house] has a stoop. I’ll tell any William and Mary student to come visit.”

Students for a Better Williamsburg is sponsoring an event, tentatively scheduled for Nov. 11, with Williamsburg Mayor Jeanne Zeidler on campus.

Blaze at Sal’s ruled accidental

0

The July 28 fire that destroyed Sal’s by Victor and damaged several surrounding stores, including the Hallmark store and Steinmart, in Williamsburg Shopping Center was ruled accidental, Williamsburg Fire Marshal Captain James Humphrey announced at a press conference Thursday.

There was not enough evidence to determine the direct cause of the fire.

The restaurant’s fourteen surveillance cameras showed that the fire originated in the kitchen near the stove, but all the appliances were turned off. The cameras also revealed no one was inside the restaurant at the time of the fire.

The restaurant is still closed, but owner Victor Minichiello hopes to reopen by Christmas of this year. Steinmart has not opened either, but the store is scheduled to reopen Oct. 1.

DOT speaker discusses personal sustainability

0

Running outside, instead of on a treadmill. Biking to campus and saving $300 on parking. Hanging laundry on a drying line. Using a reusable container every day. So many ‘Do One Things to choose from — which one is best?

DOTs are personal resolutions that promote sustainability. International advertising agency Saatchi & Saatchi S and the Mason School of Business believe DOTs can impact more than one’s personal well-being.

But DOT’s are not just for environmental sustainability — they can be also be economic, cultural or social in natire. These simple resolutions should make the DOTee happier, as well as more conscious of sustainable-living practices in everyday life.

Adam Werbach, the Global CEO of Saatchi & Saatchi S, spoke to students and faculty at the College of William and Mary yesterday at the Business School about DOTs and sustainability. At the age of 23, Werbach was the youngest president of the Sierra Club, but he felt that his leadership role did not allow him to contribute as much as he could to sustainability efforts. He moved to the commercial sector and has helped companies like Wal-Mart, HP and Proctor & Gamble become more environmentally friendly while also increasing sustainability.

“[I’m] not ideological about tactics. [I’m] ideological about ideology,” Werbach said.

Businesses are currently built to protect themselves, Werbach said, but must constantly change in their evolution. Businesses need to move beyond the Green movement, which Werbach labeled as a blip.

“Anyone who tries to tell you that Fiji water is green should be castigated,” Werbach said.

He encouraged the audience to “go blue.”

According to Werbach, going blue reaches a broader definition of sustainability in environmental, economic, cultural and social areas.

Blue sustainability strategies can be applied to all aspects of life, not just the business sector.

Strategies of increased transparency, personal engagement, and building networks outside of personal interest can be used in our daily lives.

But Werbach said starting with just “one thing” will allow you to continually inspire new sustainability practices in all parts of your life.

“I hope the students would be excited after hearing Adam’s story. At some point, everyone gets to be a leader, and we should inspire through our actions,” Director of Undergraduate Business Program Chris Adkins said.

Werbach delivered an optimistic message, challenging the audience to seize the moment and reminding the College that students are at the front of all major movements.

“We have to start small. We can’t assume big plans will be implements and so we have to work from the ground up,” attendee Peter Glowa ’11 said.

Several students have already decided how they will make small contributions to sustainability efforts by DOT.

Arwa Zabarah MBA ’13 wants to forego paper lunch bags and air-drying her hands, and Werbach’s DOT is to share nature with his kids.

The Business School has encouraged College students to participate in Saatchi’s DOT campaign by setting up a Facebook DOT page which has recorded over 200 DOTs and promoting the DOT campaign around campus.

New libertarian talk show offers insight on political issues

0

Among the newest of the student-run shows on the College of William and Mary’s WCWM radio station,
Austin Raynor’s ’10 “Libertarian Talk Radio” tackles current political issues from 3 to 4 p.m. every Thursday.

Launched this fall, the show covers current affairs from the perspective of a frequently misunderstood philosophy.

“Many people are unfamiliar with libertarianism, and my foremost goal is to simply educate them about its philosophical basis and its application to current national issues,” Raynor said. “But I also want to convince people that libertarianism is the best political philosophy available, from a moral and an economic standpoint.”

The show does not specifically endorse the Libertarian Party, nor is it affiliated with the College’s Libertarian Students.

Rather than targeting a strictly libertarian audience, Raynor tries to lay out his argument in a manner that allows listeners to keep pace.

“I choose a single topic of national interest for each show and begin by summarizing the issue in a nonpartisan way,” Raynor said. “Then I critique the legislation currently in place, or the legislation being considered, and end by proposing a libertarian solution to the problem.”

After the initial show, which provided a broad overview of libertarianism, Raynor has explored a different
subject each week.

Most recently the show discussed the issue of climate change and the Kyoto Protocol.

Raynor hopes to cover everything from macroeconomics and the role of the Federal Reserve to foreign policy.

Preparation for each show entails a considerable amount of research.

“I try to give as much evidence to support my points as I can, so I include the facts, statistics and examples relevant to each issue,” Raynor said.

Though Raynor has long had libertarian leanings, his commitment to the philosophy crystallized after coming to the College.

His study of economics and of the central tenets of libertarianism convinced him that his own beliefs were best reflected by the philosophy, with its emphasis on free market capitalism, reducing the size of government and increasing civil liberties.

Raynor was drawn to libertarianism because of its emphasis on free market capitalism, reducing the size of capitalism and increasing civil liberties.

The period of expansion in the federal government’s size and scope that has occurred under the most recent presidential administrations only further confirmed his convictions.

The show is broadcast on WCWM, 90.9 FM, and can be streamed live online at the radio station’s website. Callers are welcome to contribute to the discussion by calling in to the show at (757) 221-3268.

SA discusses bill to reduce STI testing costs

0

The Student Health Act, an initiative to subsidize sexually transmitted infection testing on campus, dominated debate at Tuesday’s meeting of the College of William and Mary’s Student Assembly.

SA Vice President Ryan Ruzic J.D. ’11 said that the $75 charge for STI testing was a disincentive for students to go to the Student Health Center.

“It only makes sense for the school to offer free STI testing,” Ruzic said.

Currently, chlamydia or gonorrhea test costs $18, a syphilis test $10 and a genital warts test $5. If passed, the Student Health Act would make all of these tests free.

“I’m really happy with this list of tests to cover because the Health Center called it the ‘most comprehensive list’ that we can reasonably afford,” Ruzic said.

The act would not cover HIV or HPV testing. Instead, Ruzic said that the health center offers alternatives.

“The university health center offers several free screening days for HIV,” Ruzic said.
Covering these tests would raise the cost of implementing the act by several thousand dollars, he added.

Based on the cost of around 950 STI tests administered at the health center last year, the act would cost the SA approximately $12,000.

Funding would come from the consolidated reserve, which is comprised of money from student activities fees.

“Our job is to pass that money back out to student groups,” Ruzic said. “Over the years, a large surplus has developed. It’s certainly large enough to cover this.”

Ruzic hopes that the SA’s funding STI testing, the SA will bring attention to an important issue.

“This is something students hear and think, ‘that is a great idea,’ and that’s what the SA should be doing,” he said.

He hopes that if the Student Health Act is passed, the College will help fund STI testing in the future.

Sen. Ben Brown ’11 said the SA is working out the best way to move forward with the Student Health Act, and that the discussion will continue during next.

At the meeting, the SA also reviewed the Fall 2009 Elections Delay Act, which postponed elections until Thursday, Oct. 1.

“We promoted it significantly better this time. We have several more candidates,” Sen. Ross Gillingham ’10 said.

Last week, the SA approved changes made to the Know Your Rights cards that are handed out to students at the beginning of the year.

The new version will be available at the end of the month or the beginning of October.

The Welcome Home Repayment Act was also discussed. The act will reimburse Undersecretary of Public Affairs Brian Focarino ’11 for the costs he personally took on for one of four “Welcome Home” banners that were on display during convocation.

“[The banners] were a huge hit,” bill sponsor Sen. Jill Olszewski ’12 said, “They’re durable. They’re great.”

The banners will be used for homecoming and other events at the college.

James Evans ’10, Chris Bettis J.D. ’11 and Mark Johnson ’10 were appointed to the Executive Review Board after a closed session was called.

Fayfay Shang ’11 was appointed as the new secretary of finance for the SA Executive. Shang, an accounting major, worked at Merrill-Lynch in Washington, D.C. over the summer.

Four person proposal condemned

0

_Click image to enlarge._

In spite of 3-person rule, students should stand up and be counted

0

As anyone in the City of Williamsburg with a pulse knows by now, the city has a rule on the books limiting the occupancy of rental units to three unrelated people. For the past couple years, we students have done our best to let the city know our opposition to this seemingly arbitrary rule and our desire to work together on a viable solution.

First, in the spring of 2008, we made it a primary focus of the Williamsburg City Council elections, forcing it into debates, questionnaires and every candidate’s platform. While Matt Beato ’09 was not elected, the issue of rental occupancy was certainly elected onto the agenda for the council.

Then came fall 2008, when Williamsburg made an effort to hear student leaders out on possible options to move forward with the issue. Students worked diligently and did plenty of research to yield promising results. In the end, students and various city staffers were able to put together a proposal to present to the council to further the discussion and achieve some significant results. The council moved our proposal to the Williamsburg Planning Commission — a vital step in the process of amending the city’s code — pending the creation and results of a focus group on the matter.

During the last semester, the focus group met weekly. The group was comprised of members of city staff, residents of Williamsburg and College of William and Mary administrators and students — including myself. Over the course of the time we spent together, our main focus was on researching other localities further. We tried both to identify and address the issues at stake when it came to potential increases in the occupancy rule. While the group never reached a full consensus, we did reach an agreement on what issues should be addressed in any proposed changes. Regardless of the indecisive outcome, enough was accomplished to present our research to the council toward the end of the spring semester.

Over the summer, the City Council took the findings from the focus group and crafted a document containing potential ordinance changes based on what the focus group had agreed; any points that had been divisive were posed as an option between two choices on the sample proposed ordinance. This document was then sent to the Planning Commission at the August City Council meeting. The group is responsible for examining the document, making final decisions regarding what proposed ordinance changes they would like to see and then sending it back to the City Council with either a stamp of approval or a rejection. It seemed that finally the students would be heard; we could finally see ordinance changes that could actually go into effect in the near future. At the public hearing last week, the Planning Commission took input from residents but chose to wait until the work session Wednesday to start actually discussing any possible solutions, with one exception. One commissioner voiced his absolute opposition to any changes allowing occupancy in rental units to increase from three to four.

At the work session Wednesday, I, along with several other students — who easily outnumbered the number of residents — attended to see what the Planning Commission was going to do. After everyone had their opinions heard, the commissioners took turns sharing their opinions with everyone present. Admittedly, it seemed as though the majority of the seven members leaned toward rejecting an increase in occupancy, but what happened next was just disheartening. Jim Joseph turned to his fellow commissioners and encouraged them to go ahead and take the discussion of increased occupancy off the table and to focus on the other issues brought up in the proposed ordinance.

His reasoning? Most of them already seemed to be against it, thus making a consensus that they were not interested in changing the rule.

This is not acceptable. The entire point of this process is so that people can come and voice their opinions, and so that the Planning Commission can take these opinions, consider them carefully and make the best decision for Williamsburg as a whole. Discarding an important decision at the start of it goes against the whole system. There have been too many people putting in too many hours to have one man muscle the group into rejecting this possibility in one afternoon. Fortunately, in work session no official motions can be passed to do such a thing.

So this is a call to all students. Get involved. From 4 to 6 p.m. on Oct. 7, the Planning Commission will be holding a second work session before their next public hearing where they can actually entertain the motion to reject the possibility of an increase in occupancy.

Tell your friends; tell your hall; tell everyone you know to come, and let the Planning Commission know that this is not an issue that can just be thrown away after so much work has been done to get to this point. Let them know that you have a right to be heard, and let them know that they have an obligation to hear you.

E-mail Dave Witkowsky at dhwitkowsky@wm.edu.

Despite praise, SAFRA could still go sour

0

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act. The bill is lauded for having the power to increase federal aid to students while simultaneously saving the government money, some of which may be used to pay off the ever-growing national debt. This seems almost too good to be true. Does this bill really have no downside? The overwhelming response to SAFRA has been positive, especially from students and universities. However, there are some dissenting voices that doubt whether such a bill would not have adverse side effects.

Neal McCluskey, an associate director from the Cato Institute — yes, a right-wing think tank, but that is no reason to summarily dismiss his views — has raised several objections to the bill. First, increasing federal aid to students will push many more into colleges, some of whom are unqualified to attend institutions of higher education. Already, American institutions have many students who fail to reap the benefits of their education. One-third of students must take remedial courses, and only 56 percent graduate within six years. Now, if they were footing their own bill, they would only be hurting themselves. However, through federal aid, the government and ultimately taxpayers incur the cost of their tuition and the risk of their possible loan default, a likely result if they cannot complete college and secure a high-paying job.

SAFRA does attempt to address this issue. For instance, it directs the secretary of education to provide grants to states that “implement activities and services that increase students’ persistence and completion of post-secondary education.” Whether or not these measures will succeed is as unknown as the bill’s language on these points is vague. It is unclear if these measures will have the teeth to push students to a timely graduation.

Another objection to SAFRA is that 29 percent of American’s hold bachelor’s degrees, while only 25 percent of jobs require B.A.s. As I stated previously, more loans will increase the number of students who attend institutions of higher education and, as a result, more and more graduates will be unemployed or underemployed. This represents a waste of government investment in their education and again increases the chances of loan defaults if they cannot find high-paying jobs.

The validity of this critique is questionable. Recently, the Council of Economic Advisors predicted that job growth in the next decade will be most rapid in professional fields that require B.A.s, outpacing growth in sectors that only require a high school diploma by a two-to-one margin. It is, therefore, a sound strategy to attain a college education, even if the job market for college graduates is currently daunting.

The most serious critique of SAFRA is that it allows institutions of higher education to continue raising tuition costs. Since federal aid causes students to be less sensitive to tuition increases, schools do not have to worry as much about driving students away with high tuition rates. Over the past decade, growth in the cost of higher education has been consistently higher than inflation. During the same period, federal aid programs have also grown dramatically.

Whether these two trends are causally related is as yet an undecided question. There have been studies done supporting both sides of the argument. Another explanation of the dramatic increase in tuition could be that in order to remain competitive and attract students, institutions of higher education must keep up-to-date with the latest research, which includes extremely expensive scientific equipment, and must provide state-of-the-art recreation facilities and comfortable living conditions. Thus, perhaps the actual cost of providing an education is the main force driving tuition prices upward.

My point is not to argue that SAFRA is detrimental; I have detailed both critiques and defenses of the bill. Rather, I wish to show that there are certain aspects of the bill that deserve our attention. Before we embrace SAFRA wholeheartedly, we must examine it closely and remember that there are very few things that offer a benefit without a cost.

E-mail Ed Innace at einnace@wm.edu.

‘Lost Symbol’ follows familiar story

0

In “The Lost Symbol,” Dan Brown writes what he writes best — a story that is both awful and impossible to put down. The book runs exactly like “Angels and Demons” or “The Da Vinci Code.” If you’ve read either, you’ll recognize the beginning: an urgent call summons professor Robert Langdon from Harvard to Washington, D.C.

His paternal mentor, professor Peter Solomon, has been kidnapped by a rogue Mason fanatic — think Silas in “The Da Vinci Code” — and for the next 400 pages, Langdon runs around the nation’s capital, deciphering symbols and eluding the CIA in his attempt to rescue his friend and save the world. He is aided by Peter’s sister, Katherine, who fulfills Brown’s typical brainy-yet-sexy scientist role. Her involvement in the story is unecessary, as is the sub-plot about Noetic science. Though this seems like an interesting topic, Brown shoves it into the plot and showers the reader with Wikipedia-derived facts.

Overall, the book is typical Brown. The usual twists and red herrings seem contrived, making the plot appear random and unreliable. Also the long digressions into symbolism, Masonic history and Noetic science clog the writing.

I ended up skimming entire chapters. Langdon grows more frustrating with each page. Once Langdon shows off his historical knowledge at a crime scene, the authorities always consider him the prime suspect. He should’ve learned to keep his mouth shut in the first two books, but I guess that would make his escapes from highly-trained agents less awesome. And it’s not like the authorities offer him much explanation either; no doubt Langdon is not mistaken in wondering why the CIA would be barking orders in the Capitol Building where they have no legal authority. However, I haven’t checked Wikipedia lately, so maybe that’s changed.

As I read, I searched for a character that had not appeared in every one of Dan’s books. The scientists and Masonic nerds were out, as was the token CIA director with unclear motives. I really thought the tattooed antagonist had potential — even a sort of deranged sex appeal — but his maniacal-genius charm fell by the wayside as the book progressed and he became another quasi-religious fanatic, like every other one of Brown’s villains.

Brown does take quick stabs at philosophy, which I sort of enjoyed, but he fails to pull out anything insightful. Then again, it is Brown. He probably won’t change his characters’ forms anytime soon, and why should he? Cheap entertainment sells, and that’s what he gives you. I’d suggest borrowing from someone who has already spent their money. Read the first 150 pages, then skip to the end.