I’ve spent years ridiculing ESPN college basketball commentator Dick Vitale. His analysis of a game rarely develops beyond “That’s awesome, baby!” For some, his shrill shtick is reason to hit the mute button. But in the wake of his two-month absence from the broadcasting booth, I discovered that college basketball coverage is pretty monotonous without Vitale’s trademark calls, catchphrases and cheerleading.
p. What’s refreshing about Dickie V is that he doesn’t pollute the airwaves with the same subject his colleagues debate nightly. Is your favorite team “on the bubble,” hoping for a bid into the NCAA tournament? If so, chances are high that they’re being scrutinized by bracketologists. And the odds are greater that if you’re a fan of a mid-major program, the same analysts are overlooking your team’s achievements. It’s more than frustrating to watch.
p. But for Vitale, scrutiny is not his mantra. What his broadcasts lack in substance, they make up for in passion and energy. While he cheers on the sidelines, others communicate in bubble speak.
The March Madness bubble watch unofficially kicks off in early January when conference play commences. The whole ordeal is then dragged out for two and half months before the tournament’s field of 65 teams is revealed on “Selection Sunday.”
p. What’s ridiculous about the bubble watch is not simply its extended duration, but also its ability to sustain the tournament hopes of average teams in major conferences. According to ESPN’s weekly bubble watch, there are currently ten teams in the mix for an at-large tournament berth from the Big East. On paper, the schools look formidable, as each maintains an RPI rating in the top 65. But on paper, every team from a major conference is above average, including those under .500. With 31 conferences in Division I and only 34 at-large bids being awarded by the selection committee, including more than five teams from a major conference on any given bubble is a snub for successful mid-major basketball programs.
p. More at-large bids should be given to schools from mid-major conferences. The NCAA thinks otherwise. Last year, the selection committee relegated a 22-7 Appalachian State team to the NIT even though they won 12 of their final 14 games and beat U.Va., Vanderbilt and VCU in their non-conference schedule. Their only sin was being a member of the Southern Conference, a perennial one-bid league, which sent Davidson to the tourney, even though the Mountaineers beat them in the regular season. Then, the committee ingeniously decided that a mediocre 18-12 Stanford team, which finished sixth in the Pac-10 and lost seven of their final 11 games, merited a spot in the tourney.
p. Part of the mess could be alleviated if ESPN Bracketbusters decided to pair mid-major bubble teams with major conference bubble teams instead of the current format. Despite improving tournament resumes for some, Bracketbusters does little to help small conference schools in the hunt for an at-large bid. Case in point was last year’s Drexel team, which desperately needed a huge RPI ratings boost after losing on the road to the College in mid-February. They beat Creighton in their Bracketbusters match-up, but likely needed a signature win over a major conference team to secure a tourney bid.
p. While Vitale’s man crushes on big programs like Duke have been well documented, he’s also an avid supporter of mid-majors. Last year, he campaigned for Old Dominion and Drexel to get at-large bids. Even though he doesn’t have a solution for the bubble mess, his love for the underdog is a welcome respite in a sport that heavily favors Goliaths.
p. __E-mail Carl Siegmund at crsieg@wm.edu.__
