Home Blog Page 391

Twin bill B-movies light up theaters

0

Drop the remote, cancel your bowling plans, skip dinner at the Caf and go see “Grindhouse.” Entertainment doesn’t come cheap these days, but “Grindhouse” is a steal as you get two films for the price of one. And to top it off, there are fake trailers between the films to compliment the experience.

p. “Grindhouse” is a homage by directors Robert Rodriguez (“Sin City”) and Quentin Tarantino (“Kill Bill”) to ’70s exploitation films, or paracinema to all you film folks. The theaters these films played at were called grindhouse theaters because the films favored an abundance of sex, violence and gore over, let’s say, character development and cinematography. In short, don’t be surprised if critics rag on “Grindhouse.” The question is, how do you make a tribute to a genre that brought such classic films such as “Cannibal Holocaust,” “Ilsa, She Wolf of the SS” and, of course, who can forget “I Spit on Your Grave” — a film Roger Ebert called “a vile bag of garbage … without a shred of artistic distinction”? With a plethora of decapitations and mass amounts of carnage, of course.

p. The first of the two films is Rodriguez’s “Planet Terror,” your not-so-typical zombie affair. While the plot may seem like a rehash (virus is on the loose, turning everyone into flesh-eating zombies), Rodriguez’s trademarks give the film its knockout punch. Most notable is the score, whose Latin flavor compliments the film, making scenes of suspense even more exhilarating. Oh, and did I mention there is a lot of gore?

p. The second film is Tarantino’s “Death Proof,” a tale about a 50-something ex-stuntman named Stuntman Mike, played by Kurt Russell (“Poseidon”), who likes to stalk girls and find creative ways to kill them with his car. “Death Proof” features all of Tarantino’s trademarks, including shots from the trunk and long conversations (and I do mean long) between his main characters. It also features one of the most suspenseful car chases in recent memory that had me at the edge of my seat the entire time.
Both films feature a cast full of big names ranging from Bruce Willis (“Sin City”), to Rosario Dawson (“Clerks 2”), to Fergie of the Black Eyed Peas. These are the type of films actors love to make, and it shows. It is also the kind of film in which bad acting doesn’t hurt the end result.

p. Both movies also feature the “missing reel” treatment. You know the part of the film that explains everyone’s motives? Tarantino and Rodriguez felt it was unnecessary and decided to cut it. Actually, the truth is a bit tamer than that. Tarantino once bought the rights to a film that had missing reels during the most important scenes and felt it was a funny way of paying tribute.

p. The concept of putting fake trailers between the two films was genius as well. Danny Trejo (“The Devil’s Rejects”) stars in “Machete,” which may feature the line of the night: “This will teach you not to fuck with a Mexican.” The best trailer goes to Rob Zombie (“The Devil’s Rejects) for “Werewolf Women of the S.S.” if only for having Nicholas Cage (“Ghost Rider”) dress up as Fu Manchu. Other trailers include Eli Roth’s (“Hostel”) “Thanksgiving,” which takes the beloved American tradition and turns it upside down. Edgar Wright (“Shaun of the Dead”) directs “Don’t Scream,” which aims to poke fun at the movie voiceover guy.

p. Out of the two, “Death Proof” is definitely the better film. “Planet Terror,” while big on the blood, lacks a plot and any substantial character development-. “Death Proof,” on the other hand, features a slow (almost too slow) build with a riveting conclusion that had the audience in the theater cheering. It seems Tarantino is the true fan of the grindhouse genre and Rodriguez is the best friend tagging along, trying to understand what’s going on but never really grasping the concept.

p. “Grindhouse” is not just a movie; it is an experience like no other found today. Leave it to Rodriguez and Tarantino to break new ground in modern cinema once again, even though they had to dig into a very trashy part of the past to get it.

p. __4.5 stars out of 5__

Staff Editorial: Intolerant behavior childish, unacceptable

0

The recent allegations of homophobic slandering on the part of members of Phi Kappa Tau fraternity, directed at neighboring fraternity Theta Delta Chi, are disturbing, embarrassing and have no place on this campus. Individual fraternity members are by no means representative of the organization as a whole, yet such inappropriate and degrading behavior exhibited by individuals naturally reflects poorly on their peers. These reports are particularly troubling when considering that many fraternities are founded on leadership and character, and that they exist today as a means for their members to develop and pursue these goals.

p. On a more rudimentary level, this sort of childish behavior, including the fecal matter which was dropped on the TDX dance floor — reportedly the result of a prank — completely contradicts the ideals of a tolerant and accepting college. Several members of the Greek community, including brothers of Phi Tau, have introduced recent initiatives which have helped increase dialogue on combating homophobia and encouraging a tolerant atmosphere, both on fraternity row and on the entire campus. Regrettably, the actions of a small number of members have, for the time being, overshadowed these efforts.

p. The fraternity situation on campus is an interesting one. With seven fraternities currently living in such close quarters, and another three slated to return to the Units next fall, the fraternities are constantly interacting with one another. This has the potential to be beneficial for all parties, yet all too often fraternity rivalries prevail and things get out of hand. We realize that this housing situation differs from other schools, where fraternities enjoy the luxuries of separate housing where they are not constantly prone to police inspections and an administrative watchdog, but this does not excuse fraternity members from displaying the maturity that should be expected from any student of the College.

p. We applaud members of Phi Tau for acknowledging their role in the incident and accepting that such behavior is unacceptable. It is no surprise that alcohol is often involved, and that situations such as this have the tendency to escalate beyond control. While accepting responsibility and being apologetic for such actions are notable starts, actions must be taken on the part of Greek organizations to ensure that these incidents do not occur.

p. Individual members must be educated and informed, much like any other student on this campus should understand the principles of tolerance and open-mindedness as they relate to sexual orientation at a liberal arts college. Fraternity members, in addition, must also understand that their actions have the potential to reflect poorly and often unfairly on their brothers.

p. Campus organizations are known for their diversity and effectiveness in increasing awareness about important campus issues. Fraternities are no different. It is often the case that actions or mistakes of one member are absent in his fellow members. The amount of self-governance which exists in most Greek organizations gives the group the power to handle problems with members internally and prevent future occurrences of this sort. We hope that an active and honest approach is taken by the leaders of these organizations to ensure that all members realize that, regardless of the circumstances, such behavior is not only juvenile, but may have extremely negative consequences for the fraternity as a whole.

Bumped? Call the mayor

0

As you’ve probably heard (or, unfortunately, experienced), a whopping 326 students were bumped from the College’s housing lottery this semester. This is a huge jump from the norm, which is usually about 100 to 200 students each year. For some reason, though, no one can really explain what happened to make this year any different –– the assistant director of Residence Life, Katrina Pawvluk, was quoted last week in The Flat Hat saying, “I’m afraid I do not have a real good answer for why the process is going so slow this year or why our demand for housing is higher.”

p. According to Pawvluk, any student who really wants on-campus housing will eventually get it, and the folks at Residence Life are going to dedicate themselves to this goal over the next few months. I guess it’s good to be optimistic, but I personally would not want to risk not getting campus housing solely based on the hopeful expectation that some students will choose to drop out of lottery over the summer.

p. What makes this housing situation especially bizarre, though, is the gender disparity in the group of bumped students. Out of the 326, 210 are women and only 125 are men, a split of 62 percent women to 38 percent men. The gender split at the College is only 54 percent women to 46 percent men, which doesn’t really explain this weird statistic. My initial explanation was that the fraternities moving back onto campus into the units –– Kappa Alpha, Pi Kappa Alpha and Beta Theta Pi –– were taking away housing spots that were available last year and causing the high numbers of bumped students (which would explain why so many women are currently displaced).

p. In some informal talks with other students, though, I’ve been told that most of the brothers in these fraternities already live on campus, so they aren’t “taking away” any spots, they’re just all moving into the Units. If anything, this should help the rest of the student body by freeing up the nicer rooms on campus. Thus, the gender ratio remains a mystery.

p. Regardless of the reasons behind the current housing situation, the basic conclusion is the same: these kids need a place to live. Typically, students who are bumped during the spring semester eventually get reinstated before classes start again in the fall, but these individuals should be able to have more control over their living situations than simply waiting for someone else to drop out of the lottery.

p. This is why it is now more imperative than ever that the student body pushes the City of Williamsburg to change its three-person housing rule. This rule states, under section 21-2 of the Zoning Ordinance of Williamsburg, that no more than three unrelated people may “live and cook as a single housekeeping unit.” In practice, it provides a reason for the city to evict groups of students living together in off-campus houses based on the number of people under one roof.

p. I spoke with Student Assembly Senator and formerly evicted student Matt Beato, a sophomore, who asserted how illogical this ordinance is: “With other laws, you typically are harming someone else when you violate them; with the three-person rule, you can be evicted for harming absolutely no one.” While many students living off-campus can get in trouble for breaking the noise ordinance or violating parking laws, students penalized by the three-person rule are not actually doing anything wrong. Because it essentially discriminates against individuals before any “real” laws are even violated, many see the ordinance as purely anti-student.

p. With the string of evictions earlier in the semester and now the high number of bumped students who may be forced to find off-campus housing, this issue certainly seems to have come to a boiling point. Students are going to start demanding action from our own Student Assembly, from the City of Williamsburg and from the student body itself. Thankfully, our new executive seems to have prioritized this issue; SA President-elect Zach Pilchen declared to me that, “You can rest assured that we will place this issue at the forefront of our administration’s relationship with the city, and that positive progress can be expected from your Student Assembly on this front for the first time in 15 years.” That is exactly the mindset we need when tackling this issue, and I look forward to hearing and reviewing Pilchen’s logistical plans for making it happen.

p. The three-person housing rule needs to be our main concern until we make significant headway –– a change in the ordinance will significantly affect other important student concerns like student parking and voting rights, as well as help build positive relations between the College and the city.

p. __Devan Barber, a junior at the College, is a staff columnist. Her columns appear on Tuesdays.__

Letters to the Editor (April 10)

0

**Open letter to Alan Kennedy-Shaffer**

p. **To the Editor:**
I am writing this as Trey Freeman, law student — not as former Student Bar Association president. I was not planning on sending a letter like this, but I could not stand by and watch while a person tries to sully the reputations of honorable students for their own twisted sense of personal aggrandizement.

p. I have no problem with you printing your opinion, but my issue boils down to a matter of your integrity. It’s easy to see that your intent is about bringing attention to yourself rather than a concern for the Honor Council. Additionally, using the term “dishonest” was itself dishonest and conveyed a message about our school that is not true. More importantly, even if what you said is valid, you have no evidence demonstrating the Honor Council had any dishonest intent.

p. If anything, what you describe were concerns of a lack of thoroughness or efficiency. Yet, even these concerns seem embellished. Through my extensive involvement with the law school student body and the Honor Council over the last three years I have seen nothing but sincere efforts for absolute excellence in thoroughness and efficiency.

p. The 2005-2006 year was the first time the Honor Council had to deal with an Honor Code violation in many years and issues were discovered with the code. These issues were brought to the attention of the undergraduate Honor Council and administration. As you should know, institutional change comes slowly — that is reality.

p. As I read your column, I found it very disrespectful and disingenuous. What is this really all about? Are you mad because you were removed from two elections? When you came to the SBA election interest meeting, I told you directly to respect the letter and the spirit of the election rules. I said this because you were the only person in three years to be removed from an election … not just once but twice. In the latest presidential election, you were given two chances to respect the rules and you disregarded them.

p. What you fail to realize is that this is a professional school. Thus, the students you disrespect and disparage today will be your colleagues tomorrow. Do you really think that anyone in law school is ever going to refer business to you or recommend you for a job after the stunts you’ve pulled this year? This concept is so fundamental that it is sometimes easy to forget, but for your professional future you may want to consider it.

p. You speak of how the Honor Council is dishonest; however, all I can think of is how dishonest you were when handling the election poll results for the Advocate. What are you trying to prove by attacking Chief Justices Leondras Webster and Ryan Brady? These are two of the most honest and well respected individuals at the law school, and nothing you say or insinuate will change that. They have earned our trust because they have flawlessly served the law school community with honor. Through their efforts, the good name of our community continues to spread throughout the country. We owe them thanks and appreciation, not underhanded accusations.

p. It’s time for you to mature and handle your situations like an adult. You need to begin accepting responsibility for your actions and accept the consequences. For the sake of the law school community, I hope you will take some time to think about what this school represents and find the integrity inside yourself to live up to the standards William and Mary Law expects of all its students: respect, honesty and, most of all, honor. You should be ashamed.

p. __Trey Freeman, JD ’07__

p. Editor’s note: Alan Kennedy-Shaffer did not include the word “dishonest” in his column. Its use in the title was a staff decision, due to layout constraints.

Reviewer remains resolute

0

I must admit that I was not at all offended when I read the March 30 Letter to the Editor calling my review of the amazing “300” “grossly inaccurate” and a “hateful diatribe masked as a movie review.” If the reader found my statements “inflammatory,” then good. I’ve written something worth reading — something that inflames. That I am in the right is evident by the fact that Kayvan Farchadi’s letter says nothing of substance, but merely blows a lot of hot air, hoping to scorch my face. In other words, I would like to say that it isn’t enough to simply be an angry Iranian American — that that doesn’t entitle you (or anyone, really) to easy offense or special cinematic treatment. Nor does it give you license to ignore or revise history — while claiming the self-righteous status of “informed citizen.” Don’t pick fights where there are none. Loaded language does not carry the day and never will. Now hear why.

p. Farchadi states that his main objection to my review is that it was “published in a student newspaper without a thought to its effect on a section of the student body.” To this, I say toughen up or stop reading The Flat Hat. As one who believes in sexual modesty, I do not balk at the sex column or write petulant letters of complaint about its effect on me. Journalism is nothing if it is not stirring; it most certainly should swat at the hornet’s nest every chance it gets. We are the watchdogs. Expect angry barking.

p. The next, slightly more relevant argument is that I claim the movie contains “an impressive amount of historical integrity,” when it supposedly doesn’t. Farchadi offers a history lesson of his own, for which I offer my most heartfelt congratulations. He knows some history, too. However, he only reiterates what I’ve said in some cases and talks past me in others. He should know that I’m well aware of the existence of Greek slavery and that it actually has nothing to do with the movie. He should also know that the Persian armies consisted of conquered peoples forced into fighting for a tyrannical god-king. Not slavery, you say? Fine. Make a word up. Leonidas’s army was composed of free men who freely assembled to protect their freedom. Xerxes sat on a hill and watched; Leonidas fought and died with his men. Does that make the Persians look bad? Well, yeah. And it makes for a darn good movie.

p. I was also tickled to read Farchadi’s account of the ruthlessness of the Spartans. How they “murdered slaves for sport” and “lived for war.” His treatment of the Greeks more closely resembles “a hateful diatribe” than anything in my review, which is amusing. Why are these facts recounted with such malice when they are exactly what I say in my review? Yes — this is the point of “300” — that the Spartans were extreme bad boys. Sometimes horrific, sometimes cool — they actually lived the seemingly exaggerated, comic book-esque lives portrayed in the film. I invoke their ruthlessness as a means of justifying the film’s accuracy.

p. Farchadi can only invoke them for a different reason — the same reason he finds it necessary to provide me with a list of reasons why the Persians were so great. He has, like the very people I tried to counter with my review, made an entertaining film, centered on glory, about East vs. West. I shall not tread lightly on this topic and will take my chances dodging the lightening bolts of the gods of political correctness. I never claimed that the Greeks are good or the Persians bad. And the less-than-flattering facts I include about the Persians, I offer only as a defense of the movie’s integrity. Art is a mirror. What do you see when you look at this movie? If truthful exhibitions of history drive a “wedge” between the Iranian government and the United States, then what does that say about the Iranian government? And, frankly, it’s nigh impossible to say anything truthful about Ahmadinejad without being insulting. He does it to himself.

p. I have to wonder, though, whether I lit this fire or simply fed one that was already burning. My original review was actually reactionary in nature; it was a response to the many hostile reviewers I had read who ignorantly and irresponsibly blasted “300” as a politically incorrect film about the present. My words were spoken as the self-defense of a person who admired a perfectly innocent and fun flick, and who was disgusted by those who could look at an isolated battle of antiquity and see American chauvinism. “300” is a graphic novel written in 1998. It’s not about the war or anything contemporary. To the masses of apologists, I say make a movie about the Melian Dialogue and get over it. Stop seeing yourselves in random action flicks; you’re not that important.

p. __Beth Sutherland is a sophomore at the College.__

Jewel ruins yet another great sports moment

0

Thanks to Hollywood, society at large and a disposition that lends itself toward the overly sentimental and sappy, I have an image indelibly etched in my mind. The heroic athlete — having overcome a silver bullet wound, blatant prejudice, ghosts in his cornfield, cancer, pesky groundhogs, the Great Depression or some other adversity of equal importance — standing triumphant and resolute, everyone watching in awe as he transcends the idea of what sport is, and what it can be. Music plays in the background, swelling to a thunderous crescendo, matched only in emotional intensity by the drama playing out on the field. For one moment, time halts its ceaseless march (because in the movies, well, it really does), and you glimpse in a flash an image of the unfettered human spirit, of a natural and pure beauty. I have had such a moment. Let me tell you my story.

p. It occurred on a warm Saturday morning, a mere week and a half ago, at the Kappa Alpha Theta Charity 5k. Cue the camera on our hero (me), splayed out on his bed. His hair is ruffled; his clothes lie in a crumpled pile beside the side of the bed. He groans in a manner that leaves no mystery as to the pounding inside of his head. Obviously, he is in for a rough morning. The clock reads 7:55 a.m. as the alarm begins to chime.

p. Calling up a resolve and strength that rivals the heroes of Greek lore, he reaches across and slams the snooze button. Ten minutes later, cradling his head in his arms so as to avoid the light from the window, he gets up and begins moving around. Will three hours of sleep be enough for him to perform adequately in the big race? Will his hangover be a detriment to his conditioning? Could this possibly be an adversity that must be overcome in order to find success, both in a physical sense and in a spiritual one? Cue next scene.

p. A large group of people, some in running clothes, some costumed, stand behind a thin chalk line waiting for the starter’s gun. And by starter’s gun I mean group of giggling girls that are set to yell ‘Go.’ Our hero, still bleary-eyed and looking like he was attached to a whiskey IV for much of the preceding night, waits among the masses. Suddenly, filled with a clueless temerity, one of the girls yells go. With all of the purpose of a pack of wild buffalo the runners amble away in confusion, stumbling awkwardly off the proverbial cliff before the girl has a chance to say “just kidding.”

p. But it’s too late now – the girl in charge of timing runs over in shock, frantically pushing her stop watch – the race has begun.
The hero pushes immediately to the front of the pack, maintaining his pace just off of first place. The course winds through the various turns of campus and the surrounding neighborhood, and it quickly becomes apparent that no one knows exactly where the race is supposed to be run. Chalk arrows and orange cones point in every which direction. Runners begin to fall off of the torrid front tempo – for some the effort has become too much, others are fated to follow spray painted arrows and cones that mark a campus waterline – and soon the field has narrowed down to two.

p. With but a short stretch to go, the race looks unbelievably close. Muscles ripple and sweat pours off of the athletes’ glistening bodies, as the agony of the race shows on their faces. The moment for greatness is fast approaching – the spectators can tell because time is beginning to slow down – but one thing is missing: the music. Except not. One of the sisters has remembered the music and she flips the switch for the sound system, hoping to aurally encase the moment like an insect trapped in amber. The athletes, arms pumping, teeth gnashing, mouths snarling, feel too that the instant is upon them, and then they hear it: “Dreams last for so long, even after your gone. You were meant for me, and I was meant for you . . .”

p. Jewel?’ the athletes think. ‘Jewel?’ the spectators say, in shock. ‘Jewel?’ our hero ponders, not believing that his moment is being so horribly treated. And in that instant of such uncertainty and confusion, the other competitor strides ahead, breaking the non-existent tape and throwing his arms up in the air.

p. And so, that’s the tale of my almost-moment. If you were at the 5k and saw the race, now you know why I got second and failed to secure a glorious victory. I was sabotaged by a blonde folk-singing bimbo. I was ruined by Jewel. But hey, don’t worry about me – it’s not that I really wanted to win anyway. I’m done with sports in general, to be honest. They’re not for me anymore, I’m above it – I’m through with those foolish games.

The odd couple

0

__For senior Megan Moulton-Levy and sophomore Katarina Zoricic, the number one-ranked doubles team in the country, their strength is in their many differences__

p. The nation’s number one-ranked doubles team steps onto the court for their Wednesday afternoon match against Old Dominion University. The two are a model in contrast. The first half of the team, senior Megan Moulton-Levy, is the veteran of the duo, the self-described “hot-wire” who, according to her coach, uses her quickness and athleticism to grind out her opponents. Her doubles partner, sophomore Katarina Zoricic, is by all accounts the quieter, more laid-back of the two, the one her coach says “takes it to her opponents” using her length and power.

p. They contrast physically as well. Moulton-Levy, who is black, stands just 5’0’’ tall, with well-defined muscles in both her arms and legs that accent her athletic frame. Zoricic, who is white, sports a lean, 5’9’’ tall frame, her blonde hair pulled back in a ponytail.

p. Individually, each is exceptional. Moulton-Levy, ranked 8th in the country, has compiled a 25-6 singles record this year and an 88-27 record during her career at the College, and Zoricic, ranked 65th nationally, has gone 27-7 this year and 52-16 overall in her two years at the College.

p. And together?

p. Together, they’re damn near impossible to beat.

p. Moulton-Levy and Zoricic’s opponents this day are Charleen Haarhoff and Fernanda Luiz of ODU. In case Haarhoff and Luiz weren’t already aware of their opponents’ number one ranking, the public address announcer makes sure of it. A large crowd, consisting mostly of adults in Tribe tennis apparel, as well as several players from the men’s tennis team, sits courtside, excitement building for the match.

p. Moulton-Levy and Zoricic stumble slightly out of the gate, committing several unforced errors on their way to a 3-3 tie after the first six games. Even during this rough patch, however, their prowess is on full display. Zoricic rips powerful forehand and backhand returns, setting up Moulton-Levy to put on a show at the net, forcing her opponents into bad shots with her strong volleys and overhead smashes. Their communication is phenomenal, as they rarely get in each other’s way, even on shots splitting the middle of the court.

p. In the seventh game, they take over. Zoricic’s power and Moulton-Levy’s athleticism overwhelm their opponents, both crashing the net at the same time to create an impenetrable wall. Luiz grows visibly frustrated, talking to herself and picking at the strings of her racket. Moulton-Levy and Zoricic sweep the last five games, resulting in an 8-3 victory.

p. The girls, who would see their 24-match winning streak (a school record) snapped by Northwestern University’s Alexis Prousis and Georgia Rose two days later, possess a stat line that is impressive to say the least. They have compiled a 52-12 record over the past two seasons, including a 33-2 record this year, and, oh yeah, a national title for their first-place finish at the ITA National Indoor Championship this past November.

p. Neither their road to success nor their partnership began at the College. Moulton-Levy, who hails from Grosse Pointe, Mich., hit her first tennis balls against the wall of her house at the age of three, emulating her tennis playing sister, Natasha Moulton-Levy, ’95. Similarly, Zoricic picked up her first tennis racket at the age of four in her hometown of Toronto, Canada. The two have been doubles partners for about six years now, as they began playing together on the junior tennis circuit and at Chris Evert’s tennis academy in Florida. While their first impressions of each other left something to be desired (“I thought she was kind of strange,” Zoricic said with a laugh, drawing an amiably outraged response from Moulton-Levy), they describe themselves now as “best of friends,” a friendship that extends far beyond the tennis court or the College.

p. Each says she idolizes the other’s skill set and ability.

p. “We’ll break down in the middle of a doubles point and just start worshipping each other, ‘You’re my idol,’ ‘No, you’re my idol,’” Moulton-Levy said. “It’s an honor to watch [Zoricic] play.”

p. Their aforementioned coach, women’s tennis head coach Kevin Epley, has only the highest praise for his dynamic duo. He described Moulton-Levy as more of a “counter-puncher,” the type of player that pressures her opponents simply by tracking down shots and keeping the ball in play. He described Zoricic as more of a “power player” with a strong forehand and serve.

p. As a person, Epley said that Moulton-Levy is “the kind of girl that everyone sort of gravitates to.” He also said that Zoricic “tends to be a little quieter than Megan, but goes about her business,” adding that she “demands a lot of herself.”

p. Though it may not have begun as the closest of friendships, it has certainly become just that.

p. “She’s an honorary member of my family,” Moulton-Levy said about Zoricic. “That speaks for itself.”

p. “Megan has been the leader of our team for the last two years,” Zoricic said. “Just to watch the things that she can overcome and how strong she is as a person … I’m sure it not only inspires me but our entire team and keeps our team going.”

p. While they mostly maintain their opposite roles — Moulton-Levy being the passionate, emotional player, and Zoricic being more composed and laid-back — occasionally their roles reverse, as was the case at the ITA National Indoor Championships. Moulton-Levy (who called that week “one of the most stressful weeks of my life”), and Epley both said that there were off-the-court issues that all three were dealing with during the week of the tournament.
“I was not in the right place mentally, and she totally picked up the slack,” Moulton-Levy said. “She carried me for the vast majority of the tournament.”

p. Both Moulton-Levy and Zoricic acknowledge that a great deal of pressure comes with the territory of being ranked number one, but emphasize that they are both far more focused on the Tribe tennis team as a whole.

p. Moulton-Levy says that there is a certain “intimidation factor” when they walk out on the court, that opposing teams feel. But she is not about to take the title of number one too seriously.
“It doesn’t mean anything,” she said.

p. Moulton-Levy is currently petitioning the NCAA for another year of eligibility. Because she attended high school in Switzerland, there was some confusion over her date of graduation and difficulties with getting her credits transferred, so she was declared ineligible her first year at the College. Epley said that the petition process has been held up by the NCAA men’s and women’s basketball championships, but that a decision should be reached sometime this week.

p. If she does not get an extra year of eligibility, she is going to give the professional circuit a try.

p. “I don’t want to be left with any questions,” Moulton-Levy said.
In the event that Moulton-Levy does not return, Zoricic will be called upon to be “the leader of the team,” according to Moulton-Levy.

p. “I’ll just kind of follow [Moulton-Levy’s] footsteps,” Zoricic said. “Hopefully, I can do as well as she has.”

p. “You will,” Moulton-Levy interjected. “I have confidence.”
For now, though, there is one major objective on the duo’s radar screen.

p. “I can’t wait for the NCAA tournament,” Zoricic said.
Moulton-Levy, who may have to miss the College’s graduation because of the tournament, couldn’t agree more.

p. “Even though I have to miss my own graduation … it’s worth it,” Moulton-Levy said. “The tournament’s the big time.”

Baseball: Panthers swipe 3-game series

0

__Pitching struggles as Georgia State sweeps; Tribe now 20-16 overall__

Having won 11 of its last 13 contests and 14 of its last 16 at home in Plumeri Park, the Tribe baseball team entered this past weekend’s series against conference opponent Georgia State University on a five-game winning streak, ranking second in the CAA. Unfortunately, the Panthers came out swinging, and managed to sweep the series 17-11, 6-2, and 15-12. With the losses, the Tribe fell to 20-16 overall, 8-7 in the CAA.

p. In Friday’s game, both teams struggled to get into a pitching rhythm as four relievers were pulled from the bullpen.

p. “We are definitely getting concerned that we’re overusing some people … Our pitching was not what we wanted it to be this weekend,” Head Coach Frank Leoni said.

p. Junior starting pitcher Sean Grieve (2-3) recorded the loss. The College put up strong offensive numbers with 11 hits, as junior catcher Tim Park went 3-for-4, sophomore shortstop Lanny Stanfield and junior left fielder Greg Maliniak went 2-for-3, and sophomore outfielder Ben Guez went 2-for-4. Guez launched the offense in the second with a double to advance Maliniak. Both ended up scoring in the inning, along with junior center fielder Paul Juliano.

p. The Panthers racked up eight runs in the sixth to give them a total of 12, and although the College pushed in seven runs before the end of the game (including a Maliniak home run that also plated sophomore first baseman Mike Sheridan and sophomore pinch hitter Jeff Jones), Georgia State would score five more to reach the final tally of 17-11.

p. Due to the snowstorm Saturday, the scheduled game was postponed until Sunday to be played as a double-header. The first game, played as a seven-inning contest, featured freshman Kevin Landry (4-4) on the mound, who struck out six but allowed seven hits, ultimately recording the 2-6 loss. Tribe bats were quieter than usual with only five hits, two from Maliniak. Maliniak charged a double to left center in the second, advanced, and scored on a single from sophomore catcher Jeff Wera. Guez shot a homer to right center in the fourth to seal the College’s scoring.

p. “Some of our most talented players are our younger players and I hope they continue to step up,” Coach Leoni said.

p. Bats were livelier in the third game of the series as Sheridan, Guez, and senior third baseman Greg Sexton all had three hits, and sophomore right fielder Robbie Nickle went 2-for-4 with two home runs and four RBIs.

p. “Robbie Nickle and Ben Guez really stepped up and gave us the boost we needed to compete this weekend,” Maliniak said.

p. Sexton launched a homer in the first to start the Tribe scoring. Georgia State put across six runs in the third and two more in the fifth, but the Tribe tallied up seven more to reach an 8-8 tie in the bottom of the seventh. In the ninth, the Panthers refused to leave quietly and brought in seven runs. The College rallied in the bottom of the ninth and recorded four runs as Sexton, Maliniak, Sheridan and Guez all scored, but could not close the gap. Junior Pete Vernon (5-3) recorded the loss.

p. “All in all, we’re not going to win every conference game and it’s good to get a bad weekend out of the way so we can dominate the way we should to close out the season,” Maliniak said.

Track: College hosts Colonial Relays as men, women finish second

0

__Saturday’s snowstorm ends competition one day early__

The return of the Colonial Relays to the College also marked the return of winter this past weekend. After Friday’s unseasonably cool temperatures, a classic Southern snowstorm raced through Williamsburg Saturday and forced the cancelation of day two of the Colonial Relays. Nevertheless, Friday provided plenty of strong performances from the College’s track athletes, including two record-breaking performances, as the Tribe men and women both finished second in the shortened meet.

p. A week after just missing the school record, sophomore Abby Lemon’s propelled herself into first place all-time at the College in the hammer throw with a heave of 161 feet and 3 inches; her throw broke the previous record of 159’ 8” held by Cassidy Harris. Lemon’s feat also captured her first place in the competition and the Tribe’s sole field event title at the Colonial Relays.

p. Equally impressive for the men was sophomore David Groff’s 1,500-meter triumph; timing 3 minutes and 46.98 seconds for the win, Groff set the meet record and qualified for the NCAA Regional meet. Prior to Groff’s victory, senior Sean Anastasia-Murphy took first place in the 3,000-m steeplechase in a NCAA Regional qualifying time of 9:04.23 as he edged Georgetown’s Dan Gerber by a mere 15 hundredths of a second. Junior Rob Dennis followed Anastasia-Murphy to the finish line in 9:06.08 to capture fourth place and an NCAA Regional qualifier.

p. Junior Ian Fitzgerald extended the Tribe’s distance-event dominance when he won the 5,000-m in an IC4A-qualifying time of 14:16.48. Sophomore Ryan Jones qualified for IC4A’s after taking second place in the 800-m, and fellow sophomore Alex Heacock moved into fifth place in the school record-books in the javelin after his 196’ throw. All told, the men’s team saw 13 individuals earn bids to IC4A’s.

p. Meanwhile, on the women’s side, senior Meghan Bishop posted an ECAC-qualifying time of 16:55.09 seconds en route to winning the 5,000-m. Junior teammate Kait Hurley followed quickly behind to take second place in 16:56.53 and qualify for ECAC’s as well. In addition to Bishop and Hurley, sophomore Lynn Morelli and junior Emily Gousen earned bids to ECAC’s as well.

p. The women’s distance corps also featured a third-place finish from freshman Anna Brousell in the 3,000-m steeplechase as she climbed to fifth all-time at the College in the event. Two Tribe women ran to the ninth-fastest times in school history in the 800-m and the 1,500-m respectively. Junior Allie Lewis finished the 800-m in 2:12.48 and freshman Emily Anderson completed the 1,500-m in an ECAC-qualifying time of 4:31.26.

p. The men and women return to action this weekend at the Lou Onesty/Milton Abramson Invitational in Charlottesville and the James Madison Open.