Home Blog Page 154

Health Center provides care away from home

0

Tucked away in the woods, the Student Health Center serves as an on-campus refuge for those suffering from health issues. With a staff composed of doctors, nurse practitioners, administrators and lab technicians, the clinic is well suited to meet a variety of medical situations.

“We certainly have the students’s interest at heart, to give good service and good care,” administrative medical assistant Jane Brown said.

Brown has worked at the health center for two and a half years, checking in patients, working with charts and insurance records, and making appointments. After spending 16 years at a private orthopedic practice, she transitioned to the campus clinic because she was ready for a change of pace.

“I liked the atmosphere,” she said. “The pace is not quite as hectic as in private practice.”

Medical Director Virginia Wells also came to the health center looking for a less frantic schedule. She had previously cared for adults in her private internal medicine practice, and was the only infectious disease specialist in Williamsburg.

“Private practice is very demanding,” Wells said. “The average day was 14 to 16 hours. Here at the health center it’s about eight to nine.”

Wells was also interested in working with the students at the College of William and Mary.

“It was an opportunity to take care of a totally different population,” she said. “It’s different in that it’s typically a healthier population with usually more acute illness, whereas with older patients you’re dealing with more chronic disease. These are healthy people that don’t have underlying problems, whose illnesses are short-lived. It’s a different challenge.”

The health center is often students’s first solo encounter with a medical establishment. Staff members are aware of their patients’s potential inexperience.

“The challenge that we as physicians have found is helping them navigate health care,” Wells said. “It’s fun, actually. It’s really just educating them on being good consumers of health.”

Being responsible about your health entails more than just going to the health center when ill, and Wells often has to remind students to come back, call back, and follow up.

“I’ve moved myself from just being a doctor to being a teacher and a doctor,” she said.
Brown frequently deals with students who are unfamiliar with how their insurance operates, and she does her best to be sensitive to their needs.

“I’m a grandmother, so it sort of kicks in,” she said. “You try to be as helpful as you’d want someone to be to your child or grandchild. If you’re a freshman and your parents have always taken you to the doctor, you don’t know how to pay for things. You try to be as helpful and understanding as you can of their situation.”

Students’ reviews about the care they’ve received at the health center have been mixed.

“I was feeling really, really bad once, and they came and picked me up from the dorm and drove me back, which was nice,” Nicole Zamalin ’13 said. “The only complaint that I’ve heard is, people who had a condition where they really had to get in quickly, and they couldn’t see them until the next day.”

Brown explained that the clinic has explicit policies about scheduling appointments. Walk-ins are not usually accepted, so students must call to make arrangements ahead of time. In cases of emergencies, the staff tries to examine patients on the same day on which they call.

“It’s a pretty fine-tuned machine, much more so than private practice — at least the ones I’ve worked for,” Brown said. “We have a very strict protocol about scheduling appointments and how long they are. We try to keep things on schedule.”

Cate Shermer ’12 was impressed with the personal attention she received last spring when she felt the beginnings of a migraine headache a few hours before one of her final exams.

“I, in a panic, decided to go to the health center,” Shermer said. “The nurse took me back and did all the checkup stuff. She suggested a medicine that would be more effective. The next day I got a call on my cell phone. It was the nurse, who had called to say, ‘I was really worried about you and your test, and I just wanted to see if it worked out.’”

The health center has integrated itself on campus, working with student medical service trips and sexual assault awareness groups, as well as with the counseling center. Staff members study student health trends in order to be as effective as possible.

“The things we’ve seen have been a decrease in respiratory illnesses,” Wells said. “I think that’s a result of students being more active with hand washing, with preventive treatment with flu vaccines. We’ve seen an increase in minor injuries, but along with that we’ve seen more activity among young women. They’re more involved in sports and activities.”

Wells also noted a decline in smoking among students, which she thought may correlate with the decline in respiratory illness. In overall terms of working at the health center, both Brown and Wells expressed satisfaction with their coworkers and facilities.

“It’s probably the nicest place I’ve ever worked,” Wells said. “I think what tells the story is that the majority of the core people who have been here 10, 15, 20, 30 years. The people who are here want to be here. The reality is that people in other parts of medicine could make much more money in the private sector, [but] my friends in private practice are extremely jealous. This is a happy place to be.”

Foster offers substance and representation for students

0

Lately, I have been very confused by what I’ve heard about Scott Foster ’10, the student candidate for Williamsburg City Council. I don’t work on his campaign, but I am an interested voter who wants to make sure students have representation in Williamsburg — representation that we have never had before and that now, more than ever, we need. It seems to me that many critics of Foster’s campaign are unaware of how electoral politics work, so hopefully I can explain. I’ll spoil the ending for you: only Scott Foster deserves our vote.

Of course Foster is pro-student. He is, in fact, a student. His campaign staff and volunteers are made up entirely of students. The unsupported and paranoid claims that he will not be pro-student while in office are completely ridiculous. Foster may look like he’s 40 years old and talk like he’s even older, but he is one of us. Foster has grown up and matured at the College of William and Mary, just as we have, and he’s seen the terrible way Williamsburg treats students. No one in their right mind could spend four years here and not want to give the students a voice, which is exactly what Foster will do when elected.

To kick off his campaign in February, Foster hosted one of the largest student events of the semester — and provided free food and drinks for everyone in attendance. I’ve seen his volunteers registering people to vote all over campus; he has spoken at numerous student group meetings, and I’m sure that even more events are on the way. These are not the actions of someone who is taking the students for granted — quite the opposite, actually. Rather, these are the actions of someone who appreciates what students want and is making a great effort to involve all of us in his local campaign.

Just as he needs student votes, Foster needs long-term resident support. He can’t win this race without members of the community supporting him. None of the greater Williamsburg population would vote for him, however, if he ran a fiery campaign on campus. By not hurling insults and burning bridges, Foster has been able to present himself as a calm and confident choice to the larger community. This is a good thing because it means that he can gain support from all sides. In order to continue hosting events on campus and reach out to us, Foster’s campaign will need more funding. Because we are college students, we don’t have the necessary amount of cash, so we should gladly accept the fact that older residents are helping Foster out.

The misguided critics of Foster’s campaign don’t seem to be in on the joke. This is a pro-student campaign all the way through, but Foster and his staff appear to be savvy enough to have crafted a message that will appeal to essentially everyone within the city limits. Going extreme on student issues to appease certain factions in this school will not lead to victory; in fact, it’s a certain path to failure.

There are four other candidates running against Foster, all of whom are long-term residents. These men will be doing everything they can to pander to us, but we have to ignore their empty promises. Only one of the candidates is a student, and only one of the candidates will truly be speaking and voting for students when he is elected.

Let’s be clear: there is only one candidate in this election for whom students should be voting. You have two votes, but using both of them would be a waste. Only Scott Foster deserves our support, and I encourage every student at the College to volunteer to get him elected, or at the very least show up to vote May 4. Foster wants to stay in Williamsburg for the rest of his life — let’s reward that insanity by making sure that our voices are finally heard.

Email Horacio Carreño-Garcia at hxcarr@wm.edu

It’s time to get tougher with Israel

0

The Middle East peace process took a major hit during Vice President Joe Biden’s visit to Israel earlier this month. During Biden’s visit, the Israeli Interior Ministry announced that Israel would build 1,600 more housing units in disputed territory in East Jerusalem. This was an insult to U.S.-Israeli relations, and the Obama administration was extremely unhappy about the development.

The announcement was made on the eve of Biden’s arrival in Israel to hail the talks’ resumption. Israel apologized for the timing of the settlement expansion, but, unfortunately, the damage had already been done. Most foreign governments and the United Nations have condemned this announcement. Specifically, Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the UN, has spoken against this action and asked for Israel to end its blockade of the Gaza Strip. This action by Israel was a major blow to the possibility of peace in the near future — it also hurt the United States’s position in the Middle East.

The east side of Jerusalem, where the new settlements are going to be built, is seen as part of Palestine’s future state’s shared capital. The Palestinian leader, Mahmoud Abbas, is refusing to resume talks unless the building order is revoked. Peace will never be achieved if both sides keep taking aggressive actions to solidify their power in the region. The two-state solution has gained acceptance in Israel and Palestine, and Israelis have accepted as inevitable an adjustment of the border to give Palestine more land in any forthcoming agreement.

The announcement by Israel has hurt the United States’s position in the Middle East. Many in the region are beginning to believe the United States cannot really prevent Israel from acting on its own. If countries in the region believe Israel is becoming more independent of the United States, they could view Israel as a security threat. The United States needs to get involved with the peace process and show that this sort of action by Israel has consequences.

The Obama administration’s best strategy is to get involved and clearly state the basic principles that must frame these negotiations. Even though President Barack Obama is engrossed with health care and Afghanistan, he needs to pay more attention to this issue. He has been criticized for beating up on his allies and proving impotent against enemies such as Iran and China. He also has been criticized for making the Israel-Palestine peace talks worse. Obama made a mistake by side-stepping the problem; however, he can correct his mistake by being direct and laying out a set of principles and a framework for the negotiations.

When the negotiations begin again, the United States will need to state its views about Jerusalem and other key issues and sketch-out the parameters of a deal that would satisfy both Israelis and Palestinians. If Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu refuses the ideas, the United States will have a real crisis on its hands in regard to U.S.-Israel relations.

At this point, the United States may have to think about cutting some of its ties with Israel and letting the region negotiate its own peace deal. This would allow the United States to focus more on domestic issues that need to be fixed.

Email Ben Arancibia at bcarancibia@wm.edu

Student Assembly election turnout troubles

0

_Click image to enlarge._

’30 Rock’: They’re actually making ‘The Hind Side’ and ‘Sherlock Homos’

0

There was a lot of good in this episode of “30 Rock,” but there is definitely some room for improvement.

I’m glad to have seen Michael Sheen again, although I’m also glad to see that he probably won’t be around for a while. His character was fun for a while, but towards the end, enough is enough. We get it: he’s awkward and not a good fit for Liz (who’s also awkward). But they really hit us over the head with the fact that they don’t get along. It kinda disproved my theory from last post that Michael Sheen was the perfect cameo…he was, but he’s not anymore. Now he’s just a regular old cameo: funny at first, but then we’re glad to see him leave in the end.

In fact, I thought Liz’s whole story was weakly written. It seemed too preachy. And it wasn’t that funny, either. You can’t win ‘em all, I guess.

“Three words. Porn. For. Women.” I thought that was so funny, particularly when Liz turned the TV to it at the very end. I like the stories where Jack goes into those horribly low depressions when he feels like everything he’s done is all for naught and his world is ending, only for him to rise up at the end and reach an even higher level of status than before.

Finally, I liked seeing Tracy upset that his image is tarnished because he hasn’t cheated on his wife. It was a nice twist on the already-careworn comedic digs against Tiger Woods. The fact that Tracy loses his sponsors because he’s been TOO virtuous (maybe “virtuous” isn’t the right word) is so simple and so funny.

We also haven’t seen much of Tracy in the past few episodes, and I’m glad to see he’s getting his own semi-major plot again. He’s always a treat!

‘Community’: Accepting the Schmaltz

1

Good episode, writers of “Community!” I was overall very, very pleased. It was fun and funny, just how the show began.

There were some great pop culture references. Jeff Winger’s impression of Jeff Goldblum was spot-on. But maybe that’s just ‘cause I love Jeff Goldblum, so the fact that he was even brought up made me giddy with excitement.

There was a lot of Jeff character development in this episode – which was good, because for a spell there, I thought he was just learning the same lesson every episode. We got to see him come to grips with one of his biggest problems in the show, and although the timeline may have been a little sped up (i.e. I know of no one who could come to grips with that kind of issue in a matter of a few days), his reaction was realistic and natural. Joel McHale is clearly talented and has matured even within this first season.

I was very pleasantly surprised with Pierce in this episode. Rather than being pathetic, he gave a rational, optimistic, and really touching description of how he’s lived his life. After all these episodes of us watching him fail at everything (and I mean EVERYTHING), we now see him in a position of total control and understanding. As much as I have ragged on his character in the past, I now feel like he is much less pathetic. Even when he ran aground on a land canoe, I thought it was funny instead of pathetic. Everyone needs a happy, insightful, life’s-okay-if-you-let-it-be moment, and I’m glad to see Pierce have one after so sad an episode as last week’s.

The ending was weird, though. The doctor/potter’s voiceover was kind of creepy. I wasn’t a fan.

“Gossip Girl”: It’s good to be back!

0

Make-up, hook-ups, F-ups, looks like Gossip Girl is back. Well, it’s about damn time.

So let’s see if I can do that thing again where I give each character only one sentence to summarize their shenanigans from last week’s (March 8) episode.

Nate: takes romantic advice from Dan Humphrey (why?…), decides to keep it in his pants with Serena, and is delectable in general.

Serena: takes romantic advice from Blair, confuses the hell out of Nate, and ends up having hot steamy sex with him in a luxurious coat closet.

Jenny: develops an elaborate scheme to deliver pills with her European drug-dealing lover to the French ambassador’s daughter, nbd.

Chuck: finds out that the guilt he has been feeling all those years of his sexy, filthy rich life about his mother dying while giving birth to him may have been for nothing.

Blair: continues to obsess over getting into some secret society, but ends up being an awesome girlfriend to Chuck.

Dan: had very little to do with anything in this episode.

Vanessa: either didn’t exist in this episode, or I just didn’t care enough to remember.

So while last week’s return-from-hiatus episode certainly brought in some drama and delish SereNate action, it still left something to be desired. This week, however, Gossip Girl was back in full scandalous swing.

First of all, I would like to proclaim that Nate and Serena are The Hottest Couple Ever. I mean, I’ve heard of chocolate and strawberries being sexy, but Nate and Serena can raid a whole fridge and make it sexy, a task few can accomplish. Who needs endless pancakes from IHOP when you can have sex for breakfast, SereNate style?

And then there’s Jenny. Oh, little J, what are you doing? Thankfully she got rid of the raccoon make-up, but she takes misguided teenager to a whole new level, all for Damien (aka Euro drug-dealer guy). Well, Damien is fine as hell, so I guess little J is kind of justified in her actions. Still, what point she was trying to make by dumping drugs on the ground in front of her dad? Is this supposed to be edgy? Daring? She ends up running away again – big whoop – only this time she doesn’t get involved with one crazy-ass model who is secretly a pyro, and instead gets a fairytale ending with a kiss from Prince Charming. Well, if your idea of a fairytale is running away from your family and dealing drugs with the ridiculously good-looking son of a European ambassador.

Oh yeah, there’s Dan and Vanessa. All of a sudden they’re relevant characters again. Sorry Dan-Fans, but the last time I cared about him was… Well, probably when he and Serena had that whole “whoops our parents are married, don’t think we can have sex anymore” storyline, which was a while ago. DanEssa (yay for couple names) awkwardly interact and somehow agree to go to some beach drunkfest mojito-laden party with their respective last-minute dates. I just love how Vanessa’s date, her ex-boyfriend Paul, is the most flamboyant guy ever featured on the show. I mean, Eric may be gay, but he hast yet to rock a popped-collar polo with a pastel neck scarf. I have never even seen that done, not even at UVA. Speaking of Eric, aka Jenny’s voice of reason, he’s been totally MIA, which needs to be fixed. Fast forward through mojitos and DanEssa’s pseudo-dates pointing out the awkwardness of the situation, and DanEssa are all over each other, becoming a couple in the process. I give it three episodes.

Blair is still awesome. She may have lost some of the edge she started this season with, but this does allow us to take her in larger doses. I love the statement she makes at the beginning of the episode with the “GOD, YES, CHUCK, DON’T STOP!” cries directed toward Nate and Serena, even though Chuck is absent. Blair is surprisingly vulnerable this week, admitting to Serena her concerns about Chuck, and even saying “I just wanna make him feel better.” Cue the awwww. True to her word and unspoken vow to be the Good Girlfriend, Blair supports Chuck from start to finish as he deals with his whole mom-might-not-be-dead deal.

Speaking of Chuck – wow, he takes Mommy Issues to a new level. In short, after a series of sketchy investigations he conducts himself, he finally finds out that Elizabeth is his mom and decides he wants nothing to do with her. He writes her off with a check boasting some obscene about of money. I do have to say I loved the little Breakfast Club going on this week with Serena, Nate, Chuck, and Blair, as Serena tried to get Chuck to connect with his mother. It’s funny how these things work out. Flashback: Chuck in his former douche days wanted to shag Serena, Blair used to date Nate, Nate cheated on Blair with Serena, and now Serena is dating Nate, and Blair is dating Chuck. Recycling never hurts.

The end of the episode simply rocks. I haven’t smiled so wide for a Gossip Girl episode in a while. Blair manages to see right through Serena, even though no one else does, and tells her that her meddling in Chuck’s mom situation was really just because of her issues with her dad. Nate convinces Serena that her dad doesn’t deserve to know her, then showers her with more affection than I can handle. Chuck finally agrees to get to know his mom, with a beaming Blair looking on. In the spirit of Queen, everybody found somebody to love, and life as we know it on the Upper East Side is just fine. That is, until next week.

“NCIS”: Down to Doctor Marvey’s locker we go

0

Tonight’s episode of “NCIS” was a welcome back for some (well, me at least) that have been neglecting their TV-watching responsibilities. But it was Spring Break, so I think everyone understands. Anyways, tonight’s installment was classic “NCIS,” with snappy one-liners and great character moments (and developments!) mixed in with an actually compelling case.

8:00.0: OH MY GOD IT’S ON!

8:00.5: Okay, freak out is totally and completely over.

8:01: Bunch of Marines running on the beach. They look…well, they aren’t really showing any emotion at all. Not even pain. Their eyes don’t even give away a thinly-veiled desire to be anywhere but that beach. Damn, that’s impressive, because I’d probably have run crying in the other direction several leagues ago.

8:01: Sergeant is not okay with one of his men stopping during their sandy stroll. Yelling commences, but Serge is cool once he spots the dead body to which the PFC was pointing. Yeah, I would think corpses would take precedence over finishing that last mile.

8:02: Tony and Ziva! How I missed you and your unresolved (or maybe partially resolved?) sexual tension. You make up for the nearly TWO freaking months that Bones has been off the air. And don’t lie you two – we know you wanted to be each other’s valentines.

8:03: Ducky’s singing on the beach as he inspects the corpse. Only his British accent and the fact that he’s an adorable old man save me from wanting to gag. Singing and rotting flesh do not mix.

8:04: The way Tony’s dropping nicknames in this scene makes me think of Sawyer on Lost. And sorry, Tony, but you’re no Sawyer. But I love you anyways.

8:06: Apparently dead guy’s name is Michael Jensen. Tony and Gibbs check out his house. Gasp! The door is unlocked. That’s never good in the NCIS universe.

8:07: Oh no! There are two other people in the house. Tony and Gibbs are holding them at gunpoint while being held at gunpoint themselves. It’s like that scene in the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie after the ship flips back over? Anyone? No? Okay, moving on…

8:08: One of the other people – apparently they’re CGIS agents (aka Coast Guard agents) – is the former DA on SVU. I didn’t recognize her without Benson and Stabler by her side. But she’s a redhead! You know what that means…

8:13: Yeah, Redhead ex-SVU Woman? Totally involved in the “romantic entanglement” we’ve been hearing about via spoilers.

8:14: That massive syringe just reminded me of my unpleasant visit to the dentist over Spring Break. Not something I really wanted to think about right now, “NCIS.”

8:15: Abby’s feeling down. Which despite her generally depressing wardrobe and too dark hair, is not normal for her.

8:17: Yeah, Redhead ex-SVU Woman is so the female version of Gibbs.

8:20: Apparently it was a double murder! Another body was found on a body that had washed up on the beach.

8:24: Redhead ex-SVU Woman’s name is Abby! Love the line this spawned. Redhead Abby: “You know, you can just call me Abby.” Gibbs: “That’s not gonna happen.”

8:25: Jensen’s kind-of girlfriend: ‘I was runner-up for Miss Biloxi. I’ve gotten used to a certain lifestyle.”

8:26: Tony and Ziva crime-fighting time. Unfortunately, their beautiful time together was interrupted by a nasty storage unit owner, who delivered this lovely little pick-up line to Ziva: “I have a bigger unit if you want to see it.” EWW gross. That has to be the worst and most skeezy pick-up line I’ve heard in a while. Especially on national TV.

8:27: Jensen, apparently, was a treasure hunter in his free time. That would have been surprising, if pirate references hadn’t been dropped throughout the entire episode.

8:28: Jensen had a rich partner – a Dr. Marvey – that funded his undersea adventures. And he’s conveniently out of the country right now. How cliché.

8:30: How does Tony remember so much trivia on so many movies and still have the brain capacity to function as a human being?

8:32: Doctor Marvey’s missing. Not surprised.

8:36: Gibbs wants to intercept a plane? While it’s in the sky? How in God’s name does one do that?

8:38: Ducky’s pulling skin away from Corpse Jensen’s cheek. Gross. I expect that when I’m watching “Bones,” but really “NCIS”? Usually your corpses are so beautifully and artfully lit.

8:41: Tony visits Marvey’s house for the first time: “Nice pad. Early americal colossal.”

8:42: That actress playing Marvey’s wife looks like a girl I went to high school with. It’s kind of weird. Hopefully she’s not as annoying at the girl from my high school.

8:42: Her accent/breathy way of speaking is annoying, though. So is her completely FAKE ignorance. Yes, I am calling her out now. I think she’s involved.

8:43: Marvey’s wife claims she doesn’t know anything. Oh, honey. Denial’s not just a river in Egypt.

8:44: Apparently Jensen had a liver problem that would have prevented him from becoming a diver. So who is (was?) the dead guy?

8:48: Okay, back to Marvey’s wife. Her facial expressions even remind me of my high school comrade. And she fake cries just like that girl did. Get some acting lessons, girl.

8:50: Dead guy is not Jensen. It’s Marvey. Kind of surprised by that, but not completely.

8:51: Miss Biloxi is back! I should’ve known she would be. You don’t book an ex-beauty pageant winner in a guest starring role without giving her at least a couple scenes.

8:51: The woman playing Miss Biloxi should get “Special Guest Star” by her name because she doesn’t really suck. You know, the way random “famous” guest stars usually do. Anyways, moving back to the case – apparently Jensen’s alive and told her to go buy some one-way plane tickets to Mexico. She’s a decoy so he can escape! But the NCIS team’s not fooled.

8:53: What’s with the creepy horror movie music playing as Marvey’s wife and Jensen try to find the money Dr. Marvey left behind? Apparently she hired Jensen to kill him and swindle his money away at the same time.

8:55: The team finds them. Tony’s got the money; it was in Dr. Marvey’s locker. Bad guys are arrested. And victory is sweet.

8:56: Vance calls Redhead Abby and Gibbs into his office. He gives them a great, cat-ate-the-canary look. Oh, he knows something’s going on – well, that something will be going on soon. Mrs. Vance didn’t marry no fool, that’s for sure.

8:57: Tony and Ziva watch a movie. It’s about pirates. And it’s one of the best Tiva scenes we’ve had recently. They tell each other that they’re friends, but there’s something more behind those words.

8:57: Ziva was totally about to say something to Tony! Damn you, writers! Couldn’t you show us Tiva fans a little compassion? But I appreciate the angst and tension, too. So I forgive you for now.

Unfortunately, there’s no new episode next week. But rest assured, I’ll be back with a recap as soon as a new one airs!

Vasold picks new running mate

0

Jessee Vasold’s ’11 running mate Kim Green ’13 dropped out of the race for Student Assembly vice president Saturday and was replaced by Caitlin Goldblatt ’11 a day later.

“Kim has dropped out,” Vasold said. “She just had to prioritize herself as a student at the College of William and Mary.”

Vasold and Green had announced their candidacies Thursday after the SA extended the deadline to declare due to a lack of student interest in some positions. Goldblatt’s entry came on the final day in which candidates were eligible to make changes to their ticket.

SA Deputy Chief of Staff Chrissy Scott ’11 and SA Sen. Ben Brown ’11 are also running for SA president.

_Check back with flathatnews.com for more on this developing story._

Greenhouse discusses the highlights of covering the Supreme Court

0

_Former New York Times reporter Linda Greenhouse spoke with The Flat Hat about Sandra Day O’Connor, the allocation of federal power and her experience covering Bush v. Gore._

*Tell me about your relationship with Sandra Day O’Connor.*
I’ve had the chance to see her a number of times since she retired. I’ve been on a couple of panels in programs that she put together at Georgetown Law School and her project to clean up the system for selecting state court judges that she’s really devoted herself to. I feel privileged that I’ve known her because I think she’s really the genuine article. She’s a terrific servant of the public, really, and she’s using her premature retirement to really try to make a difference in American civic life, and that’s very commendable.

*Do you think it’s likely that Justice John Paul Stevens will retire at the end of this term?*
Yeah, I think it’s highly likely. I’d be very surprised if he didn’t.

*What about Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who has had some health problems and subsequent rumors about her own retirement?*
She’s fine. I had dinner with her last week. You can’t believe a lot of rumors you hear about the court. She’s not retiring, and she’s not sick.

*Does she plan on retiring in the next few years?*
She’s certainly not planning to retire this year, and I haven’t asked her what her long-term plans are. But people make assumptions about her that are not justified.

*What sort of landmark decisions do you think will be coming to the court in the next few years?*
I think, as I’ve said … we’re going to see a revival of interest in questions about federal authority vis-à-vis the states [and] congressional authority vis-à-vis other branches of government. These structural issues about the organization, about the allocation of power within the American government that keep recurring since the beginning of the country’s history, I think we’re in a phase where they’ll come back to the court.

*Gay marriage is a hot-button issue, and although you said the court is handling more structural issues, the Proposition 8 trial is ongoing. Do you think this will be an issue before the Supreme Court in coming years?*
Well, of course, that’s up to the court, and I think that may depend on how the lower courts eventually rule in the Prop. 8 case. After this trial, and after Judge [Vaughn] Walker makes a decision, [it] goes to the Ninth Circuit, so it doesn’t go directly to the Supreme Court. You know, it takes four votes to grant a case at the Supreme Court, and whether four justices will be inclined to get into this, I think, depends on where the law is left after the Ninth Circuit gets finished with it. So, I think it’s hard to predict.

*You covered the Supreme Court for 30 years. What are some of your favorite moments?*
Well, I don’t know, favorite moment — you know — certainly a gripping moment was the 2000 election case.

*Bush v. Gore?*
Bush against Gore. It was probably the most unusual few days in my 30 years at the court. Very gripping.

*How so?*
The court granted the case on a Saturday, briefs were due on Sunday, the argument was on Monday and the decision was on Tuesday. So everything that usually takes months, if not like a year, was compressed into those few hours, and it was extremely intense and high-stakes. Nobody slept and nobody did anything else but just try to watch that and live through that. For sheer intensity and drama, it would be hard to top that.

*What’s a case that you would like to see the court take on?*
That’s an interesting question. I don’t know. I mean, I’m sure there are issues I wish they would get into. Whether I would be confident they would decide them the right way, I don’t know. So, I think I’ll take a pass on that one.

*What are your feelings on Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who is in the midst of her first term?*
Well, she’s only written two opinions so far. So, you know, her service on the court is really a work in progress, but she’s very smart and very prepared and I’ve seen her in oral argument and she asks really good questions, and so I think she’s a very highly functioning member of the group.