Home Blog Page 249

To create safe social environment, College must work with frats

0

The battle between the administration and the fraternity system rages on. The two sides are natural enemies. One is bound by law to enforce underage drinking regulations, and the other has adopted drinking of all sorts as its raison d’être.

It seems that the administration has the upper hand and is gaining ground, using probation, suspension and house occupancy policies as its weapons of choice to force fraternities off campus. But do they really want to destroy the institutionalized system of drinking embodied by the frats in favor of an insurgency of individual drinking cells?

It is in the school’s best interest for the majority of drinking and partying to be located in a single place, preferably remote, where the inevitable noise and destruction can be self-contained.
The current frat row serves this purpose well. Far away from residents, its cinderblock walls, sparse furniture and utter lack of beauty render it immune to most damage. An even better location would be the Botetourt Complex, which is farther removed from civilization and even less attractive on the inside. Who knows, keeping more frats on campus might even lead to an improvement of student-resident relations, as the number of off-campus parties would decrease since more could take place on campus.

A large fraternity complex would also create a safer environment for students and Williamsburg residents. Less driving to off-campus parties would mean less drunk driving back from off-campus parties.

Furthermore, as the police would know where a majority of alcohol was being consumed, they could be on the lookout for drunk drivers leaving this location and have a greater chance of stopping them before anyone got hurt. A single location would also be easily serviced by bus transportation or Steer Clear, providing an easy alternative to the temptation to drive home.

A new fraternity system would also allow the administration a measure of control over the College of William and Mary’s social life. Negotiations could more easily occur between institutions with existing relationships — such as the one between chartered fraternities and the administration — than between the College and all of its students individually or through the Student Assembly.

The administration can impose incentives and punishments on organizations that it cannot enforce on individuals or the student body as a whole. For instance frats could be rewarded for letting the school know when events would be held, practicing responsible self-policing, or even holding a high GPA average.

Conversely, they could be punished — with the proceeds going to other frats that are rewarded — for members drinking and driving, or for damages to their buildings. Through these measures, the administration could exercise limited control of student social activities that would not be possible without the institutions with which they are now at war.

These are some clear benefits of having the fraternities in a concentrated location on campus. However, it all comes down to the administration’s actions.

If they continue to ferociously attack institutionalized drinking on campus through the inflexible housing regulations explained in another article, “Fraternities fight ResLife changes,” there are two possible results. Either most students will stop drinking and partying, or social life will move off campus, where it will annoy the townies, endanger students, and move the College’s social life completely outside of the administration’s control.

As it is naive for the administration to believe that the disappearance of fraternities will cause the underage drinking problem to vanish as well, let us hope that they will reconsider their course, look at the big picture, and begin to accept that perhaps fraternities can be used to everyone’s advantage.

Ed Innace is a sophomore at the College.

Honor code doesn’t deserve second chance

0

On Monday, students at the College of William and Mary will vote on the revisions to the Honor Code. Again.
In the fall, the College voted against the proposed revisions to the Honor Code. Now, with no changes to the code rejected by the previously failed referendum, the Honor Council is trying to force the changes upon the College by redoubling “efforts at publicizing the referendum.” With this simple phrase, the Honor Council takes the position that the initial referendum didn’t count. This is an insult to all of us who voted in the fall.

Unfortunately, this redo is going to happen despite its gross unfairness to those of us who already participated in the process. Therefore, the College needs to speak with one voice and again reject the revisions to the Honor Code.

One of these changes alters the determination of triviality. According to the current code, the Honor Council must conduct an initial evaluation of whether an accusation involves a trivial matter. The term “council” indicates that there will be a deliberative process, where the council is bound to discuss and apply the code’s test for triviality. Under the revisions, however, this power lies solely within the authority of the office of the chair of each of the six Honor Council jurisdictions.

This change places too much power in the hands of a single person. While an accused student can challenge the council’s jurisdiction at any stage in the proceedings, the accuser has no recourse if this single person deems the accusation to be trivial. The code, both in its current and revised states, places a significant burden upon an accuser.

This burden is both procedural and psychological — it is not easy to refer someone to the Honor Council, especially when considering the consequences of such an act. To allow a single person to thwart the accuser’s difficult decision with no recourse to the accuser will only serve to chill otherwise legitimate accusations.

Marshall-Wythe School of Law Honor Council Chief Justice Bishop Garrison, regarding the revisions, told a town hall meeting that, while the code in its written word places the initial triviality determination in the hands of the chief justice, chairs will talk with other chairs in order to make a decision. I have complete trust in Garrison to conduct such deliberations. In fact, there is no one at the law school I trust more to oversee our Honor Council.

However, the revised code does not require any chair to conduct any deliberations and makes the chair’s decision of triviality unquestionable. What is to prevent future chairs from abusing this power?
Dean David Gilbert, Director of Student Conduct, indicated that such a change was necessary to allow expedited closure to cases where students use the Honor Code to harass those with whom they have a non-honor-related dispute. However, the Student Code of Conduct already adequately addresses this concern. Furthermore, accusers who are reluctant to make an accusation under the revisions could fear that an adverse triviality determination will subject them to disciplinary procedures under the code of conduct, further chilling valid accusations.

It is particularly telling that neither Dean Gilbert nor the law school Honor Council could provide statistics regarding how many trivial cases are brought to their attention, nor could they indicate how many harassing accusations were made. That should lead every student to ask whether this change is really necessary.

Therefore, I encourage every student to turn out to vote Monday and indicate that the Honor Code revisions still need work before they are ready for student approval. Again.

Brian Kargus is a third-year law student at the Marshall-Wythe School of Law.

Capsule Review: “Ryan Leslie” by Ryan Leslie

0

When you hear about famous Harvard University graduates leading their lives in the public eye, people tend to think of figures rooted in politics, a U.S. president — John F. Kennedy, Barack Obama — not musicians. Surprisingly, celebrities and famous musicians such as Natalie Portman, Yo Yo Ma and Tom Morello have obtained some of that Ivy League prestige from Harvard, including music producer Ryan Leslie.

Though not yet a household name, this producer-turned-artist’s new, self-titled album released this past week, and he gained some fame through his release of last year’s single, “Diamond Girl.” Nicknamed “R-Les,” Leslie has been flying under the radar, working with hit singers and rappers, including Beyoncé, LL Cool J and Britney Spears. Now, he’s looking for his own piece of stardom by becoming a credible R&B singer.

Production-wise, Leslie took a clear shot at a noted album, fixed with groovy beats reminiscent of old soul and a mixture of piano and organ church intros. However, he keeps it modern with some melodic, bass-heavy hooks. His summer single, “Addicted,” a sexy, fluid R&B ditty about obsessed lovers, is probably the best track on the album. With the help of model-turned-singer Cassie and Brooklyn rapper Fabolous, the song gives Leslie a much-needed boost from the rest of the tracks on the album. His sub-par singing mixed with rap inflections charms a bit, but his conventional R&B lyrics are too gooey and imitate a less-confident John Legend. Because of his long career in the music industry, I expected a better rendition of an R&B/Pop album without the loss of his successful nature. The producer is still in him, but the singer needs some skills.

Critical Condition: Films portray graphic novels in living picture

0

Last weekend I found myself desperate for entertainment. Normally I turn to my “Arrested Development” DVDs in times of crisis, but I discovered my overuse of them had, in fact, rendered the discs unreadable. Therefore I made the difficult trek to Barnes & Noble to find something else to occupy my attention-deficit addled brain. I made my way to the new release shelf, carefully sifting past such heroes as Batman, the Punisher, Hellboy and the Hulk himself before finally settling on my favorite womanizing crusader, Iron Man. I don’t have to be Professor X to know what you’re thinking: I actually was not out shopping for comic books. These were DVDs.

Movies based on comic books, or graphic novels, have soared to the forefront of Hollywood’s advertising focus. The practice of making movies out of comics has existed nearly as long as the media itself.
It might be the inner-nerd in me geeking out here, but I can’t help but love this sudden trend.

The release about which I currently lie awake at night fantasizing is “Watchmen,” which debuts March 6. Alan Moore, author of “V for Vendetta” and “From Hell,” wrote the graphic novel “Watchmen” in the ’80s. Since then, it has garnered praise from dozens of literary journals and critics, even finding a spot on Time magazine’s top 100 novels of all time. The novel itself is one of the most compelling and well-written comics I’ve ever read, and if the film stays even remotely true to its source material, I won’t be surprised if it becomes one of the must-see films of 2009.

“Watchmen” is set in an alternate reality in the ’80s in which superheroes have affected the course of history. Most superheroes have gone into retirement or become government-sponsored agents who vastly sway the numbers in global conflicts. Despite these figures’ involvements, the United States is moving closer to nuclear war with the Soviet Union. The global conflict runs parallel to the personal lives of the main characters, who are forced to deal with the murder of one of their own. The two stories intertwine more intricately than fibers of a fine wicker chair, making “Watchmen” stand out from the rest of the genre. Moore created believable protagonists who stand out among the large cast of characters. Though the narrative is powerful throughout, it culminates with an ending both shocking and fulfilling. I’m literally giddy. I can’t even look beyond “Watchmen;” I believe it will be such a treat.

__Matthew Falwell is a Critical Condition columnist. He’s already reserved a ticket to the opening of “Watchmen.”__

A Valentine’s Day Serenade

0

Kelsey Newell ’12 [right] receives a musical valentine courtesy of her Kappa Alpha Theta big, Kelly Cotton ’11. The women of the a capella group Revelie sang “Radio” to Newell on the Sadler Center Terrace. The group held a Valentine’s Day event, during which they offered to serenade valentines and other special someones.

Behind Closed Doors: Take a ride on the red tide

0

Valentine’s Day has had me seeing scarlets, rouges, pinks and cherries all around. And all these reds got me to thinking about everyone’s favorite red-colored experience: menstruation. Yes, a woman’s monthly ruby visitor. Periods are pretty obviously connected to sex — the whole fertility, uterine lining, screaming baby thing. But they also come into play when you’re getting play.

Since the bloody membrane makes its exit through the vagina and the blood-filled member makes its entrance through the vagina, there seem to be conflicting processes going on while hooking up with a girl who’s on her period. But are a little blood and a single unfertilized egg enough to deter guys from doing the dirty when her lady-parts are (perhaps) dirty?

Apparently so… at least according the to the random drunk-boy sampling I conducted at the Green Leafe Thursday night. Their arguments against can be summed up in one phrase: no way. A mind-erasing orgasm is not a good enough reason to suffer the membranous scarlet trenches.

But I beg to differ. Why miss out on viable sexual time? Imagine all the freaky monkey love you give up by skipping out on one fourth of every month.

Maybe that’s not enough to convince you, men out there, but how’s this for incentive: Women tend to be hornier when they’re on the rag. They are often bloated, tired and more acne-prone that week. Many women feel undesirable during this time, so making her feel sexually attractive can really give your girl a boost. She’s likely to work harder in the sack and be more grateful for your extra loving. Enjoy extra blow job action? Try turning your lady on during her period.

And it’s not just the man who benefits. When a woman orgasms during her period, her vagina contracts repeatedly. This can expel the endometrial lining quicker and make her period shorter, while also easing headaches, backaches and cramps to get down with your bad self. Sex is good for you — which is what I’ve been saying all along.

Period sex can also increase bonding. By letting a woman know that you love her body — all of it and all of its functions — you are showing her your devotion. And the sex may be hotter than ever before. Period blood is a natural lubricant. The wetter the slide, the more slippery the ride.

So maybe you’re convinced, but you’re still unsure of how to proceed. Here are a few tips on having sex when Aunt Flow is in town:

Put down a towel (preferably red) before engaging in sexual activity. Doing the laundry easily cleans up any mess that results from your thrusting.

Ask her to shower first. This will clean the area and eliminate any unwanted odors.

Use a condom. Your winky stays blood-free and as an added bonus, no sexually transmitted infections or unwanted pregnancy.

If you think you may get grossed out, don’t change positions more than once. If you have a chance to look or smell, you may loose your woody and have a very unhappy lady.

Now, as to etiquette on the woman’s part: It is very important that you warn a potential partner before he submerges himself in the Red Sea. Be aware of how heavy your period is on that day. If it’s likely that his penis is going to look like John Bobbitt’s when you’re done, maybe avoid doing the beast with two backs. You may also be extra emotional at this time. If you’re at risk of crying or irrational anger, at least let the man know. Sex can often make you feel vulnerable and bring out emotions you’ve been holding in.

To all the drunken boys that I polled (and anyone who is against period sex), I hope I’ve convinced you of the merits of buck-wild, badass — and yes, a little bloody — banging. And to any of you who were already down with this idea and feel like getting a little crazy, Google “getting your red wings.”

__Maya Horowitz is The Flat Hat sex columnist. She doesn’t think a little mess ever hurt anyone.__

Confusion Corner: Students use flu fixes for salvation, help

0

As I sat down at my desk in Tucker 213 for my morning British Literature II class, I looked around and discovered several of my fellow students were absent. In any of my other classes, all of which have over 200 students, I barely would have noticed, but with eight students missing from this small lecture, the classroom felt empty. I cringed as professor Meyers entered our classroom, wondering what his reaction would be after finding only half of us in attendance. He merely smiled and addressed the few filled seats before him.

“How many of you feel absolutely miserable right now?” The majority of us raised our hands. “They sent out a department-wide e-mail warning us about this. The flu epidemic is making its way around campus.”
As soon as they start advising the professors to prepare for increasingly empty classrooms, I guess that means we should all brace ourselves. Sure enough, lately I’ve seen the tell-tale signs all over campus.

Students trudged from class to class shivering despite the unseasonably temperate sunshine of last week. Familiar voices have become unrecognizable due to the presence of frogs, tickles and other unpleasant throat-dwellers. From the Botetourt Complex to Sorority Court, our faces have collectively lost their rosy glows and we join in the sniffling chorus of a thousand stuffy noses. Our dear College of William and Mary has caught one nasty bug, and it’s digging in with a vengeance.

My heart goes out to the professors whose students refuse to just stay in bed and wait it out. Instead, these walking contagions emerge each morning to haul their cough drops and tissue packs into class. In my Tuesday/Thursday Psychology class, attendance is impressively high, even though a good 80 percent of us are sick. For an hour and twenty minutes, our highly resonant lecture hall amplifies each sneeze, cough, wheeze and sniffle until it’s virtually impossible for professor Vishton to get a word in edgewise. I struggle to pay attention as he explains the effects resulting from damage to the amygdalae, but I’m seated next to a mound of used tissues and a poor kid who looks like he’s about to keel over. Luckily, I can escape infection after class ends by sprinting for the nearest exit into free, unrecycled air.

Even more luckily, my roommate hasn’t caught it yet either. When one of my friends comes down with something, maybe we don’t go to lunch or cram into a study lounge together for a while until the flu meds kick in. The sick roommate, on the other hand, offers no escape. Once she gets sick, I stock my dorm full of Campbell’s Chicken Noodle Soup-at-Hand and prepare to work through the latest season of “House,” on hulu.com.

As for me, I’m a preventer. I fight to the death. The moment I find myself with a hint of stiffness in the back of my neck or a stomachache I can’t explain, I pull out the Airborne (I swear by it — definitely a good investment), pop some Vitamin C and go on the offensive. My mantra — I will not get sick; I will not get sick — becomes a key mental weapon against illness. I make impressively proactive plans of going to bed early, eating my fruits and veggies and washing my hands more frequently. But then, it hits me: The week from hell springs up out of nowhere, without warning. Papers I’d been telling myself were due at the end of the month are due in three days. My art project grading criteria requires a 5-plus hour time commitment outside of class. An exam I haven’t prepared for looms around the corner. Maintaining my anti-flu lifestyle drops from top priority and a thousand unexpected assignments take its place.

My Brit Lit II class continues to shrink and even some of my diseased Psych classmates have given in to their sicknesses. I wish them well, but I’m thankful for the extra few seats between myself and the ever-present mound of used tissues. For now, my roommate is sniffle-free and I’m healthy, but I’m not letting my guard down. Getting this bug may not be the worst thing that could happen, but it makes reading Wordsworth and Tennyson as arduous a task as deciphering the Rosetta stone.

__Zoe Speas is a Confusion Corner columnist. She’s buying stock in Sucrets’ cough drops.__

Best beer for your buck

0

__Alice Hahn also wrote this report.__

Walk into any party, and you’re sure to find Natty cans littering the floor, couches and stairwells. Wait, just kidding, this is the College of William and Mary.

Seriously, though, that’s why we decided to conduct a scientific taste test to determine the best and worst of shitty beer. At 4.5 cents an ounce, we didn’t have high hopes.

While many students think that all cheap, frat-party beers taste the same — namely, like urine — we beg to differ.

We administered a blind taste test to 12 students: a balance of guys and girls, Greek and unaffiliated — three lightweights, five so-called social drinkers and four who identified themselves as lushes.
After testing two ounces at a time of beers labeled one through six, participants collectively ranked the beers in order from best to worst. At that point, we revealed which number was which beer. While some were surprised with the results, they seemed pretty accurate to the heavy drinkers among us.

Coming in at the absolute bottom is Pabst Blue Ribbon, known colloquially as PBR. PBR is the cheapest beer on tap at the College Delly. On Sundays during NFL season, Paul’s Deli sells pitchers for $4. In short, everyone seems to want to get rid of it, and it’s not hard to figure out why.

Most reviewers writhed in agony while forcing down their shot-sized sample. “Ew, putrid,” muttered one taste-tester.

While PBR is full of flavor, the flavor itself is overwhelmingly bad. According to one taste-tester, the only thing worse than tasting it was smelling it.

When asked what he thought, another taste-tester responded, “I don’t know why I’m still drinking this.”
And with that, let’s continue on to the second-worst beer we tried: Miller High Life. It’s appropriate that High Life is advertised as “the champagne of beers,” because it’s an embarrassment to beer. The only thing funny about High Life is its commercials; the taste falls closer to depressing — or dirty feet, as we noted. Even for people who like beer, there’s little to salvage this atrocity.

“Plug your nose and drink it if you have to,” suggested one taste-tester.

Rounding out the bottom half is Milwaukee’s Best Light, or, simply, Beast. If this really is Milwaukee’s best, we urge you to avoid that city at all costs. While the taste test proved that it can get worse, the most appropriate adjective that emerged from our taste test is “blah.”

Tasters agreed Beast is watery but drinkable; one taste-tester described it as “effervescent.” This beer does not have much of an aftertaste, which may be a good thing. As Beast is among the cheapest beers of the six we tested, this is a good option for those willing to sacrifice flavor to save a few cents.

At the beginning of the upper-tier beers — a term used very loosely — is Busch Light. The pride of St. Louis, Busch is a good, cheap option for drinking games — conducted exclusively off campus, of course — or for pregaming the roller coasters at the neighboring Busch Gardens amusement park.

Taste-testers said it struck a good balance between the repulsive flavors of the bottom beers and the more enjoyable top tier. To be fair, this means it doesn’t taste like much at all. Though somewhat bland, at least the people at Busch manufacturing didn’t try to force too many flavors into one 12-oz. can (ahem, PBR). Faced with the task of creating an admittedly mediocre cheap beer, they neither impress nor disappoint.
If nothing else, taste-testers came to one consensus about Busch: “I could drink a lot of this.”

Coming in second is the ubiquitous and aforementioned Natural Light, or Natty. Natty is like yellow shirts during freshmen orientation: It’s everywhere, and the College wouldn’t be able to function without it. The staple college beverage is good for almost any occasion, whether you’re watching a game on the weekend, shotgunning in the Swem Library stacks on Blowout or doing your best to forget you accidentally sent that text message to your girlfriend instead of to your roommate.

“It’s definitely good,” said one taste-tester, while another noted that it tastes like berries.

While not all the taste-testers agreed that Natty boasted hints of fruit, the response was generally positive. It seemed to be the right amount of flavor for a cheap beer, resulting in an easy-to-consume, easy-to-chug beverage. When it comes to cheap booze, Keystone Light reigns supreme. This delicious beer had testers nodding in approval, and was the first case to disappear during the ensuing game of Kings.

In a nearly unanimous vote, the testers agreed Keystone was the best of the bunch. It had the mellowest taste, and even prompted one person to say that it almost tasted classy.

“Woah,” one taste-tester said. “This is like, the best. I lost a couple pounds just drinking it.”

We’re not exactly recommending a Keystone diet, but the folks in Golden, Colo. — Keystone is the brainchild of the Coors Brewing Company — certainly deserve credit for coming up with the best of the worst.

(The Flat Hat is expecting a sponsorship in free cases of Keystone any day now.)

We hope this comes in handy at your next party, pregame or moment of excessive boredom. And if someone brings you a six-pack of PBR, take it for the insult that it is.

Tune in next month when we taste test Aristocrat’s full line of liquor.

Century Project: art, not porn

0

Doubtless there could be a better time for nudity to once again become the center of debate at the College of William and Mary. Any time would be better, really. We’re not picky. But now, quick on the heels of College President Taylor Reveley’s announcement that he would not turn away the Sex Workers’ Art Show comes The Century Project, a collection of photographs depicting nude women of all ages — from birth to 100. The show has drawn the ire of some in the College community and on Facebook because it includes uncensored pictures of minors. Cue the outrage.
But this time, it appears even less justified.

The exhibition, which will appear on campus from March 16 to 20, features photographs of a range of women differing in age, class, physique and ethnicity. Written statements discussing issues like understanding the female body in society, rape and disfiguring surgery accompany each. On the project’s website, photographer Frank Cordelle writes, “The primary goal of The Century Project is to provide, through art, a healthy alternative to the way in which women are represented in the media.”

Ignoring those stated aims, the Attorney General wishes to review the project’s collection of photographs before they are allowed to be displayed at the College — a choice that smacks of paternalism — in an attempt to pander in the wake of Reveley’s decision on SWAS. Where was the concern when the exhibit arrived at the College in 2003? Why the consternation now, after hundreds of universities around the country have hosted the exhibition?

The answer to both, we think, lies with an incensed minority of the electorate that would do well to remember that its tax dollars will not be funding the show. Only tuition money, in the form of the Student Assembly’s $1,275 check from from the Student Activities account, will support the project.
But even if tax dollars were at stake, all the evidence indicates that The Century Project is an artistic endeavor. We appreciate the administration’s decision to move the show from the Sadler Center to the Muscarelle Museum of Art. Though admittedly less central, the Muscarelle lends it a deserved air of legitimacy as art. Like former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, we know pornography when we see it.

And The Century Project isn’t pornography. Neither is it an affront to decency under Virginia’s obscenity laws. If the project is presented as its literature suggests, then we fail to see how it will “appeal to … a shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sexual conduct, [or] sexual excitement.”

At the same time, we realize that some may find the inclusion of minors unsettling. The project’s organizers, though, stress that photographs of children and teens only appear with the consent of the subject and her parents. And in its history, just one woman who was photographed as a minor has asked that her picture be removed. We are satisfied, even if others are not, that the organizers’ aims and their commitment to individual consent exonerate the exhibition of the accusation that it represents nothing more than child pornography.

Great and public is no longer an option for cash-strapped College

0

In September 2005, then-College of William and Mary President Gene Nichol kicked off his tenure with a campus-wide discussion on what it meant to be “great and public.” He trumpeted the Gateway program as a way of providing much-needed access to higher education for low and middle-income families. His decisions, while controversial, appeared to be rooted in the fundamental belief that education should be a societal good and that equity and access were of equal importance in fulfilling what Thomas Jefferson referred to as the pursuit of “genius in every condition of life.”

Four years later — and 12 months removed from Nichol’s resignation — this question is as important as ever. With troubling e-mails from College President Taylor Reveley detailing state budget cuts, and with the endowment losing over 15 percent of its value over the last fiscal year, the issue of “great and public” has given way to concerns for survival and fiscal stability.

But the solution to Nichol’s goal of greatness is closely related to the question of financing the College. Using funds to advance the cause of public service and making the College more accessible to a variety of students are goals that are impossible without money.

When the problem is money, there is one obvious long-term solution: If the College is to be as great as it can, then it must cease to be public.

Arguments for and against privatization have been voiced through campus media outlets, at Board Of Visitors meetings, and just about everywhere on campus for the past few years. Alan J. Meese ’86, a professor at the College’s Marshall-Wythe School of Law, has written columns for The Flat Hat and has frequently argued that the College would be in much better shape if it were to take the private plunge.

The obvious financial advantage is that the College could raise tuition rates without Richmond’s approval, and could therefore generate more income, particularly from in-state students who would have to pay the same tuition as out-of-state students. Currently the tuition cost for non-Virginians sits at $29,000, but comes closer to $40,000 when adding room, board and living expenses, as well as books and supplies. In the November 2008 Flat Hat article, “Case laid out for going private,” Meese said that the low tuition for in-state students, which is roughly half that of out-of-state students when including fees and expenses, created “an artificial ceiling” that hurt the College’s competitiveness. He is exactly right.

Maintaining our public status also places the College at the mercy of political posturing in Richmond, forcing Reveley and others to their knees when confronting state legislators whose concern for re-election trumps desires for maintaining and improving the quality of the education offered by the state’s universities. In fact, it would appear that if the Virginia General Assembly had its way, the College and its fellow institutions in Blacksburg and Charlottesville would be 100 percent Virginian. Going private would rid us of that mess and others like it. Then ignoramuses in the legislature wouldn’t have to waste time writing us letters telling us to cancel the Sex Workers’ Art Show, or whatever other internal College matter was pissing them off on that particular day.

The notions that the College must be public in order to emphasize public service, and that it somehow provides a better product to Virginians by virtue of being public. are as prevalent as they are foolish. The College could use the additional revenue to finance programs like the Gateway initiative. The College’s robust recruiting network in Virginia would still exist, as would its commitment to make college affordable to as many people as possible. With the extra money, the College could finance the creation of a graduate school for government that could, with time, compete with other programs in the country, attracting the best would-be public servants.

Clearly, there are huge obstacles to privatization, most notably the buildings on campus, which are currently state property and which the College would presumably have to buy back from Virginia. While Virginia is probably dying to get rid of Morton Hall and the Units, the same is clearly not the case for most of the other campus buildings. As a friend pointed out to me yesterday, it’s pretty hard to put a price on the Wren Building.

That being said, there are potential solutions to this problem as well. If the state was absolved of all annual financial commitments to the College, this sudden freedom would allow them to divert funding elsewhere and may, in itself, be enough to convince Richmond that simply letting the buildings go is acceptable. It doesn’t exactly generate much revenue from them.

Another option would be for the College to develop a payment plan to slowly gain ownership of these buildings over a number of years. Buildings of exceptional historical significance could be leased by the College for academic use and could be included in tours that would help finance the non-profit Colonial Williamsburg Foundation.

In the final analysis, the College is a burden on the state, and the state is a burden on the College. It doesn’t matter how long the marriage has lasted, when it goes on the rocks, you get a divorce.

Alexander Ely is a senior at the College.